$3k pa breeder bonus. Labour will pay you $3k pa to breed yet another
child. Payment until age two. But don't worry, just pop out another to restart the payments.
http://lindsaymitchell.blogspot.com.au/2017/07/baby-bribes.html
Labour sure do know how to trap people in a dependence on the state.
JohnO wrote:
$3k pa breeder bonus. Labour will pay you $3k pa to breed yet another
child. Payment until age two. But don't worry, just pop out another to
restart the payments.
http://lindsaymitchell.blogspot.com.au/2017/07/baby-bribes.html
Labour sure do know how to trap people in a dependence on the state.
Encouraging irresponsibility like that is despicable.
On Thu, 13 Jul 2017 22:43:29 +1200, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
wrote:
JohnO wrote:
$3k pa breeder bonus. Labour will pay you $3k pa to breed yet another
child. Payment until age two. But don't worry, just pop out another to
restart the payments.
http://lindsaymitchell.blogspot.com.au/2017/07/baby-bribes.html
Labour sure do know how to trap people in a dependence on the state.
Encouraging irresponsibility like that is despicable.
Labour are not encouraging the irresponsibility of heartless bashing
of people who need help: http://www.radionz.co.nz/national/programmes/morningreport/audio/201851056/should-only-people-who-can-afford-children-have-them
On Friday, 14 July 2017 12:53:51 UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:paying taxes, just to see deadbeat bludgers with no dad in the house producing 6 kids to different fathers, and getting paid by the kid to do so. It's wrong.
On Thu, 13 Jul 2017 22:43:29 +1200, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
wrote:
JohnO wrote:
$3k pa breeder bonus. Labour will pay you $3k pa to breed yet another
child. Payment until age two. But don't worry, just pop out another to
restart the payments.
http://lindsaymitchell.blogspot.com.au/2017/07/baby-bribes.html
Labour sure do know how to trap people in a dependence on the state.
Encouraging irresponsibility like that is despicable.
Labour are not encouraging the irresponsibility of heartless bashing
of people who need help:
http://www.radionz.co.nz/national/programmes/morningreport/audio/201851056/should-only-people-who-can-afford-children-have-them
People can have as many children as they like. However they should not expect unlimited state funding to pop out unlimited children.
There are families working hard to do the best for their 1, 2 or 3 kids, while
Here's one today with NINE. FFS >http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11890786
People can have as many children as they like. However they should not expect unlimited state funding to pop out unlimited children.paying taxes, just to see deadbeat bludgers with no dad in the house producing 6 kids to different fathers, and getting paid by the kid to do so. It's wrong.
There are families working hard to do the best for their 1, 2 or 3 kids, while
On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 12:53:15 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>expect unlimited state funding to pop out unlimited children.
wrote:
Here's one today with NINE. FFS >http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11890786
I guerss you were embarrassed at your previous claims - here they are, together with my response::
People can have as many children as they like. However they should not
while paying taxes, just to see deadbeat bludgers with no dad in the house producing 6 kids to different fathers, and getting paid by the kid to do so. It's wrong.There are families working hard to do the best for their 1, 2 or 3 kids,
I'd be interested to know about anyone producing unlimited children -
and also some evidence of deadbeat bludgers with no dad in the house producing 6 kids to different fathers - and according to you getting
paid by the kid to do so!
Waiting, JohnO . . .
_________________________
and as I expected you can show
no evidence of anyone producing unlimited children
no evidence of any deadbeat bludger
no evidence of 6 children to different fathers,
no evidence of the any kid paying the mother to have more
and no evidence that this mother would have more children if she was
paid a little more by the government.
From the article:
"Buchanan claimed Work and Income had known she was living there for
over a year so she did not understand why they had only been given two
weeks notice to get out.
Ministry of Social Development spokeswoman Kim Going confirmed they
were made aware of the situation in March 2016. "This is not ideal
but...we are working to find a suitable home for Rochelle and her
children."
Buchanan tried to get emergency housing but her application was "put
on hold" while she discussed options with WINZ, Going said. She was
then referred to social service Te Tuinga Whanau but they would not be
able to meet her until after she was due to leave.
"We knew it was overcrowded, but we thought they'd help find us a
house," Buchanan told the Herald.
"They don't want to help until we're literally on the street." "
. . . . .
"To the people who may judge her on having so many children and
struggling to find a house Buchanan said that this was never her plan
to end up in this situation
"I didn't plan on being a solo mum, but things happen." "
What is evident from the story is that the splitting of social housing
both with government and between government and private providers is resulting in one hand not knowing what the other hand is doing - and
no-one actually sorting out problems. It illustrates a failure of
government that after more than a year after they knew of this
difficult situation, government had not been able to assist - there is
indeed a crisis - a crisis caused by government incompetence,
fragmentation of services, lack of funding, sale of social housing, an uncaring attitude to those in need.
For all I know this could be your family, JohnO - somewhere their must
be a father that if he had this article read to him should be ashamed
of his lack of support and also ashamed of the lack of support from
our government.
$3k pa breeder bonus. Labour will pay you $3k pa to breed yet another child.Payment until age two. But don't worry, just pop out another to restart the payments.
http://lindsaymitchell.blogspot.com.au/2017/07/baby-bribes.html
Labour sure do know how to trap people in a dependence on the state.
On Thu, 13 Jul 2017 22:43:29 +1200, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
wrote:
JohnO wrote:
$3k pa breeder bonus. Labour will pay you $3k pa to breed yet another
child. Payment until age two. But don't worry, just pop out another to
restart the payments.
http://lindsaymitchell.blogspot.com.au/2017/07/baby-bribes.html
Labour sure do know how to trap people in a dependence on the state.
Encouraging irresponsibility like that is despicable.
Labour are not encouraging the irresponsibility of heartless bashing
of people who need help: http://www.radionz.co.nz/national/programmes/morningreport/audio/201851056/should-only-people-who-can-afford-children-have-them
On Saturday, 15 July 2017 09:13:13 UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:dogma rammed down your throat by your masters, Dickbot. You take the world far to literally.
On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 12:53:15 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
wrote:
Here's one today with NINE. FFS
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11890786
I guerss you were embarrassed at your previous claims - here they are,
together with my response::
People can have as many children as they like. However they should not expect unlimited state funding to pop out unlimited children.
There are families working hard to do the best for their 1, 2 or 3 kids, while paying taxes, just to see deadbeat bludgers with no dad in the house producing 6 kids to different fathers, and getting paid by the kid to do so. It's wrong.
I'd be interested to know about anyone producing unlimited children -
and also some evidence of deadbeat bludgers with no dad in the house
producing 6 kids to different fathers - and according to you getting
paid by the kid to do so!
Waiting, JohnO . . .
Is 9 not enough you idiot?
_________________________
and as I expected you can show
no evidence of anyone producing unlimited children
no evidence of any deadbeat bludger
no evidence of 6 children to different fathers,
no evidence of the any kid paying the mother to have more
and no evidence that this mother would have more children if she was
paid a little more by the government.
That's the trouble when your intelligence is limited to regurgitating the
incredible.
From the article:
"Buchanan claimed Work and Income had known she was living there for
over a year so she did not understand why they had only been given two
weeks notice to get out.
Ministry of Social Development spokeswoman Kim Going confirmed they
were made aware of the situation in March 2016. "This is not ideal
but...we are working to find a suitable home for Rochelle and her
children."
Buchanan tried to get emergency housing but her application was "put
on hold" while she discussed options with WINZ, Going said. She was
then referred to social service Te Tuinga Whanau but they would not be
able to meet her until after she was due to leave.
"We knew it was overcrowded, but we thought they'd help find us a
house," Buchanan told the Herald.
"They don't want to help until we're literally on the street." "
. . . . .
"To the people who may judge her on having so many children and
struggling to find a house Buchanan said that this was never her plan
to end up in this situation
"I didn't plan on being a solo mum, but things happen." "
Oh well that's a clever explanation! All forgiven, let her have another nine.
What is evident from the story is that the splitting of social housing
both with government and between government and private providers is
resulting in one hand not knowing what the other hand is doing - and
no-one actually sorting out problems. It illustrates a failure of
government that after more than a year after they knew of this
difficult situation, government had not been able to assist - there is
indeed a crisis - a crisis caused by government incompetence,
fragmentation of services, lack of funding, sale of social housing, an
uncaring attitude to those in need.
For all I know this could be your family, JohnO - somewhere their must
be a father that if he had this article read to him should be ashamed
of his lack of support and also ashamed of the lack of support from
our government.
Lack of support? The support given to useless bludgers in this country is
On Thu, 13 Jul 2017 22:43:29 +1200, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
wrote:
JohnO wrote:
$3k pa breeder bonus. Labour will pay you $3k pa to breed yet another
child. Payment until age two. But don't worry, just pop out another to
restart the payments.
http://lindsaymitchell.blogspot.com.au/2017/07/baby-bribes.html
Labour sure do know how to trap people in a dependence on the state.
Encouraging irresponsibility like that is despicable.
Labour are not encouraging the irresponsibility of heartless bashing
of people who need help:
Rich80105 wrote:
On Thu, 13 Jul 2017 22:43:29 +1200, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
wrote:
JohnO wrote:
$3k pa breeder bonus. Labour will pay you $3k pa to breed yet another
child. Payment until age two. But don't worry, just pop out another to >>>> restart the payments.
http://lindsaymitchell.blogspot.com.au/2017/07/baby-bribes.html
Labour sure do know how to trap people in a dependence on the state.
Encouraging irresponsibility like that is despicable.
Labour are not encouraging the irresponsibility of heartless bashing
of people who need help:
http://www.radionz.co.nz/national/programmes/morningreport/audio/201851056/should-only-people-who-can-afford-children-have-them
Should only people who can afford children have them?
Absolutely and unequivocally: YES!
Why would you bring children into the world when you cannot provide for
them?
On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 00:50:38 +1200, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
wrote:
Rich80105 wrote:
On Thu, 13 Jul 2017 22:43:29 +1200, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
wrote:
JohnO wrote:
$3k pa breeder bonus. Labour will pay you $3k pa to breed yet another >>>>> child. Payment until age two. But don't worry, just pop out another to >>>>> restart the payments.
http://lindsaymitchell.blogspot.com.au/2017/07/baby-bribes.html
Labour sure do know how to trap people in a dependence on the state.
Encouraging irresponsibility like that is despicable.
Labour are not encouraging the irresponsibility of heartless bashing
of people who need help:
http://www.radionz.co.nz/national/programmes/morningreport/audio/201851056/should-only-people-who-can-afford-children-have-them
Should only people who can afford children have them?
Absolutely and unequivocally: YES!
Why would you bring children into the world when you cannot provide for >>them?
So you decide you can afford children, have 2 or 3, bu then a business
falls over, or a marriage breaks up, and suddenly a mother finds
herself trying to survive with children she cannot afford, cannot put
back where they came from, and cannot get assistance from government .
What should she do, Allistar?
Rich80105 wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 00:50:38 +1200, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
wrote:
Rich80105 wrote:
On Thu, 13 Jul 2017 22:43:29 +1200, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
wrote:
JohnO wrote:
$3k pa breeder bonus. Labour will pay you $3k pa to breed yet another >>>>>> child. Payment until age two. But don't worry, just pop out another to >>>>>> restart the payments.Encouraging irresponsibility like that is despicable.
http://lindsaymitchell.blogspot.com.au/2017/07/baby-bribes.html
Labour sure do know how to trap people in a dependence on the state. >>>>>
Labour are not encouraging the irresponsibility of heartless bashing
of people who need help:
http://www.radionz.co.nz/national/programmes/morningreport/audio/201851056/should-only-people-who-can-afford-children-have-them
Should only people who can afford children have them?
Absolutely and unequivocally: YES!
Why would you bring children into the world when you cannot provide for >>>them?
So you decide you can afford children, have 2 or 3, bu then a business
falls over, or a marriage breaks up, and suddenly a mother finds
herself trying to survive with children she cannot afford, cannot put
back where they came from, and cannot get assistance from government .
What should she do, Allistar?
You've shifted the goal posts. I was talking about people who cannot afford >children before having them and then still decide to have them.
On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 23:49:54 +1200, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
wrote:
Rich80105 wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 00:50:38 +1200, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
wrote:
Rich80105 wrote:
On Thu, 13 Jul 2017 22:43:29 +1200, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
wrote:
JohnO wrote:
$3k pa breeder bonus. Labour will pay you $3k pa to breed yetEncouraging irresponsibility like that is despicable.
another child. Payment until age two. But don't worry, just pop out >>>>>>> another to restart the payments.
http://lindsaymitchell.blogspot.com.au/2017/07/baby-bribes.html
Labour sure do know how to trap people in a dependence on the state. >>>>>>
Labour are not encouraging the irresponsibility of heartless bashing >>>>> of people who need help:
http://www.radionz.co.nz/national/programmes/morningreport/audio/201851056/should-only-people-who-can-afford-children-have-them
Should only people who can afford children have them?
Absolutely and unequivocally: YES!
Why would you bring children into the world when you cannot provide for >>>>them?
So you decide you can afford children, have 2 or 3, bu then a business
falls over, or a marriage breaks up, and suddenly a mother finds
herself trying to survive with children she cannot afford, cannot put
back where they came from, and cannot get assistance from government .
What should she do, Allistar?
You've shifted the goal posts. I was talking about people who cannot
afford children before having them and then still decide to have them.
So are you saying that welfare payments ae OK if they could afford the
child at the time they became pregnant?
What proortion of welfare
payments are those, Allistar?
Are you calling for a test of financial
ability to provide at the time of conception?
How should the
government decide is welfare is OK wen there are children invovled
without such a test?
On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 00:50:38 +1200, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
wrote:
Rich80105 wrote:
On Thu, 13 Jul 2017 22:43:29 +1200, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>http://www.radionz.co.nz/national/programmes/morningreport/audio/201851056/should-only-people-who-can-afford-children-have-them
wrote:
JohnO wrote:
$3k pa breeder bonus. Labour will pay you $3k pa to breed yet another >>>>> child. Payment until age two. But don't worry, just pop out another to >>>>> restart the payments.
http://lindsaymitchell.blogspot.com.au/2017/07/baby-bribes.html
Labour sure do know how to trap people in a dependence on the state.
Encouraging irresponsibility like that is despicable.
Labour are not encouraging the irresponsibility of heartless bashing
of people who need help:
Should only people who can afford children have them?
Absolutely and unequivocally: YES!
Why would you bring children into the world when you cannot provide for
them?
So you decide you can afford children, have 2 or 3, bu then a business
falls over, or a marriage breaks up, and suddenly a mother finds
herself trying to survive with children she cannot afford, cannot put
back where they came from, and cannot get assistance from government .
. .
What should she do, Allistar?
On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 00:50:38 +1200, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
wrote:
Rich80105 wrote:
On Thu, 13 Jul 2017 22:43:29 +1200, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
wrote:
JohnO wrote:
$3k pa breeder bonus. Labour will pay you $3k pa to breed yet another >>>>> child. Payment until age two. But don't worry, just pop out another to >>>>> restart the payments.
http://lindsaymitchell.blogspot.com.au/2017/07/baby-bribes.html
Labour sure do know how to trap people in a dependence on the state.
Encouraging irresponsibility like that is despicable.
Labour are not encouraging the irresponsibility of heartless bashing
of people who need help:
http://www.radionz.co.nz/national/programmes/morningreport/audio/201851056/should-only-people-who-can-afford-children-have-them
Should only people who can afford children have them?
Absolutely and unequivocally: YES!
Why would you bring children into the world when you cannot provide for >>them?
So you decide you can afford children, have 2 or 3, bu then a business
falls over, or a marriage breaks up, and suddenly a mother finds
herself trying to survive with children she cannot afford, cannot put
back where they came from, and cannot get assistance from government .
. .
What should she do, Allistar?
| Sysop: | sneaky |
|---|---|
| Location: | Ashburton,NZ |
| Users: | 31 |
| Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
| Uptime: | 47:45:59 |
| Calls: | 2,096 |
| Files: | 11,143 |
| Messages: | 950,025 |