http://www.thecivilian.co.nz/government-vows-that-by-2040-90-of-new-zealands-rivers-will-be-vaguely-liquid-in-nature/
http://www.thecivilian.co.nz/government-vows-that-by-2040-90-of-new-zealands-rivers-will-be-vaguely-liquid-in-nature/
On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 23:18:20 +1300, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com>Sorry - that was the wrong url! - and now I can't find the one I saw -
wrote:
http://www.thecivilian.co.nz/government-vows-that-by-2040-90-of-new-zealands-rivers-will-be-vaguely-liquid-in-nature/
And a vote! >http://www.thecivilian.co.nz/government-vows-that-by-2040-90-of-new-zealands-rivers-will-be-vaguely-liquid-in-nature/
On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 16:19:31 +1300, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 23:18:20 +1300, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com>Sorry - that was the wrong url! - and now I can't find the one I saw - >possibly removesd as 90% did not like the announcements.
wrote:
http://www.thecivilian.co.nz/government-vows-that-by-2040-90-of-new-zealands-rivers-will-be-vaguely-liquid-in-nature/
And a vote! >>http://www.thecivilian.co.nz/government-vows-that-by-2040-90-of-new-zealands-rivers-will-be-vaguely-liquid-in-nature/
I did find that Nick Smith promised in 2006 that all rivers would be >swimmable by 2030 (and that under the old definitions of "swimmable" -
so in effet National are admitting so much of a fail that their
objective will now take 10 more years to only achive a much lower
standard of water. >http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PA1702/S00322/nats-water-policy-a-colossal-u-turn.htm
also see: >http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO1702/S00269/swimmable-rivers-five-times-more-likely-to-make-you-sick.htm
https://twitter.com/rodemmerson/status/834820247966212096/photo/1 >https://twitter.com/denistegg/status/834683499445489664/photo/1 >http://www.stuff.co.nz/environment/89750791/the-thorny-politics-of-swimmable-a-word-losing-its-meaning
I suspect the usual Nat-bots will stay away from this one - it must be >worrying that there has been nothing that has gone well for English or >National for months now - incompetence coming through from the whole
National cabinet . . Will Smith get sacked now?
On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 16:19:31 +1300, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 23:18:20 +1300, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com>Sorry - that was the wrong url! - and now I can't find the one I saw - possibly removesd as 90% did not like the announcements.
wrote:
http://www.thecivilian.co.nz/government-vows-that-by-2040-90-of-new-zealands-rivers-will-be-vaguely-liquid-in-nature/
And a vote!
http://www.thecivilian.co.nz/government-vows-that-by-2040-90-of-new-zealands-rivers-will-be-vaguely-liquid-in-nature/
I did find that Nick Smith promised in 2006 that all rivers would be swimmable by 2030 (and that under the old definitions of "swimmable" -
so in effet National are admitting so much of a fail that their
objective will now take 10 more years to only achive a much lower
standard of water. http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PA1702/S00322/nats-water-policy-a-colossal-u-turn.htm
also see: http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO1702/S00269/swimmable-rivers-five-times-more-likely-to-make-you-sick.htm
https://twitter.com/rodemmerson/status/834820247966212096/photo/1 https://twitter.com/denistegg/status/834683499445489664/photo/1 http://www.stuff.co.nz/environment/89750791/the-thorny-politics-of-swimmable-a-word-losing-its-meaning
I suspect the usual Nat-bots will stay away from this one - it must be worrying that there has been nothing that has gone well for English or National for months now - incompetence coming through from the whole
National cabinet . . Will Smith get sacked now?
On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 22:55:01 +1300, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 16:19:31 +1300, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 23:18:20 +1300, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com>Sorry - that was the wrong url! - and now I can't find the one I saw -
wrote:
http://www.thecivilian.co.nz/government-vows-that-by-2040-90-of-new-zealands-rivers-will-be-vaguely-liquid-in-nature/
And a vote!
http://www.thecivilian.co.nz/government-vows-that-by-2040-90-of-new-zealands-rivers-will-be-vaguely-liquid-in-nature/
possibly removesd as 90% did not like the announcements.
I did find that Nick Smith promised in 2006 that all rivers would be
swimmable by 2030 (and that under the old definitions of "swimmable" -
so in effet National are admitting so much of a fail that their
objective will now take 10 more years to only achive a much lower
standard of water.
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PA1702/S00322/nats-water-policy-a-colossal-u-turn.htm
also see:
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO1702/S00269/swimmable-rivers-five-times-more-likely-to-make-you-sick.htm
https://twitter.com/rodemmerson/status/834820247966212096/photo/1
https://twitter.com/denistegg/status/834683499445489664/photo/1
http://www.stuff.co.nz/environment/89750791/the-thorny-politics-of-swimmable-a-word-losing-its-meaning
I suspect the usual Nat-bots will stay away from this one - it must be
worrying that there has been nothing that has gone well for English or
National for months now - incompetence coming through from the whole
National cabinet . . Will Smith get sacked now?
As predicted, no response from the wilfully blind National supporters.
I did however find the poll: http://www.newshub.co.nz/home/shows/2017/02/poll-are-you-satisfied-with-the-government-s-plan-to-clean-up-our-waterways.html
On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 22:55:01 +1300, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 16:19:31 +1300, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 23:18:20 +1300, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com> >>>wrote:Sorry - that was the wrong url! - and now I can't find the one I saw - >>possibly removesd as 90% did not like the announcements.
http://www.thecivilian.co.nz/government-vows-that-by-2040-90-of-new-zealands-rivers-will-be-vaguely-liquid-in-nature/
And a vote! >>>http://www.thecivilian.co.nz/government-vows-that-by-2040-90-of-new-zealands-rivers-will-be-vaguely-liquid-in-nature/
I did find that Nick Smith promised in 2006 that all rivers would be >>swimmable by 2030 (and that under the old definitions of "swimmable" -
so in effet National are admitting so much of a fail that their
objective will now take 10 more years to only achive a much lower
standard of water. >>http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PA1702/S00322/nats-water-policy-a-colossal-u-turn.htm
also see: >>http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO1702/S00269/swimmable-rivers-five-times-more-likely-to-make-you-sick.htm
https://twitter.com/rodemmerson/status/834820247966212096/photo/1 >>https://twitter.com/denistegg/status/834683499445489664/photo/1 >>http://www.stuff.co.nz/environment/89750791/the-thorny-politics-of-swimmable-a-word-losing-its-meaning
I suspect the usual Nat-bots will stay away from this one - it must be >>worrying that there has been nothing that has gone well for English or >>National for months now - incompetence coming through from the whole >>National cabinet . . Will Smith get sacked now?
As predicted, no response from the wilfully blind National supporters.
I did however find the poll: >http://www.newshub.co.nz/home/shows/2017/02/poll-are-you-satisfied-with-the-government-s-plan-to-clean-up-our-waterways.html
On Sat, 25 Feb 2017 09:06:42 +1300, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 22:55:01 +1300, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 16:19:31 +1300, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com> >>>wrote:
On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 23:18:20 +1300, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com> >>>>wrote:Sorry - that was the wrong url! - and now I can't find the one I saw - >>>possibly removesd as 90% did not like the announcements.
http://www.thecivilian.co.nz/government-vows-that-by-2040-90-of-new-zealands-rivers-will-be-vaguely-liquid-in-nature/
And a vote! >>>>http://www.thecivilian.co.nz/government-vows-that-by-2040-90-of-new-zealands-rivers-will-be-vaguely-liquid-in-nature/
I did find that Nick Smith promised in 2006 that all rivers would be >>>swimmable by 2030 (and that under the old definitions of "swimmable" -
so in effet National are admitting so much of a fail that their
objective will now take 10 more years to only achive a much lower >>>standard of water. >>>http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PA1702/S00322/nats-water-policy-a-colossal-u-turn.htm
also see: >>>http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO1702/S00269/swimmable-rivers-five-times-more-likely-to-make-you-sick.htm
https://twitter.com/rodemmerson/status/834820247966212096/photo/1 >>>https://twitter.com/denistegg/status/834683499445489664/photo/1 >>>http://www.stuff.co.nz/environment/89750791/the-thorny-politics-of-swimmable-a-word-losing-its-meaning
I suspect the usual Nat-bots will stay away from this one - it must be >>>worrying that there has been nothing that has gone well for English or >>>National for months now - incompetence coming through from the whole >>>National cabinet . . Will Smith get sacked now?
As predicted, no response from the wilfully blind National supporters.
I did however find the poll: >>http://www.newshub.co.nz/home/shows/2017/02/poll-are-you-satisfied-with-the-government-s-plan-to-clean-up-our-waterways.html
And it continues, with concern about both the reality of National
accepting that they have a problem, but now taking voters for fools
that can be placated by moving the goalposts, and not even promising
any action this year!
Here is something that can be done to get National to take this
seriously:
https://contribute-actionstation.nationbuilder.com/cleanrivers
The only thing that counts for National is turning off voters - this
is one way we can help change priorities to ensure the next generation
does not have to accept this shit from National
On Sat, 25 Feb 2017 22:24:14 +1300, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Sat, 25 Feb 2017 09:06:42 +1300, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 22:55:01 +1300, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com> >>>wrote:
On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 16:19:31 +1300, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com> >>>>wrote:
On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 23:18:20 +1300, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com> >>>>>wrote:Sorry - that was the wrong url! - and now I can't find the one I saw - >>>>possibly removesd as 90% did not like the announcements.
http://www.thecivilian.co.nz/government-vows-that-by-2040-90-of-new-zealands-rivers-will-be-vaguely-liquid-in-nature/
And a vote! >>>>>http://www.thecivilian.co.nz/government-vows-that-by-2040-90-of-new-zealands-rivers-will-be-vaguely-liquid-in-nature/
I did find that Nick Smith promised in 2006 that all rivers would be >>>>swimmable by 2030 (and that under the old definitions of "swimmable" - >>>>so in effet National are admitting so much of a fail that their >>>>objective will now take 10 more years to only achive a much lower >>>>standard of water. >>>>http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PA1702/S00322/nats-water-policy-a-colossal-u-turn.htm
also see: >>>>http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO1702/S00269/swimmable-rivers-five-times-more-likely-to-make-you-sick.htm
https://twitter.com/rodemmerson/status/834820247966212096/photo/1 >>>>https://twitter.com/denistegg/status/834683499445489664/photo/1 >>>>http://www.stuff.co.nz/environment/89750791/the-thorny-politics-of-swimmable-a-word-losing-its-meaning
I suspect the usual Nat-bots will stay away from this one - it must be >>>>worrying that there has been nothing that has gone well for English or >>>>National for months now - incompetence coming through from the whole >>>>National cabinet . . Will Smith get sacked now?
As predicted, no response from the wilfully blind National supporters.
I did however find the poll: >>>http://www.newshub.co.nz/home/shows/2017/02/poll-are-you-satisfied-with-the-government-s-plan-to-clean-up-our-waterways.html
And it continues, with concern about both the reality of National
accepting that they have a problem, but now taking voters for fools
that can be placated by moving the goalposts, and not even promising
any action this year!
Here is something that can be done to get National to take this
seriously:
https://contribute-actionstation.nationbuilder.com/cleanrivers
The only thing that counts for National is turning off voters - this
is one way we can help change priorities to ensure the next generation
does not have to accept this shit from National
http://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2017/02/govt-aims-to-get-90pct-of-rivers-swimmable-by-2040.html
Listen to this from 3:35 on.
So what are they going to do between now and the election to make our
rivers cleaner?
Paddy Gower: Nothing.
That the key really - a lower target for many years away means nothing
needs to be done now.
Nick Smith is trying to peddle junk politics - but they have been
caught
So its talk talk talk, and do nothing. Not very credible has just
descended to a farce. Just don't ask Bill English to replace Nick
Smith with someone with competence - that would be a waste of time as
well..
| Sysop: | sneaky |
|---|---|
| Location: | Ashburton,NZ |
| Users: | 31 |
| Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
| Uptime: | 189:46:23 |
| Calls: | 2,082 |
| Calls today: | 5 |
| Files: | 11,137 |
| Messages: | 947,684 |
