• Re: Labour activist Keith Ng schools idiot Labour MP

    From Allistar@3:770/3 to JohnO on Thursday, February 02, 2017 09:14:38
    JohnO wrote:


    http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2017/02/labour_blaming_immigrants_like_trump.html

    Lees-Galloway seems to be absorbing Twyford's racist xenophobia.

    The biggest issue I see with immigration is not race but religion. Adhering
    to stone age superstitions should be enough to not allow anyone in. Beliefs matter because they lead to actions, and the Abrahamic religions in
    particular lead to vile inhumane actions.
    --
    "From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs."
    creates the incentive to minimize your abilities and maximize your needs.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From JohnO@3:770/3 to All on Wednesday, February 01, 2017 11:49:22
    http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2017/02/labour_blaming_immigrants_like_trump.html

    Lees-Galloway seems to be absorbing Twyford's racist xenophobia.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Rich80105@3:770/3 to All on Thursday, February 02, 2017 09:52:36
    On Wed, 1 Feb 2017 11:49:22 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2017/02/labour_blaming_immigrants_like_trump.html

    Lees-Galloway seems to be absorbing Twyford's racist xenophobia.

    https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/money/2017/01/new-zealand-unemployment-rate-jumps-unexpectedly.html

    A large number of people entering New Zealand’s workforce has pushed
    the unemployment rate back above 5 percent.

    The unemployment rate rose to 5.2 percent in the three months ended
    December 31 from a revised 4.9 percent in the September quarter,
    Statistics New Zealand said. Economists had been expecting the
    unemployment rate to ease back to 4.8 percent.

    The participation rate was an all-time high of 70.5 percent. While
    recent changes to methodology means comparisons with earlier periods
    aren’t easy to make, the working-age population has been bolstered by
    record migration.

    The recently added underutilisation rate, which seeks to measure the
    potential labour supply, was at 12.8 percent up from 12.2 percent in
    September. The increase came from more people being unemployed and
    more people actively seeking work but not currently being available to
    work. …

    ____________

    Remember also that the definition of "unemployed" was changed ast year
    - it reduced unemployment from 5.7% to 5.2% when implemented last year (actively seeking work now needs more than just seeking work from
    people you know and websites such as seek or Trade Me).'

    Remember also "immigrants" for the purposes of getting a job also
    include those much higher numbers of people with "temporary work
    visas"- many of whom go on to become ïmmigrants" through living and
    working here . . .

    Then there are the foreign workers working for foreign contractors in
    New Zealand - they don't even count in the statistics, and can be paid
    lower than our minimum wage - there are a few welders who were unhappy
    at missing out on work before Christmas . . .

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Rich80105@3:770/3 to All on Thursday, February 02, 2017 09:30:34
    On Wed, 1 Feb 2017 11:49:22 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2017/02/labour_blaming_immigrants_like_trump.html

    Lees-Galloway seems to be absorbing Twyford's racist xenophobia.

    So foreign workers on temporary work visas are not immigrants
    competeing for jobs?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From JohnO@3:770/3 to All on Wednesday, February 01, 2017 13:55:18
    On Thursday, 2 February 2017 09:30:38 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Wed, 1 Feb 2017 11:49:22 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2017/02/labour_blaming_immigrants_like_trump.html

    Lees-Galloway seems to be absorbing Twyford's racist xenophobia.

    So foreign workers on temporary work visas are not immigrants
    competeing for jobs?

    Correct. They are here doing the jobs that employers cannot get locals to do, such as the guys digging a drain under my basement. You can't get locals to do it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Rich80105@3:770/3 to All on Thursday, February 02, 2017 12:56:50
    On Wed, 1 Feb 2017 13:55:18 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Thursday, 2 February 2017 09:30:38 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Wed, 1 Feb 2017 11:49:22 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2017/02/labour_blaming_immigrants_like_trump.html >> >
    Lees-Galloway seems to be absorbing Twyford's racist xenophobia.

    So foreign workers on temporary work visas are not immigrants
    competeing for jobs?

    Correct. They are here doing the jobs that employers cannot get locals to do, such as the guys digging a drain under my basement. You can't get locals to do it.

    So the plumber that does not have an apprentie is here on a temporary
    work visa - is he qualified to do plumbing work in New Zealand, JohnO?
    If you are correct it certainly explains why he would not have a New
    Zealand apprentice!

    Certainly it can be difficult to get a plumber occasionally, but I was
    not aware they were on the list of skills shortages. How did you get
    in touch with him if he works for himself - I thought those on
    temporary work visas had to be employed?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Fred@3:770/3 to All on Thursday, February 02, 2017 13:01:42
    On 2/02/2017 12:56 PM, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Wed, 1 Feb 2017 13:55:18 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Thursday, 2 February 2017 09:30:38 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Wed, 1 Feb 2017 11:49:22 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2017/02/labour_blaming_immigrants_like_trump.html

    Lees-Galloway seems to be absorbing Twyford's racist xenophobia.

    So foreign workers on temporary work visas are not immigrants
    competeing for jobs?

    Correct. They are here doing the jobs that employers cannot get locals to do, such as the guys digging a drain under my basement. You can't get locals to
    do it.

    So the plumber that does not have an apprentie is here on a temporary
    work visa - is he qualified to do plumbing work in New Zealand, JohnO?
    If you are correct it certainly explains why he would not have a New
    Zealand apprentice!

    Certainly it can be difficult to get a plumber occasionally, but I was
    not aware they were on the list of skills shortages. How did you get
    in touch with him if he works for himself - I thought those on
    temporary work visas had to be employed?

    Digging does not need any qualification. Even you might be able to do that.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Rich80105@3:770/3 to All on Thursday, February 02, 2017 13:13:04
    On Thu, 02 Feb 2017 09:14:38 +1300, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
    wrote:

    JohnO wrote:


    http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2017/02/labour_blaming_immigrants_like_trump.html

    Lees-Galloway seems to be absorbing Twyford's racist xenophobia.

    The biggest issue I see with immigration is not race but religion. Adhering >to stone age superstitions should be enough to not allow anyone in. Beliefs >matter because they lead to actions, and the Abrahamic religions in >particular lead to vile inhumane actions.

    I am sorry that your religious beliefs are so troubling to you.

    You refer to "Abrahamic" religions, from which I presume you refer to
    these: http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-GQGud-eg1HA/Ttp1HLmVtnI/AAAAAAAAABI/JjmIXghY10g/s1600/5100_Abrahamic%252520religions.gif

    Certainly there are other reigions which appear to have a history from
    earlier than thse religions - see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_religion

    How do you define "stone age", Allistar?

    Your religious beliefs are undoubtedly influenced by your own
    experience; I am surprised that you should hold such strong
    judgemental views about those that do not share your beliefs - for a
    person whop prefesses to be "libertarian" on some issues you seem to
    have a strong authoritarian streak.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From JohnO@3:770/3 to All on Wednesday, February 01, 2017 18:10:06
    On Thursday, 2 February 2017 12:56:53 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Wed, 1 Feb 2017 13:55:18 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Thursday, 2 February 2017 09:30:38 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Wed, 1 Feb 2017 11:49:22 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2017/02/labour_blaming_immigrants_like_trump.html

    Lees-Galloway seems to be absorbing Twyford's racist xenophobia.

    So foreign workers on temporary work visas are not immigrants
    competeing for jobs?

    Correct. They are here doing the jobs that employers cannot get locals to
    do, such as the guys digging a drain under my basement. You can't get locals to
    do it.

    So the plumber that does not have an apprentie is here on a temporary
    work visa

    <sigh>

    No, he is not. And I wouldn't hire a plumber to do labouring work you idiot.

    - is he qualified to do plumbing work in New Zealand, JohnO?

    <sigh> Yes he is, Dumbo. And by the way, you don't need qualifications to dig a
    trench.

    If you are correct it certainly explains why he would not have a New
    Zealand apprentice!

    Certainly it can be difficult to get a plumber occasionally, but I was
    not aware they were on the list of skills shortages.

    There's an awful lot that you aren't aware of, clearly.

    How did you get
    in touch with him if he works for himself - I thought those on
    temporary work visas had to be employed?

    <sigh>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From JohnO@3:770/3 to Fred on Wednesday, February 01, 2017 18:07:34
    On Thursday, 2 February 2017 13:01:43 UTC+13, Fred wrote:
    On 2/02/2017 12:56 PM, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Wed, 1 Feb 2017 13:55:18 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Thursday, 2 February 2017 09:30:38 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Wed, 1 Feb 2017 11:49:22 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2017/02/labour_blaming_immigrants_like_trump.html

    Lees-Galloway seems to be absorbing Twyford's racist xenophobia.

    So foreign workers on temporary work visas are not immigrants
    competeing for jobs?

    Correct. They are here doing the jobs that employers cannot get locals to
    do, such as the guys digging a drain under my basement. You can't get locals to
    do it.

    So the plumber that does not have an apprentie is here on a temporary
    work visa - is he qualified to do plumbing work in New Zealand, JohnO?
    If you are correct it certainly explains why he would not have a New Zealand apprentice!

    Certainly it can be difficult to get a plumber occasionally, but I was
    not aware they were on the list of skills shortages. How did you get
    in touch with him if he works for himself - I thought those on
    temporary work visas had to be employed?

    Digging does not need any qualification. Even you might be able to do that.

    Dickbot's an expert of digging. Especially when its already trapped in the logical hole of its own making.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Rich80105@3:770/3 to Fred on Thursday, February 02, 2017 18:02:26
    On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 13:01:42 +1300, Fred <dryrot@hotmail.com> wrote:

    On 2/02/2017 12:56 PM, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Wed, 1 Feb 2017 13:55:18 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Thursday, 2 February 2017 09:30:38 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Wed, 1 Feb 2017 11:49:22 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2017/02/labour_blaming_immigrants_like_trump.html

    Lees-Galloway seems to be absorbing Twyford's racist xenophobia.

    So foreign workers on temporary work visas are not immigrants
    competeing for jobs?

    Correct. They are here doing the jobs that employers cannot get locals to do, such as the guys digging a drain under my basement. You can't get locals to
    do it.

    So the plumber that does not have an apprentie is here on a temporary
    work visa - is he qualified to do plumbing work in New Zealand, JohnO?
    If you are correct it certainly explains why he would not have a New
    Zealand apprentice!

    Certainly it can be difficult to get a plumber occasionally, but I was
    not aware they were on the list of skills shortages. How did you get
    in touch with him if he works for himself - I thought those on
    temporary work visas had to be employed?

    Digging does not need any qualification. Even you might be able to do that.

    True, but digging a drain implied that it was the same person that he
    had talked about in another thread where he said:

    "Case in point - we have a plumber working on our renovation project.
    He has no apprentice and I asked him why, given he's flat out to the
    extent of working on Auckland Anniversary Day. His answer: not worth
    the hassle. There is a lack of quality young people to take up the
    work. The sort of people he's tried are entitled little snowflakes who
    want to be the boss from day one, don't like doing shit jobs, aren't
    reliable etc. The few good ones, who are prepared to turn up on time
    every day, work hard and not complain get snapped up, and come out
    after 4 years of paid training with a valuable qualification and start
    to make serious money, often starting their own business."

    JohnO may or may not clarify just what he really meant.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Rich80105@3:770/3 to All on Thursday, February 02, 2017 18:04:11
    On Wed, 1 Feb 2017 18:10:06 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Thursday, 2 February 2017 12:56:53 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Wed, 1 Feb 2017 13:55:18 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Thursday, 2 February 2017 09:30:38 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Wed, 1 Feb 2017 11:49:22 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2017/02/labour_blaming_immigrants_like_trump.html

    Lees-Galloway seems to be absorbing Twyford's racist xenophobia.

    So foreign workers on temporary work visas are not immigrants
    competeing for jobs?

    Correct. They are here doing the jobs that employers cannot get locals to do, such as the guys digging a drain under my basement. You can't get locals to
    do it.

    So the plumber that does not have an apprentie is here on a temporary
    work visa

    <sigh>

    No, he is not. And I wouldn't hire a plumber to do labouring work you idiot.

    - is he qualified to do plumbing work in New Zealand, JohnO?

    <sigh> Yes he is, Dumbo. And by the way, you don't need qualifications to dig a trench.

    If you are correct it certainly explains why he would not have a New
    Zealand apprentice!

    Certainly it can be difficult to get a plumber occasionally, but I was
    not aware they were on the list of skills shortages.

    There's an awful lot that you aren't aware of, clearly.

    How did you get
    in touch with him if he works for himself - I thought those on
    temporary work visas had to be employed?

    <sigh>

    Yeah it must be a bitch when you only tell half a story and it gets
    all confused. I think that has happened to me a couple of times.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From JohnO@3:770/3 to All on Wednesday, February 01, 2017 22:48:04
    On Thursday, 2 February 2017 18:02:30 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 13:01:42 +1300, Fred <dryrot@hotmail.com> wrote:

    On 2/02/2017 12:56 PM, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Wed, 1 Feb 2017 13:55:18 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Thursday, 2 February 2017 09:30:38 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Wed, 1 Feb 2017 11:49:22 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com> >>>> wrote:

    http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2017/02/labour_blaming_immigrants_like_trump.html

    Lees-Galloway seems to be absorbing Twyford's racist xenophobia.

    So foreign workers on temporary work visas are not immigrants
    competeing for jobs?

    Correct. They are here doing the jobs that employers cannot get locals to
    do, such as the guys digging a drain under my basement. You can't get locals to
    do it.

    So the plumber that does not have an apprentie is here on a temporary
    work visa - is he qualified to do plumbing work in New Zealand, JohnO?
    If you are correct it certainly explains why he would not have a New
    Zealand apprentice!

    Certainly it can be difficult to get a plumber occasionally, but I was
    not aware they were on the list of skills shortages. How did you get
    in touch with him if he works for himself - I thought those on
    temporary work visas had to be employed?

    Digging does not need any qualification. Even you might be able to do that.

    True, but digging a drain implied that it was the same person that he

    Only someone with subnormal reading comprehension would draw such a conclusion.

    had talked about in another thread where he said:

    "Case in point - we have a plumber working on our renovation project.
    He has no apprentice and I asked him why, given he's flat out to the
    extent of working on Auckland Anniversary Day. His answer: not worth
    the hassle. There is a lack of quality young people to take up the
    work. The sort of people he's tried are entitled little snowflakes who
    want to be the boss from day one, don't like doing shit jobs, aren't
    reliable etc. The few good ones, who are prepared to turn up on time
    every day, work hard and not complain get snapped up, and come out
    after 4 years of paid training with a valuable qualification and start
    to make serious money, often starting their own business."

    JohnO may or may not clarify just what he really meant.

    If you'd bothered to read down further in the VERY POST you slavishly quoted me
    you would have read:

    "We also have on site 3 foreign "students" working for AWF. They've been sweating their guts out digging a drainage trench in the basement."

    Damn you seem to love making a fool of yourself, Dickbot.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From JohnO@3:770/3 to All on Wednesday, February 01, 2017 22:49:40
    On Thursday, 2 February 2017 18:04:11 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Wed, 1 Feb 2017 18:10:06 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Thursday, 2 February 2017 12:56:53 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Wed, 1 Feb 2017 13:55:18 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Thursday, 2 February 2017 09:30:38 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Wed, 1 Feb 2017 11:49:22 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2017/02/labour_blaming_immigrants_like_trump.html

    Lees-Galloway seems to be absorbing Twyford's racist xenophobia.

    So foreign workers on temporary work visas are not immigrants
    competeing for jobs?

    Correct. They are here doing the jobs that employers cannot get locals to
    do, such as the guys digging a drain under my basement. You can't get locals to
    do it.

    So the plumber that does not have an apprentie is here on a temporary
    work visa

    <sigh>

    No, he is not. And I wouldn't hire a plumber to do labouring work you idiot.

    - is he qualified to do plumbing work in New Zealand, JohnO?

    <sigh> Yes he is, Dumbo. And by the way, you don't need qualifications to
    dig a trench.

    If you are correct it certainly explains why he would not have a New
    Zealand apprentice!

    Certainly it can be difficult to get a plumber occasionally, but I was
    not aware they were on the list of skills shortages.

    There's an awful lot that you aren't aware of, clearly.

    How did you get
    in touch with him if he works for himself - I thought those on
    temporary work visas had to be employed?

    <sigh>

    Yeah it must be a bitch when you only tell half a story and it gets
    all confused. I think that has happened to me a couple of times.

    "We also have on site 3 foreign "students" working for AWF. They've been sweating their guts out digging a drainage trench in the basement."

    There, I completed the *full story* that Dickbot was too retarded to follow.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Pooh@3:770/3 to Fred on Thursday, February 02, 2017 22:17:41
    On 2/02/2017 1:01 p.m., Fred wrote:
    On 2/02/2017 12:56 PM, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Wed, 1 Feb 2017 13:55:18 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Thursday, 2 February 2017 09:30:38 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Wed, 1 Feb 2017 11:49:22 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2017/02/labour_blaming_immigrants_like_trump.html


    Lees-Galloway seems to be absorbing Twyford's racist xenophobia.

    So foreign workers on temporary work visas are not immigrants
    competeing for jobs?

    Correct. They are here doing the jobs that employers cannot get
    locals to do, such as the guys digging a drain under my basement. You
    can't get locals to do it.

    So the plumber that does not have an apprentie is here on a temporary
    work visa - is he qualified to do plumbing work in New Zealand, JohnO?
    If you are correct it certainly explains why he would not have a New
    Zealand apprentice!

    Certainly it can be difficult to get a plumber occasionally, but I was
    not aware they were on the list of skills shortages. How did you get
    in touch with him if he works for himself - I thought those on
    temporary work visas had to be employed?

    Digging does not need any qualification. Even you might be able to do that.

    Nope! Rich is only any good at spreading Fred. Mostly bullshit! Hell
    Rich can't even dig himself out of the holes the dumb ass keeps digging
    for himself.

    Pooh

    Pooh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Pooh@3:770/3 to JohnO on Thursday, February 02, 2017 22:19:46
    On 2/02/2017 7:48 p.m., JohnO wrote:
    On Thursday, 2 February 2017 18:02:30 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 13:01:42 +1300, Fred <dryrot@hotmail.com> wrote:

    On 2/02/2017 12:56 PM, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Wed, 1 Feb 2017 13:55:18 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Thursday, 2 February 2017 09:30:38 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Wed, 1 Feb 2017 11:49:22 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote:

    http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2017/02/labour_blaming_immigrants_like_trump.html

    Lees-Galloway seems to be absorbing Twyford's racist xenophobia.

    So foreign workers on temporary work visas are not immigrants
    competeing for jobs?

    Correct. They are here doing the jobs that employers cannot get locals to
    do, such as the guys digging a drain under my basement. You can't get locals to
    do it.

    So the plumber that does not have an apprentie is here on a temporary
    work visa - is he qualified to do plumbing work in New Zealand, JohnO? >>>> If you are correct it certainly explains why he would not have a New
    Zealand apprentice!

    Certainly it can be difficult to get a plumber occasionally, but I was >>>> not aware they were on the list of skills shortages. How did you get
    in touch with him if he works for himself - I thought those on
    temporary work visas had to be employed?

    Digging does not need any qualification. Even you might be able to do that. >>
    True, but digging a drain implied that it was the same person that he

    Only someone with subnormal reading comprehension would draw such a
    conclusion.

    had talked about in another thread where he said:

    "Case in point - we have a plumber working on our renovation project.
    He has no apprentice and I asked him why, given he's flat out to the
    extent of working on Auckland Anniversary Day. His answer: not worth
    the hassle. There is a lack of quality young people to take up the
    work. The sort of people he's tried are entitled little snowflakes who
    want to be the boss from day one, don't like doing shit jobs, aren't
    reliable etc. The few good ones, who are prepared to turn up on time
    every day, work hard and not complain get snapped up, and come out
    after 4 years of paid training with a valuable qualification and start
    to make serious money, often starting their own business."

    JohnO may or may not clarify just what he really meant.

    If you'd bothered to read down further in the VERY POST you slavishly quoted
    me you would have read:

    "We also have on site 3 foreign "students" working for AWF. They've been
    sweating their guts out digging a drainage trench in the basement."

    Damn you seem to love making a fool of yourself, Dickbot.


    It's his lack of comprehension JohnO. Get's the trolling marxist muppet
    deep in it every day.

    Pooh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Pooh@3:770/3 to All on Thursday, February 02, 2017 22:20:53
    On 2/02/2017 6:04 p.m., Rich80105 wrote:
    On Wed, 1 Feb 2017 18:10:06 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Thursday, 2 February 2017 12:56:53 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Wed, 1 Feb 2017 13:55:18 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Thursday, 2 February 2017 09:30:38 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Wed, 1 Feb 2017 11:49:22 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote:

    http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2017/02/labour_blaming_immigrants_like_trump.html

    Lees-Galloway seems to be absorbing Twyford's racist xenophobia.

    So foreign workers on temporary work visas are not immigrants
    competeing for jobs?

    Correct. They are here doing the jobs that employers cannot get locals to do, such as the guys digging a drain under my basement. You can't get locals to
    do it.

    So the plumber that does not have an apprentie is here on a temporary
    work visa

    <sigh>

    No, he is not. And I wouldn't hire a plumber to do labouring work you idiot. >>
    - is he qualified to do plumbing work in New Zealand, JohnO?

    <sigh> Yes he is, Dumbo. And by the way, you don't need qualifications to dig a trench.

    If you are correct it certainly explains why he would not have a New
    Zealand apprentice!

    Certainly it can be difficult to get a plumber occasionally, but I was
    not aware they were on the list of skills shortages.

    There's an awful lot that you aren't aware of, clearly.

    How did you get
    in touch with him if he works for himself - I thought those on
    temporary work visas had to be employed?

    <sigh>

    Yeah it must be a bitch when you only tell half a story and it gets
    all confused. I think that has happened to me a couple of times.


    The bitch is your lack of comprehension troll.

    Pooh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From george152@3:770/3 to JohnO on Friday, February 03, 2017 08:09:14
    On 2/2/2017 10:55 AM, JohnO wrote:
    On Thursday, 2 February 2017 09:30:38 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Wed, 1 Feb 2017 11:49:22 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2017/02/labour_blaming_immigrants_like_trump.html >>>
    Lees-Galloway seems to be absorbing Twyford's racist xenophobia.

    So foreign workers on temporary work visas are not immigrants
    competeing for jobs?

    Correct. They are here doing the jobs that employers cannot get locals to do,
    such as the guys digging a drain under my basement. You can't get locals to do it.


    That used to be the job of the apprentice when I was in the trade :)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From george152@3:770/3 to JohnO on Friday, February 03, 2017 08:11:01
    On 2/2/2017 3:10 PM, JohnO wrote:
    On Thursday, 2 February 2017 12:56:53 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Wed, 1 Feb 2017 13:55:18 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Thursday, 2 February 2017 09:30:38 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Wed, 1 Feb 2017 11:49:22 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2017/02/labour_blaming_immigrants_like_trump.html

    Lees-Galloway seems to be absorbing Twyford's racist xenophobia.

    So foreign workers on temporary work visas are not immigrants
    competeing for jobs?

    Correct. They are here doing the jobs that employers cannot get locals to do, such as the guys digging a drain under my basement. You can't get locals to
    do it.

    So the plumber that does not have an apprentie is here on a temporary
    work visa

    <sigh>

    No, he is not. And I wouldn't hire a plumber to do labouring work you idiot.

    - is he qualified to do plumbing work in New Zealand, JohnO?

    <sigh> Yes he is, Dumbo. And by the way, you don't need qualifications to dig
    a trench.

    If you are correct it certainly explains why he would not have a New
    Zealand apprentice!

    Certainly it can be difficult to get a plumber occasionally, but I was
    not aware they were on the list of skills shortages.

    There's an awful lot that you aren't aware of, clearly.

    How did you get
    in touch with him if he works for himself - I thought those on
    temporary work visas had to be employed?

    <sigh>

    Kill file it then you wont have to feel responsible for its education

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From JohnO@3:770/3 to george on Thursday, February 02, 2017 12:57:05
    On Friday, 3 February 2017 08:09:21 UTC+13, george wrote:
    On 2/2/2017 10:55 AM, JohnO wrote:
    On Thursday, 2 February 2017 09:30:38 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Wed, 1 Feb 2017 11:49:22 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2017/02/labour_blaming_immigrants_like_trump.html

    Lees-Galloway seems to be absorbing Twyford's racist xenophobia.

    So foreign workers on temporary work visas are not immigrants
    competeing for jobs?

    Correct. They are here doing the jobs that employers cannot get locals to
    do, such as the guys digging a drain under my basement. You can't get locals to
    do it.


    That used to be the job of the apprentice when I was in the trade :)

    Yep, that and unblocking toilets!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Allistar@3:770/3 to All on Friday, February 03, 2017 10:55:38
    Rich80105 wrote:

    On Thu, 02 Feb 2017 09:14:38 +1300, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
    wrote:

    JohnO wrote:

    http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2017/02/labour_blaming_immigrants_like_trump.html >>>
    Lees-Galloway seems to be absorbing Twyford's racist xenophobia.

    The biggest issue I see with immigration is not race but religion.
    Adhering to stone age superstitions should be enough to not allow anyone >>in. Beliefs matter because they lead to actions, and the Abrahamic >>religions in particular lead to vile inhumane actions.

    I am sorry that your religious beliefs are so troubling to you.

    I have no religious beliefs.

    You refer to "Abrahamic" religions, from which I presume you refer to
    these: http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-GQGud-eg1HA/Ttp1HLmVtnI/AAAAAAAAABI/JjmIXghY10g/s1600/5100_Abrahamic%252520religions.gif

    Certainly there are other reigions which appear to have a history from earlier than thse religions - see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_religion

    Sorry, if you were making a point it has escaped me. The term "Abrahamic religion" is hardly ambiguous.

    How do you define "stone age", Allistar?

    This is also not an ambiguous term. Look it up.

    Your religious beliefs are undoubtedly influenced by your own
    experience;

    I have no religious beliefs.

    I am surprised that you should hold such strong
    judgemental views about those that do not share your beliefs

    What beliefs?

    - for a
    person whop prefesses to be "libertarian" on some issues you seem to
    have a strong authoritarian streak.

    Wanting to curb the spread of superstition and unreason is not
    authoritarian.
    --
    "From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs."
    creates the incentive to minimize your abilities and maximize your needs.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Rich80105@3:770/3 to All on Friday, February 03, 2017 12:13:29
    On Fri, 03 Feb 2017 10:55:38 +1300, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
    wrote:

    Rich80105 wrote:

    On Thu, 02 Feb 2017 09:14:38 +1300, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
    wrote:

    JohnO wrote:

    http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2017/02/labour_blaming_immigrants_like_trump.html >>>>
    Lees-Galloway seems to be absorbing Twyford's racist xenophobia.

    The biggest issue I see with immigration is not race but religion. >>>Adhering to stone age superstitions should be enough to not allow anyone >>>in. Beliefs matter because they lead to actions, and the Abrahamic >>>religions in particular lead to vile inhumane actions.

    I am sorry that your religious beliefs are so troubling to you.

    I have no religious beliefs.
    That is a belief - and religious in nature.


    You refer to "Abrahamic" religions, from which I presume you refer to
    these:
    http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-GQGud-eg1HA/Ttp1HLmVtnI/AAAAAAAAABI/JjmIXghY10g/s1600/5100_Abrahamic%252520religions.gif

    Certainly there are other reigions which appear to have a history from
    earlier than thse religions - see
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_religion

    Sorry, if you were making a point it has escaped me. The term "Abrahamic >religion" is hardly ambiguous.

    The religions you refer to did not exist in the Stone Age


    How do you define "stone age", Allistar?

    This is also not an ambiguous term. Look it up.

    Why do you think it is relevant to reigious belief by current New
    Zealanders, Allistar?


    Your religious beliefs are undoubtedly influenced by your own
    experience;

    I have no religious beliefs.
    Your judgemental view of the beliefs of others represents a belief in
    itself.


    I am surprised that you should hold such strong
    judgemental views about those that do not share your beliefs

    What beliefs?

    - for a
    person whop prefesses to be "libertarian" on some issues you seem to
    have a strong authoritarian streak.

    Wanting to curb the spread of superstition and unreason is not
    authoritarian.
    Why should your belief (or if you prefer belief that those with
    religious beliefs are wrong), take any preceence whatsoever over other
    New Zealanders who do not share your view?

    Your belief that your vew should be forced on others is authoritarian.
    Why can you not live and let live?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Pooh@3:770/3 to All on Friday, February 03, 2017 13:47:08
    On 3/02/2017 12:13 p.m., Rich80105 wrote:
    On Fri, 03 Feb 2017 10:55:38 +1300, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
    wrote:

    Rich80105 wrote:

    On Thu, 02 Feb 2017 09:14:38 +1300, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
    wrote:

    JohnO wrote:


    http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2017/02/labour_blaming_immigrants_like_trump.html

    Lees-Galloway seems to be absorbing Twyford's racist xenophobia.

    The biggest issue I see with immigration is not race but religion.
    Adhering to stone age superstitions should be enough to not allow anyone >>>> in. Beliefs matter because they lead to actions, and the Abrahamic
    religions in particular lead to vile inhumane actions.

    I am sorry that your religious beliefs are so troubling to you.

    I have no religious beliefs.
    That is a belief - and religious in nature.


    Have to keep reminding myself you're just a marxist parrot Rich. Just
    burbling words without understanding their meaning. Typical of marxist
    muppets.


    You refer to "Abrahamic" religions, from which I presume you refer to
    these:
    http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-GQGud-eg1HA/Ttp1HLmVtnI/AAAAAAAAABI/JjmIXghY10g/s1600/5100_Abrahamic%252520religions.gif

    Certainly there are other reigions which appear to have a history from
    earlier than thse religions - see
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_religion

    Sorry, if you were making a point it has escaped me. The term "Abrahamic
    religion" is hardly ambiguous.

    The religions you refer to did not exist in the Stone Age


    BULLSHIT! It's when they began you stupid bridge hugging troll!


    How do you define "stone age", Allistar?

    This is also not an ambiguous term. Look it up.

    Why do you think it is relevant to reigious belief by current New
    Zealanders, Allistar?


    Because that's when religion got started you dumb marxist muppet. It was started by idiots like you to explain what they couldn't understand.
    Much like the marxist dogma that runs your life and that of the marxist
    muppets destroying Labour!


    Your religious beliefs are undoubtedly influenced by your own
    experience;

    I have no religious beliefs.
    Your judgemental view of the beliefs of others represents a belief in
    itself.


    Only in the belief that you're not the only stupid bastard in New
    Zealand Rich.


    I am surprised that you should hold such strong
    judgemental views about those that do not share your beliefs

    What beliefs?

    - for a
    person whop prefesses to be "libertarian" on some issues you seem to
    have a strong authoritarian streak.

    Wanting to curb the spread of superstition and unreason is not
    authoritarian.
    Why should your belief (or if you prefer belief that those with
    religious beliefs are wrong), take any preceence whatsoever over other
    New Zealanders who do not share your view?


    Do you mean precedence Rich? Because it does. The majority of New
    Zealanders don't believe in any mythical gods such as Marx, Lenin, Allah
    or others. Yet the belief in these imaginary 'god's' is still
    highlighted every time parliament (the most ungodly place in NZ) sits.

    Your belief that your vew should be forced on others is authoritarian.
    Why can you not live and let live?


    Unlike your desire for marxist dogma to be forced on New Zealand
    Allistar has in no way proposed his beliefs be forced on anyone. Only in
    the typical marxist authoritarian mindset you display daily is the use
    of force to proposed to get people to change their beliefs Rich.

    Pooh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Dave Doe@3:770/3 to All on Friday, February 03, 2017 13:32:01
    In article <b2f79cd9qk6pds7tcg34sojl81b5bgjpbd@4ax.com>, rich80105 @hotmail.com, Rich80105 says...

    On Fri, 03 Feb 2017 10:55:38 +1300, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
    wrote:

    Rich80105 wrote:

    On Thu, 02 Feb 2017 09:14:38 +1300, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
    wrote:

    JohnO wrote:

    http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2017/02/labour_blaming_immigrants_like_trump.html

    Lees-Galloway seems to be absorbing Twyford's racist xenophobia.

    The biggest issue I see with immigration is not race but religion. >>>Adhering to stone age superstitions should be enough to not allow anyone >>>in. Beliefs matter because they lead to actions, and the Abrahamic >>>religions in particular lead to vile inhumane actions.

    I am sorry that your religious beliefs are so troubling to you.

    I have no religious beliefs.
    That is a belief - and religious in nature.

    One day, and it may be a long way away... you might work out the
    difference between beliefs...

    * founded belief: based on science => fact (knowledge we know to be
    true, but in good science is always subject to revision and change)
    * unfounded belief: generally based on faith => religious belief

    --
    Duncan.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Pooh@3:770/3 to Dave Doe on Friday, February 03, 2017 13:48:36
    On 3/02/2017 1:32 p.m., Dave Doe wrote:
    In article <b2f79cd9qk6pds7tcg34sojl81b5bgjpbd@4ax.com>, rich80105 @hotmail.com, Rich80105 says...

    On Fri, 03 Feb 2017 10:55:38 +1300, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
    wrote:

    Rich80105 wrote:

    On Thu, 02 Feb 2017 09:14:38 +1300, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
    wrote:

    JohnO wrote:


    http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2017/02/labour_blaming_immigrants_like_trump.html

    Lees-Galloway seems to be absorbing Twyford's racist xenophobia.

    The biggest issue I see with immigration is not race but religion.
    Adhering to stone age superstitions should be enough to not allow anyone >>>>> in. Beliefs matter because they lead to actions, and the Abrahamic
    religions in particular lead to vile inhumane actions.

    I am sorry that your religious beliefs are so troubling to you.

    I have no religious beliefs.
    That is a belief - and religious in nature.

    One day, and it may be a long way away... you might work out the
    difference between beliefs...

    * founded belief: based on science => fact (knowledge we know to be
    true, but in good science is always subject to revision and change)
    * unfounded belief: generally based on faith => religious belief


    That second description describes Richie's believe in marxism perfectly.

    Pooh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Allistar@3:770/3 to Where have I on Friday, February 03, 2017 14:21:18
    Rich80105 wrote:

    On Fri, 03 Feb 2017 10:55:38 +1300, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
    wrote:

    Rich80105 wrote:

    On Thu, 02 Feb 2017 09:14:38 +1300, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
    wrote:

    JohnO wrote:

    http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2017/02/labour_blaming_immigrants_like_trump.html >>>>>
    Lees-Galloway seems to be absorbing Twyford's racist xenophobia.

    The biggest issue I see with immigration is not race but religion. >>>>Adhering to stone age superstitions should be enough to not allow anyone >>>>in. Beliefs matter because they lead to actions, and the Abrahamic >>>>religions in particular lead to vile inhumane actions.

    I am sorry that your religious beliefs are so troubling to you.

    I have no religious beliefs.
    That is a belief - and religious in nature.

    Are you saying that the expression "I have no religious beliefs" is in
    itself a religious belief? Really?

    You refer to "Abrahamic" religions, from which I presume you refer to
    these:
    http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-GQGud-eg1HA/Ttp1HLmVtnI/AAAAAAAAABI/JjmIXghY10g/s1600/5100_Abrahamic%252520religions.gif

    Certainly there are other reigions which appear to have a history from
    earlier than thse religions - see
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_religion

    Sorry, if you were making a point it has escaped me. The term "Abrahamic >>religion" is hardly ambiguous.

    The religions you refer to did not exist in the Stone Age

    Some of them didn't, sure.

    How do you define "stone age", Allistar?

    This is also not an ambiguous term. Look it up.

    Why do you think it is relevant to reigious belief by current New
    Zealanders, Allistar?

    Why is what relevant? You'll need to be specific because your point is lost
    on me.

    Your religious beliefs are undoubtedly influenced by your own
    experience;

    I have no religious beliefs.

    Your judgemental view of the beliefs of others represents a belief in
    itself.

    A religious belief?

    I am surprised that you should hold such strong
    judgemental views about those that do not share your beliefs

    What beliefs?

    - for a
    person whop prefesses to be "libertarian" on some issues you seem to
    have a strong authoritarian streak.

    Wanting to curb the spread of superstition and unreason is not >>authoritarian.

    Why should your belief (or if you prefer belief that those with
    religious beliefs are wrong), take any preceence whatsoever over other
    New Zealanders who do not share your view?

    Who said it should?

    Why should ancient unfounded superstitions play a part in our government,
    our legal system and schools?

    Your belief that your vew should be forced on others is authoritarian.

    Where have I said that my views should be forced on others?

    Why can you not live and let live?

    As soon as religion stays out of the legal system, public schools and public policy I will consider it less important to fight ridiculous and immoral religious ideas.
    --
    "From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs."
    creates the incentive to minimize your abilities and maximize your needs.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From george152@3:770/3 to Dave Doe on Friday, February 03, 2017 15:42:13
    On 2/3/2017 1:32 PM, Dave Doe wrote:
    In article <b2f79cd9qk6pds7tcg34sojl81b5bgjpbd@4ax.com>, rich80105 @hotmail.com, Rich80105 says...

    On Fri, 03 Feb 2017 10:55:38 +1300, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
    wrote:

    Rich80105 wrote:

    On Thu, 02 Feb 2017 09:14:38 +1300, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
    wrote:

    JohnO wrote:


    http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2017/02/labour_blaming_immigrants_like_trump.html

    Lees-Galloway seems to be absorbing Twyford's racist xenophobia.

    The biggest issue I see with immigration is not race but religion.
    Adhering to stone age superstitions should be enough to not allow anyone >>>>> in. Beliefs matter because they lead to actions, and the Abrahamic
    religions in particular lead to vile inhumane actions.

    I am sorry that your religious beliefs are so troubling to you.

    I have no religious beliefs.
    That is a belief - and religious in nature.

    One day, and it may be a long way away... you might work out the
    difference between beliefs...

    * founded belief: based on science => fact (knowledge we know to be
    true, but in good science is always subject to revision and change)
    * unfounded belief: generally based on faith => religious belief


    I believe rich to be a thicko

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From george152@3:770/3 to JohnO on Friday, February 03, 2017 15:41:14
    On 2/3/2017 9:57 AM, JohnO wrote:
    On Friday, 3 February 2017 08:09:21 UTC+13, george wrote:
    On 2/2/2017 10:55 AM, JohnO wrote:
    On Thursday, 2 February 2017 09:30:38 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Wed, 1 Feb 2017 11:49:22 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2017/02/labour_blaming_immigrants_like_trump.html

    Lees-Galloway seems to be absorbing Twyford's racist xenophobia.

    So foreign workers on temporary work visas are not immigrants
    competeing for jobs?

    Correct. They are here doing the jobs that employers cannot get locals to do, such as the guys digging a drain under my basement. You can't get locals to
    do it.


    That used to be the job of the apprentice when I was in the trade :)

    Yep, that and unblocking toilets!

    Used to have walk to the local boarding house with the rods and clear
    the drains each week

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Rich80105@3:770/3 to All on Friday, February 03, 2017 22:51:23
    On Fri, 03 Feb 2017 14:21:18 +1300, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
    wrote:

    Rich80105 wrote:

    On Fri, 03 Feb 2017 10:55:38 +1300, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
    wrote:

    Rich80105 wrote:

    On Thu, 02 Feb 2017 09:14:38 +1300, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
    wrote:

    JohnO wrote:

    http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2017/02/labour_blaming_immigrants_like_trump.html

    Lees-Galloway seems to be absorbing Twyford's racist xenophobia.

    The biggest issue I see with immigration is not race but religion. >>>>>Adhering to stone age superstitions should be enough to not allow anyone >>>>>in. Beliefs matter because they lead to actions, and the Abrahamic >>>>>religions in particular lead to vile inhumane actions.

    I am sorry that your religious beliefs are so troubling to you.

    I have no religious beliefs.
    That is a belief - and religious in nature.

    Are you saying that the expression "I have no religious beliefs" is in
    itself a religious belief? Really?

    Sorry, I should have referred to your belief that religion is a
    stone-age supersitition.


    You refer to "Abrahamic" religions, from which I presume you refer to
    these:
    http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-GQGud-eg1HA/Ttp1HLmVtnI/AAAAAAAAABI/JjmIXghY10g/s1600/5100_Abrahamic%252520religions.gif

    Certainly there are other reigions which appear to have a history from >>>> earlier than thse religions - see
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_religion

    Sorry, if you were making a point it has escaped me. The term "Abrahamic >>>religion" is hardly ambiguous.

    The religions you refer to did not exist in the Stone Age

    Some of them didn't, sure.

    How do you define "stone age", Allistar?

    This is also not an ambiguous term. Look it up.

    Why do you think it is relevant to reigious belief by current New
    Zealanders, Allistar?

    Why is what relevant? You'll need to be specific because your point is lost >on me.

    Your religious beliefs are undoubtedly influenced by your own
    experience;

    I have no religious beliefs.

    Your judgemental view of the beliefs of others represents a belief in
    itself.

    A religious belief?

    I am surprised that you should hold such strong
    judgemental views about those that do not share your beliefs

    What beliefs?

    - for a
    person whop prefesses to be "libertarian" on some issues you seem to
    have a strong authoritarian streak.

    Wanting to curb the spread of superstition and unreason is not >>>authoritarian.

    Why should your belief (or if you prefer belief that those with
    religious beliefs are wrong), take any precedence whatsoever over other
    New Zealanders who do not share your view?

    Who said it should?

    You are wanting to curb the beliefs of others. You want to use your
    belief that religion is a stone-age superstition to control and
    manipulatethe beliefs of others

    Why should ancient unfounded superstitions play a part in our government,
    our legal system and schools?

    Your belief that your vew should be forced on others is authoritarian.

    Where have I said that my views should be forced on others?

    Why can you not live and let live?

    As soon as religion stays out of the legal system, public schools and public >policy I will consider it less important to fight ridiculous and immoral >religious ideas.

    I am not aware of religion needing tobe fought, but it is important
    that everyone has some understanding ofhte beliefs that motivate the
    actions and views of others. Tolerance is easier with understanding,
    and toleranceis an essential element of an ordered andnon-violent
    society. You appear to want to be provocative in your blithe dismissal
    of the views of others

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Rich80105@3:770/3 to Dave Doe on Friday, February 03, 2017 22:45:29
    On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 13:32:01 +1300, Dave Doe <hard@work.ok> wrote:

    In article <b2f79cd9qk6pds7tcg34sojl81b5bgjpbd@4ax.com>, rich80105 >@hotmail.com, Rich80105 says...

    On Fri, 03 Feb 2017 10:55:38 +1300, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
    wrote:

    Rich80105 wrote:

    On Thu, 02 Feb 2017 09:14:38 +1300, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
    wrote:

    JohnO wrote:


    http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2017/02/labour_blaming_immigrants_like_trump.html

    Lees-Galloway seems to be absorbing Twyford's racist xenophobia.

    The biggest issue I see with immigration is not race but religion.
    Adhering to stone age superstitions should be enough to not allow anyone >> >>>in. Beliefs matter because they lead to actions, and the Abrahamic
    religions in particular lead to vile inhumane actions.

    I am sorry that your religious beliefs are so troubling to you.

    I have no religious beliefs.
    That is a belief - and religious in nature.

    One day, and it may be a long way away... you might work out the
    difference between beliefs...

    * founded belief: based on science => fact (knowledge we know to be
    true, but in good science is always subject to revision and change)
    * unfounded belief: generally based on faith => religious belief

    So a belief that there is no god, or that religion beliefs are
    stone-age superstititions, can be proved by science? I look forward to
    your proof.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Pooh@3:770/3 to All on Saturday, February 04, 2017 17:55:59
    On 3/02/2017 10:45 p.m., Rich80105 wrote:
    On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 13:32:01 +1300, Dave Doe <hard@work.ok> wrote:

    In article <b2f79cd9qk6pds7tcg34sojl81b5bgjpbd@4ax.com>, rich80105
    @hotmail.com, Rich80105 says...

    On Fri, 03 Feb 2017 10:55:38 +1300, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
    wrote:

    Rich80105 wrote:

    On Thu, 02 Feb 2017 09:14:38 +1300, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
    wrote:

    JohnO wrote:


    http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2017/02/labour_blaming_immigrants_like_trump.html

    Lees-Galloway seems to be absorbing Twyford's racist xenophobia.

    The biggest issue I see with immigration is not race but religion. >>>>>> Adhering to stone age superstitions should be enough to not allow anyone >>>>>> in. Beliefs matter because they lead to actions, and the Abrahamic >>>>>> religions in particular lead to vile inhumane actions.

    I am sorry that your religious beliefs are so troubling to you.

    I have no religious beliefs.
    That is a belief - and religious in nature.

    One day, and it may be a long way away... you might work out the
    difference between beliefs...

    * founded belief: based on science => fact (knowledge we know to be
    true, but in good science is always subject to revision and change)
    * unfounded belief: generally based on faith => religious belief

    So a belief that there is no god, or that religion beliefs are
    stone-age superstititions, can be proved by science? I look forward to
    your proof.


    Go talk to an archaeologist or read some of the National Geographic and archaeology websites excellent articles on the rise of religion in the
    stone age you moronic marxist muppet! Hell you won't find anything in
    the lefty websites you seem to spend most of your time in rich. Hell I
    doubt if thestranded or norightturn have anything on religion or
    anything except their archaic belief that Engels Marx and Lenin were the
    only true apostles.

    Pooh

    Pooh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Pooh@3:770/3 to All on Saturday, February 04, 2017 22:58:50
    On 3/02/2017 10:51 p.m., Rich80105 wrote:
    On Fri, 03 Feb 2017 14:21:18 +1300, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
    wrote:

    Rich80105 wrote:

    On Fri, 03 Feb 2017 10:55:38 +1300, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
    wrote:

    Rich80105 wrote:

    On Thu, 02 Feb 2017 09:14:38 +1300, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
    wrote:

    JohnO wrote:


    http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2017/02/labour_blaming_immigrants_like_trump.html

    Lees-Galloway seems to be absorbing Twyford's racist xenophobia.

    The biggest issue I see with immigration is not race but religion. >>>>>> Adhering to stone age superstitions should be enough to not allow anyone >>>>>> in. Beliefs matter because they lead to actions, and the Abrahamic >>>>>> religions in particular lead to vile inhumane actions.

    I am sorry that your religious beliefs are so troubling to you.

    I have no religious beliefs.
    That is a belief - and religious in nature.

    Are you saying that the expression "I have no religious beliefs" is in
    itself a religious belief? Really?

    Sorry, I should have referred to your belief that religion is a
    stone-age supersitition.


    Considering the basics of it started in the stone age you are as usual
    Rich WRONG!


    You refer to "Abrahamic" religions, from which I presume you refer to >>>>> these:
    http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-GQGud-eg1HA/Ttp1HLmVtnI/AAAAAAAAABI/JjmIXghY10g/s1600/5100_Abrahamic%252520religions.gif

    Certainly there are other reigions which appear to have a history from >>>>> earlier than thse religions - see
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_religion

    Sorry, if you were making a point it has escaped me. The term "Abrahamic >>>> religion" is hardly ambiguous.

    The religions you refer to did not exist in the Stone Age

    Some of them didn't, sure.

    How do you define "stone age", Allistar?

    This is also not an ambiguous term. Look it up.

    Why do you think it is relevant to reigious belief by current New
    Zealanders, Allistar?

    Why is what relevant? You'll need to be specific because your point is lost >> on me.

    Your religious beliefs are undoubtedly influenced by your own
    experience;

    I have no religious beliefs.

    Your judgemental view of the beliefs of others represents a belief in
    itself.

    A religious belief?

    I am surprised that you should hold such strong
    judgemental views about those that do not share your beliefs

    What beliefs?

    - for a
    person whop prefesses to be "libertarian" on some issues you seem to >>>>> have a strong authoritarian streak.

    Wanting to curb the spread of superstition and unreason is not
    authoritarian.

    Why should your belief (or if you prefer belief that those with
    religious beliefs are wrong), take any precedence whatsoever over other
    New Zealanders who do not share your view?

    Who said it should?

    You are wanting to curb the beliefs of others. You want to use your
    belief that religion is a stone-age superstition to control and
    manipulatethe beliefs of others

    It's not a belief Rich it's a fact backed up by scientific evidence and
    once again your lack of any comprehension skills is letting you down Rich. Allistar hasn't proposed anything. You have however pushed the bullshit
    that Allistar has proposed such nonsense.


    Why should ancient unfounded superstitions play a part in our government,
    our legal system and schools?

    Your belief that your vew should be forced on others is authoritarian.

    Where have I said that my views should be forced on others?

    Why can you not live and let live?

    As soon as religion stays out of the legal system, public schools and public >> policy I will consider it less important to fight ridiculous and immoral
    religious ideas.

    I am not aware of religion needing tobe fought, but it is important
    that everyone has some understanding ofhte beliefs that motivate the
    actions and views of others. Tolerance is easier with understanding,
    and toleranceis an essential element of an ordered andnon-violent
    society. You appear to want to be provocative in your blithe dismissal
    of the views of others


    Yet another comprehension fail. Unlike you Allistar displays a very high tolerance of your ever more crazy misinterpretations of the world around
    you and his statements.

    Pooh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Allistar@3:770/3 to All on Monday, February 06, 2017 19:13:00
    Rich80105 wrote:

    On Fri, 03 Feb 2017 14:21:18 +1300, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
    wrote:

    Rich80105 wrote:

    On Fri, 03 Feb 2017 10:55:38 +1300, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
    wrote:

    Rich80105 wrote:

    On Thu, 02 Feb 2017 09:14:38 +1300, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
    wrote:

    JohnO wrote:

    http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2017/02/labour_blaming_immigrants_like_trump.html

    Lees-Galloway seems to be absorbing Twyford's racist xenophobia.

    The biggest issue I see with immigration is not race but religion. >>>>>>Adhering to stone age superstitions should be enough to not allow >>>>>>anyone in. Beliefs matter because they lead to actions, and the >>>>>>Abrahamic religions in particular lead to vile inhumane actions.

    I am sorry that your religious beliefs are so troubling to you.

    I have no religious beliefs.
    That is a belief - and religious in nature.

    Are you saying that the expression "I have no religious beliefs" is in >>itself a religious belief? Really?

    Sorry, I should have referred to your belief that religion is a
    stone-age supersitition.

    Some religions were founded in the stone ages. Some later. The expression "stone age" is an idiom relating to the ancient and more often that not primitive nature of modern religions.

    You refer to "Abrahamic" religions, from which I presume you refer to >>>>> these:
    http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-GQGud-eg1HA/Ttp1HLmVtnI/AAAAAAAAABI/JjmIXghY10g/s1600/5100_Abrahamic%252520religions.gif

    Certainly there are other reigions which appear to have a history from >>>>> earlier than thse religions - see
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_religion

    Sorry, if you were making a point it has escaped me. The term "Abrahamic >>>>religion" is hardly ambiguous.

    The religions you refer to did not exist in the Stone Age

    Some of them didn't, sure.

    How do you define "stone age", Allistar?

    This is also not an ambiguous term. Look it up.

    Why do you think it is relevant to reigious belief by current New
    Zealanders, Allistar?

    Why is what relevant? You'll need to be specific because your point is
    lost on me.

    Your religious beliefs are undoubtedly influenced by your own
    experience;

    I have no religious beliefs.

    Your judgemental view of the beliefs of others represents a belief in
    itself.

    A religious belief?

    I am surprised that you should hold such strong
    judgemental views about those that do not share your beliefs

    What beliefs?

    - for a
    person whop prefesses to be "libertarian" on some issues you seem to >>>>> have a strong authoritarian streak.

    Wanting to curb the spread of superstition and unreason is not >>>>authoritarian.

    Why should your belief (or if you prefer belief that those with
    religious beliefs are wrong), take any precedence whatsoever over other
    New Zealanders who do not share your view?

    Who said it should?

    You are wanting to curb the beliefs of others.

    No I'm not. I'm wanting people to stop spreading unreasonable memes to other people.

    You want to use your
    belief that religion is a stone-age superstition to control and
    manipulatethe beliefs of others

    No, I don't. I don't want to control the beliefs of anyone. To suggest that
    I do shows a massive lack of comprehension on your part.

    Why should ancient unfounded superstitions play a part in our government, >>our legal system and schools?

    Your belief that your vew should be forced on others is authoritarian.

    Where have I said that my views should be forced on others?

    Nowhere.

    Why can you not live and let live?

    As soon as religion stays out of the legal system, public schools and >>public policy I will consider it less important to fight ridiculous and >>immoral religious ideas.

    I am not aware of religion needing tobe fought,

    Then you're ignorant of the cause of many of today's ills.

    but it is important
    that everyone has some understanding ofhte beliefs that motivate the
    actions and views of others.

    It's important that people realise that beliefs have consequences. People
    act on their beliefs.

    Tolerance is easier with understanding,
    and toleranceis an essential element of an ordered andnon-violent
    society.

    Tell that to those who want to kill people who do not share their particular delusions. Tell it to those that want to tell their misguided via of reality
    in public schools.

    You appear to want to be provocative in your blithe dismissal
    of the views of others

    I have no problem being provocative when it comes to infantile, unnecessary
    and harmful superstitions. Ridiculous beliefs deserve to be ridiculed.

    I'll start respecting religious beliefs when religious beliefs become respectable. At the moment most are not.
    --
    "From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs."
    creates the incentive to minimize your abilities and maximize your needs.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Allistar@3:770/3 to All on Monday, February 06, 2017 19:15:55
    Rich80105 wrote:

    On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 13:32:01 +1300, Dave Doe <hard@work.ok> wrote:

    In article <b2f79cd9qk6pds7tcg34sojl81b5bgjpbd@4ax.com>, rich80105 >>@hotmail.com, Rich80105 says...

    On Fri, 03 Feb 2017 10:55:38 +1300, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
    wrote:

    Rich80105 wrote:

    On Thu, 02 Feb 2017 09:14:38 +1300, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
    wrote:

    JohnO wrote:


    http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2017/02/labour_blaming_immigrants_like_trump.html >>> >>>>
    Lees-Galloway seems to be absorbing Twyford's racist xenophobia.

    The biggest issue I see with immigration is not race but religion.
    Adhering to stone age superstitions should be enough to not allow
    anyone in. Beliefs matter because they lead to actions, and the
    Abrahamic religions in particular lead to vile inhumane actions.

    I am sorry that your religious beliefs are so troubling to you.

    I have no religious beliefs.
    That is a belief - and religious in nature.

    One day, and it may be a long way away... you might work out the
    difference between beliefs...

    * founded belief: based on science => fact (knowledge we know to be
    true, but in good science is always subject to revision and change)
    * unfounded belief: generally based on faith => religious belief

    So a belief that there is no god, or that religion beliefs are
    stone-age superstititions, can be proved by science? I look forward to
    your proof.

    Are you making the common mistake that an atheist believes there is no god? Some may believe that, but I don't. I lack belief in a god. That doesn't
    mean I believe none exist. A belief of lack is different to a lack of
    belief. The difference may be subtle but it's a massive difference. P.S. I
    also lack belief in unicorns and many other things.
    --
    "From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs."
    creates the incentive to minimize your abilities and maximize your needs.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Rich80105@3:770/3 to All on Monday, February 06, 2017 22:04:48
    On Mon, 06 Feb 2017 19:15:55 +1300, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
    wrote:

    Rich80105 wrote:

    On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 13:32:01 +1300, Dave Doe <hard@work.ok> wrote:

    In article <b2f79cd9qk6pds7tcg34sojl81b5bgjpbd@4ax.com>, rich80105 >>>@hotmail.com, Rich80105 says...

    On Fri, 03 Feb 2017 10:55:38 +1300, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
    wrote:

    Rich80105 wrote:

    On Thu, 02 Feb 2017 09:14:38 +1300, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com> >>>> >> wrote:

    JohnO wrote:


    http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2017/02/labour_blaming_immigrants_like_trump.html >>>> >>>>
    Lees-Galloway seems to be absorbing Twyford's racist xenophobia.

    The biggest issue I see with immigration is not race but religion.
    Adhering to stone age superstitions should be enough to not allow
    anyone in. Beliefs matter because they lead to actions, and the
    Abrahamic religions in particular lead to vile inhumane actions.

    I am sorry that your religious beliefs are so troubling to you.

    I have no religious beliefs.
    That is a belief - and religious in nature.

    One day, and it may be a long way away... you might work out the >>>difference between beliefs...

    * founded belief: based on science => fact (knowledge we know to be
    true, but in good science is always subject to revision and change)
    * unfounded belief: generally based on faith => religious belief

    So a belief that there is no god, or that religion beliefs are
    stone-age superstititions, can be proved by science? I look forward to
    your proof.

    Are you making the common mistake that an atheist believes there is no god? >Some may believe that, but I don't. I lack belief in a god. That doesn't
    mean I believe none exist. A belief of lack is different to a lack of
    belief. The difference may be subtle but it's a massive difference. P.S. I >also lack belief in unicorns and many other things.

    A lack of belief does notthen give you authority to ridicule the
    beliefs of others, and to categorise them as adopting stone-age
    superstitions and of encouraging vile inhumane actions. If you can
    prove such accusations against any individuals, then refer them to the
    police - chances are they have offended against a law - as it is you
    are close to attempting fostering hatred of others solely due to
    religious belief - I suspect that is against the law - and rightly in
    my view..

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Rich80105@3:770/3 to All on Monday, February 06, 2017 22:01:50
    On Mon, 06 Feb 2017 19:13 +1300, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
    wrote:

    Rich80105 wrote:

    On Fri, 03 Feb 2017 14:21:18 +1300, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
    wrote:

    Rich80105 wrote:

    On Fri, 03 Feb 2017 10:55:38 +1300, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
    wrote:

    Rich80105 wrote:

    On Thu, 02 Feb 2017 09:14:38 +1300, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com> >>>>>> wrote:

    JohnO wrote:

    http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2017/02/labour_blaming_immigrants_like_trump.html

    Lees-Galloway seems to be absorbing Twyford's racist xenophobia. >>>>>>>
    The biggest issue I see with immigration is not race but religion. >>>>>>>Adhering to stone age superstitions should be enough to not allow >>>>>>>anyone in. Beliefs matter because they lead to actions, and the >>>>>>>Abrahamic religions in particular lead to vile inhumane actions.

    I am sorry that your religious beliefs are so troubling to you.

    I have no religious beliefs.
    That is a belief - and religious in nature.

    Are you saying that the expression "I have no religious beliefs" is in >>>itself a religious belief? Really?

    Sorry, I should have referred to your belief that religion is a
    stone-age supersitition.

    Some religions were founded in the stone ages. Some later. The expression >"stone age" is an idiom relating to the ancient and more often that not >primitive nature of modern religions.

    You refer to "Abrahamic" religions, from which I presume you refer to >>>>>> these:
    http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-GQGud-eg1HA/Ttp1HLmVtnI/AAAAAAAAABI/JjmIXghY10g/s1600/5100_Abrahamic%252520religions.gif

    Certainly there are other reigions which appear to have a history from >>>>>> earlier than thse religions - see
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_religion

    Sorry, if you were making a point it has escaped me. The term "Abrahamic >>>>>religion" is hardly ambiguous.

    The religions you refer to did not exist in the Stone Age

    Some of them didn't, sure.

    How do you define "stone age", Allistar?

    This is also not an ambiguous term. Look it up.

    Why do you think it is relevant to reigious belief by current New
    Zealanders, Allistar?

    Why is what relevant? You'll need to be specific because your point is >>>lost on me.

    Your religious beliefs are undoubtedly influenced by your own
    experience;

    I have no religious beliefs.

    Your judgemental view of the beliefs of others represents a belief in
    itself.

    A religious belief?

    I am surprised that you should hold such strong
    judgemental views about those that do not share your beliefs

    What beliefs?

    - for a
    person whop prefesses to be "libertarian" on some issues you seem to >>>>>> have a strong authoritarian streak.

    Wanting to curb the spread of superstition and unreason is not >>>>>authoritarian.

    Why should your belief (or if you prefer belief that those with
    religious beliefs are wrong), take any precedence whatsoever over other >>>> New Zealanders who do not share your view?

    Who said it should?

    You are wanting to curb the beliefs of others.

    No I'm not. I'm wanting people to stop spreading unreasonable memes to other >people.

    That is certainly your opinion or belief, but you have not justified restricting the freedom of others to hold different beliefs. Can you
    prove any religious nelief to be wrong in itself? I certainly do not
    hold with religious beliefs being used to persecute others - it is
    merely consistent to hold that lack of a belief should not allow
    anyone to persecute those who do hold a religious belief.

    You want to use your
    belief that religion is a stone-age superstition to control and
    manipulatethe beliefs of others

    No, I don't. I don't want to control the beliefs of anyone. To suggest that
    I do shows a massive lack of comprehension on your part.

    You state below that you want to use ridicule to achieve your
    objective of minimising religious belief


    Why should ancient unfounded superstitions play a part in our government, >>>our legal system and schools?

    Your belief that your vew should be forced on others is authoritarian.

    Where have I said that my views should be forced on others?

    Nowhere.

    Why can you not live and let live?

    As soon as religion stays out of the legal system, public schools and >>>public policy I will consider it less important to fight ridiculous and >>>immoral religious ideas.

    I am not aware of religion needing tobe fought,

    Then you're ignorant of the cause of many of today's ills.
    So give an examle where religion - of itself as noted above, needs to
    be fought. You may legitimately object to actions, but beliefs? Why if
    they do not hurt anyone?


    but it is important
    that everyone has some understanding ofhte beliefs that motivate the
    actions and views of others.

    It's important that people realise that beliefs have consequences. People
    act on their beliefs.

    Often with toleration, kindness, help to those in need, comfort to the afflicted, etc, etc. What have you against those - often religious
    motivated - actions?

    Tolerance is easier with understanding,
    and toleranceis an essential element of an ordered andnon-violent
    society.

    Tell that to those who want to kill people who do not share their particular >delusions. Tell it to those that want to tell their misguided via of reality >in public schools.

    Anyone acting contrary to law should be identified and suitable
    punished - why restrict harmlessmotivation to do good because it is
    abused by a very small minority?


    You appear to want to be provocative in your blithe dismissal
    of the views of others

    I have no problem being provocative when it comes to infantile, unnecessary >and harmful superstitions. Ridiculous beliefs deserve to be ridiculed.
    Indeed I have just such an attitute to your overbearing dismissal of
    harmless mmpotivations of others who do a lot of good in our
    community.


    I'll start respecting religious beliefs when religious beliefs become >respectable. At the moment most are not.
    Again in your opinion - give examples of people in New Zealand who
    deserve to have their freedoms restricted . . .

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Pooh@3:770/3 to All on Monday, February 06, 2017 22:42:19
    On 6/02/2017 10:04 p.m., Rich80105 wrote:
    On Mon, 06 Feb 2017 19:15:55 +1300, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
    wrote:

    Rich80105 wrote:

    On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 13:32:01 +1300, Dave Doe <hard@work.ok> wrote:

    In article <b2f79cd9qk6pds7tcg34sojl81b5bgjpbd@4ax.com>, rich80105
    @hotmail.com, Rich80105 says...

    On Fri, 03 Feb 2017 10:55:38 +1300, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
    wrote:

    Rich80105 wrote:

    On Thu, 02 Feb 2017 09:14:38 +1300, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com> >>>>>>> wrote:

    JohnO wrote:



    http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2017/02/labour_blaming_immigrants_like_trump.html

    Lees-Galloway seems to be absorbing Twyford's racist xenophobia. >>>>>>>>
    The biggest issue I see with immigration is not race but religion. >>>>>>>> Adhering to stone age superstitions should be enough to not allow >>>>>>>> anyone in. Beliefs matter because they lead to actions, and the >>>>>>>> Abrahamic religions in particular lead to vile inhumane actions. >>>>>>>
    I am sorry that your religious beliefs are so troubling to you.

    I have no religious beliefs.
    That is a belief - and religious in nature.

    One day, and it may be a long way away... you might work out the
    difference between beliefs...

    * founded belief: based on science => fact (knowledge we know to be
    true, but in good science is always subject to revision and change)
    * unfounded belief: generally based on faith => religious belief

    So a belief that there is no god, or that religion beliefs are
    stone-age superstititions, can be proved by science? I look forward to
    your proof.

    Are you making the common mistake that an atheist believes there is no god? >> Some may believe that, but I don't. I lack belief in a god. That doesn't
    mean I believe none exist. A belief of lack is different to a lack of
    belief. The difference may be subtle but it's a massive difference. P.S. I >> also lack belief in unicorns and many other things.

    A lack of belief does notthen give you authority to ridicule the
    beliefs of others, and to categorise them as adopting stone-age
    superstitions and of encouraging vile inhumane actions. If you can
    prove such accusations against any individuals, then refer them to the
    police - chances are they have offended against a law - as it is you
    are close to attempting fostering hatred of others solely due to
    religious belief - I suspect that is against the law - and rightly in
    my view..

    Allistar has every right to point out inconsistencies in someone's
    beliefs Rich. But then you describing it as ridiculing beliefs doesn't
    surprise me considering how touchy you are when people point out
    inconvenient truths about your great and glorious Labour party.

    You also need to do a hell of a lot of work on your comprehension skills.

    Pooh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Allistar@3:770/3 to All on Tuesday, February 07, 2017 10:54:08
    Rich80105 wrote:

    On Mon, 06 Feb 2017 19:15:55 +1300, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
    wrote:

    Rich80105 wrote:

    On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 13:32:01 +1300, Dave Doe <hard@work.ok> wrote:

    In article <b2f79cd9qk6pds7tcg34sojl81b5bgjpbd@4ax.com>, rich80105 >>>>@hotmail.com, Rich80105 says...

    On Fri, 03 Feb 2017 10:55:38 +1300, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
    wrote:

    Rich80105 wrote:

    On Thu, 02 Feb 2017 09:14:38 +1300, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com> >>>>> >> wrote:

    JohnO wrote:


    http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2017/02/labour_blaming_immigrants_like_trump.html

    Lees-Galloway seems to be absorbing Twyford's racist xenophobia. >>>>> >>>
    The biggest issue I see with immigration is not race but religion. >>>>> >>>Adhering to stone age superstitions should be enough to not allow >>>>> >>>anyone in. Beliefs matter because they lead to actions, and the
    Abrahamic religions in particular lead to vile inhumane actions.

    I am sorry that your religious beliefs are so troubling to you.

    I have no religious beliefs.
    That is a belief - and religious in nature.

    One day, and it may be a long way away... you might work out the >>>>difference between beliefs...

    * founded belief: based on science => fact (knowledge we know to be >>>>true, but in good science is always subject to revision and change)
    * unfounded belief: generally based on faith => religious belief

    So a belief that there is no god, or that religion beliefs are
    stone-age superstititions, can be proved by science? I look forward to
    your proof.

    Are you making the common mistake that an atheist believes there is no
    god? Some may believe that, but I don't. I lack belief in a god. That >>doesn't mean I believe none exist. A belief of lack is different to a lack >>of belief. The difference may be subtle but it's a massive difference.
    P.S. I also lack belief in unicorns and many other things.

    A lack of belief does notthen give you authority to ridicule the
    beliefs of others,

    Authority is not needed to point out ridiculous ideas.

    and to categorise them as adopting stone-age
    superstitions and of encouraging vile inhumane actions. If you can
    prove such accusations against any individuals, then refer them to the
    police

    In many jurisdictions the abhorrence committed in the name of superstition
    is legal. See how women are treated in the middle east for an obvious
    example.

    - chances are they have offended against a law - as it is you
    are close to attempting fostering hatred of others solely due to
    religious belief - I suspect that is against the law - and rightly in
    my view..

    I am not and have not ever showed disrespect to individual people in this regard. I do very often show disrespect for disrespectful ideas. There is a difference.
    --
    "From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs."
    creates the incentive to minimize your abilities and maximize your needs.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Allistar@3:770/3 to All on Tuesday, February 07, 2017 10:50:42
    Rich80105 wrote:

    On Mon, 06 Feb 2017 19:13 +1300, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
    wrote:

    Rich80105 wrote:

    On Fri, 03 Feb 2017 14:21:18 +1300, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
    wrote:

    Rich80105 wrote:

    On Fri, 03 Feb 2017 10:55:38 +1300, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
    wrote:

    Rich80105 wrote:

    On Thu, 02 Feb 2017 09:14:38 +1300, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com> >>>>>>> wrote:

    JohnO wrote:

    http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2017/02/labour_blaming_immigrants_like_trump.html

    Lees-Galloway seems to be absorbing Twyford's racist xenophobia. >>>>>>>>
    The biggest issue I see with immigration is not race but religion. >>>>>>>>Adhering to stone age superstitions should be enough to not allow >>>>>>>>anyone in. Beliefs matter because they lead to actions, and the >>>>>>>>Abrahamic religions in particular lead to vile inhumane actions. >>>>>>>
    I am sorry that your religious beliefs are so troubling to you.

    I have no religious beliefs.
    That is a belief - and religious in nature.

    Are you saying that the expression "I have no religious beliefs" is in >>>>itself a religious belief? Really?

    Sorry, I should have referred to your belief that religion is a
    stone-age supersitition.

    Some religions were founded in the stone ages. Some later. The expression >>"stone age" is an idiom relating to the ancient and more often that not >>primitive nature of modern religions.

    You refer to "Abrahamic" religions, from which I presume you refer >>>>>>> to these:
    http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-GQGud-eg1HA/Ttp1HLmVtnI/AAAAAAAAABI/JjmIXghY10g/s1600/5100_Abrahamic%252520religions.gif

    Certainly there are other reigions which appear to have a history >>>>>>> from earlier than thse religions - see
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_religion

    Sorry, if you were making a point it has escaped me. The term >>>>>>"Abrahamic religion" is hardly ambiguous.

    The religions you refer to did not exist in the Stone Age

    Some of them didn't, sure.

    How do you define "stone age", Allistar?

    This is also not an ambiguous term. Look it up.

    Why do you think it is relevant to reigious belief by current New
    Zealanders, Allistar?

    Why is what relevant? You'll need to be specific because your point is >>>>lost on me.

    Your religious beliefs are undoubtedly influenced by your own
    experience;

    I have no religious beliefs.

    Your judgemental view of the beliefs of others represents a belief in >>>>> itself.

    A religious belief?

    I am surprised that you should hold such strong
    judgemental views about those that do not share your beliefs

    What beliefs?

    - for a
    person whop prefesses to be "libertarian" on some issues you seem to >>>>>>> have a strong authoritarian streak.

    Wanting to curb the spread of superstition and unreason is not >>>>>>authoritarian.

    Why should your belief (or if you prefer belief that those with
    religious beliefs are wrong), take any precedence whatsoever over
    other New Zealanders who do not share your view?

    Who said it should?

    You are wanting to curb the beliefs of others.

    No I'm not. I'm wanting people to stop spreading unreasonable memes to >>other people.

    That is certainly your opinion or belief, but you have not justified restricting the freedom of others to hold different beliefs.

    I have not suggested that people's right to hold various beliefs be
    restricted. To suggest otherwise is dishonest.

    Can you
    prove any religious nelief to be wrong in itself?

    Wrong in what sense? In the sense that it's unfounded or not "real"?

    I certainly do not
    hold with religious beliefs being used to persecute others - it is
    merely consistent to hold that lack of a belief should not allow
    anyone to persecute those who do hold a religious belief.

    Where is this faux persecution you're referring to?

    You want to use your
    belief that religion is a stone-age superstition to control and
    manipulatethe beliefs of others

    No, I don't. I don't want to control the beliefs of anyone. To suggest
    that I do shows a massive lack of comprehension on your part.

    You state below that you want to use ridicule to achieve your
    objective of minimising religious belief

    Ridiculous ideas deserve to be ridiculed. If such ridicule causes people to swap superstition for reason then that's great!

    Why should ancient unfounded superstitions play a part in our >>>>government, our legal system and schools?

    Your belief that your vew should be forced on others is authoritarian. >>>>
    Where have I said that my views should be forced on others?

    Nowhere.

    Why can you not live and let live?

    As soon as religion stays out of the legal system, public schools and >>>>public policy I will consider it less important to fight ridiculous and >>>>immoral religious ideas.

    I am not aware of religion needing tobe fought,

    Then you're ignorant of the cause of many of today's ills.

    So give an examle where religion - of itself as noted above, needs to
    be fought. You may legitimately object to actions, but beliefs? Why if
    they do not hurt anyone?

    Unreasonable beliefs tend to lead to unreasonable actions.

    Why is gay marriage an issue these days? Why is stem cell research
    curtailed? Why are condoms not used more in AIDS ridden Africa? Why are
    people killing themselves and others in an effect to get to a fictional after-life? Why are children told that if they don't believe in a particular fairy tale then they'll be punished?

    but it is important
    that everyone has some understanding ofhte beliefs that motivate the
    actions and views of others.

    It's important that people realise that beliefs have consequences. People >>act on their beliefs.

    Often with toleration, kindness, help to those in need, comfort to the afflicted, etc, etc. What have you against those - often religious
    motivated - actions?

    Those actions do not require religion. Good people will do good things, bad people will do bad things. For a good person to do a bad thing it takes religion.

    Tolerance is easier with understanding,
    and toleranceis an essential element of an ordered andnon-violent
    society.

    Tell that to those who want to kill people who do not share their >>particular delusions. Tell it to those that want to tell their misguided >>via of reality in public schools.

    Anyone acting contrary to law should be identified and suitable
    punished - why restrict harmlessmotivation to do good because it is
    abused by a very small minority?

    I'm not suggesting any motivation to do good be restricted. Doing good does
    not require you to believe a talking snake told a rib woman to eat from a
    tree of knowledge. Doing good doesn't require you to think that a god impregnated a woman to give birth to himself in order to sacrifice himself
    to get around ruled he himself created.

    Goodness doesn't require you to suspend your intellectual faculties.

    You appear to want to be provocative in your blithe dismissal
    of the views of others

    I have no problem being provocative when it comes to infantile,
    unnecessary and harmful superstitions. Ridiculous beliefs deserve to be >>ridiculed.

    Indeed I have just such an attitute to your overbearing dismissal of
    harmless mmpotivations of others who do a lot of good in our
    community.

    Good deeds do not require a superstitious framework.

    I'll start respecting religious beliefs when religious beliefs become >>respectable. At the moment most are not.

    Again in your opinion - give examples of people in New Zealand who
    deserve to have their freedoms restricted . . .

    I'm not talking about only New Zealand.
    Lying to children isn't a "freedom" people should have.

    Spreading superstitious nonsense shouldn't qualify an organisation as a
    charity in NZ. Such organisations should get no additional rights that an
    other organisation should get.
    --
    "From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs."
    creates the incentive to minimize your abilities and maximize your needs.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Dave Doe@3:770/3 to All on Thursday, February 09, 2017 11:41:51
    In article <qseg9c1dt2npc7cqnq54ktpt7nmcth1hgk@4ax.com>, rich80105 @hotmail.com, Rich80105 says...

    On Mon, 06 Feb 2017 19:15:55 +1300, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
    wrote:

    Rich80105 wrote:

    On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 13:32:01 +1300, Dave Doe <hard@work.ok> wrote:

    In article <b2f79cd9qk6pds7tcg34sojl81b5bgjpbd@4ax.com>, rich80105 >>>@hotmail.com, Rich80105 says...

    On Fri, 03 Feb 2017 10:55:38 +1300, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
    wrote:

    Rich80105 wrote:

    On Thu, 02 Feb 2017 09:14:38 +1300, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com> >>>> >> wrote:

    JohnO wrote:


    http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2017/02/labour_blaming_immigrants_like_trump.html

    Lees-Galloway seems to be absorbing Twyford's racist xenophobia. >>>> >>>
    The biggest issue I see with immigration is not race but religion. >>>> >>>Adhering to stone age superstitions should be enough to not allow >>>> >>>anyone in. Beliefs matter because they lead to actions, and the
    Abrahamic religions in particular lead to vile inhumane actions.

    I am sorry that your religious beliefs are so troubling to you.

    I have no religious beliefs.
    That is a belief - and religious in nature.

    One day, and it may be a long way away... you might work out the >>>difference between beliefs...

    * founded belief: based on science => fact (knowledge we know to be >>>true, but in good science is always subject to revision and change)
    * unfounded belief: generally based on faith => religious belief

    So a belief that there is no god, or that religion beliefs are
    stone-age superstititions, can be proved by science? I look forward to
    your proof.

    Are you making the common mistake that an atheist believes there is no god? >Some may believe that, but I don't. I lack belief in a god. That doesn't >mean I believe none exist. A belief of lack is different to a lack of >belief. The difference may be subtle but it's a massive difference. P.S. I >also lack belief in unicorns and many other things.

    A lack of belief does notthen give you authority to ridicule the
    beliefs of others, and to categorise them as adopting stone-age
    superstitions and of encouraging vile inhumane actions. If you can
    prove such accusations against any individuals, then refer them to the
    police - chances are they have offended against a law - as it is you
    are close to attempting fostering hatred of others solely due to
    religious belief - I suspect that is against the law - and rightly in
    my view..

    What an absolute load of rubbish! Human rights themselves are a human
    contruct and subject to constant evolution.

    Any belief should be well ridiculed should it be unfounded.

    Suggest you find and read, Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind, by
    Yuval Noah Harari.

    --
    Duncan.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Dave Doe@3:770/3 to All on Thursday, February 09, 2017 11:36:15
    In article <58k89cdb5l9n8fa06gvik5pmf7evbp8acv@4ax.com>, rich80105 @hotmail.com, Rich80105 says...

    On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 13:32:01 +1300, Dave Doe <hard@work.ok> wrote:

    In article <b2f79cd9qk6pds7tcg34sojl81b5bgjpbd@4ax.com>, rich80105 >@hotmail.com, Rich80105 says...

    On Fri, 03 Feb 2017 10:55:38 +1300, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
    wrote:

    Rich80105 wrote:

    On Thu, 02 Feb 2017 09:14:38 +1300, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
    wrote:

    JohnO wrote:


    http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2017/02/labour_blaming_immigrants_like_trump.html

    Lees-Galloway seems to be absorbing Twyford's racist xenophobia.

    The biggest issue I see with immigration is not race but religion.
    Adhering to stone age superstitions should be enough to not allow
    anyone
    in. Beliefs matter because they lead to actions, and the Abrahamic
    religions in particular lead to vile inhumane actions.

    I am sorry that your religious beliefs are so troubling to you.

    I have no religious beliefs.
    That is a belief - and religious in nature.

    One day, and it may be a long way away... you might work out the
    difference between beliefs...

    * founded belief: based on science => fact (knowledge we know to be
    true, but in good science is always subject to revision and change)
    * unfounded belief: generally based on faith => religious belief

    So a belief that there is no god, or that religion beliefs are
    stone-age superstititions, can be proved by science? I look forward to
    your proof.

    It seems I was correct, that it's going to take you a long long time to understand the difference between founded and unfounded beleifs.

    To your goalpost moving question about god (you don't make any reference
    to which one) - yes, it's trivially proved really. There are several documented cases of asian islands that have been visited and made
    instant gods by there godlike abilities to light fires point pole like
    things at natives a hundred meters away and with a bang, they drop dead.
    To the god you are probably referring of, one could and should apply
    simple logic and reason and say that until proven, god does *not* exist.
    This simple reasoning should apply to any belief.

    --
    Duncan.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)