Ha ha . Taxinda: "Lets do it has change to I can't do it!!"
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11922151
On Thursday, 14 September 2017 10:47:56 UTC+12, Mutlley wrote:
Ha ha . Taxinda: "Lets do it has change to I can't do it!!"
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11922151
Riiiiiight... no new taxes but an $18 billion spend up. How's that going to work, Taxcinda?
Wouldn't trust these mutts as far as I could throw 'em/
JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, 14 September 2017 10:47:56 UTC+12, Mutlley wrote:
Ha ha . Taxinda: "Lets do it has change to I can't do it!!"
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11922151
Riiiiiight... no new taxes but an $18 billion spend up. How's that going to work, Taxcinda?
Wouldn't trust these mutts as far as I could throw 'em/
Their pot of gold at the end of the magic rainbow. Wonder how Rich
will spin this.
Labor's new slogan. "Let's undo this"
They're holding off on two new taxes but going ahead with five others. Methinks the reds are talking with forked tongue....again!
JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, 14 September 2017 10:47:56 UTC+12, Mutlley wrote:
Ha ha . Taxinda: "Lets do it has change to I can't do it!!"
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11922151
Riiiiiight... no new taxes but an $18 billion spend up. How's that going to work, Taxcinda?
Wouldn't trust these mutts as far as I could throw 'em/
Their pot of gold at the end of the magic rainbow. Wonder how Rich
will spin this.
Labor's new slogan. "Let's undo this"
On Thu, 14 Sep 2017 11:22:25 +1200, Mutlley <mutley2000@hotmail.com>
wrote:
JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, 14 September 2017 10:47:56 UTC+12, Mutlley wrote:
Ha ha . Taxinda: "Lets do it has change to I can't do it!!"
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11922151
Riiiiiight... no new taxes but an $18 billion spend up. How's that going to work, Taxcinda?
Wouldn't trust these mutts as far as I could throw 'em/
Their pot of gold at the end of the magic rainbow. Wonder how Rich
will spin this.
Labor's new slogan. "Let's undo this"
There are a few tax changes that perhaps you saw as "the magic
rainbow" - see this list of tax increases under National:
GST increase from 12.5% to 15% (after promising not to do so)
Increased tertiary fees
The 2012 ‘Paperboy’ tax
Civil Aviation Authority fees rise
Additional fuel tax increase of 9 cents with annual CPI increases
Locked in for perpetuity
Road User Charges increased
In contrast, Labour are talking about the principles and objectives,
and setting up a working group to consider balance between different elements.
Lowering of Working for Families abatement threshold and increasing
the abatement rate, taking money out of the pockets of families
Imposing a $900 Family Court fee
GST on digital purchases
On 2017-09-14, Rich80105 <rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:work, Taxcinda?
On Thu, 14 Sep 2017 11:22:25 +1200, Mutlley <mutley2000@hotmail.com>
wrote:
JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, 14 September 2017 10:47:56 UTC+12, Mutlley wrote:
Ha ha . Taxinda: "Lets do it has change to I can't do it!!"Riiiiiight... no new taxes but an $18 billion spend up. How's that going to
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11922151 >>>>
Wouldn't trust these mutts as far as I could throw 'em/
Their pot of gold at the end of the magic rainbow. Wonder how Rich
will spin this.
Labor's new slogan. "Let's undo this"
There are a few tax changes that perhaps you saw as "the magic
rainbow" - see this list of tax increases under National:
GST increase from 12.5% to 15% (after promising not to do so)
Ad tax cuts which benifited the wealthy more than Joe Average.
Increased tertiary fees
The 2012 ?Paperboy? tax
Civil Aviation Authority fees rise
Additional fuel tax increase of 9 cents with annual CPI increases
Locked in for perpetuity
Road User Charges increased
I have no problem with costs rising at the rate of inflation as long as the >tax table is adjust in a similar fashion.
In contrast, Labour are talking about the principles and objectives,
and setting up a working group to consider balance between different
elements.
As are the TOP party.
The whole question of the Government's income and who is going to pay it,
and benfit from it does need a big Green/White or what ever colour paper and >public debate every so often. Things change and staying steady as it goes >will have the Country in the wrong place given enough time.
It is something that should be done and no poltician should be involved.
Labour is thinking on the fly as the election approaches. This will result
is some bulls eye ideas and some that should be directed towards the window >to go out of. The risk is thatthe overall affect will be one of public >opinion being that they are a bit scatter brained.
At this stage I think Labour will fall at the last hurdle but they will put >on the oppostion uniform and a) challange National and b) keep throwing out >these ideas, only they will be thought through.
If change is necessary for the overall good of the Country, National is >unable to deliver it as they are conservative. They are predicitiable. >Sometimes a bit of tension is good.
Lowering of Working for Families abatement threshold and increasing
the abatement rate, taking money out of the pockets of families
Imposing a $900 Family Court fee
GST on digital purchases
Good grief Rich you missed this. Netflix as an example has GST added now.
On 15 Sep 2017 06:16:41 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@clear.net.nz> wrote:I don't know who the judgemental right are, I have never met any of them but you are certainly worth vilfying, all liars are.
On 2017-09-14, Rich80105 <rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, 14 Sep 2017 11:22:25 +1200, Mutlley <mutley2000@hotmail.com>
wrote:
JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, 14 September 2017 10:47:56 UTC+12, Mutlley wrote:
Ha ha . Taxinda: "Lets do it has change to I can't do it!!"Riiiiiight... no new taxes but an $18 billion spend up. How's that going >>>>>to work, Taxcinda?
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11922151 >>>>>
Wouldn't trust these mutts as far as I could throw 'em/
Their pot of gold at the end of the magic rainbow. Wonder how Rich >>>>will spin this.
Labor's new slogan. "Let's undo this"
There are a few tax changes that perhaps you saw as "the magic
rainbow" - see this list of tax increases under National:
GST increase from 12.5% to 15% (after promising not to do so)
Ad tax cuts which benifited the wealthy more than Joe Average.
Increased tertiary fees
The 2012 ?Paperboy? tax
Civil Aviation Authority fees rise
Additional fuel tax increase of 9 cents with annual CPI increases
Locked in for perpetuity
Road User Charges increased
I have no problem with costs rising at the rate of inflation as long as the >>tax table is adjust in a similar fashion.
In contrast, Labour are talking about the principles and objectives,
and setting up a working group to consider balance between different
elements.
As are the TOP party.
The whole question of the Government's income and who is going to pay it, >>and benfit from it does need a big Green/White or what ever colour paper and >>public debate every so often. Things change and staying steady as it goes >>will have the Country in the wrong place given enough time.
It is something that should be done and no poltician should be involved.
Labour is thinking on the fly as the election approaches. This will result >>is some bulls eye ideas and some that should be directed towards the window >>to go out of. The risk is thatthe overall affect will be one of public >>opinion being that they are a bit scatter brained.
At this stage I think Labour will fall at the last hurdle but they will put >>on the oppostion uniform and a) challange National and b) keep throwing out >>these ideas, only they will be thought through.
If change is necessary for the overall good of the Country, National is >>unable to deliver it as they are conservative. They are predicitiable. >>Sometimes a bit of tension is good.
Lowering of Working for Families abatement threshold and increasing
the abatement rate, taking money out of the pockets of families
Imposing a $900 Family Court fee
GST on digital purchases
Good grief Rich you missed this. Netflix as an example has GST added now.
That is part of GST on digital purchases -a change I agree with but >introduced, as other changes by National, without consultation, and
without being mentioned at the previous election, and while pretending
that they are all about reducing tax! You are also correct that the
changes to income tax benefitted those on higher incomes hugely more
than those on lower incomes - but the Nat-nuts will deny that truth as
well. Its all part of a knee-jerk set of attitudes that we should have
flat tax rates, more user charges, - but ironically they have taken it
so far that they are now having to book out whole motels in Auckland
to house the homeless at huge cost - far better to have provided a
better level of assistance that enables beneficiaries to better
themselves and become productive taxpayers, but the judgemental right
need someone to vilify . . .
| Sysop: | sneaky |
|---|---|
| Location: | Ashburton,NZ |
| Users: | 31 |
| Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
| Uptime: | 188:38:21 |
| Calls: | 2,082 |
| Calls today: | 5 |
| Files: | 11,137 |
| Messages: | 947,673 |