http://www.newstalkzb.co.nz/on-air/wellington/tim-fookes-morning-show/opinion/tims-take-alternative-flag-flying-insulting/.VscGcl_wjJE.facebook
Spin has become expected, but the lying and disrespect for our
traditions
While I suspect there is no offence against legislation >http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1981/0047/latest/whole.html
and in particular:
11 Offences involving New Zealand Flag
(1)
Every person commits an offence against this Act who,—
(a)
without lawful authority, alters the New Zealand Flag by the placement >thereon of any letter, emblem, or representation:
(b)
in or within view of any public place, uses, displays, destroys, or
damages the New Zealand Flag in any manner with the intention of
dishonouring it.
(2)
In this section the New Zealand Flag means any flag of the design
depicted in Schedule 1 or of any other design that so closely
resembles it as to be likely to cause any person to believe that it is
the design depicted in that schedule.
(3)
In any prosecution for an offence against this section the onus of
proving that any alteration of the New Zealand Flag was lawfully
authorised shall be on the defendant.
——————
What the Prime Mnister is doing could be seen as coming close to
offending in terms of 11 (1)(a) of the act, but I suspect not enough
for a conviction.
The use of an latenative emblem _by_ a Minister of the Crown and >representing it as a symbol of New Zealand was almost certainly not
thought to be even a possiblility when the legislation was written.
The arrogance and contempt for our traditions is sad however.
On Sat, 20 Feb 2016 07:18:33 +1300, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
http://www.newstalkzb.co.nz/on-air/wellington/tim-fookes-morning-show/opinion/tims-take-alternative-flag-flying-insulting/.VscGcl_wjJE.facebook
Spin has become expected, but the lying and disrespect for our
traditions
While I suspect there is no offence against legislation
http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1981/0047/latest/whole.html
and in particular:
11 Offences involving New Zealand Flag
(1)
Every person commits an offence against this Act who,—
(a)
without lawful authority, alters the New Zealand Flag by the placement
thereon of any letter, emblem, or representation:
(b)
in or within view of any public place, uses, displays, destroys, or
damages the New Zealand Flag in any manner with the intention of
dishonouring it.
(2)
In this section the New Zealand Flag means any flag of the design
depicted in Schedule 1 or of any other design that so closely
resembles it as to be likely to cause any person to believe that it is
the design depicted in that schedule.
(3)
In any prosecution for an offence against this section the onus of
proving that any alteration of the New Zealand Flag was lawfully
authorised shall be on the defendant.
——————
What the Prime Mnister is doing could be seen as coming close to
offending in terms of 11 (1)(a) of the act, but I suspect not enough
for a conviction.
The use of an latenative emblem _by_ a Minister of the Crown and
representing it as a symbol of New Zealand was almost certainly not
thought to be even a possiblility when the legislation was written.
The arrogance and contempt for our traditions is sad however.
You are paranoid over Key .
So much so it is unhealthy.
On 20/02/2016 10:48 a.m., Liberty wrote:I think blaming the whole National Party is a bit strong, Fred, this
On Sat, 20 Feb 2016 07:18:33 +1300, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >>Not just Key - the entire National party.
http://www.newstalkzb.co.nz/on-air/wellington/tim-fookes-morning-show/opinion/tims-take-alternative-flag-flying-insulting/.VscGcl_wjJE.facebook
Spin has become expected, but the lying and disrespect for our
traditions
While I suspect there is no offence against legislation
http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1981/0047/latest/whole.html
and in particular:
11 Offences involving New Zealand Flag
(1)
Every person commits an offence against this Act who,—
(a)
without lawful authority, alters the New Zealand Flag by the placement
thereon of any letter, emblem, or representation:
(b)
in or within view of any public place, uses, displays, destroys, or
damages the New Zealand Flag in any manner with the intention of
dishonouring it.
(2)
In this section the New Zealand Flag means any flag of the design
depicted in Schedule 1 or of any other design that so closely
resembles it as to be likely to cause any person to believe that it is
the design depicted in that schedule.
(3)
In any prosecution for an offence against this section the onus of
proving that any alteration of the New Zealand Flag was lawfully
authorised shall be on the defendant.
——————
What the Prime Mnister is doing could be seen as coming close to
offending in terms of 11 (1)(a) of the act, but I suspect not enough
for a conviction.
The use of an latenative emblem _by_ a Minister of the Crown and
representing it as a symbol of New Zealand was almost certainly not
thought to be even a possiblility when the legislation was written.
The arrogance and contempt for our traditions is sad however.
You are paranoid over Key .
So much so it is unhealthy.
On Sat, 20 Feb 2016 10:52:32 +1300, Fred <dryrot@hotmail.com> wrote:
On 20/02/2016 10:48 a.m., Liberty wrote:I think blaming the whole National Party is a bit strong, Fred, this
On Sat, 20 Feb 2016 07:18:33 +1300, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>Not just Key - the entire National party.
http://www.newstalkzb.co.nz/on-air/wellington/tim-fookes-morning-show/opinion/tims-take-alternative-flag-flying-insulting/.VscGcl_wjJE.facebook
Spin has become expected, but the lying and disrespect for our
traditions
While I suspect there is no offence against legislation
http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1981/0047/latest/whole.html
and in particular:
11 Offences involving New Zealand Flag
(1)
Every person commits an offence against this Act who,—
(a)
without lawful authority, alters the New Zealand Flag by the placement >>>> thereon of any letter, emblem, or representation:
(b)
in or within view of any public place, uses, displays, destroys, or
damages the New Zealand Flag in any manner with the intention of
dishonouring it.
(2)
In this section the New Zealand Flag means any flag of the design
depicted in Schedule 1 or of any other design that so closely
resembles it as to be likely to cause any person to believe that it is >>>> the design depicted in that schedule.
(3)
In any prosecution for an offence against this section the onus of
proving that any alteration of the New Zealand Flag was lawfully
authorised shall be on the defendant.
——————
What the Prime Mnister is doing could be seen as coming close to
offending in terms of 11 (1)(a) of the act, but I suspect not enough
for a conviction.
The use of an latenative emblem _by_ a Minister of the Crown and
representing it as a symbol of New Zealand was almost certainly not
thought to be even a possiblility when the legislation was written.
The arrogance and contempt for our traditions is sad however.
You are paranoid over Key .
So much so it is unhealthy.
may shed light on the leading culprits http://www.nzherald.co.nz/opinion/news/article.cfm?c_id=466&objectid=11592540
On 20/02/2016 1:12 p.m., Rich80105 wrote:You may be surprised at how widely I do read, Fred.
On Sat, 20 Feb 2016 10:52:32 +1300, Fred <dryrot@hotmail.com> wrote:I'm suprised you read the childish crap that 'journalist' comes up with.
On 20/02/2016 10:48 a.m., Liberty wrote:I think blaming the whole National Party is a bit strong, Fred, this
On Sat, 20 Feb 2016 07:18:33 +1300, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Not just Key - the entire National party.
http://www.newstalkzb.co.nz/on-air/wellington/tim-fookes-morning-show/opinion/tims-take-alternative-flag-flying-insulting/.VscGcl_wjJE.facebook
Spin has become expected, but the lying and disrespect for our
traditions
While I suspect there is no offence against legislation
http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1981/0047/latest/whole.html >>>>> and in particular:
11 Offences involving New Zealand Flag
(1)
Every person commits an offence against this Act who,—
(a)
without lawful authority, alters the New Zealand Flag by the placement >>>>> thereon of any letter, emblem, or representation:
(b)
in or within view of any public place, uses, displays, destroys, or
damages the New Zealand Flag in any manner with the intention of
dishonouring it.
(2)
In this section the New Zealand Flag means any flag of the design
depicted in Schedule 1 or of any other design that so closely
resembles it as to be likely to cause any person to believe that it is >>>>> the design depicted in that schedule.
(3)
In any prosecution for an offence against this section the onus of
proving that any alteration of the New Zealand Flag was lawfully
authorised shall be on the defendant.
——————
What the Prime Mnister is doing could be seen as coming close to
offending in terms of 11 (1)(a) of the act, but I suspect not enough >>>>> for a conviction.
The use of an latenative emblem _by_ a Minister of the Crown and
representing it as a symbol of New Zealand was almost certainly not >>>>> thought to be even a possiblility when the legislation was written.
The arrogance and contempt for our traditions is sad however.
You are paranoid over Key .
So much so it is unhealthy.
may shed light on the leading culprits
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/opinion/news/article.cfm?c_id=466&objectid=11592540
But it is unhealthy to be paranoid against the entire National party.
Your problem - if you choose to do nothing about it other than to spin
every written word you ever read, then sobeit. Help is available.
On 20/02/2016 7:18 a.m., Rich80105 wrote:
Yes but it's only your problem. You shouldn't be suprised that no-one respects you.
On 20/02/2016 1:12 p.m., Rich80105 wrote:
On Sat, 20 Feb 2016 10:52:32 +1300, Fred <dryrot@hotmail.com> wrote:I'm suprised you read the childish crap that 'journalist' comes up with.
On 20/02/2016 10:48 a.m., Liberty wrote:I think blaming the whole National Party is a bit strong, Fred, this
On Sat, 20 Feb 2016 07:18:33 +1300, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com>Not just Key - the entire National party.
wrote:
http://www.newstalkzb.co.nz/on-air/wellington/tim-fookes-morning-show/opinion/tims-take-alternative-flag-flying-insulting/.VscGcl_wjJE.facebook
Spin has become expected, but the lying and disrespect for our
traditions
While I suspect there is no offence against legislation
http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1981/0047/latest/whole.html >>>>> and in particular:
11 Offences involving New Zealand Flag
(1)
Every person commits an offence against this Act who,—
(a)
without lawful authority, alters the New Zealand Flag by the placement >>>>> thereon of any letter, emblem, or representation:
(b)
in or within view of any public place, uses, displays, destroys, or
damages the New Zealand Flag in any manner with the intention of
dishonouring it.
(2)
In this section the New Zealand Flag means any flag of the design
depicted in Schedule 1 or of any other design that so closely
resembles it as to be likely to cause any person to believe that it is >>>>> the design depicted in that schedule.
(3)
In any prosecution for an offence against this section the onus of
proving that any alteration of the New Zealand Flag was lawfully
authorised shall be on the defendant.
——————
What the Prime Mnister is doing could be seen as coming close to
offending in terms of 11 (1)(a) of the act, but I suspect not enough >>>>> for a conviction.
The use of an latenative emblem _by_ a Minister of the Crown and
representing it as a symbol of New Zealand was almost certainly not >>>>> thought to be even a possiblility when the legislation was written.
The arrogance and contempt for our traditions is sad however.
You are paranoid over Key .
So much so it is unhealthy.
may shed light on the leading culprits
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/opinion/news/article.cfm?c_id=466&objectid=11592540
But it is unhealthy to be paranoid against the entire National party. Your problem - if you choose to do nothing about it other than to spin every written word you ever read, then sobeit. Help is available.
On Sat, 20 Feb 2016 13:27:15 +1300, Fred <dryrot@hotmail.com> wrote:
On 20/02/2016 1:12 p.m., Rich80105 wrote:You may be surprised at how widely I do read, Fred.
On Sat, 20 Feb 2016 10:52:32 +1300, Fred <dryrot@hotmail.com> wrote:I'm suprised you read the childish crap that 'journalist' comes up with.
On 20/02/2016 10:48 a.m., Liberty wrote:I think blaming the whole National Party is a bit strong, Fred, this
On Sat, 20 Feb 2016 07:18:33 +1300, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com> >>>>> wrote:Not just Key - the entire National party.
http://www.newstalkzb.co.nz/on-air/wellington/tim-fookes-morning-show/opinion/tims-take-alternative-flag-flying-insulting/.VscGcl_wjJE.facebook
Spin has become expected, but the lying and disrespect for our
traditions
While I suspect there is no offence against legislation
http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1981/0047/latest/whole.html >>>>>> and in particular:
11 Offences involving New Zealand Flag
(1)
Every person commits an offence against this Act who,-
(a)
without lawful authority, alters the New Zealand Flag by the
placement
thereon of any letter, emblem, or representation:
(b)
in or within view of any public place, uses, displays, destroys, or >>>>>> damages the New Zealand Flag in any manner with the intention of
dishonouring it.
(2)
In this section the New Zealand Flag means any flag of the design
depicted in Schedule 1 or of any other design that so closely
resembles it as to be likely to cause any person to believe that it >>>>>> is
the design depicted in that schedule.
(3)
In any prosecution for an offence against this section the onus of >>>>>> proving that any alteration of the New Zealand Flag was lawfully
authorised shall be on the defendant.
------
What the Prime Mnister is doing could be seen as coming close to
offending in terms of 11 (1)(a) of the act, but I suspect not enough >>>>>> for a conviction.
The use of an latenative emblem _by_ a Minister of the Crown and
representing it as a symbol of New Zealand was almost certainly not >>>>>> thought to be even a possiblility when the legislation was written. >>>>>>
The arrogance and contempt for our traditions is sad however.
You are paranoid over Key .
So much so it is unhealthy.
may shed light on the leading culprits
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/opinion/news/article.cfm?c_id=466&objectid=11592540
But it is unhealthy to be paranoid against the entire National party.
Which of course I am not - as I said to blame the whole NAtional party
for the Flag issue as you may have been suggesting would be wrong; in
fact I believe there are a number of National MPs who are appalled at
the waste of money and political capital from the poorly run campaign.
Your problem - if you choose to do nothing about it other than to spin >>every written word you ever read, then sobeit. Help is available.
| Sysop: | sneaky |
|---|---|
| Location: | Ashburton,NZ |
| Users: | 31 |
| Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
| Uptime: | 188:27:21 |
| Calls: | 2,082 |
| Calls today: | 5 |
| Files: | 11,137 |
| Messages: | 947,669 |