On 11/03/2017 5:33 p.m., Gordon wrote:
On 2017-03-10, Pooh <rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
Rich has been banging on falsely about the tax-cuts in 2008 as only
benefiting the so called rich (which when you think about it means Rich
must have benefited). It seems to be a mantra amongst the sheep blindly
believing everything Angry Andy the typical lying union stooge utters.
Had some idiot on the New Zealand Labour Party banging on about it. The
same idiot believes Nicky Hager is a paragon of honesty and fairness
along with the fairy tale that Labour left the country in perfect
condition after pushing unemployment and government debt up because of
Labours stupidity. No wonder the useless buggers are broke!
Pooh, have you been drinking.
No. Interesting that you ask. I have noticed that many Labour supporters (including our own beloved Rich) appear to suffer from problems with
alcohol or drug misuse. Which may explain their warped belief that
Labour has been good for New Zealand. Though I'm quite happy to admit
that even though having done better than Labour National isn't a hell of
a lot better:)
Still nice to get your thoughts, as a thread starter.
Tax cuts have, in recent years benefited the rich/wealthy a great deal more than the poor. Something the rich know, but are still in denial over.
Thank you Gordon for confirming my point. Contrary to what some idiot
claimed a while ago. I'm far from rich and (as I have explained before)
am on super. Something the loopy lefty's seem to be unaware of is that
National have reacted to cost of living increases much more promptly
than your glorious Labour party ever have.
Pooh
p.s. Tax cuts will ALWAYS benefit the so called wealthy because when all
is said and done THEY are the ones who carry the tax burden as has been
proved in this forum time without counting. But something that the comprehension bereft left just can't seem to understand.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)