http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11908838unpopularity.
OK, so we can take it as read that they'll introduce a CGT if elected to government. They've always wanted to, and only dropped it last time due to it's
I wouldn't trust the pricks as far as I could throw them.
On Tue, 22 Aug 2017 04:30:45 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>unpopularity.
wrote:
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11908838 >>
OK, so we can take it as read that they'll introduce a CGT if elected to government. They've always wanted to, and only dropped it last time due to it's
I wouldn't trust the pricks as far as I could throw them.
Do you think they would increase GST again? That was a broken promise
by National of course - can you point to any such broken promise from Labour? But then National just love txes that hit the poor more than
high income earners . . .
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11908838unpopularity.
OK, so we can take it as read that they'll introduce a CGT if elected to government. They've always wanted to, and only dropped it last time due to it's
I wouldn't trust the pricks as far as I could throw them.
JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com> wrote:government. They've always wanted to, and only dropped it last time due to it's
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11908838
OK, so we can take it as read that they'll introduce a CGT if elected to
I wouldn't trust the pricks as far as I could throw them.
Add increase to 17.5% GST to Taxinda's new taxes.
On Tue, 22 Aug 2017 04:30:45 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>government. They've always wanted to, and only dropped it last time due to it's
wrote:
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11908838
OK, so we can take it as read that they'll introduce a CGT if elected to
I wouldn't trust the pricks as far as I could throw them.
Do you think they would increase GST again? That was a broken promise
by National of course
- can you point to any such broken promise from
Labour? But then National just love txes that hit the poor more than
high income earners . . .
On Tuesday, 22 August 2017 23:34:21 UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:government. They've always wanted to, and only dropped it last time due to it's
On Tue, 22 Aug 2017 04:30:45 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com> wrote:
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11908838
OK, so we can take it as read that they'll introduce a CGT if elected to
question to Key which was would he increase GST to cover the deficit. Given theI wouldn't trust the pricks as far as I could throw them.
Do you think they would increase GST again? That was a broken promise
by National of course
National never promised not to increase GST. That story came out of a
are GST free.- can you point to any such broken promise from
Labour? But then National just love txes that hit the poor more than
high income earners . . .
GST hits the poor less than the spendthrift rich - because mortgages and rent
http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/national/326370/labour-party-won't-raise-taxes-littlefuel tax, water tax, capital gains tax. Given this trajectory you'd be a fool not to expect more - income tax, estate tax, GST you name it.
Yet a few short months later we have Labour coming up with new or increased
LABOUR LOVE TAXES.
On Tuesday, 22 August 2017 23:34:21 UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:unpopularity.
On Tue, 22 Aug 2017 04:30:45 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
wrote:
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11908838
OK, so we can take it as read that they'll introduce a CGT if elected to government. They've always wanted to, and only dropped it last time due to it's
to Key which was would he increase GST to cover the deficit. Given the neutrality of the GST increase/income tax decrease that was borne out.
I wouldn't trust the pricks as far as I could throw them.
Do you think they would increase GST again? That was a broken promise
by National of course
National never promised not to increase GST. That story came out of a question
Don't forget salt tax, sugar tax, fat tax, carbon tax, mortgage and- can you point to any such broken promise from
Labour? But then National just love txes that hit the poor more than
high income earners . . .
GST hits the poor less than the spendthrift rich - because mortgages and rent are GST free.
http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/national/326370/labour-party-won't-raise-taxes-little
Yet a few short months later we have Labour coming up with new or increased fuel tax, water tax, capital gains tax. Given this trajectory you'd be a fool not to expect more - income tax, estate tax, GST you name it.
LABOUR LOVE TAXES.
JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com> wrote:government. They've always wanted to, and only dropped it last time due to it's
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11908838
OK, so we can take it as read that they'll introduce a CGT if elected to
I wouldn't trust the pricks as far as I could throw them.
Add increase to 17.5% GST to Taxinda's new taxes.
On Wednesday, August 23, 2017 at 10:50:03 AM UTC+12, JohnO wrote:government. They've always wanted to, and only dropped it last time due to it's
On Tuesday, 22 August 2017 23:34:21 UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
On Tue, 22 Aug 2017 04:30:45 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com> wrote:
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11908838
OK, so we can take it as read that they'll introduce a CGT if elected to
question to Key which was would he increase GST to cover the deficit. Given theI wouldn't trust the pricks as far as I could throw them.
Do you think they would increase GST again? That was a broken promise
by National of course
National never promised not to increase GST. That story came out of a
rent are GST free.- can you point to any such broken promise from
Labour? But then National just love txes that hit the poor more than high income earners . . .
GST hits the poor less than the spendthrift rich - because mortgages and
fuel tax, water tax, capital gains tax. Given this trajectory you'd be a fool not to expect more - income tax, estate tax, GST you name it.http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/national/326370/labour-party-won't-raise-taxes-little
Yet a few short months later we have Labour coming up with new or increased
LABOUR LOVE TAXES.
But Rich may take some comfort in knowing that, according to Joyce today,with the current state of the books now divulged by Treasury, nothing much can change taxwise until 2020 or thereabouts.
On Wednesday, August 23, 2017 at 8:38:10 AM UTC+12, Mutlley wrote:government. They've always wanted to, and only dropped it last time due to it's
JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com> wrote:
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11908838
OK, so we can take it as read that they'll introduce a CGT if elected to
study of the New Zealand economy consistently shows that it gains 'vibrancy' (Jones) under Labour but suffers 'stultification' (Jones) under National. Indeed, today's TreasuryI wouldn't trust the pricks as far as I could throw them.
Add increase to 17.5% GST to Taxinda's new taxes.
In a 2013 NZ Herald article I have to hand, Sir Bob Jones writes 40 years
On Wednesday, 23 August 2017 13:45:42 UTC+12, jmschri...@gmail.com wrote:government. They've always wanted to, and only dropped it last time due to it's
On Wednesday, August 23, 2017 at 8:38:10 AM UTC+12, Mutlley wrote:
JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com> wrote:
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11908838
OK, so we can take it as read that they'll introduce a CGT if elected to
study of the New Zealand economy consistently shows that it gains 'vibrancy' (Jones) under Labour but suffers 'stultification' (Jones) under National. Indeed, today's TreasuryI wouldn't trust the pricks as far as I could throw them.
Add increase to 17.5% GST to Taxinda's new taxes.
In a 2013 NZ Herald article I have to hand, Sir Bob Jones writes 40 years
That's probably based on the wonderful reforms of the fourth Labourgovernment.
On Wednesday, 23 August 2017 13:15:52 UTC+12, jmschri...@gmail.com wrote:unpopularity.
On Wednesday, August 23, 2017 at 10:50:03 AM UTC+12, JohnO wrote:
On Tuesday, 22 August 2017 23:34:21 UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
On Tue, 22 Aug 2017 04:30:45 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
wrote:
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11908838
OK, so we can take it as read that they'll introduce a CGT if elected to government. They've always wanted to, and only dropped it last time due to it's
neutrality of the GST increase/income tax decrease that was borne out.
I wouldn't trust the pricks as far as I could throw them.
Do you think they would increase GST again? That was a broken promise
by National of course
National never promised not to increase GST. That story came out of a question to Key which was would he increase GST to cover the deficit. Given the
fuel tax, water tax, capital gains tax. Given this trajectory you'd be a fool not to expect more - income tax, estate tax, GST you name it.
- can you point to any such broken promise from
Labour? But then National just love txes that hit the poor more than
high income earners . . .
GST hits the poor less than the spendthrift rich - because mortgages and rent are GST free.
http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/national/326370/labour-party-won't-raise-taxes-little
Yet a few short months later we have Labour coming up with new or increased
would require large tax increase to fund their $19.38 billion in election bribes)
LABOUR LOVE TAXES.
But Rich may take some comfort in knowing that, according to Joyce today, with the current state of the books now divulged by Treasury, nothing much can change taxwise until 2020 or thereabouts.
Perhaps - but it increases the likelihood (certainty already?) that Labour
On 23/08/2017 2:00 p.m., JohnO wrote:to government. They've always wanted to, and only dropped it last time due to it's unpopularity.
On Wednesday, 23 August 2017 13:15:52 UTC+12, jmschri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, August 23, 2017 at 10:50:03 AM UTC+12, JohnO wrote:
On Tuesday, 22 August 2017 23:34:21 UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
On Tue, 22 Aug 2017 04:30:45 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com> >>>> wrote:
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11908838
OK, so we can take it as read that they'll introduce a CGT if elected
question to Key which was would he increase GST to cover the deficit. Given the
I wouldn't trust the pricks as far as I could throw them.
Do you think they would increase GST again? That was a broken promise >>>> by National of course
National never promised not to increase GST. That story came out of a
rent are GST free.
- can you point to any such broken promise from
Labour? But then National just love txes that hit the poor more than >>>> high income earners . . .
GST hits the poor less than the spendthrift rich - because mortgages and
increased fuel tax, water tax, capital gains tax. Given this trajectory you'd be a fool not to expect more - income tax, estate tax, GST you name it.
http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/national/326370/labour-party-won't-raise-taxes-little
Yet a few short months later we have Labour coming up with new or
with the current state of the books now divulged by Treasury, nothing much can change taxwise until 2020 or thereabouts.
LABOUR LOVE TAXES.
But Rich may take some comfort in knowing that, according to Joyce today,
would require large tax increase to fund their $19.38 billion in election bribes)Perhaps - but it increases the likelihood (certainty already?) that Labour
With the promise of rapid rail for Hamilton/Tauranga that's more like
$36 billion at least JohnO!
Pooh
On Tue, 22 Aug 2017 04:30:45 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>unpopularity.
wrote:
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11908838 >>
OK, so we can take it as read that they'll introduce a CGT if elected to government. They've always wanted to, and only dropped it last time due to it's
I wouldn't trust the pricks as far as I could throw them.
Do you think they would increase GST again? That was a broken promise
by National of course - can you point to any such broken promise from Labour? But then National just love txes that hit the poor more than
high income earners . . .
On Thursday, August 24, 2017 at 1:50:02 AM UTC+12, Pooh wrote:neutrality of the GST increase/income tax decrease that was borne out.
On 23/08/2017 2:00 p.m., JohnO wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 August 2017 13:15:52 UTC+12, jmschri...@gmail.com wrote: >>>> On Wednesday, August 23, 2017 at 10:50:03 AM UTC+12, JohnO wrote:
On Tuesday, 22 August 2017 23:34:21 UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
On Tue, 22 Aug 2017 04:30:45 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote:
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11908838
OK, so we can take it as read that they'll introduce a CGT if elected to government. They've always wanted to, and only dropped it last time due to it's unpopularity.
I wouldn't trust the pricks as far as I could throw them.
Do you think they would increase GST again? That was a broken promise >>>>>> by National of course
National never promised not to increase GST. That story came out of a question to Key which was would he increase GST to cover the deficit. Given the
- can you point to any such broken promise from
Labour? But then National just love txes that hit the poor more than >>>>>> high income earners . . .
GST hits the poor less than the spendthrift rich - because mortgages and rent are GST free.
http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/national/326370/labour-party-won't-raise-taxes-little
Yet a few short months later we have Labour coming up with new or increased fuel tax, water tax, capital gains tax. Given this trajectory you'd be a fool not to expect more - income tax, estate tax, GST you name it.
LABOUR LOVE TAXES.
But Rich may take some comfort in knowing that, according to Joyce today, with the current state of the books now divulged by Treasury, nothing much can change taxwise until 2020 or thereabouts.
Perhaps - but it increases the likelihood (certainty already?) that Labour would require large tax increase to fund their $19.38 billion in election bribes)
With the promise of rapid rail for Hamilton/Tauranga that's more like
$36 billion at least JohnO!
Pooh
With interest rates as low as they now are, borrowing the required loot willbe a breeze.
Then, simply impose a High Speed Rail levy on owners/occupiers of all newAuckland/Tauranga/Hamilton housing built since, say, 2012, just like the levy imposed on you for the construction of the occasional sport and regular booze-fest cake tin in
In case you don't already know, this kind of caper is called "User pays."inefficient, under-capitalised, family-trust employers in booze - such smart thinking also helps to perpetuate the country's grindingly low per-capita real productivity
But best of all, along with WFF - the scam that keeps thousands of hopelessly
Now, with such an exemplary model as Wellington, who wouldn't vote for that,eh?
| Sysop: | sneaky |
|---|---|
| Location: | Ashburton,NZ |
| Users: | 31 |
| Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
| Uptime: | 189:21:04 |
| Calls: | 2,082 |
| Calls today: | 5 |
| Files: | 11,137 |
| Messages: | 947,684 |