1. Forum
  2. Usenet NZ Messa
  3. NZ.GENERAL

  • Angry little Andy's grovelling, obsequious apology comes too late for t

    From JohnO@3:770/3 to All on Thursday, March 23, 2017 20:55:30
    http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/90820583/labour-leader-andrew-little-headed-to-court-over-defamation-case

    So Angry Andy waits until a week before the court case to apologise, leaving his obnoxious smear to hang out there for as long as he thought he could get away with.

    Kudos to the Hagarmans for not letting the little wanker off the hook. The court case should be fun.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Tony @3:770/3 to JohnO on Thursday, March 23, 2017 23:16:43
    JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com> wrote: >http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/90820583/labour-leader-andrew-little-headed-to-court-over-defamation-case

    So Angry Andy waits until a week before the court case to apologise, leaving >his obnoxious smear to hang out there for as long as he thought he could get >away with.

    Kudos to the Hagarmans for not letting the little wanker off the hook. The >court case should be fun.
    He deserves to be taught a lesson - he has had a year to apologize and has treated it like politics instead of principle - but he is dealing with people of principle and they should always win.
    Tony

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From george152@3:770/3 to JohnO on Friday, March 24, 2017 18:06:57
    On 3/24/2017 3:55 PM, JohnO wrote:
    http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/90820583/labour-leader-andrew-little-headed-to-court-over-defamation-case

    So Angry Andy waits until a week before the court case to apologise, leaving
    his obnoxious smear to hang out there for as long as he thought he could get away with.

    Kudos to the Hagarmans for not letting the little wanker off the hook. The
    court case should be fun.


    That has made my week.
    To make my year deport the fat felon and dump the dud judge

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From peterwn@3:770/3 to JohnO on Saturday, April 01, 2017 04:03:57
    On Friday, March 24, 2017 at 3:55:32 PM UTC+13, JohnO wrote:
    http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/90820583/labour-leader-andrew-little-headed-to-court-over-defamation-case

    So Angry Andy waits until a week before the court case to apologise, leaving
    his obnoxious smear to hang out there for as long as he thought he could get away with.

    Kudos to the Hagarmans for not letting the little wanker off the hook. The
    court case should be fun.

    Yes, All systems GO at Wellington High Court 3 at 10am Monday, complete with jury (according to court lists). Wonder if they will settle on the courthouse steps.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Tony @3:770/3 to peterwn on Sunday, April 02, 2017 23:04:00
    peterwn <peterwn@paradise.net.nz> wrote:
    On Friday, March 24, 2017 at 3:55:32 PM UTC+13, JohnO wrote:
    http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/90820583/labour-leader-andrew-little-headed-to-court-over-defamation-case

    So Angry Andy waits until a week before the court case to apologise, leaving >>his obnoxious smear to hang out there for as long as he thought he could get >>away with.

    Kudos to the Hagarmans for not letting the little wanker off the hook. The >>court case should be fun.

    Yes, All systems GO at Wellington High Court 3 at 10am Monday, complete with >jury (according to court lists). Wonder if they will settle on the courthouse >steps.
    Apparently not.
    Neither of the Hagarmans are stupid and whatever happens Andrew Little should learn from this!
    Tony

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Rich80105@3:770/3 to dot nz on Monday, April 03, 2017 16:17:41
    On Sun, 02 Apr 2017 23:04:00 -0500, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
    dot nz> wrote:

    peterwn <peterwn@paradise.net.nz> wrote:
    On Friday, March 24, 2017 at 3:55:32 PM UTC+13, JohnO wrote:
    http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/90820583/labour-leader-andrew-little-headed-to-court-over-defamation-case

    So Angry Andy waits until a week before the court case to apologise, leaving
    his obnoxious smear to hang out there for as long as he thought he could get >>>away with.

    Kudos to the Hagarmans for not letting the little wanker off the hook. The >>>court case should be fun.

    Yes, All systems GO at Wellington High Court 3 at 10am Monday, complete with >>jury (according to court lists). Wonder if they will settle on the courthouse >>steps.
    Apparently not.
    Neither of the Hagarmans are stupid and whatever happens Andrew Little should >learn from this!
    Tony
    Of course Andrew Little should learn from it - avoid giving the venal
    the opportunity for taking a case to court! I suspect the reputation
    of the Hagermans has if anything been enhanced - they will have known
    exactly what they were doing in donating to the National Party. What
    is interesting is that the other side of that transaction did not take
    offence - it is clear that Hagerman knew how to get what he wanted . .
    . as have of course others over the last few years . . .

    I suspect there would have been discussions by lawyers well before
    this; if there was any way the offer of settlement would be accepted
    it would have happened before now, but submissions may well be
    interesting.

    Certainly his lawyer is doing all that he can for his client - from
    the small report on the news it appears he is clearly over-reaching in
    his interpretation of what the situation stinks means - it is
    certainly no indightment of the Hagermans. I do wonder what happened
    with the contract they got - what was the government trying to achieve
    from it?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Tony @3:770/3 to rich80105@hotmail.com on Sunday, April 02, 2017 23:39:19
    Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Sun, 02 Apr 2017 23:04:00 -0500, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
    dot nz> wrote:

    peterwn <peterwn@paradise.net.nz> wrote:
    On Friday, March 24, 2017 at 3:55:32 PM UTC+13, JohnO wrote:
    http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/90820583/labour-leader-andrew-little-headed-to-court-over-defamation-case

    So Angry Andy waits until a week before the court case to apologise, >>>>leaving
    his obnoxious smear to hang out there for as long as he thought he could >>>>get
    away with.

    Kudos to the Hagarmans for not letting the little wanker off the hook. The >>>>court case should be fun.

    Yes, All systems GO at Wellington High Court 3 at 10am Monday, complete with >>>jury (according to court lists). Wonder if they will settle on the >>>courthouse
    steps.
    Apparently not.
    Neither of the Hagarmans are stupid and whatever happens Andrew Little should >>learn from this!
    Tony
    Of course Andrew Little should learn from it
    There is nothing venal about a business that has provide employment for so many people.
    The lesson is to understand that he cannot impune someone in his position unless he has proof, he let the imagined power run to his head.
    - avoid giving the venal
    the opportunity for taking a case to court! I suspect the reputation
    of the Hagermans has if anything been enhanced - they will have known
    exactly what they were doing in donating to the National Party. What
    is interesting is that the other side of that transaction did not take >offence - it is clear that Hagerman knew how to get what he wanted . .
    . as have of course others over the last few years . . .
    That is what good, intelligent and New Zealand supporting commerce does.

    I suspect there would have been discussions by lawyers well before
    this; if there was any way the offer of settlement would be accepted
    it would have happened before now, but submissions may well be
    interesting.
    Of course there wasm duh!

    Certainly his lawyer is doing all that he can for his client - from
    the small report on the news it appears he is clearly over-reaching in
    his interpretation of what the situation stinks means - it is
    certainly no indightment of the Hagermans. I do wonder what happened
    with the contract they got - what was the government trying to achieve
    from it?
    Irrelevant to the case and you know it!

    Tony

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Pooh@3:770/3 to All on Monday, April 03, 2017 21:33:42
    On 3/04/2017 4:17 p.m., Rich80105 wrote:
    On Sun, 02 Apr 2017 23:04:00 -0500, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
    dot nz> wrote:

    peterwn <peterwn@paradise.net.nz> wrote:
    On Friday, March 24, 2017 at 3:55:32 PM UTC+13, JohnO wrote:

    http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/90820583/labour-leader-andrew-little-headed-to-court-over-defamation-case

    So Angry Andy waits until a week before the court case to apologise, leaving
    his obnoxious smear to hang out there for as long as he thought he could get
    away with.

    Kudos to the Hagarmans for not letting the little wanker off the hook. The >>>> court case should be fun.

    Yes, All systems GO at Wellington High Court 3 at 10am Monday, complete with
    jury (according to court lists). Wonder if they will settle on the courthouse
    steps.
    Apparently not.
    Neither of the Hagarmans are stupid and whatever happens Andrew Little should
    learn from this!
    Tony
    Of course Andrew Little should learn from it - avoid giving the venal
    the opportunity for taking a case to court! I suspect the reputation
    of the Hagermans has if anything been enhanced - they will have known
    exactly what they were doing in donating to the National Party. What
    is interesting is that the other side of that transaction did not take offence - it is clear that Hagerman knew how to get what he wanted . .
    . as have of course others over the last few years . . .


    Little, Labour and you Rich are incapable of learning anything! It comes
    from a lack of comprehension and you, Labour and Little will only blame
    others for your own bad decisions and the inevitable consequences.

    I suspect there would have been discussions by lawyers well before
    this; if there was any way the offer of settlement would be accepted
    it would have happened before now, but submissions may well be
    interesting.


    Nope! Angry Andy has shafted himself again. So typical of the ever
    loopier left.

    Certainly his lawyer is doing all that he can for his client - from
    the small report on the news it appears he is clearly over-reaching in
    his interpretation of what the situation stinks means - it is
    certainly no indightment of the Hagermans. I do wonder what happened
    with the contract they got - what was the government trying to achieve
    from it?


    Come again? Little slandered them plain and clear to anyone who isn't a
    member of the loopy left like you Rich. The union stooge thought he
    could get away with it and only when he realised how bad it'd look in an election year did he apologise.

    What I'm wondering is where the useless union goon will get $1.5 million
    from if the court doesn't allow the full amount being claimed. Andy's
    probably hoping he can win the election and change the law and backdate
    in Labours usual manner to get off having to pay. Then of course when he
    loses the party might just decide to toss him for bringing yet more shit
    down on the party :)

    Pooh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)