1. Forum
  2. Usenet NZ Messa
  3. NZ.GENERAL

  • Labour's dirty little secret

    From JohnO@3:770/3 to All on Tuesday, June 27, 2017 15:08:52
    Labour are trying really hard to claim that the 'Campaign for Change' that was run by Labour staffers, and had "Labour" and red printed all over it, and had the intern-slaves working with Labour staffers was not a Labour operation.

    Initially I could understand that they'd want to distance themselves from this embarrassing clusterfuck, but it's going to get a lot worse for Labour. We have
    now heard that this operation was funded by a mystery donor. Well if the campaign is really a
    Labour campaign then it's a donation to Labour. If the donation is in excess of
    $15k then the donor must be revealed.

    More embarrassment and misery coming Labour's way. Couldn't happen to a nicer bunch of crooks. Schadenfreude has never been better!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Allistar@3:770/3 to JohnO on Wednesday, June 28, 2017 10:35:34
    JohnO wrote:

    Labour are trying really hard to claim that the 'Campaign for Change' that was run by Labour staffers, and had "Labour" and red printed all over it,
    and had the intern-slaves working with Labour staffers was not a Labour operation.

    Initially I could understand that they'd want to distance themselves from this embarrassing clusterfuck, but it's going to get a lot worse for
    Labour. We have now heard that this operation was funded by a mystery
    donor. Well if the campaign is really a Labour campaign then it's a
    donation to Labour. If the donation is in excess of $15k then the donor
    must be revealed.

    More embarrassment and misery coming Labour's way. Couldn't happen to a
    nicer bunch of crooks. Schadenfreude has never been better!

    Little has claimed he knew nothing of it even though he was only the list of people supposedly talking to the students. Someone is lying.
    --
    "From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs."
    creates the incentive to minimize your abilities and maximize your needs.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Mutlley@3:770/3 to JohnO on Wednesday, June 28, 2017 13:26:10
    JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com> wrote:

    Labour are trying really hard to claim that the 'Campaign for Change' that was
    run by Labour staffers, and had "Labour" and red printed all over it, and had the intern-slaves working with Labour staffers was not a Labour operation.

    Initially I could understand that they'd want to distance themselves from this
    embarrassing clusterfuck, but it's going to get a lot worse for Labour. We have
    now heard that this operation was funded by a mystery donor. Well if the campaign is really a
    Labour campaign then it's a donation to Labour. If the donation is in excess of
    $15k then the donor must be revealed.

    More embarrassment and misery coming Labour's way. Couldn't happen to a nicer bunch of crooks. Schadenfreude has never been better!

    Mmmm. Waiting for the next installment on the TV news tonite. Oh
    wait. It won't be mentioned as they try to deflect it back to
    National.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Rich80105@3:770/3 to All on Wednesday, June 28, 2017 15:11:07
    On Wed, 28 Jun 2017 13:26:10 +1200, Mutlley <mutley2000@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com> wrote:

    Labour are trying really hard to claim that the 'Campaign for Change' that was run by Labour staffers, and had "Labour" and red printed all over it, and had the intern-slaves working with Labour staffers was not a Labour operation. >>
    Initially I could understand that they'd want to distance themselves from this embarrassing clusterfuck, but it's going to get a lot worse for Labour. We
    have now heard that this operation was funded by a mystery donor. Well if the campaign is really a
    Labour campaign then it's a donation to Labour. If the donation is in excess of
    $15k then the donor must be revealed.

    More embarrassment and misery coming Labour's way. Couldn't happen to a nicer
    bunch of crooks. Schadenfreude has never been better!

    Mmmm. Waiting for the next installment on the TV news tonite. Oh
    wait. It won't be mentioned as they try to deflect it back to
    National.
    JOhnO is behind the times. All his questions have been answered by
    Andrew Little who frinted up immediately it became evident there was a
    problem. It wasn't really much of a problem though, but enugh that the
    Nat-bots hope it distracts from teh contrast with NAtional who when
    they knew there was a problem covered it up - and are now attacking
    their own in an attempt to protect the obvious issues facing the prime minister. For the latest: http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11882660

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From JohnO@3:770/3 to All on Tuesday, June 27, 2017 20:35:41
    On Wednesday, 28 June 2017 15:11:14 UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Wed, 28 Jun 2017 13:26:10 +1200, Mutlley <mutley2000@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com> wrote:

    Labour are trying really hard to claim that the 'Campaign for Change' that
    was run by Labour staffers, and had "Labour" and red printed all over it, and had the intern-slaves working with Labour staffers was not a Labour operation.

    Initially I could understand that they'd want to distance themselves from
    this embarrassing clusterfuck, but it's going to get a lot worse for Labour. We
    have now heard that this operation was funded by a mystery donor. Well if the campaign is really
    a Labour campaign then it's a donation to Labour. If the donation is in excess of $15k then the donor must be revealed.

    More embarrassment and misery coming Labour's way. Couldn't happen to a
    nicer bunch of crooks. Schadenfreude has never been better!

    Mmmm. Waiting for the next installment on the TV news tonite. Oh
    wait. It won't be mentioned as they try to deflect it back to
    National.
    JOhnO is behind the times. All his questions have been answered by
    Andrew Little

    Hardly. Little and co are desperately throwing McCarten and other Labour staffers under a bus to try and distance themselves. But it's clearly a Labour campaign and the public deserves to know who the mystery donor is that funded it, and whether Labour
    has included this in its donations return.

    Moreover the public deserves to know whether public funds have been incorrectly
    or fraudulently used for this campaigning.

    who frinted up immediately it became evident there was a
    problem. It wasn't really much of a problem though, but enugh that the Nat-bots hope it distracts from teh contrast with NAtional who when
    they knew there was a problem covered it up - and are now attacking
    their own in an attempt to protect the obvious issues facing the prime minister. For the latest: http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11882660

    Ha ha! Dickbot's pathetic attempt to divert from the thread. FAIL.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Tony @3:770/3 to rich80105@hotmail.com on Tuesday, June 27, 2017 22:55:37
    Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Wed, 28 Jun 2017 13:26:10 +1200, Mutlley <mutley2000@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com> wrote:

    Labour are trying really hard to claim that the 'Campaign for Change' that >>>was run by Labour staffers, and had "Labour" and red printed all over it, and
    had the intern-slaves working with Labour staffers was not a Labour operation.

    Initially I could understand that they'd want to distance themselves from >>>this embarrassing clusterfuck, but it's going to get a lot worse for Labour.
    We
    have now heard that this operation was funded by a mystery donor. Well if the
    campaign is really a Labour campaign then it's a donation to Labour. If the >>>donation is in excess of $15k then the donor must be revealed.

    More embarrassment and misery coming Labour's way. Couldn't happen to a >>>nicer bunch of crooks. Schadenfreude has never been better!

    Mmmm. Waiting for the next installment on the TV news tonite. Oh
    wait. It won't be mentioned as they try to deflect it back to
    National.
    JOhnO is behind the times. All his questions have been answered by
    Andrew Little who frinted up immediately it became evident there was a >problem. It wasn't really much of a problem though, but enugh that the >Nat-bots hope it distracts from teh contrast with NAtional who when
    they knew there was a problem covered it up - and are now attacking
    their own in an attempt to protect the obvious issues facing the prime >minister. For the latest: >http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11882660
    He has not answered anything important - time to get a competent leader who can turn Labour into some sort of semblance of an opposition! Trouble is they are 40 years out of date!
    Tony

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Pooh@3:770/3 to All on Friday, June 30, 2017 01:42:44
    On 28/06/2017 3:11 p.m., Rich80105 wrote:
    On Wed, 28 Jun 2017 13:26:10 +1200, Mutlley <mutley2000@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com> wrote:

    Labour are trying really hard to claim that the 'Campaign for Change' that was run by Labour staffers, and had "Labour" and red printed all over it, and had the intern-slaves working with Labour staffers was not a Labour operation. >>>
    Initially I could understand that they'd want to distance themselves from this embarrassing clusterfuck, but it's going to get a lot worse for Labour. We
    have now heard that this operation was funded by a mystery donor. Well if the campaign is really
    a Labour campaign then it's a donation to Labour. If the donation is in excess of $15k then the donor must be revealed.

    More embarrassment and misery coming Labour's way. Couldn't happen to a nicer bunch of crooks. Schadenfreude has never been better!

    Mmmm. Waiting for the next installment on the TV news tonite. Oh
    wait. It won't be mentioned as they try to deflect it back to
    National.
    JOhnO is behind the times. All his questions have been answered by
    Andrew Little who frinted up immediately it became evident there was a problem. It wasn't really much of a problem though, but enugh that the Nat-bots hope it distracts from teh contrast with NAtional who when
    they knew there was a problem covered it up - and are now attacking
    their own in an attempt to protect the obvious issues facing the prime minister. For the latest: http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11882660

    The only problem Rich is that Little is as big a liar as you are.
    Anything he says it treated by most (well more than 30% of the
    electorate) as just another Labour party propaganda failure. but you
    keep on telling us the union goon is best for New Zealand and we'll just
    keep on laughing at the pair of you.

    Pooh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)