Contempt for the law got her a spell in the naughty box - will itWhat privacy has she breached and which law has she treated with contempt?
happen again, or does National believe laws are only for other people,
and that provided a Nat is opponents anything goes? >http://www.newshub.co.nz/politics/collins-outs-davis-prison-source-2016021618#ixzz40MqSs8u2
Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
Contempt for the law got her a spell in the naughty box - will itWhat privacy has she breached and which law has she treated with contempt?
happen again, or does National believe laws are only for other people,
and that provided a Nat is opponents anything goes? >>http://www.newshub.co.nz/politics/collins-outs-davis-prison-source-2016021618#ixzz40MqSs8u2
I think you are making up childish nonsense. There is such a thing as >parliamentary provilege which all parties use. I believe this comes under that >ruling.
Tony
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 20:52:03 -0600, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
dot nz> wrote:
Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
Contempt for the law got her a spell in the naughty box - will itWhat privacy has she breached and which law has she treated with contempt? >>I think you are making up childish nonsense. There is such a thing as >>parliamentary provilege which all parties use. I believe this comes under >>that ruling.
happen again, or does National believe laws are only for other people, >>>and that provided a Nat is opponents anything goes? >>>http://www.newshub.co.nz/politics/collins-outs-davis-prison-source-2016021618#ixzz40MqSs8u2
Tony
Personal information is made available for corrections purposes. Both
the prisoner and visitor have a right to their privacy, and using
personal information for other than the purposes provided ghoes
against the principles of privacy legislaton. I am not a lawyer, so
cannot quote you the clause in legislation or what charge could be
used, but for a Minioster of the Crown to use private information for political purposes is disgraceful as well as showing contempt for both
the law and common decency.
She claims that who visits who is common knowledge within corrections
- it should have stayed there, and the public service should be
ashamed at the Minister having been given the inforamtion.
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 20:52:03 -0600, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot netShe did nothing that dozens of other politicians have done under parliamentary privilege.
dot nz> wrote:
Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
Contempt for the law got her a spell in the naughty box - will itWhat privacy has she breached and which law has she treated with contempt? >>I think you are making up childish nonsense. There is such a thing as >>parliamentary provilege which all parties use. I believe this comes under >>that
happen again, or does National believe laws are only for other people, >>>and that provided a Nat is opponents anything goes? >>>http://www.newshub.co.nz/politics/collins-outs-davis-prison-source-2016021618#ixzz40MqSs8u2
ruling.
Tony
Personal information is made available for corrections purposes. Both
the prisoner and visitor have a right to their privacy, and using
personal information for other than the purposes provided ghoes
against the principles of privacy legislaton. I am not a lawyer, so
cannot quote you the clause in legislation or what charge could be
used, but for a Minioster of the Crown to use private information for >political purposes is disgraceful as well as showing contempt for both
the law and common decency.
She claims that who visits who is common knowledge within corrections
- it should have stayed there, and the public service should be
ashamed at the Minister having been given the inforamtion.
Contempt for the law got her a spell in the naughty box - will it
happen again, or does National believe laws are only for other people,
and that provided a Nat is opponents anything goes? >http://www.newshub.co.nz/politics/collins-outs-davis-prison-source-2016021618#ixzz40MqSs8u2
On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 15:37:04 +1300, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Contempt for the law got her a spell in the naughty box - will it
happen again, or does National believe laws are only for other people,
and that provided a Nat is opponents anything goes? >>http://www.newshub.co.nz/politics/collins-outs-davis-prison-source-2016021618#ixzz40MqSs8u2
Rich is posting crap again
At first blush, it did seem Collins had narked on Davis for spending
quality time with hardened crims. The next day, when asked how she
came by the information, she insisted everyone in the world already
knew about it. This was true - the Herald had reported on Davis' visit
to Taylor in August last year
http://www.whaleoil.co.nz/2016/02/shes-back-claire-trevett-says-so/#more-234194
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 20:52:03 -0600, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
dot nz> wrote:
Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
Contempt for the law got her a spell in the naughty box - will itWhat privacy has she breached and which law has she treated with contempt? >>I think you are making up childish nonsense. There is such a thing as >>parliamentary provilege which all parties use. I believe this comes under >>that
happen again, or does National believe laws are only for other people, >>>and that provided a Nat is opponents anything goes? >>>http://www.newshub.co.nz/politics/collins-outs-davis-prison-source-2016021618#ixzz40MqSs8u2
ruling.
Tony
Personal information is made available for corrections purposes. Both
the prisoner and visitor have a right to their privacy, and using
personal information for other than the purposes provided ghoes
against the principles of privacy legislaton. I am not a lawyer, so
cannot quote you the clause in legislation or what charge could be
used, but for a Minioster of the Crown to use private information for political purposes is disgraceful as well as showing contempt for both
the law and common decency.
She claims that who visits who is common knowledge within corrections
- it should have stayed there, and the public service should be
ashamed at the Minister having been given the inforamtion.
Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 20:52:03 -0600, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot netShe did nothing that dozens of other politicians have done under parliamentary
dot nz> wrote:
Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
Contempt for the law got her a spell in the naughty box - will it >>>>happen again, or does National believe laws are only for other people, >>>>and that provided a Nat is opponents anything goes? >>>>http://www.newshub.co.nz/politics/collins-outs-davis-prison-source-2016021618#ixzz40MqSs8u2What privacy has she breached and which law has she treated with >>>contempt?
I think you are making up childish nonsense. There is such a thing as >>>parliamentary provilege which all parties use. I believe this comes under >>>that
ruling.
Tony
Personal information is made available for corrections purposes. Both
the prisoner and visitor have a right to their privacy, and using
personal information for other than the purposes provided ghoes
against the principles of privacy legislaton. I am not a lawyer, so
cannot quote you the clause in legislation or what charge could be
used, but for a Minioster of the Crown to use private information for >>political purposes is disgraceful as well as showing contempt for both
the law and common decency.
She claims that who visits who is common knowledge within corrections
- it should have stayed there, and the public service should be
ashamed at the Minister having been given the inforamtion.
privilege.
You can't quote anything yet you are as usual adamant that you are right. Bullshit!
Tony
Contempt for the law got her a spell in the naughty box - will it
happen again, or does National believe laws are only for other people,
and that provided a Nat is opponents anything goes? http://www.newshub.co.nz/politics/collins-outs-davis-prison-source-2016021618#ixzz40MqSs8u2
| Sysop: | sneaky |
|---|---|
| Location: | Ashburton,NZ |
| Users: | 31 |
| Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
| Uptime: | 188:10:07 |
| Calls: | 2,081 |
| Calls today: | 4 |
| Files: | 11,137 |
| Messages: | 947,662 |