1. Forum
  2. Usenet NZ Messa
  3. NZ.GENERAL

  • LOL Ardern overtakes Angry Andy

    From JohnO@3:770/3 to All on Tuesday, March 21, 2017 14:12:10
    As was predicted by many pundits, and of course the actors themselves denied it
    would happen.

    How embarrassing for Angry Andy.

    http://www.curia.co.nz/2017/03/newshub-reid-research-poll-march-2017/

    And despite all the excitement from the lefty air-heads, National steadily ploughs on at 47% like there was no leadership change.

    Oh dear. It's all too hard for *Labour*

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Mutlley@3:770/3 to JohnO on Wednesday, March 22, 2017 14:19:27
    JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com> wrote:

    As was predicted by many pundits, and of course the actors themselves denied it would happen.

    How embarrassing for Angry Andy.

    http://www.curia.co.nz/2017/03/newshub-reid-research-poll-march-2017/

    And despite all the excitement from the lefty air-heads, National steadily ploughs on at 47% like there was no leadership change.

    Oh dear. It's all too hard for *Labour*

    I wonder how the feminazis in the Labor party site with the party
    using Ardern as the "sex sells" messenger??

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Rich80105@3:770/3 to All on Wednesday, March 22, 2017 17:25:09
    On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 13:12:10 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    As was predicted by many pundits, and of course the actors themselves denied it would happen.

    How embarrassing for Angry Andy.

    http://www.curia.co.nz/2017/03/newshub-reid-research-poll-march-2017/

    And despite all the excitement from the lefty air-heads, National steadily ploughs on at 47% like there was no leadership change.

    Oh dear. It's all too hard for *Labour*

    Try looking at the poll of polls.

    The leadership poll is a lot more volatile than party polling, but it
    is possible that some who previously voted for Key as a leader have
    now abandoned English for a woman . . .

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Rich80105@3:770/3 to All on Wednesday, March 22, 2017 19:06:08
    On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 17:57:43 +1300, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
    wrote:

    Rich80105 wrote:

    On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 13:12:10 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    As was predicted by many pundits, and of course the actors themselves >>>denied it would happen.

    How embarrassing for Angry Andy.

    http://www.curia.co.nz/2017/03/newshub-reid-research-poll-march-2017/

    And despite all the excitement from the lefty air-heads, National steadily >>>ploughs on at 47% like there was no leadership change.

    Oh dear. It's all too hard for *Labour*

    Try looking at the poll of polls.

    The leadership poll is a lot more volatile than party polling, but it
    is possible that some who previously voted for Key as a leader have
    now abandoned English for a woman . . .

    Playing the gender card is very telling of your morals Rich. It's irrelevant >and yet you mention it as if it is. Tsk tsk.

    Apparently it is relevant for some. We may not like it, but there it
    is. . What percentage did National's deputy leader get?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Allistar@3:770/3 to All on Wednesday, March 22, 2017 18:57:43
    Rich80105 wrote:

    On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 13:12:10 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    As was predicted by many pundits, and of course the actors themselves >>denied it would happen.

    How embarrassing for Angry Andy.

    http://www.curia.co.nz/2017/03/newshub-reid-research-poll-march-2017/

    And despite all the excitement from the lefty air-heads, National steadily >>ploughs on at 47% like there was no leadership change.

    Oh dear. It's all too hard for *Labour*

    Try looking at the poll of polls.

    The leadership poll is a lot more volatile than party polling, but it
    is possible that some who previously voted for Key as a leader have
    now abandoned English for a woman . . .

    Playing the gender card is very telling of your morals Rich. It's irrelevant and yet you mention it as if it is. Tsk tsk.
    --
    "From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs."
    creates the incentive to minimize your abilities and maximize your needs.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Pooh@3:770/3 to All on Thursday, March 23, 2017 01:43:10
    On 22/03/2017 4:25 p.m., Rich80105 wrote:
    On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 13:12:10 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    As was predicted by many pundits, and of course the actors themselves denied
    it would happen.

    How embarrassing for Angry Andy.

    http://www.curia.co.nz/2017/03/newshub-reid-research-poll-march-2017/

    And despite all the excitement from the lefty air-heads, National steadily ploughs on at 47% like there was no leadership change.

    Oh dear. It's all too hard for *Labour*

    Try looking at the poll of polls.

    The leadership poll is a lot more volatile than party polling, but it
    is possible that some who previously voted for Key as a leader have
    now abandoned English for a woman . . .


    Only in what passes for your demented little mind Rich. The poll result
    was much like Labours win in Mt Albert: Only a surprise to Labour and
    the idiots like you Rich who blindly believe every lie that comes out of Labours blogs.

    Pooh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Pooh@3:770/3 to All on Thursday, March 23, 2017 01:44:07
    On 22/03/2017 6:06 p.m., Rich80105 wrote:
    On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 17:57:43 +1300, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
    wrote:

    Rich80105 wrote:

    On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 13:12:10 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    As was predicted by many pundits, and of course the actors themselves
    denied it would happen.

    How embarrassing for Angry Andy.

    http://www.curia.co.nz/2017/03/newshub-reid-research-poll-march-2017/

    And despite all the excitement from the lefty air-heads, National steadily >>>> ploughs on at 47% like there was no leadership change.

    Oh dear. It's all too hard for *Labour*

    Try looking at the poll of polls.

    The leadership poll is a lot more volatile than party polling, but it
    is possible that some who previously voted for Key as a leader have
    now abandoned English for a woman . . .

    Playing the gender card is very telling of your morals Rich. It's irrelevant >> and yet you mention it as if it is. Tsk tsk.

    Apparently it is relevant for some. We may not like it, but there it
    is. . What percentage did National's deputy leader get?


    A hell of a lot than Labours union stooge Rich :)

    Pooh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Allistar@3:770/3 to All on Thursday, March 23, 2017 10:15:08
    Rich80105 wrote:

    On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 17:57:43 +1300, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
    wrote:

    Rich80105 wrote:

    On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 13:12:10 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    As was predicted by many pundits, and of course the actors themselves >>>>denied it would happen.

    How embarrassing for Angry Andy.

    http://www.curia.co.nz/2017/03/newshub-reid-research-poll-march-2017/

    And despite all the excitement from the lefty air-heads, National >>>>steadily ploughs on at 47% like there was no leadership change.

    Oh dear. It's all too hard for *Labour*

    Try looking at the poll of polls.

    The leadership poll is a lot more volatile than party polling, but it
    is possible that some who previously voted for Key as a leader have
    now abandoned English for a woman . . .

    Playing the gender card is very telling of your morals Rich. It's >>irrelevant and yet you mention it as if it is. Tsk tsk.

    Apparently it is relevant for some.

    To you obviously otherwise you wouldn't mention it.

    We may not like it, but there it is. .

    The left tend to be pro the oppression of women (another example is in supporting the vile ideology called Islam, the biggest oppressor of women
    since the Catholic church.

    What percentage did National's deputy leader get?
    --
    "From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs."
    creates the incentive to minimize your abilities and maximize your needs.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)