http://norightturn.blogspot.co.nz/2017/05/climate-change-cost-of-inaction.html
National are a bunch of muppets - incapable of thinking longer than
the gap between political polls. I suspect they didnt reallythink they
would win the lst election so decided to leave all the difficult stuff
to the next Labour-led government - and now their stupid decisions to
keep subsiding polluting indutries is coming back to bite us all in
the bum - regardless of where you would rather we had spent $1.4
billion a year!
http://norightturn.blogspot.co.nz/2017/05/climate-change-cost-of-inaction.htmlWhich tax cuts are they "pissing away".
National are a bunch of muppets - incapable of thinking longer than
the gap between political polls. I suspect they didnt reallythink they
would win the lst election so decided to leave all the difficult stuff
to the next Labour-led government - and now their stupid decisions to
keep subsiding polluting indutries is coming back to bite us all in
the bum - regardless of where you would rather we had spent $1.4
billion a year!
On Tue, 23 May 2017 16:28:13 +1200, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com>
wrote:
http://norightturn.blogspot.co.nz/2017/05/climate-change-cost-of-inaction.htmlWhich tax cuts are they "pissing away".
National are a bunch of muppets - incapable of thinking longer than
the gap between political polls. I suspect they didnt reallythink they >>would win the lst election so decided to leave all the difficult stuff
to the next Labour-led government - and now their stupid decisions to
keep subsiding polluting indutries is coming back to bite us all in
the bum - regardless of where you would rather we had spent $1.4
billion a year!
Is it the ones that they gave us yesterday or some other ones.
I think the budget was good for people that need a little help.
Some others could do with help but this is mainly good news
On Fri, 26 May 2017 16:36:22 +1200, Sam <open-minded@fairness.here>I read the article. Did you read what you posted as a title to the
wrote:
On Tue, 23 May 2017 16:28:13 +1200, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Which tax cuts are they "pissing away".http://norightturn.blogspot.co.nz/2017/05/climate-change-cost-of-inaction.html
National are a bunch of muppets - incapable of thinking longer than
the gap between political polls. I suspect they didnt reallythink they >>>would win the lst election so decided to leave all the difficult stuff
to the next Labour-led government - and now their stupid decisions to >>>keep subsiding polluting indutries is coming back to bite us all in
the bum - regardless of where you would rather we had spent $1.4
billion a year!
Is it the ones that they gave us yesterday or some other ones.
I think the budget was good for people that need a little help.
Some others could do with help but this is mainly good news
Did you read the article? It was written prior to the budget.
But it demonstrates again what is becoming a pattern for National -
stearing profits to friends with no thought for consequences; and
denying future problems until forced to account for them. They are now >shovelling more subsidies to private landlords because they weren't
prepared to act as landlords themselves - selling off houses in a
rising market to enrich speculators and estate agents rather than act
as a responsible investor on behalf of New Zealanders. Tax cuts are
given before the surplus that will pay for them - and will result as
their eealier cuts in a greater level of inequality, and greater
borrowing for taxpayers to pay back in future. By contrast, benefit
increases are after costs have already risen. This is a short term
governmetn designed to rip off the majority to favour their minority -
they have no vision except that of a till to plunder; but they do have
the cunning to do the absolute minimum necessary to be able to pretend
that they are trying to do somthing for those most in need - leaving
of course the majority in need relatively untouched by the priority to
give more to the wealthy.
Try reading the article before commenting - you just appear an
ignorant Nat-hack otherwise.
On Fri, 26 May 2017 23:10:07 +1200, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Fri, 26 May 2017 16:36:22 +1200, Sam <open-minded@fairness.here>I read the article. Did you read what you posted as a title to the post.
wrote:
On Tue, 23 May 2017 16:28:13 +1200, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com> >>>wrote:
http://norightturn.blogspot.co.nz/2017/05/climate-change-cost-of- inaction.htmlWhich tax cuts are they "pissing away".
National are a bunch of muppets - incapable of thinking longer than
the gap between political polls. I suspect they didnt reallythink they >>>>would win the lst election so decided to leave all the difficult stuff >>>>to the next Labour-led government - and now their stupid decisions to >>>>keep subsiding polluting indutries is coming back to bite us all in
the bum - regardless of where you would rather we had spent $1.4 >>>>billion a year!
Is it the ones that they gave us yesterday or some other ones.
I think the budget was good for people that need a little help. Some >>>others could do with help but this is mainly good news
Did you read the article? It was written prior to the budget.
But it demonstrates again what is becoming a pattern for National - >>stearing profits to friends with no thought for consequences; and
denying future problems until forced to account for them. They are now >>shovelling more subsidies to private landlords because they weren't >>prepared to act as landlords themselves - selling off houses in a rising >>market to enrich speculators and estate agents rather than act as a >>responsible investor on behalf of New Zealanders. Tax cuts are given
before the surplus that will pay for them - and will result as their >>eealier cuts in a greater level of inequality, and greater borrowing for >>taxpayers to pay back in future. By contrast, benefit increases are
after costs have already risen. This is a short term governmetn designed
to rip off the majority to favour their minority -
they have no vision except that of a till to plunder; but they do have
the cunning to do the absolute minimum necessary to be able to pretend
that they are trying to do somthing for those most in need - leaving of >>course the majority in need relatively untouched by the priority to give >>more to the wealthy.
Try reading the article before commenting - you just appear an ignorant >>Nat-hack otherwise.
I was responding to that, if they had done what you said they could not
offer tax cuts but they have done.
You are very rude, why is that.
It's because he cannot bear the thought that the current National-led government might just have got something - anything - right. The mere possibility drives him to hysterical frenzy, rendering him unable to
sustain rational debate, and to expect others to accept without quibble
his own blind faith that left-wing bloggers speak nothing but
unassailable truths.
| Sysop: | sneaky |
|---|---|
| Location: | Ashburton,NZ |
| Users: | 31 |
| Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
| Uptime: | 189:46:13 |
| Calls: | 2,082 |
| Calls today: | 5 |
| Files: | 11,137 |
| Messages: | 947,684 |