They had nearly died out, but with a concerted effort . . . https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CcEzTrFUYAADZtf.jpg
They had nearly died out, but with a concerted effort . . . >https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CcEzTrFUYAADZtf.jpg
On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 09:49:57 +1300, Liberty <liberty48@live.com>Allistar didn't post I did. (Think before you rant off)
wrote:
On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 14:31:42 +1300, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >>I abhore the waste of government funds - as you are fond of pointing
They had nearly died out, but with a concerted effort . . . >>>https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CcEzTrFUYAADZtf.jpg
Your point is?
out, Allistar
the waste is that we use funds for little benefit, at a time when we
are already rapidly increasing debt, which itself requires tax revenue
for interest, and will future taxation to repay the capital.
The "white elephants" also point out the hypocrisy of the government
that demonises individual beneficiaries while doling out corporate
welfare, that lies about selling state assets
housing is at least in part in crisis because the government hasWhat talk was that? cite
largely been selling off state houses instead of building more . . .
so much for stopping asset sales . . .).
Recently there has been talk of banks possibly needing government
assistance
in poverty are too small to save?Replaced with what.
National appear to be at the stage where they know they will not be in
power for much longer, and are taking what they can while they can -
the arrogance of the third term . . .
On Saturday, 27 February 2016 11:10:18 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:etc. It's just bullshit he's made up. A recidivist liar with an uncontrollable obsession with Key and National.
On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 09:49:57 +1300, Liberty <liberty48@live.com>
wrote:
On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 14:31:42 +1300, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>I abhore the waste of government funds - as you are fond of pointing
They had nearly died out, but with a concerted effort . . .
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CcEzTrFUYAADZtf.jpg
Your point is?
out, Allistar - those funds come largely from taxpayers; the effect of
the waste is that we use funds for little benefit, at a time when we
are already rapidly increasing debt, which itself requires tax revenue
for interest, and will future taxation to repay the capital.
The "white elephants" also point out the hypocrisy of the government
that demonises individual beneficiaries while doling out corporate
welfare, that lies about selling state assets (you will be aware that
housing is at least in part in crisis because the government has
largely been selling off state houses instead of building more . . .
so much for stopping asset sales . . .).
Recently there has been talk of banks possibly needing government
assistance - ask ourself why is a bank "too large to fail" while those
in poverty are too small to save?
What talk is this? Voices inside your tiny little head? Otherwise cite them.
This is what Dickbot does:" posts "it seems...", "there has been talk..."
the last 12 years?
National appear to be at the stage where they know they will not be in
power for much longer,
Right. That's because they're polling the same or better than they have for
Does anyone, anywhere believe your transparent bullshit, Dickbot?
their opposition.and are taking what they can while they can -
the arrogance of the third term . . .
They probably are arrogant. Hard not to be when they are so, so far ahead of
On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 09:49:57 +1300, Liberty <liberty48@live.com>
wrote:
On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 14:31:42 +1300, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
They had nearly died out, but with a concerted effort . . . >>https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CcEzTrFUYAADZtf.jpg
Your point is?I abhore the waste of government funds - as you are fond of pointing
out, Allistar - those funds come largely from taxpayers; the effect of
the waste is that we use funds for little benefit, at a time when we
are already rapidly increasing debt, which itself requires tax revenue
for interest, and will future taxation to repay the capital.
The "white elephants" also point out the hypocrisy of the government
that demonises individual beneficiaries while doling out corporate
welfare, that lies about selling state assets (you will be aware that
housing is at least in part in crisis because the government has
largely been selling off state houses instead of building more . . .
so much for stopping asset sales . . .).
Recently there has been talk of banks possibly needing government
assistance - ask ourself why is a bank "too large to fail" while those
in poverty are too small to save?
National appear to be at the stage where they know they will not be in
power for much longer,
and are taking what they can while they can -
the arrogance of the third term . . .
On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 11:10:08 +1300, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 09:49:57 +1300, Liberty <liberty48@live.com>Allistar didn't post I did. (Think before you rant off)
wrote:
On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 14:31:42 +1300, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>I abhore the waste of government funds - as you are fond of pointing
They had nearly died out, but with a concerted effort . . . >>>>https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CcEzTrFUYAADZtf.jpg
Your point is?
out, Allistar
On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 09:49:57 +1300, Liberty <liberty48@live.com>
wrote:
On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 14:31:42 +1300, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com>I abhore the waste of government funds - as you are fond of pointing
wrote:
They had nearly died out, but with a concerted effort . . . >>>https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CcEzTrFUYAADZtf.jpg
Your point is?
out, Allistar - those funds come largely from taxpayers; the effect of
the waste is that we use funds for little benefit, at a time when we
are already rapidly increasing debt, which itself requires tax revenue
for interest, and will future taxation to repay the capital.
The "white elephants" also point out the hypocrisy of the government
that demonises individual beneficiaries while doling out corporate
welfare, that lies about selling state assets (you will be aware that
housing is at least in part in crisis because the government has
largely been selling off state houses instead of building more . . .
so much for stopping asset sales . . .).
Recently there has been talk of banks possibly needing government
assistance - ask ourself why is a bank "too large to fail" while those
in poverty are too small to save?
National appear to be at the stage where they know they will not be in
power for much longer, and are taking what they can while they can -
the arrogance of the third term . . .
On Saturday, 27 February 2016 11:10:18 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 09:49:57 +1300, Liberty <liberty48@live.com>
wrote:
On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 14:31:42 +1300, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com>I abhore the waste of government funds - as you are fond of pointing
wrote:
They had nearly died out, but with a concerted effort . . .
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CcEzTrFUYAADZtf.jpg
Your point is?
out, Allistar - those funds come largely from taxpayers; the effect of
the waste is that we use funds for little benefit, at a time when we
are already rapidly increasing debt, which itself requires tax revenue
for interest, and will future taxation to repay the capital.
The "white elephants" also point out the hypocrisy of the government
that demonises individual beneficiaries while doling out corporate
welfare, that lies about selling state assets (you will be aware that
housing is at least in part in crisis because the government has
largely been selling off state houses instead of building more . . .
so much for stopping asset sales . . .).
Recently there has been talk of banks possibly needing government
assistance - ask ourself why is a bank "too large to fail" while those
in poverty are too small to save?
What talk is this? Voices inside your tiny little head? Otherwise cite
them.
This is what Dickbot does:" posts "it seems...", "there has been talk..." etc. It's just bullshit he's made up. A recidivist liar with an uncontrollable obsession with Key and National.
National appear to be at the stage where they know they will not be in
power for much longer,
Right. That's because they're polling the same or better than they have
for the last 12 years?
Does anyone, anywhere believe your transparent bullshit, Dickbot?
and are taking what they can while they can -
the arrogance of the third term . . .
They probably are arrogant. Hard not to be when they are so, so far ahead
of their opposition.
On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 09:49:57 +1300, Liberty <liberty48@live.com>
wrote:
On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 14:31:42 +1300, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >>I abhore the waste of government funds
They had nearly died out, but with a concerted effort . . . >>>https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CcEzTrFUYAADZtf.jpg
Your point is?
On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 11:10:08 +1300, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 09:49:57 +1300, Liberty <liberty48@live.com>Allistar didn't post I did. (Think before you rant off)
wrote:
On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 14:31:42 +1300, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>I abhore the waste of government funds - as you are fond of pointing
They had nearly died out, but with a concerted effort . . . >>>>https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CcEzTrFUYAADZtf.jpg
Your point is?
out, Allistar
You claim you adhore waste. And you a labour party apologist !!
So what Government departments will the axe ?
- those funds come largely from taxpayers; the effect of
the waste is that we use funds for little benefit, at a time when we
are already rapidly increasing debt, which itself requires tax revenue
for interest, and will future taxation to repay the capital.
The "white elephants" also point out the hypocrisy of the government
that demonises individual beneficiaries while doling out corporate
welfare, that lies about selling state assets
What happen to the 300,000 little pinkos who supported the coalition of losers. Silly save or assets campaign.
Only 30,000 signed up to save a beach. I suspect very few of the 30,000 would be part of the 300,000
as they were spending their own money.
(you will be aware that
housing is at least in part in crisis because the government hasWhat talk was that? cite
largely been selling off state houses instead of building more . . .
so much for stopping asset sales . . .).
Recently there has been talk of banks possibly needing government >>assistance
Venom from the standard doesn't count.
- ask ourself why is a bank "too large to fail" while those
in poverty are too small to save?Replaced with what.
National appear to be at the stage where they know they will not be in >>power for much longer, and are taking what they can while they can -
the arrogance of the third term . . .
A labour party that has a leader appointed by the unions who gets around 9% in the polls on a good day.
A coalition of 3 parties that hate each other .
A 3 headed old dog.
On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 14:44:47 +1300, Liberty <liberty48@live.com> wrote:What a delightully naive person you are Liberty! Pigs will fly when the cite arrives.
On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 11:10:08 +1300, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >>
On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 09:49:57 +1300, Liberty <liberty48@live.com>Allistar didn't post I did. (Think before you rant off)
wrote:
On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 14:31:42 +1300, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>I abhore the waste of government funds - as you are fond of pointing
They had nearly died out, but with a concerted effort . . . >>>>>https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CcEzTrFUYAADZtf.jpg
Your point is?
out, Allistar
You claim you adhore waste. And you a labour party apologist !!
So what Government departments will the axe ?
- those funds come largely from taxpayers; the effect of
the waste is that we use funds for little benefit, at a time when we
are already rapidly increasing debt, which itself requires tax revenue >>>for interest, and will future taxation to repay the capital.
The "white elephants" also point out the hypocrisy of the government
that demonises individual beneficiaries while doling out corporate >>>welfare, that lies about selling state assets
What happen to the 300,000 little pinkos who supported the coalition of >>losers. Silly save or assets campaign.
Only 30,000 signed up to save a beach. I suspect very few of the 30,000 >>would be part of the 300,000
as they were spending their own money.
(you will be aware that
housing is at least in part in crisis because the government hasWhat talk was that? cite
largely been selling off state houses instead of building more . . .
so much for stopping asset sales . . .).
Recently there has been talk of banks possibly needing government >>>assistance
Still waiting for a cite Rich.
Venom from the standard doesn't count.
- ask ourself why is a bank "too large to fail" while those
in poverty are too small to save?Replaced with what.
National appear to be at the stage where they know they will not be in >>>power for much longer, and are taking what they can while they can -
the arrogance of the third term . . .
A labour party that has a leader appointed by the unions who gets around 9% >>in the polls on a good day.
A coalition of 3 parties that hate each other .
A 3 headed old dog.
On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 14:44:47 +1300, Liberty <liberty48@live.com> wrote:
On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 11:10:08 +1300, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >>
On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 09:49:57 +1300, Liberty <liberty48@live.com>Allistar didn't post I did. (Think before you rant off)
wrote:
On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 14:31:42 +1300, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>I abhore the waste of government funds - as you are fond of pointing
They had nearly died out, but with a concerted effort . . . >>>>>https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CcEzTrFUYAADZtf.jpg
Your point is?
out, Allistar
You claim you adhore waste. And you a labour party apologist !!
So what Government departments will the axe ?
- those funds come largely from taxpayers; the effect of
the waste is that we use funds for little benefit, at a time when we
are already rapidly increasing debt, which itself requires tax revenue >>>for interest, and will future taxation to repay the capital.
The "white elephants" also point out the hypocrisy of the government
that demonises individual beneficiaries while doling out corporate >>>welfare, that lies about selling state assets
What happen to the 300,000 little pinkos who supported the coalition of losers. Silly save or assets campaign.
Only 30,000 signed up to save a beach. I suspect very few of the 30,000 would be part of the 300,000
as they were spending their own money.
(you will be aware that
housing is at least in part in crisis because the government hasWhat talk was that? cite
largely been selling off state houses instead of building more . . .
so much for stopping asset sales . . .).
Recently there has been talk of banks possibly needing government >>>assistance
Still waiting for a cite Rich.
in the polls on a good day.Venom from the standard doesn't count.
- ask ourself why is a bank "too large to fail" while those
in poverty are too small to save?Replaced with what.
National appear to be at the stage where they know they will not be in >>>power for much longer, and are taking what they can while they can -
the arrogance of the third term . . .
A labour party that has a leader appointed by the unions who gets around 9%
A coalition of 3 parties that hate each other .
A 3 headed old dog.
What talk was that? cite
Recently there has been talk of banks possibly needing government >>>>assistance
Still waiting for a cite Rich.
It was on radio; Bill English was being asked about the problems for
banks due to the expected number of dairy farmers getting into
financial difficulties, combined with the potential problems of >unaffordability of housing leading to a higer proportion of loans
getting into arrears as unemployment was projected to rise, plus
higher debt from firms like Fonterra making refinancing of debt
through foreign investors potentially difficult as the world economy
mooves towards recession - leading to the possibility of the banks
needing similar assistance as was provided in 2009. From memory
English indicated that he didn't think the banks would need
assistance, but the topic did come up. It would most likely have been
on National Radio, but I cannot remember what day it was on so do not
have a cite.
Liberty <liberty48@live.com> wrote:
On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 14:44:47 +1300, Liberty <liberty48@live.com> wrote:What a delightully naive person you are Liberty! Pigs will fly when the cite >arrives.
On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 11:10:08 +1300, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>
On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 09:49:57 +1300, Liberty <liberty48@live.com>Allistar didn't post I did. (Think before you rant off)
wrote:
On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 14:31:42 +1300, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:I abhore the waste of government funds - as you are fond of pointing >>>>out, Allistar
They had nearly died out, but with a concerted effort . . . >>>>>>https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CcEzTrFUYAADZtf.jpg
Your point is?
You claim you adhore waste. And you a labour party apologist !!
So what Government departments will the axe ?
- those funds come largely from taxpayers; the effect of
the waste is that we use funds for little benefit, at a time when we >>>>are already rapidly increasing debt, which itself requires tax revenue >>>>for interest, and will future taxation to repay the capital.
The "white elephants" also point out the hypocrisy of the government >>>>that demonises individual beneficiaries while doling out corporate >>>>welfare, that lies about selling state assets
What happen to the 300,000 little pinkos who supported the coalition of >>>losers. Silly save or assets campaign.
Only 30,000 signed up to save a beach. I suspect very few of the 30,000 >>>would be part of the 300,000
as they were spending their own money.
(you will be aware that
housing is at least in part in crisis because the government has >>>>largely been selling off state houses instead of building more . . . >>>>so much for stopping asset sales . . .).What talk was that? cite
Recently there has been talk of banks possibly needing government >>>>assistance
Still waiting for a cite Rich.
Venom from the standard doesn't count.
- ask ourself why is a bank "too large to fail" while those
in poverty are too small to save?Replaced with what.
National appear to be at the stage where they know they will not be in >>>>power for much longer, and are taking what they can while they can - >>>>the arrogance of the third term . . .
A labour party that has a leader appointed by the unions who gets around 9% >>>in the polls on a good day.
A coalition of 3 parties that hate each other .
A 3 headed old dog.
Tony
On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 11:10:08 +1300, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 09:49:57 +1300, Liberty <liberty48@live.com>
wrote:
On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 14:31:42 +1300, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>I abhore the waste of government funds
They had nearly died out, but with a concerted effort . . .
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CcEzTrFUYAADZtf.jpg
Your point is?
So you would strongly disagree with Cullen's buyback of the trainset
then?
On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 11:10:08 +1300, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 09:49:57 +1300, Liberty <liberty48@live.com>
wrote:
On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 14:31:42 +1300, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com> >>>wrote:I abhore the waste of government funds
They had nearly died out, but with a concerted effort . . . >>>>https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CcEzTrFUYAADZtf.jpg
Your point is?
So you would strongly disagree with Cullen's buyback of the trainset
then?
There are many more examples of government waste during Labour's time
in government, but they to numerous to list here.
Bill.
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 18:27:39 +1300, Liberty <liberty48@live.com>
wrote:
On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 14:44:47 +1300, Liberty <liberty48@live.com> wrote:
On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 11:10:08 +1300, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com> >>>wrote:
On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 09:49:57 +1300, Liberty <liberty48@live.com>Allistar didn't post I did. (Think before you rant off)
wrote:
On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 14:31:42 +1300, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com> >>>>>wrote:I abhore the waste of government funds - as you are fond of pointing >>>>out, Allistar
They had nearly died out, but with a concerted effort . . . >>>>>>https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CcEzTrFUYAADZtf.jpg
Your point is?
You claim you adhore waste. And you a labour party apologist !!
So what Government departments will the axe ?
- those funds come largely from taxpayers; the effect of
the waste is that we use funds for little benefit, at a time when we >>>>are already rapidly increasing debt, which itself requires tax revenue >>>>for interest, and will future taxation to repay the capital.
The "white elephants" also point out the hypocrisy of the government >>>>that demonises individual beneficiaries while doling out corporate >>>>welfare, that lies about selling state assets
What happen to the 300,000 little pinkos who supported the coalition of >>>losers. Silly save or assets campaign.
Only 30,000 signed up to save a beach. I suspect very few of the 30,000 >>>would be part of the 300,000
as they were spending their own money.
(you will be aware that
housing is at least in part in crisis because the government has >>>>largely been selling off state houses instead of building more . . . >>>>so much for stopping asset sales . . .).What talk was that? cite
Recently there has been talk of banks possibly needing government >>>>assistance
Still waiting for a cite Rich.
It was on radio; Bill English was being asked about the problems for
banks due to the expected number of dairy farmers getting into
financial difficulties, combined with the potential problems of unaffordability of housing leading to a higer proportion of loans
getting into arrears as unemployment was projected to rise, plus
higher debt from firms like Fonterra making refinancing of debt
through foreign investors potentially difficult as the world economy
mooves towards recession - leading to the possibility of the banks
needing similar assistance as was provided in 2009. From memory
English indicated that he didn't think the banks would need
assistance, but the topic did come up. It would most likely have been
on National Radio, but I cannot remember what day it was on so do not
have a cite.
The principle is however valid - we have a reserve bank systemm
designed to give support to banks in times of need, but in the early
years of government Bill English did a lot of travelling to shore up
banks which would otherwise have had problems rolling over investments
- in effect the government undertook borrowing which was nlent to the
banks to tide them over. The major banks were considered then, by both
Labout and National, as being "too big to fail" - why are some people
then "too small to save"?
Venom from the standard doesn't count.
- ask ourself why is a bank "too large to fail" while those
in poverty are too small to save?Replaced with what.
National appear to be at the stage where they know they will not be in >>>>power for much longer, and are taking what they can while they can - >>>>the arrogance of the third term . . .
A labour party that has a leader appointed by the unions who gets around >>>9% in the polls on a good day.
A coalition of 3 parties that hate each other .
A 3 headed old dog.
| Sysop: | sneaky |
|---|---|
| Location: | Ashburton,NZ |
| Users: | 31 |
| Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
| Uptime: | 188:01:44 |
| Calls: | 2,081 |
| Calls today: | 4 |
| Files: | 11,137 |
| Messages: | 947,658 |
