The NZDF denied that there were any photographs taken, then when it
was pointed out they had released some themselves, had to admit there
were more - most of which have still not been released . . .

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11854727

which finishes with:
" "The photographs are forensic evidence. It would be standard
procedure to photograph the dead guys to make positive IDs.

"In this case, they say they killed insurgents but provide no evidence
other than their assertions."

He said it was standard practice to photograph, fingerprint and take
DNA or dental impressions from those killed to match up with
intelligence reports.

Asked what he made of the claim there were no photographs, Buchanan
said: "That may be because they didn't kill any insurgents and the
people they did kill, they didn't want to photograph." "

But of course this is the necessary few weeks after it was a media
issue, and after Bill English decided that there was no need for an
enquiry . . . .

The Nats, and the Defence FOrce, are trying to cover the issue with
bullshit - there should be an investigation!

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)

On Saturday, May 13, 2017 at 8:18:39 AM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:

The NZDF denied that there were any photographs taken, then when it
was pointed out they had released some themselves, had to admit there
were more - most of which have still not been released . . .

Several years ago you accused me of telling lies. I asked you to cite three examples and you could not come up with one.
So you were wrong about calling me a liar but you are too chicken to admit it as it might deflate your ego.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)

On Sat, 13 May 2017 14:01:28 -0700 (PDT), peterwn
<peterwn@paradise.net.nz> wrote:

On Saturday, May 13, 2017 at 8:18:39 AM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:

The NZDF denied that there were any photographs taken, then when it
was pointed out they had released some themselves, had to admit there
were more - most of which have still not been released . . .

Several years ago you accused me of telling lies. I asked you to cite three examples and you could not come up with one.
So you were wrong about calling me a liar but you are too chicken to admit it as it might deflate your ego.

I may well have accused you of lying in relatin to a previous thread,
peterwn, but I do not understand the refeence to three examples - do
you believe that a person is not a liar unless they have lied three
times? Or is it some religious superstition? I certainy don't regard
you as an habitual liar, and while I do not remember the exchange or
thread involved, your post does not seem to be relevant to the thread
above.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)

On 14/05/2017 9:42 a.m., Rich80105 wrote:

On Sat, 13 May 2017 14:01:28 -0700 (PDT), peterwn
<peterwn@paradise.net.nz> wrote:

On Saturday, May 13, 2017 at 8:18:39 AM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:

The NZDF denied that there were any photographs taken, then when it
was pointed out they had released some themselves, had to admit there
were more - most of which have still not been released . . .

Several years ago you accused me of telling lies. I asked you to cite three examples and you could not come up with one.
So you were wrong about calling me a liar but you are too chicken to admit it as it might deflate your ego.

I may well have accused you of lying in relatin to a previous thread, peterwn, but I do not understand the refeence to three examples - do
you believe that a person is not a liar unless they have lied three
times? Or is it some religious superstition? I certainy don't regard
you as an habitual liar, and while I do not remember the exchange or
thread involved, your post does not seem to be relevant to the thread
above.

Yet another comprehension fail from the ever lying Rich. You have made
the same accusations about others Rich and have NEVER been able to
provide examples. Your support of a lying turd like Hager and his
fictional account of an SAS raid only proves you're just a trolling
snowflake blindly supporting losers like angry Andy.

Pooh

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)