Almost there.
Its a wonder as to how the 'political commentators' aren't required to actually state their bias with every utterance...
Every TV program I've seen so far in this cycle have 'panels' top heavy
with leftist commentators which I suppose brings joy to those of that persuasion and when (shock, horror) their unimagined happens and the
other side gets in what excuses do their 'paneled biased' have to say to avoid lynching ?
Almost there.
Its a wonder as to how the 'political commentators' aren't required to actually state their bias with every utterance...
Every TV program I've seen so far in this cycle have 'panels' top heavy
with leftist commentators which I suppose brings joy to those of that persuasion and when (shock, horror) their unimagined happens and the
other side gets in what excuses do their 'paneled biased' have to say to avoid lynching ?
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Almost there.
Its a wonder as to how the 'political commentators' aren't required to actually state their bias with every utterance...
Every TV program I've seen so far in this cycle have 'panels' top heavy
with leftist commentators which I suppose brings joy to those of that persuasion and when (shock, horror) their unimagined happens and the
other side gets in what excuses do their 'paneled biased' have to say to avoid lynching ?
On 2017-09-20, george152 <gblack@hnpl.net> wrote:
Almost there.Of course it could just be your reality George.
Its a wonder as to how the 'political commentators' aren't required to
actually state their bias with every utterance...
Every TV program I've seen so far in this cycle have 'panels' top heavy
with leftist commentators which I suppose brings joy to those of that
persuasion and when (shock, horror) their unimagined happens and the
other side gets in what excuses do their 'paneled biased' have to say to
avoid lynching ?
On 9/21/2017 5:24 PM, Gordon wrote:
On 2017-09-20, george152 <gblack@hnpl.net> wrote:Except that every 'news/media' outlet has unashamedly run on their bias. Background colours during interviews.
Almost there.Of course it could just be your reality George.
Its a wonder as to how the 'political commentators' aren't required to
actually state their bias with every utterance...
Every TV program I've seen so far in this cycle have 'panels' top heavy
with leftist commentators which I suppose brings joy to those of that
persuasion and when (shock, horror) their unimagined happens and the
other side gets in what excuses do their 'paneled biased' have to say to >>> avoid lynching ?
Photos showing subject in an awkward pose.
Newspaper morgues are full of such photos.
'exasperated' interviewers asking the same question and expecting a
different answer..
On 9/22/2017 8:25 AM, george152 wrote:
On 9/21/2017 5:24 PM, Gordon wrote:And further on the bias proof:
On 2017-09-20, george152 <gblack@hnpl.net> wrote:Except that every 'news/media' outlet has unashamedly run on their bias.
Almost there.Of course it could just be your reality George.
Its a wonder as to how the 'political commentators' aren't required to >>>> actually state their bias with every utterance...
Every TV program I've seen so far in this cycle have 'panels' top heavy >>>> with leftist commentators which I suppose brings joy to those of that
persuasion and when (shock, horror) their unimagined happens and the
other side gets in what excuses do their 'paneled biased' have to say to >>>> avoid lynching ?
Background colours during interviews.
Photos showing subject in an awkward pose.
Newspaper morgues are full of such photos.
'exasperated' interviewers asking the same question and expecting a
different answer..
As quoted:
Research showed that from August 5-20 there were 94 images of the two
major party leaders. English featured in 23 images (24.5 per cent);
Ardern featured in 71 images (75.5 per cent). English had 13.3 per cent
of front-page images to Ardern's 86.6 per cent.
On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 09:13:21 +1200, george152 <gblack@hnpl.net> wrote:
On 9/22/2017 8:25 AM, george152 wrote:
On 9/21/2017 5:24 PM, Gordon wrote:And further on the bias proof:
On 2017-09-20, george152 <gblack@hnpl.net> wrote:Except that every 'news/media' outlet has unashamedly run on their bias. >> Background colours during interviews.
Almost there.Of course it could just be your reality George.
Its a wonder as to how the 'political commentators' aren't required to >>>> actually state their bias with every utterance...
Every TV program I've seen so far in this cycle have 'panels' top heavy >>>> with leftist commentators which I suppose brings joy to those of that >>>> persuasion and when (shock, horror) their unimagined happens and the >>>> other side gets in what excuses do their 'paneled biased' have to say to >>>> avoid lynching ?
Photos showing subject in an awkward pose.
Newspaper morgues are full of such photos.
'exasperated' interviewers asking the same question and expecting a
different answer..
As quoted:
Research showed that from August 5-20 there were 94 images of the two
major party leaders. English featured in 23 images (24.5 per cent);
Ardern featured in 71 images (75.5 per cent). English had 13.3 per cent
of front-page images to Ardern's 86.6 per cent.
This is in part the nature of the media beast. In this election
English is the incumbent and Ardern is seeking to displace him.
Ardern is the new fresh face and clearly has charisma and that is
newsworthy in itself because the Parliamentary Labour leaders since
Clark have not. English is an old hand so therefore far less
newsworthy.
On Friday, September 22, 2017 at 10:16:37 AM UTC+12, Crash wrote:heavy
On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 09:13:21 +1200, george152 <gblack@hnpl.net> wrote:
On 9/22/2017 8:25 AM, george152 wrote:
On 9/21/2017 5:24 PM, Gordon wrote:
On 2017-09-20, george152 <gblack@hnpl.net> wrote:
Almost there.
Its a wonder as to how the 'political commentators' aren't required to >>>> actually state their bias with every utterance...
Every TV program I've seen so far in this cycle have 'panels' top
towith leftist commentators which I suppose brings joy to those of that >>>> persuasion and when (shock, horror) their unimagined happens and the >>>> other side gets in what excuses do their 'paneled biased' have to say
as the Guardian which has been giving comprehensive daily updates on New Zealand's general election.And further on the bias proof:Except that every 'news/media' outlet has unashamedly run on their bias. >> Background colours during interviews.avoid lynching ?Of course it could just be your reality George.
Photos showing subject in an awkward pose.
Newspaper morgues are full of such photos.
'exasperated' interviewers asking the same question and expecting a
different answer..
As quoted:
Research showed that from August 5-20 there were 94 images of the two >major party leaders. English featured in 23 images (24.5 per cent); >Ardern featured in 71 images (75.5 per cent). English had 13.3 per cent >of front-page images to Ardern's 86.6 per cent.
This is in part the nature of the media beast. In this election
English is the incumbent and Ardern is seeking to displace him.
Ardern is the new fresh face and clearly has charisma and that is newsworthy in itself because the Parliamentary Labour leaders since
Clark have not. English is an old hand so therefore far less
newsworthy.
Yes; and 'Jacindamania' is solely a media construct, having flowed on to such
These have embraced the issues with a level of journalistic elegance andcoherence that put the clumsy Barry Soper's ignorance of even the most rudimentary punctuation and syntax to shame.
On 9/22/2017 8:25 AM, george152 wrote:
On 9/21/2017 5:24 PM, Gordon wrote:And further on the bias proof:
On 2017-09-20, george152 <gblack@hnpl.net> wrote:Except that every 'news/media' outlet has unashamedly run on their bias.
Almost there.Of course it could just be your reality George.
Its a wonder as to how the 'political commentators' aren't required to >>>> actually state their bias with every utterance...
Every TV program I've seen so far in this cycle have 'panels' top heavy >>>> with leftist commentators which I suppose brings joy to those of that
persuasion and when (shock, horror) their unimagined happens and the
other side gets in what excuses do their 'paneled biased' have to say to >>>> avoid lynching ?
Background colours during interviews.
Photos showing subject in an awkward pose.
Newspaper morgues are full of such photos.
'exasperated' interviewers asking the same question and expecting a
different answer..
As quoted:
Research showed that from August 5-20 there were 94 images of the two
major party leaders. English featured in 23 images (24.5 per cent);
Ardern featured in 71 images (75.5 per cent). English had 13.3 per cent
of front-page images to Ardern's 86.6 per cent.
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. >https://www.avast.com/antivirus
On Friday, 22 September 2017 11:57:56 UTC+12, jmschri...@gmail.com wrote:to
On Friday, September 22, 2017 at 10:16:37 AM UTC+12, Crash wrote:
On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 09:13:21 +1200, george152 <gblack@hnpl.net> wrote:
On 9/22/2017 8:25 AM, george152 wrote:
On 9/21/2017 5:24 PM, Gordon wrote:
On 2017-09-20, george152 <gblack@hnpl.net> wrote:
Almost there.
Its a wonder as to how the 'political commentators' aren't required
heavyactually state their bias with every utterance...
Every TV program I've seen so far in this cycle have 'panels' top
thatwith leftist commentators which I suppose brings joy to those of
say topersuasion and when (shock, horror) their unimagined happens and the >>>> other side gets in what excuses do their 'paneled biased' have to
bias.Except that every 'news/media' outlet has unashamedly run on theiravoid lynching ?Of course it could just be your reality George.
such as the Guardian which has been giving comprehensive daily updates on New Zealand's general election.Background colours during interviews.And further on the bias proof:
Photos showing subject in an awkward pose.
Newspaper morgues are full of such photos.
'exasperated' interviewers asking the same question and expecting a
different answer..
As quoted:
Research showed that from August 5-20 there were 94 images of the two >major party leaders. English featured in 23 images (24.5 per cent); >Ardern featured in 71 images (75.5 per cent). English had 13.3 per cent >of front-page images to Ardern's 86.6 per cent.
This is in part the nature of the media beast. In this election
English is the incumbent and Ardern is seeking to displace him.
Ardern is the new fresh face and clearly has charisma and that is newsworthy in itself because the Parliamentary Labour leaders since
Clark have not. English is an old hand so therefore far less
newsworthy.
Yes; and 'Jacindamania' is solely a media construct, having flowed on to
coherence that put the clumsy Barry Soper's ignorance of even the most rudimentary punctuation and syntax to shame.These have embraced the issues with a level of journalistic elegance and
The Guardian articles are written by a New Zealander freelance journalist,not by Guardian staff.
| Sysop: | sneaky |
|---|---|
| Location: | Ashburton,NZ |
| Users: | 31 |
| Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
| Uptime: | 188:41:32 |
| Calls: | 2,082 |
| Calls today: | 5 |
| Files: | 11,137 |
| Messages: | 947,673 |