1. Forum
  2. Usenet NZ Messa
  3. NZ.GENERAL

  • Guarded praise for the government

    From Rich80105@3:770/3 to All on Wednesday, March 15, 2017 22:45:12
    http://pundit.co.nz/content/brave-bills-super-pledge-but-what-about-tax-health

    A thoughtful contribution to debate. He tactfully neglects to mention
    that National since 2008 have reduced real funding for health - it
    does not match our increasing population let alone our aging
    population; and he is fairly soft on capital gains tax - it would not
    solve the housing problems but would go a long way towards adjusting
    investment patterns to the benefit of employment and productivity.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Pooh@3:770/3 to All on Thursday, March 16, 2017 18:15:44
    On 15/03/2017 10:45 p.m., Rich80105 wrote:
    http://pundit.co.nz/content/brave-bills-super-pledge-but-what-about-tax-health

    A thoughtful contribution to debate. He tactfully neglects to mention
    that National since 2008 have reduced real funding for health - it
    does not match our increasing population let alone our aging
    population; and he is fairly soft on capital gains tax - it would not
    solve the housing problems but would go a long way towards adjusting investment patterns to the benefit of employment and productivity.


    BULLSHIT! Or are you and your marxist mate at the Pundit still trying to
    push a Labour lie from six years ago?

    Pooh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Gordon@3:770/3 to Pooh on Friday, March 17, 2017 05:25:07
    On 2017-03-16, Pooh <rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On 15/03/2017 10:45 p.m., Rich80105 wrote:
    http://pundit.co.nz/content/brave-bills-super-pledge-but-what-about-tax-health

    A thoughtful contribution to debate. He tactfully neglects to mention
    that National since 2008 have reduced real funding for health - it
    does not match our increasing population let alone our aging
    population; and he is fairly soft on capital gains tax - it would not
    solve the housing problems but would go a long way towards adjusting
    investment patterns to the benefit of employment and productivity.


    BULLSHIT! Or are you and your marxist mate at the Pundit still trying to
    push a Labour lie from six years ago?

    Oh crap, what is this lie? Shout and scream like its 3am at the party.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Gordon@3:770/3 to rich80105@hotmail.com on Friday, March 17, 2017 05:23:14
    On 2017-03-15, Rich80105 <rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    http://pundit.co.nz/content/brave-bills-super-pledge-but-what-about-tax-health

    A thoughtful contribution to debate. He tactfully neglects to mention
    that National since 2008 have reduced real funding for health - it
    does not match our increasing population let alone our aging
    population; and he is fairly soft on capital gains tax - it would not
    solve the housing problems but would go a long way towards adjusting investment patterns to the benefit of employment and productivity.

    So Rich, you are saying let us fix one issue and increase the bad affect of another. Okay.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Rich80105@3:770/3 to Gordon on Friday, March 17, 2017 22:12:22
    On 17 Mar 2017 05:23:14 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@clear.net.nz> wrote:

    On 2017-03-15, Rich80105 <rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    http://pundit.co.nz/content/brave-bills-super-pledge-but-what-about-tax-health

    A thoughtful contribution to debate. He tactfully neglects to mention
    that National since 2008 have reduced real funding for health - it
    does not match our increasing population let alone our aging
    population; and he is fairly soft on capital gains tax - it would not
    solve the housing problems but would go a long way towards adjusting
    investment patterns to the benefit of employment and productivity.

    So Rich, you are saying let us fix one issue and increase the bad affect of >another. Okay.

    No, I thought it was an intelligent the thoughtful view on a mix of
    problems - my view is that he understated the problem National has
    exacerbated in health, and under estimated the need for a capital
    gains tax that removed a distortion in our investment markets. For
    long term problems it can be helpful to have an analysis which does at
    lest try to avoid partisan politics in looking at options and reasons
    for action - Pundit does seem to have quite a few of them.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Rich80105@3:770/3 to Gordon on Friday, March 17, 2017 22:14:50
    On 17 Mar 2017 05:25:07 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@clear.net.nz> wrote:

    On 2017-03-16, Pooh <rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On 15/03/2017 10:45 p.m., Rich80105 wrote:
    http://pundit.co.nz/content/brave-bills-super-pledge-but-what-about-tax-health

    A thoughtful contribution to debate. He tactfully neglects to mention
    that National since 2008 have reduced real funding for health - it
    does not match our increasing population let alone our aging
    population; and he is fairly soft on capital gains tax - it would not
    solve the housing problems but would go a long way towards adjusting
    investment patterns to the benefit of employment and productivity.


    BULLSHIT! Or are you and your marxist mate at the Pundit still trying to
    push a Labour lie from six years ago?

    Oh crap, what is this lie? Shout and scream like its 3am at the party.

    I'd be interested in what lie the troll thinks is there - but I
    suspect even he doesn't know. Last time I saw one of his posts I
    notioced that he is trying to be more like me with his posting name -
    amusing if it wasn't so sad.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Pooh@3:770/3 to All on Saturday, March 18, 2017 16:26:46
    On 17/03/2017 10:14 p.m., Rich80105 wrote:
    On 17 Mar 2017 05:25:07 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@clear.net.nz> wrote:

    On 2017-03-16, Pooh <rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On 15/03/2017 10:45 p.m., Rich80105 wrote:
    http://pundit.co.nz/content/brave-bills-super-pledge-but-what-about-tax-health

    A thoughtful contribution to debate. He tactfully neglects to mention
    that National since 2008 have reduced real funding for health - it
    does not match our increasing population let alone our aging
    population; and he is fairly soft on capital gains tax - it would not
    solve the housing problems but would go a long way towards adjusting
    investment patterns to the benefit of employment and productivity.


    BULLSHIT! Or are you and your marxist mate at the Pundit still trying to >>> push a Labour lie from six years ago?

    Oh crap, what is this lie? Shout and scream like its 3am at the party.

    I'd be interested in what lie the troll thinks is there - but I
    suspect even he doesn't know.

    If you were capable of remembering anything past ten minutes ago Rich
    you'd know which one it was.

    Last time I saw one of his posts I
    notioced that he is trying to be more like me with his posting name - amusing if it wasn't so sad.


    Utter BULLSHIT like all you post Rich. As to being more like you. I
    don't make shit up or blindly ignore the faults of ANY political party
    let alone Labours mountain!

    Pooh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Rich80105@3:770/3 to All on Monday, March 20, 2017 21:08:51
    On Fri, 17 Mar 2017 22:14:50 +1300, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    On 17 Mar 2017 05:25:07 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@clear.net.nz> wrote:

    On 2017-03-16, Pooh <rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On 15/03/2017 10:45 p.m., Rich80105 wrote:
    http://pundit.co.nz/content/brave-bills-super-pledge-but-what-about-tax-health

    A thoughtful contribution to debate. He tactfully neglects to mention
    that National since 2008 have reduced real funding for health - it
    does not match our increasing population let alone our aging
    population; and he is fairly soft on capital gains tax - it would not
    solve the housing problems but would go a long way towards adjusting
    investment patterns to the benefit of employment and productivity.


    BULLSHIT! Or are you and your marxist mate at the Pundit still trying to >>> push a Labour lie from six years ago?

    Oh crap, what is this lie? Shout and scream like its 3am at the party.

    I'd be interested in what lie the troll thinks is there - but I
    suspect even he doesn't know. Last time I saw one of his posts I
    notioced that he is trying to be more like me with his posting name - >amusing if it wasn't so sad.

    I was also waiting to see when the penny would drop about the author
    of the pundit article - I suspect the troll is now trying to avoid his embarassment. . . .

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Pooh@3:770/3 to All on Tuesday, March 21, 2017 21:23:43
    On 20/03/2017 8:08 p.m., Rich80105 wrote:
    On Fri, 17 Mar 2017 22:14:50 +1300, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    On 17 Mar 2017 05:25:07 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@clear.net.nz> wrote:

    On 2017-03-16, Pooh <rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On 15/03/2017 10:45 p.m., Rich80105 wrote:
    http://pundit.co.nz/content/brave-bills-super-pledge-but-what-about-tax-health

    A thoughtful contribution to debate. He tactfully neglects to mention >>>>> that National since 2008 have reduced real funding for health - it
    does not match our increasing population let alone our aging
    population; and he is fairly soft on capital gains tax - it would not >>>>> solve the housing problems but would go a long way towards adjusting >>>>> investment patterns to the benefit of employment and productivity.


    BULLSHIT! Or are you and your marxist mate at the Pundit still trying to >>>> push a Labour lie from six years ago?

    Oh crap, what is this lie? Shout and scream like its 3am at the party.

    I'd be interested in what lie the troll thinks is there - but I
    suspect even he doesn't know. Last time I saw one of his posts I
    notioced that he is trying to be more like me with his posting name -
    amusing if it wasn't so sad.

    I was also waiting to see when the penny would drop about the author
    of the pundit article - I suspect the troll is now trying to avoid his embarassment. . . .


    What embarrassment Rich. I'm just waiting for you to climb out from
    under your bridge and stop acting like the mendacious marxist muppet you
    are.

    Oh and the lie was your and Labours that National 'reduced real funding
    for health'. Hell they've put far more into health than Labour ever did.
    Or are you finally understanding just how useless Labour was when it
    came to Health, Defence, Poverty and the rest of the crap Labour and you
    have been burbling about for the last nine years!

    Labour democratic? Yet ANOTHER COMPREHENSION FAIL FOR THE TROLLING rICH.

    Pooh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)