• Re: House building in the 21st century

    From JohnO@3:770/3 to jmschri...@gmail.com on Thursday, August 24, 2017 16:17:46
    On Friday, 25 August 2017 11:00:38 UTC+12, jmschri...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Nat Rad this morning there was a discussion of speedy high-tech modular
    houses as widely practised in Europe. The contributor bemoaned New Zealand's staunch backwardness in having failed to embrace these cost- and time-saving techniques. And not
    just backward but, critically, employing a vast workforce who contribute so shockingly little to the country's real per-capita productivity and earning power as to be shameful.

    So, do you think that a couple of jokers in black singlets and too-tight
    shorts plus attack dog and transistor radio, taking months on end to tack together yet another upholstered garden shed, still cuts it in the 21st century?

    It's obvious from the above that Keith has never had anything built in NZ, nor does he have any knowledge whatsoever of permits, producer statements or code of compliance certificates.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From jmschristophers@gmail.com@3:770/3 to All on Thursday, August 24, 2017 16:00:37
    On Nat Rad this morning there was a discussion of speedy high-tech modular houses as widely practised in Europe. The contributor bemoaned New Zealand's staunch backwardness in having failed to embrace these cost- and time-saving techniques. And not
    just backward but, critically, employing a vast workforce who contribute so shockingly little to the country's real per-capita productivity and earning power as to be shameful.

    So, do you think that a couple of jokers in black singlets and too-tight shorts
    plus attack dog and transistor radio, taking months on end to tack together yet
    another upholstered garden shed, still cuts it in the 21st century?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Pooh@3:770/3 to JohnO on Friday, August 25, 2017 13:54:30
    On 25/08/2017 11:17 a.m., JohnO wrote:
    On Friday, 25 August 2017 11:00:38 UTC+12, jmschri...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Nat Rad this morning there was a discussion of speedy high-tech modular houses as widely practised in Europe. The contributor bemoaned New Zealand's staunch backwardness in having failed to embrace these cost- and time-saving techniques. And not
    just backward but, critically, employing a vast workforce who contribute so shockingly little to the country's real per-capita productivity and earning power as to be shameful.

    So, do you think that a couple of jokers in black singlets and too-tight shorts plus attack dog and transistor radio, taking months on end to tack together yet another upholstered garden shed, still cuts it in the 21st century?

    It's obvious from the above that Keith has never had anything built in NZ,
    nor does he have any knowledge whatsoever of permits, producer statements or code of compliance certificates.



    He also seems to be ignorant* of the fact their are several
    manufacturers of high-tech modular houses in New Zealand already.

    Pooh

    *probably because his much lauded superior education ain't :)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From george152@3:770/3 to JohnO on Friday, August 25, 2017 13:41:45
    On 8/25/2017 11:17 AM, JohnO wrote:
    On Friday, 25 August 2017 11:00:38 UTC+12, jmschri...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Nat Rad this morning there was a discussion of speedy high-tech modular houses as widely practised in Europe. The contributor bemoaned New Zealand's staunch backwardness in having failed to embrace these cost- and time-saving techniques. And not
    just backward but, critically, employing a vast workforce who contribute so shockingly little to the country's real per-capita productivity and earning power as to be shameful.

    So, do you think that a couple of jokers in black singlets and too-tight shorts plus attack dog and transistor radio, taking months on end to tack together yet another upholstered garden shed, still cuts it in the 21st century?

    It's obvious from the above that Keith has never had anything built in NZ,
    nor does he have any knowledge whatsoever of permits, producer statements or code of compliance certificates.

    And it's evident that he has no experience of the building trade.
    But then that's work. Employment.
    Where you have to have skills and training not a computer, keyboard and
    an internet connection


    ---
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From BR@3:770/3 to All on Saturday, August 26, 2017 07:36:42
    On Thu, 24 Aug 2017 16:00:37 -0700 (PDT), jmschristophers@gmail.com
    wrote:

    On Nat Rad this morning there was a discussion of speedy high-tech modular houses as widely practised in Europe. The contributor bemoaned New Zealand's staunch backwardness in having failed to embrace these cost- and time-saving techniques. And not
    just backward but, critically, employing a vast workforce who contribute so shockingly little to the country's real per-capita productivity and earning power as to be shameful.

    So, do you think that a couple of jokers in black singlets and too-tight shorts plus attack dog and transistor radio, taking months on end to tack together yet another upholstered garden shed, still cuts it in the 21st century?

    ---
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
    http://www.avg.com

    They jokers in black singlets are not the problem. Local councils and government are the greatest impedance to building houses with their
    obstrucive zoning restrictions and the nonsense that is the Resource
    Management Act

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)