Nats have 4 of 59 MPs (7%) retiring, and it's a "flood". http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&objectid=11767118
Oh and Audrey, dear, 4 of 59 Nat MPs is 7% not 10%.
Greens have 2 of 14 MPs (14%) retiring and it's a *nothing* apparently. http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&objectid=11767501
Q: Who is retiring from Labour? Shearer, Cosgrove, Cunliffe. Anyone else? 3of 31 really is about 10% Audrey. Is that not a flood too? Apparently not even remarkable enough to report on.
On 12/15/2016 11:02 AM, JohnO wrote:
Nats have 4 of 59 MPs (7%) retiring, and it's a "flood".The Horrid wants me to get their paper free for X number of weeks.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&objectid=11767118
Oh and Audrey, dear, 4 of 59 Nat MPs is 7% not 10%.
Greens have 2 of 14 MPs (14%) retiring and it's a *nothing* apparently.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&objectid=11767501
Q: Who is retiring from Labour? Shearer, Cosgrove, Cunliffe. Anyone else? 3 of 31 really is about 10% Audrey. Is that not a flood too? Apparently not even remarkable enough to report on.
Why should I add to their dying tree publication circulating lies ?????
On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 11:06:16 +1300, george152 <gblack@hnpl.net> wrote:3 of 31 really is about 10% Audrey. Is that not a flood too? Apparently not even remarkable enough to report on.
On 12/15/2016 11:02 AM, JohnO wrote:
Nats have 4 of 59 MPs (7%) retiring, and it's a "flood".
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&objectid=11767118
Oh and Audrey, dear, 4 of 59 Nat MPs is 7% not 10%.
Greens have 2 of 14 MPs (14%) retiring and it's a *nothing* apparently.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&objectid=11767501
Q: Who is retiring from Labour? Shearer, Cosgrove, Cunliffe. Anyone else?
The Horrid wants me to get their paper free for X number of weeks.
Why should I add to their dying tree publication circulating lies ?????
The Dom-post are also making the same offer in their circulation area
- we discussed it and decided it was not worth the work of pcking it
up each morning and getting rid of the waste paper.
The problem however is that falling circulation is leading to
desperate cost-cutting measures in the media, with a tendency to rely
on (cheaper) opinion rather than fact, and "reporters" (not many
qualify as journalists any more) who have their own (and the owners) political biasses to push - leading down to the appalling Audrey
referred to above, who is nevertheless more subtle than the more
appalling Paul Henry and Mike Hosking on TV - thankfully one of those
is going.
It suits the government to keep real argument off the front pages, and
it also suits them to have the lazy mantra of "balance" giving equal
time and credibility to charlatans and con-merchants as to genuine
experts and professionals
Nats have 4 of 59 MPs (7%) retiring, and it's a "flood". http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&objectid=11767118
Oh and Audrey, dear, 4 of 59 Nat MPs is 7% not 10%.
Greens have 2 of 14 MPs (14%) retiring and it's a *nothing* apparently. http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&objectid=11767501
Q: Who is retiring from Labour? Shearer, Cosgrove, Cunliffe. Anyone else? 3of 31 really is about 10% Audrey. Is that not a flood too? Apparently not even remarkable enough to report on.
On 15/12/16 11:02, JohnO wrote:
Nats have 4 of 59 MPs (7%) retiring, and it's a "flood".
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&objectid=11767118
Oh and Audrey, dear, 4 of 59 Nat MPs is 7% not 10%.
Greens have 2 of 14 MPs (14%) retiring and it's a *nothing* apparently.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&objectid=11767501
Q: Who is retiring from Labour? Shearer, Cosgrove, Cunliffe. Anyone else? 3 of 31 really is about 10% Audrey. Is that not a flood too? Apparently not even remarkable enough to report on.
Leaving out that Goof (another former leader) has left the building already.
The problem however is that falling circulation is leading to
desperate cost-cutting measures in the media, with a tendency to rely
on (cheaper) opinion rather than fact, and "reporters" (not many
qualify as journalists any more) who have their own (and the owners) >political biasses to push - leading down to the appalling Audrey
referred to above, who is nevertheless more subtle than the more
appalling Paul Henry and Mike Hosking on TV - thankfully one of those
is going.
On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 11:38:31 +1300, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Any comments about Audrey Young are usually in reponse to othersThe problem however is that falling circulation is leading to
desperate cost-cutting measures in the media, with a tendency to rely
on (cheaper) opinion rather than fact, and "reporters" (not many
qualify as journalists any more) who have their own (and the owners) >>political biasses to push - leading down to the appalling Audrey
referred to above, who is nevertheless more subtle than the more
appalling Paul Henry and Mike Hosking on TV - thankfully one of those
is going.
It's somewhat ironic that you should post the above when so much of
the stuff you quote here is cut and pasted from those very
publications.
Bill.
On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 15:14:12 +1300, greybeard <nobody@nowhere.invalid>3 of 31 really is about 10% Audrey. Is that not a flood too? Apparently not even remarkable enough to report on.
wrote:
On 15/12/16 11:02, JohnO wrote:
Nats have 4 of 59 MPs (7%) retiring, and it's a "flood".
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&objectid=11767118
Oh and Audrey, dear, 4 of 59 Nat MPs is 7% not 10%.
Greens have 2 of 14 MPs (14%) retiring and it's a *nothing* apparently.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&objectid=11767501
Q: Who is retiring from Labour? Shearer, Cosgrove, Cunliffe. Anyone else?
Leaving out that Goof (another former leader) has left the building already.
And now we hear that McCully has received the message. Renewal or
removal of dead wood? I suspect most see it as a bit of both, with
some Ministers still faking being alive - Gerry Brownlee was
apparently offended by being told by someone in Kaikoura that he is a
waste of space; I'm sure it is a common view!
Interesting responses though - not all will ge as sympathetic a send
off as Shearer: http://www.nzherald.co.nz/wanganui-chronicle/opinion/news/article.cfm?c_id=1503423&objectid=11766115
On Thursday, 15 December 2016 18:08:48 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:3 of 31 really is about 10% Audrey. Is that not a flood too? Apparently not even remarkable enough to report on.
On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 15:14:12 +1300, greybeard <nobody@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 15/12/16 11:02, JohnO wrote:
Nats have 4 of 59 MPs (7%) retiring, and it's a "flood".
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&objectid=11767118
Oh and Audrey, dear, 4 of 59 Nat MPs is 7% not 10%.
Greens have 2 of 14 MPs (14%) retiring and it's a *nothing* apparently. >> >> http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&objectid=11767501
Q: Who is retiring from Labour? Shearer, Cosgrove, Cunliffe. Anyone else?
Another deliberate "typo" from you JohnO - you must be desperate!
Leaving out that Goof (another former leader) has left the building already.
And now we hear that McCully has received the message. Renewal or
removal of dead wood? I suspect most see it as a bit of both, with
some Ministers still faking being alive - Gerry Brownlee was
apparently offended by being told by someone in Kaikoura that he is a
waste of space; I'm sure it is a common view!
Stop the lies. He was defending the NZTA from unfair criticism. That's one of the many differences about National; they defend the public service but Labour stab them in the back.
Interesting responses though - not all will ge as sympathetic a send
off as Shearer:
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/wanganui-chronicle/opinion/news/article.cfm?c_id=1503423&objectid=11766115
On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 22:40:53 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>else? 3 of 31 really is about 10% Audrey. Is that not a flood too? Apparently not even remarkable enough to report on.
wrote:
On Thursday, 15 December 2016 18:08:48 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 15:14:12 +1300, greybeard <nobody@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 15/12/16 11:02, JohnO wrote:
Nats have 4 of 59 MPs (7%) retiring, and it's a "flood".
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&objectid=11767118
Oh and Audrey, dear, 4 of 59 Nat MPs is 7% not 10%.
Greens have 2 of 14 MPs (14%) retiring and it's a *nothing* apparently. >> >> http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&objectid=11767501
Q: Who is retiring from Labour? Shearer, Cosgrove, Cunliffe. Anyone
already.
Leaving out that Goof (another former leader) has left the building
Another deliberate "typo" from you JohnO - you must be desperate!of the many differences about National; they defend the public service but Labour stab them in the back.
And now we hear that McCully has received the message. Renewal or
removal of dead wood? I suspect most see it as a bit of both, with
some Ministers still faking being alive - Gerry Brownlee was
apparently offended by being told by someone in Kaikoura that he is a
waste of space; I'm sure it is a common view!
Stop the lies. He was defending the NZTA from unfair criticism. That's one
Really?
Read this:
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/nz-earthquake/87590358/pm-bill-english-flies-to-earthquakehit-kaikoura?cid=facebook.post.87590358
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11767842
Remind you of something? - if so it is probably this:
http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/news/christchurch-earthquake-2011/7656654/Brownlee-fed-up-with-moaning-residents
and I suspect from putting the two together someone has put this
together
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Czs3VgKUQAAKQA8.jpg
(Its too well put together to be Whaleoil; sorry I don't know the
author, but like all satire it appears to contain more than a smidgeon
of truth - in fact without having seen a denial perhaps it is the
truth; Bill will have a few hard decisions to make before Sunday; he's fishing in a very shallow pool . . . )
Interesting responses though - not all will ge as sympathetic a send
off as Shearer:
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/wanganui-chronicle/opinion/news/article.cfm?c_id=1503423&objectid=11766115
and regarding Goff (see above), it seems he has started very well : http://m.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11765928
I do not expect any of those National people leaving are likely to get
a positive mention in the press . . .
So an understandably frustrated but altogether ignorant farmer is having awhinge that "nothing has happened" when in fact an enormous amount of work has to be done before they go blundering in and start moving rocks.
On 12/16/2016 8:09 AM, JohnO wrote:
whinge that "nothing has happened" when in fact an enormous amount of work has to be done before they go blundering in and start moving rocks.So an understandably frustrated but altogether ignorant farmer is having a
That cocky would really have something to moan about if Liebor were
running the show...
and just why shouldn't the minister in charge of fixing disasters get
tetchy with the bystanders when they're proving to be pisswits ?
On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 11:38:31 +1300, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com>
wrote:
The problem however is that falling circulation is leading to
desperate cost-cutting measures in the media, with a tendency to rely
on (cheaper) opinion rather than fact, and "reporters" (not many
qualify as journalists any more) who have their own (and the owners)
political biasses to push - leading down to the appalling Audrey
referred to above, who is nevertheless more subtle than the more
appalling Paul Henry and Mike Hosking on TV - thankfully one of those
is going.
It's somewhat ironic that you should post the above when so much of
the stuff you quote here is cut and pasted from those very
publications.
Bill.
On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 15:14:12 +1300, greybeard <nobody@nowhere.invalid>of 31 really is about 10% Audrey. Is that not a flood too? Apparently not even remarkable enough to report on.
wrote:
On 15/12/16 11:02, JohnO wrote:
Nats have 4 of 59 MPs (7%) retiring, and it's a "flood".
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&objectid=11767118
Oh and Audrey, dear, 4 of 59 Nat MPs is 7% not 10%.
Greens have 2 of 14 MPs (14%) retiring and it's a *nothing* apparently.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&objectid=11767501
Q: Who is retiring from Labour? Shearer, Cosgrove, Cunliffe. Anyone else? 3
Leaving out that Goof (another former leader) has left the building already.
And now we hear that McCully has received the message. Renewal or
removal of dead wood? I suspect most see it as a bit of both, with
some Ministers still faking being alive - Gerry Brownlee was
apparently offended by being told by someone in Kaikoura that he is a
waste of space; I'm sure it is a common view!
Interesting responses though - not all will ge as sympathetic a send
off as Shearer: http://www.nzherald.co.nz/wanganui-chronicle/opinion/news/article.cfm?c_id=1503423&objectid=11766115
On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 22:40:53 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>3 of 31 really is about 10% Audrey. Is that not a flood too? Apparently not even remarkable enough to report on.
wrote:
On Thursday, 15 December 2016 18:08:48 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 15:14:12 +1300, greybeard <nobody@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 15/12/16 11:02, JohnO wrote:
Nats have 4 of 59 MPs (7%) retiring, and it's a "flood".
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&objectid=11767118
Oh and Audrey, dear, 4 of 59 Nat MPs is 7% not 10%.
Greens have 2 of 14 MPs (14%) retiring and it's a *nothing* apparently. >>>>> http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&objectid=11767501
Q: Who is retiring from Labour? Shearer, Cosgrove, Cunliffe. Anyone else?
Another deliberate "typo" from you JohnO - you must be desperate!
Leaving out that Goof (another former leader) has left the building already.
And now we hear that McCully has received the message. Renewal or
removal of dead wood? I suspect most see it as a bit of both, with
some Ministers still faking being alive - Gerry Brownlee was
apparently offended by being told by someone in Kaikoura that he is a
waste of space; I'm sure it is a common view!
Stop the lies. He was defending the NZTA from unfair criticism. That's one of the many differences about National; they defend the public service but Labour stab them in the back.
Really? Read this: http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/nz-earthquake/87590358/pm-bill-english-flies-to-earthquakehit-kaikoura?cid=facebook.post.87590358
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11767842
Interesting responses though - not all will ge as sympathetic a send
off as Shearer:
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/wanganui-chronicle/opinion/news/article.cfm?c_id=1503423&objectid=11766115
and regarding Goff (see above), it seems he has started very well : http://m.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11765928
I do not expect any of those National people leaving are likely to get
a positive mention in the press . . .
On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 17:24:23 +1300, BR <buggeroff@spammer.com> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 11:38:31 +1300, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com>Any comments about Audrey Young are usually in reponse to others
wrote:
The problem however is that falling circulation is leading to
desperate cost-cutting measures in the media, with a tendency to rely
on (cheaper) opinion rather than fact, and "reporters" (not many
qualify as journalists any more) who have their own (and the owners)
political biasses to push - leading down to the appalling Audrey
referred to above, who is nevertheless more subtle than the more
appalling Paul Henry and Mike Hosking on TV - thankfully one of those
is going.
It's somewhat ironic that you should post the above when so much of
the stuff you quote here is cut and pasted from those very
publications.
Bill.
posting her breathless (and often thoughtless) unwarranted praise for
some failure of government; I cannot recall quoting Henry or Hosking -
are you projecting your own behaviour?
On Friday, 16 December 2016 08:21:27 UTC+13, george wrote:down hills etc. Sorting it out all is dangerous, expensive work and it needs to
On 12/16/2016 8:09 AM, JohnO wrote:
So an understandably frustrated but altogether ignorant farmer is having a whinge that "nothing has happened" when in fact an enormous amount of work has to be done before they go blundering in and start moving rocks.That cocky would really have something to moan about if Liebor were
running the show...
and just why shouldn't the minister in charge of fixing disasters get
tetchy with the bystanders when they're proving to be pisswits ?
Even so, Brownlie shouldn't have risen to the bait.
But there are still aftershocks, there's still huge risks with rocks tumbling
On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 22:40:53 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>else? 3 of 31 really is about 10% Audrey. Is that not a flood too? Apparently not even remarkable enough to report on.
wrote:
On Thursday, 15 December 2016 18:08:48 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 15:14:12 +1300, greybeard <nobody@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 15/12/16 11:02, JohnO wrote:
Nats have 4 of 59 MPs (7%) retiring, and it's a "flood".
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&objectid=11767118
Oh and Audrey, dear, 4 of 59 Nat MPs is 7% not 10%.
Greens have 2 of 14 MPs (14%) retiring and it's a *nothing* apparently. >> >> http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&objectid=11767501
Q: Who is retiring from Labour? Shearer, Cosgrove, Cunliffe. Anyone
already.
Leaving out that Goof (another former leader) has left the building
Another deliberate "typo" from you JohnO - you must be desperate!
of the many differences about National; they defend the public service but Labour stab them in the back.
And now we hear that McCully has received the message. Renewal or
removal of dead wood? I suspect most see it as a bit of both, with
some Ministers still faking being alive - Gerry Brownlee was
apparently offended by being told by someone in Kaikoura that he is a
waste of space; I'm sure it is a common view!
Stop the lies. He was defending the NZTA from unfair criticism. That's one
Really? Read this: http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/nz-earthquake/87590358/pm-bill-english-flies-to-earthquakehit-kaikoura?cid=facebook.post.87590358
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11767842
Remind you of something? - if so it is probably this:
http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/news/christchurch-earthquake-2011/7656654/Brownlee-fed-up-with-moaning-residents
and I suspect from putting the two together someone has put this
together
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Czs3VgKUQAAKQA8.jpg
(Its too well put together to be Whaleoil; sorry I don't know the
author, but like all satire it appears to contain more than a smidgeon
of truth - in fact without having seen a denial perhaps it is the
truth; Bill will have a few hard decisions to make before Sunday; he's fishing in a very shallow pool . . . )
Interesting responses though - not all will ge as sympathetic a send
off as Shearer:
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/wanganui-chronicle/opinion/news/article.cfm?c_id=1503423&objectid=11766115
and regarding Goff (see above), it seems he has started very well : http://m.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11765928
I do not expect any of those National people leaving are likely to get
a positive mention in the press . . .
On Thursday, 15 December 2016 23:04:01 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 22:40:53 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Thursday, 15 December 2016 18:08:48 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:Another deliberate "typo" from you JohnO - you must be desperate!
On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 15:14:12 +1300, greybeard <nobody@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 15/12/16 11:02, JohnO wrote:
Nats have 4 of 59 MPs (7%) retiring, and it's a "flood".
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&objectid=11767118
Oh and Audrey, dear, 4 of 59 Nat MPs is 7% not 10%.
Greens have 2 of 14 MPs (14%) retiring and it's a *nothing* apparently.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&objectid=11767501
Q: Who is retiring from Labour? Shearer, Cosgrove, Cunliffe. Anyone else? 3 of 31 really is about 10% Audrey. Is that not a flood too? Apparently not even remarkable enough to report on.
Leaving out that Goof (another former leader) has left the building already.
And now we hear that McCully has received the message. Renewal or
removal of dead wood? I suspect most see it as a bit of both, with
some Ministers still faking being alive - Gerry Brownlee was
apparently offended by being told by someone in Kaikoura that he is a
waste of space; I'm sure it is a common view!
Stop the lies. He was defending the NZTA from unfair criticism. That's one of the many differences about National; they defend the public service but Labour stab them in the back.
Really?
Yes. Really.
Read this:
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/nz-earthquake/87590358/pm-bill-english-flies-to-earthquakehit-kaikoura?cid=facebook.post.87590358
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11767842
Yes, already read it, this is what we are discussing you fool.
So an understandably frustrated but altogether ignorant farmer is having a whinge that "nothing has happened" when in fact an enormous amount of work has to be done before they go blundering in and start moving rocks.
Remind you of something? - if so it is probably this:
http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/news/christchurch-earthquake-2011/7656654/Brownlee-fed-up-with-moaning-residents
and I suspect from putting the two together someone has put this
together
Well it would be par for the course for you to put one and one together and make three, Dickbot.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Czs3VgKUQAAKQA8.jpg
(Its too well put together to be Whaleoil; sorry I don't know the
author, but like all satire it appears to contain more than a smidgeon
of truth - in fact without having seen a denial perhaps it is the
truth; Bill will have a few hard decisions to make before Sunday; he's
fishing in a very shallow pool . . . )
Interesting responses though - not all will ge as sympathetic a send
off as Shearer:
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/wanganui-chronicle/opinion/news/article.cfm?c_id=1503423&objectid=11766115
and regarding Goff (see above), it seems he has started very well :
http://m.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11765928
Irrelevant diversion.
I do not expect any of those National people leaving are likely to get
a positive mention in the press . . .
Irrelevant (and nasty, spiteful) diversion.
On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 11:09:47 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com><nobody@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On Thursday, 15 December 2016 23:04:01 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 22:40:53 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Thursday, 15 December 2016 18:08:48 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 15:14:12 +1300, greybeard
Anyone else? 3 of 31 really is about 10% Audrey. Is that not a flood too? Apparently not even remarkable enough to report on.wrote:
On 15/12/16 11:02, JohnO wrote:
Nats have 4 of 59 MPs (7%) retiring, and it's a "flood".
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm? c_id=280&objectid=11767118
Oh and Audrey, dear, 4 of 59 Nat MPs is 7% not 10%.
Greens have 2 of 14 MPs (14%) retiring and it's a *nothing* apparently.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm? c_id=280&objectid=11767501
Q: Who is retiring from Labour? Shearer, Cosgrove, Cunliffe.
building already.
Leaving out that Goof (another former leader) has left the
is aAnother deliberate "typo" from you JohnO - you must be desperate!
And now we hear that McCully has received the message. Renewal or
removal of dead wood? I suspect most see it as a bit of both, with
some Ministers still faking being alive - Gerry Brownlee was
apparently offended by being told by someone in Kaikoura that he
That's one of the many differences about National; they defend the public service but Labour stab them in the back.waste of space; I'm sure it is a common view!
Stop the lies. He was defending the NZTA from unfair criticism.
having a whinge that "nothing has happened" when in fact an enormous
Really?
Yes. Really.
Read this:
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/nz-earthquake/87590358/pm-bill- english-flies-to-earthquakehit-kaikoura?cid=facebook.post.87590358
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11767842
Yes, already read it, this is what we are discussing you fool.
So an understandably frustrated but altogether ignorant farmer is
and make three, Dickbot.
Remind you of something? - if so it is probably this:
http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/news/christchurch- earthquake-2011/7656654/Brownlee-fed-up-with-moaning-residents
and I suspect from putting the two together someone has put this
together
Well it would be par for the course for you to put one and one together
send
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Czs3VgKUQAAKQA8.jpg
(Its too well put together to be Whaleoil; sorry I don't know the
author, but like all satire it appears to contain more than a smidgeon
of truth - in fact without having seen a denial perhaps it is the
truth; Bill will have a few hard decisions to make before Sunday; he's
fishing in a very shallow pool . . . )
Interesting responses though - not all will ge as sympathetic a
c_id=3&objectid=11765928off as Shearer:
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/wanganui-chronicle/opinion/news/ article.cfm?c_id=1503423&objectid=11766115
and regarding Goff (see above), it seems he has started very well :
http://m.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?
Irrelevant diversion.
I do not expect any of those National people leaving are likely to get
a positive mention in the press . . .
Irrelevant (and nasty, spiteful) diversion.
Just the facts, JOhnO - see for example re McCully: http://norightturn.blogspot.co.nz/2016/12/good-riddance.html
(Yes it is an opinion piece, but supported by a lot of news articles)
On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 11:09:47 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>apparently.
wrote:
On Thursday, 15 December 2016 23:04:01 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 22:40:53 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Thursday, 15 December 2016 18:08:48 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 15:14:12 +1300, greybeard <nobody@nowhere.invalid> >> >> wrote:
On 15/12/16 11:02, JohnO wrote:
Nats have 4 of 59 MPs (7%) retiring, and it's a "flood".
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&objectid=11767118
Oh and Audrey, dear, 4 of 59 Nat MPs is 7% not 10%.
Greens have 2 of 14 MPs (14%) retiring and it's a *nothing*
else? 3 of 31 really is about 10% Audrey. Is that not a flood too? Apparently not even remarkable enough to report on.http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&objectid=11767501
Q: Who is retiring from Labour? Shearer, Cosgrove, Cunliffe. Anyone
already.
Leaving out that Goof (another former leader) has left the building
one of the many differences about National; they defend the public service but Labour stab them in the back.Another deliberate "typo" from you JohnO - you must be desperate!
And now we hear that McCully has received the message. Renewal or
removal of dead wood? I suspect most see it as a bit of both, with
some Ministers still faking being alive - Gerry Brownlee was
apparently offended by being told by someone in Kaikoura that he is a >> >> waste of space; I'm sure it is a common view!
Stop the lies. He was defending the NZTA from unfair criticism. That's
whinge that "nothing has happened" when in fact an enormous amount of work has to be done before they go blundering in and start moving rocks.
Really?
Yes. Really.
Read this:
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/nz-earthquake/87590358/pm-bill-english-flies-to-earthquakehit-kaikoura?cid=facebook.post.87590358
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11767842
Yes, already read it, this is what we are discussing you fool.
So an understandably frustrated but altogether ignorant farmer is having a
make three, Dickbot.
Remind you of something? - if so it is probably this:
http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/news/christchurch-earthquake-2011/7656654/Brownlee-fed-up-with-moaning-residents
and I suspect from putting the two together someone has put this
together
Well it would be par for the course for you to put one and one together and
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Czs3VgKUQAAKQA8.jpg
(Its too well put together to be Whaleoil; sorry I don't know the
author, but like all satire it appears to contain more than a smidgeon
of truth - in fact without having seen a denial perhaps it is the
truth; Bill will have a few hard decisions to make before Sunday; he's
fishing in a very shallow pool . . . )
Interesting responses though - not all will ge as sympathetic a send
off as Shearer:
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/wanganui-chronicle/opinion/news/article.cfm?c_id=1503423&objectid=11766115
and regarding Goff (see above), it seems he has started very well :
http://m.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11765928
Irrelevant diversion.
I do not expect any of those National people leaving are likely to get
a positive mention in the press . . .
Irrelevant (and nasty, spiteful) diversion.
Just the facts, JOhnO - see for example re McCully: http://norightturn.blogspot.co.nz/2016/12/good-riddance.html
(Yes it is an opinion piece, but supported by a lot of news articles)
On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 11:09:47 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>What a horrible piece of pretend journalism, the people that produce this tripe should be on the "dole queue". Come to think of it; they probably are.
wrote:
On Thursday, 15 December 2016 23:04:01 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 22:40:53 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Thursday, 15 December 2016 18:08:48 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:Another deliberate "typo" from you JohnO - you must be desperate!
On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 15:14:12 +1300, greybeard <nobody@nowhere.invalid> >>> >> wrote:
On 15/12/16 11:02, JohnO wrote:
Nats have 4 of 59 MPs (7%) retiring, and it's a "flood".
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&objectid=11767118
Oh and Audrey, dear, 4 of 59 Nat MPs is 7% not 10%.
Greens have 2 of 14 MPs (14%) retiring and it's a *nothing*
apparently.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&objectid=11767501
Q: Who is retiring from Labour? Shearer, Cosgrove, Cunliffe. Anyone >>> >> >>else? 3 of 31 really is about 10% Audrey. Is that not a flood too? Apparently
not even remarkable enough to report on.
Leaving out that Goof (another former leader) has left the building
already.
And now we hear that McCully has received the message. Renewal or
removal of dead wood? I suspect most see it as a bit of both, with
some Ministers still faking being alive - Gerry Brownlee was
apparently offended by being told by someone in Kaikoura that he is a >>> >> waste of space; I'm sure it is a common view!
Stop the lies. He was defending the NZTA from unfair criticism. That's one >>> >of the many differences about National; they defend the public service but >>> >Labour stab them in the back.
Really?
Yes. Really.
Read this:
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11767842http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/nz-earthquake/87590358/pm-bill-english-flies-to-earthquakehit-kaikoura?cid=facebook.post.87590358
Yes, already read it, this is what we are discussing you fool.
So an understandably frustrated but altogether ignorant farmer is having a >>whinge that "nothing has happened" when in fact an enormous amount of work has
to be done before they go blundering in and start moving rocks.
Remind you of something? - if so it is probably this:
http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/news/christchurch-earthquake-2011/7656654/Brownlee-fed-up-with-moaning-residents
and I suspect from putting the two together someone has put this
together
Well it would be par for the course for you to put one and one together and >>make three, Dickbot.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Czs3VgKUQAAKQA8.jpgIrrelevant diversion.
(Its too well put together to be Whaleoil; sorry I don't know the
author, but like all satire it appears to contain more than a smidgeon
of truth - in fact without having seen a denial perhaps it is the
truth; Bill will have a few hard decisions to make before Sunday; he's
fishing in a very shallow pool . . . )
Interesting responses though - not all will ge as sympathetic a send
off as Shearer:
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/wanganui-chronicle/opinion/news/article.cfm?c_id=1503423&objectid=11766115
and regarding Goff (see above), it seems he has started very well :
http://m.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11765928 >>
I do not expect any of those National people leaving are likely to get
a positive mention in the press . . .
Irrelevant (and nasty, spiteful) diversion.
Just the facts, JOhnO - see for example re McCully: >http://norightturn.blogspot.co.nz/2016/12/good-riddance.html
(Yes it is an opinion piece, but supported by a lot of news articles)
On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 15:45:57 +1300, Rich80105 wrote:
On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 11:09:47 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com> wrote:
<nobody@nowhere.invalid>On Thursday, 15 December 2016 23:04:01 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 22:40:53 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Thursday, 15 December 2016 18:08:48 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 15:14:12 +1300, greybeard
Anyone else? 3 of 31 really is about 10% Audrey. Is that not a flood too? Apparently not even remarkable enough to report on.wrote:
On 15/12/16 11:02, JohnO wrote:
Nats have 4 of 59 MPs (7%) retiring, and it's a "flood".
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm? c_id=280&objectid=11767118
Oh and Audrey, dear, 4 of 59 Nat MPs is 7% not 10%.
Greens have 2 of 14 MPs (14%) retiring and it's a *nothing* apparently.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm? c_id=280&objectid=11767501
Q: Who is retiring from Labour? Shearer, Cosgrove, Cunliffe.
building already.
Leaving out that Goof (another former leader) has left the
is aAnother deliberate "typo" from you JohnO - you must be desperate!
And now we hear that McCully has received the message. Renewal or
removal of dead wood? I suspect most see it as a bit of both, with
some Ministers still faking being alive - Gerry Brownlee was
apparently offended by being told by someone in Kaikoura that he
That's one of the many differences about National; they defend the public service but Labour stab them in the back.waste of space; I'm sure it is a common view!
Stop the lies. He was defending the NZTA from unfair criticism.
having a whinge that "nothing has happened" when in fact an enormous
Really?
Yes. Really.
Read this:
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/nz-earthquake/87590358/pm-bill- english-flies-to-earthquakehit-kaikoura?cid=facebook.post.87590358
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11767842
Yes, already read it, this is what we are discussing you fool.
So an understandably frustrated but altogether ignorant farmer is
amount of work has to be done before they go blundering in and start
moving rocks.
and make three, Dickbot.
Remind you of something? - if so it is probably this:
http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/news/christchurch- earthquake-2011/7656654/Brownlee-fed-up-with-moaning-residents
and I suspect from putting the two together someone has put this
together
Well it would be par for the course for you to put one and one together
send
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Czs3VgKUQAAKQA8.jpg
(Its too well put together to be Whaleoil; sorry I don't know the
author, but like all satire it appears to contain more than a smidgeon >>> of truth - in fact without having seen a denial perhaps it is the
truth; Bill will have a few hard decisions to make before Sunday; he's >>> fishing in a very shallow pool . . . )
Interesting responses though - not all will ge as sympathetic a
off as Shearer:
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/wanganui-chronicle/opinion/news/ article.cfm?c_id=1503423&objectid=11766115
and regarding Goff (see above), it seems he has started very well :
http://m.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm? c_id=3&objectid=11765928
Irrelevant diversion.
I do not expect any of those National people leaving are likely to get >>> a positive mention in the press . . .
Irrelevant (and nasty, spiteful) diversion.
Just the facts, JOhnO - see for example re McCully: http://norightturn.blogspot.co.nz/2016/12/good-riddance.html
(Yes it is an opinion piece, but supported by a lot of news articles)
Oh, I get it. You want Ministers to interfere in operational matters
when it suits your agenda (as in Pike River), but you pillory them when
they press a point that doesn't suit your agenda.
But I suppose you could argue that, in speaking with forked tongue, at
least you are consistent. After a fashion.
On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 15:45:57 +1300, Rich80105 wrote:
On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 11:09:47 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com><nobody@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On Thursday, 15 December 2016 23:04:01 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 22:40:53 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Thursday, 15 December 2016 18:08:48 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 15:14:12 +1300, greybeard
Anyone else? 3 of 31 really is about 10% Audrey. Is that not a flood too? >Apparently not even remarkable enough to report on.wrote:
On 15/12/16 11:02, JohnO wrote:
Nats have 4 of 59 MPs (7%) retiring, and it's a "flood".
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm? >c_id=280&objectid=11767118
Oh and Audrey, dear, 4 of 59 Nat MPs is 7% not 10%.
Greens have 2 of 14 MPs (14%) retiring and it's a *nothing* >apparently.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm? >c_id=280&objectid=11767501
Q: Who is retiring from Labour? Shearer, Cosgrove, Cunliffe.
building already.
Leaving out that Goof (another former leader) has left the
is aAnother deliberate "typo" from you JohnO - you must be desperate!
And now we hear that McCully has received the message. Renewal or
removal of dead wood? I suspect most see it as a bit of both, with
some Ministers still faking being alive - Gerry Brownlee was
apparently offended by being told by someone in Kaikoura that he
That's one of the many differences about National; they defend the public >service but Labour stab them in the back.waste of space; I'm sure it is a common view!
Stop the lies. He was defending the NZTA from unfair criticism.
having a whinge that "nothing has happened" when in fact an enormous
Really?
Yes. Really.
Read this:
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/nz-earthquake/87590358/pm-bill- >english-flies-to-earthquakehit-kaikoura?cid=facebook.post.87590358
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11767842
Yes, already read it, this is what we are discussing you fool.
So an understandably frustrated but altogether ignorant farmer is
amount of work has to be done before they go blundering in and start
moving rocks.
and make three, Dickbot.
Remind you of something? - if so it is probably this:
http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/news/christchurch- >earthquake-2011/7656654/Brownlee-fed-up-with-moaning-residents
and I suspect from putting the two together someone has put this
together
Well it would be par for the course for you to put one and one together
send
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Czs3VgKUQAAKQA8.jpg
(Its too well put together to be Whaleoil; sorry I don't know the
author, but like all satire it appears to contain more than a smidgeon >>>> of truth - in fact without having seen a denial perhaps it is the
truth; Bill will have a few hard decisions to make before Sunday; he's >>>> fishing in a very shallow pool . . . )
Interesting responses though - not all will ge as sympathetic a
off as Shearer:
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/wanganui-chronicle/opinion/news/ >article.cfm?c_id=1503423&objectid=11766115
and regarding Goff (see above), it seems he has started very well :
http://m.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm? >c_id=3&objectid=11765928
Irrelevant diversion.
I do not expect any of those National people leaving are likely to get >>>> a positive mention in the press . . .
Irrelevant (and nasty, spiteful) diversion.
Just the facts, JOhnO - see for example re McCully:
http://norightturn.blogspot.co.nz/2016/12/good-riddance.html
(Yes it is an opinion piece, but supported by a lot of news articles)
Oh, I get it. You want Ministers to interfere in operational matters
when it suits your agenda (as in Pike River), but you pillory them when
they press a point that doesn't suit your agenda.
But I suppose you could argue that, in speaking with forked tongue, at
least you are consistent. After a fashion.
On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 22:40:53 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>I guess we should feel sorry for you because you cannot help but kick people when they cannot defend themselves. But I do not!
wrote:
On Thursday, 15 December 2016 18:08:48 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:Another deliberate "typo" from you JohnO - you must be desperate!
On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 15:14:12 +1300, greybeard <nobody@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 15/12/16 11:02, JohnO wrote:
Nats have 4 of 59 MPs (7%) retiring, and it's a "flood".
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&objectid=11767118
Oh and Audrey, dear, 4 of 59 Nat MPs is 7% not 10%.
Greens have 2 of 14 MPs (14%) retiring and it's a *nothing* apparently. >>> >>
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&objectid=11767501
Q: Who is retiring from Labour? Shearer, Cosgrove, Cunliffe. Anyone
else? 3 of 31 really is about 10% Audrey. Is that not a flood too? Apparently
not even remarkable enough to report on.
Leaving out that Goof (another former leader) has left the building
already.
And now we hear that McCully has received the message. Renewal or
removal of dead wood? I suspect most see it as a bit of both, with
some Ministers still faking being alive - Gerry Brownlee was
apparently offended by being told by someone in Kaikoura that he is a
waste of space; I'm sure it is a common view!
Stop the lies. He was defending the NZTA from unfair criticism. That's one of >>the many differences about National; they defend the public service but Labour
stab them in the back.
Really? Read this: >http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/nz-earthquake/87590358/pm-bill-english-flies-to-earthquakehit-kaikoura?cid=facebook.post.87590358
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11767842
Remind you of something? - if so it is probably this:
http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/news/christchurch-earthquake-2011/7656654/Brownlee-fed-up-with-moaning-residents
and I suspect from putting the two together someone has put this
together
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Czs3VgKUQAAKQA8.jpg
(Its too well put together to be Whaleoil; sorry I don't know the
author, but like all satire it appears to contain more than a smidgeon
of truth - in fact without having seen a denial perhaps it is the
truth; Bill will have a few hard decisions to make before Sunday; he's >fishing in a very shallow pool . . . )
Interesting responses though - not all will ge as sympathetic a send
off as Shearer:
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/wanganui-chronicle/opinion/news/article.cfm?c_id=1503423&objectid=11766115
and regarding Goff (see above), it seems he has started very well : >http://m.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11765928
I do not expect any of those National people leaving are likely to get
a positive mention in the press . . .
On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 03:04:53 -0000 (UTC), HitAnyKey <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:c_id=1&objectid=11767842
On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 15:45:57 +1300, Rich80105 wrote:
On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 11:09:47 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>too?
wrote:
On Thursday, 15 December 2016 23:04:01 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 22:40:53 -0800 (PST), JohnO
<johno1234@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, 15 December 2016 18:08:48 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 15:14:12 +1300, greybeard >><nobody@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On 15/12/16 11:02, JohnO wrote:
Nats have 4 of 59 MPs (7%) retiring, and it's a "flood".
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm? >>c_id=280&objectid=11767118
Oh and Audrey, dear, 4 of 59 Nat MPs is 7% not 10%.
Greens have 2 of 14 MPs (14%) retiring and it's a *nothing* >>apparently.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm? >>c_id=280&objectid=11767501
Q: Who is retiring from Labour? Shearer, Cosgrove, Cunliffe. >>Anyone else? 3 of 31 really is about 10% Audrey. Is that not a flood
Apparently not even remarkable enough to report on.
building already.Leaving out that Goof (another former leader) has left the
is aAnother deliberate "typo" from you JohnO - you must be desperate!
And now we hear that McCully has received the message. Renewal or >>>>> >> removal of dead wood? I suspect most see it as a bit of both,
with some Ministers still faking being alive - Gerry Brownlee was >>>>> >> apparently offended by being told by someone in Kaikoura that he
That's one of the many differences about National; they defend thewaste of space; I'm sure it is a common view!
Stop the lies. He was defending the NZTA from unfair criticism.
public service but Labour stab them in the back.
Really?
Yes. Really.
Read this:
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/nz-earthquake/87590358/pm-bill- >>english-flies-to-earthquakehit-kaikoura?cid=facebook.post.87590358
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?
learns.htmlhaving a whinge that "nothing has happened" when in fact an enormous
Yes, already read it, this is what we are discussing you fool.
So an understandably frustrated but altogether ignorant farmer is
amount of work has to be done before they go blundering in and start
moving rocks.
and make three, Dickbot.
Remind you of something? - if so it is probably this:
http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/news/christchurch- >>earthquake-2011/7656654/Brownlee-fed-up-with-moaning-residents
and I suspect from putting the two together someone has put this
together
Well it would be par for the course for you to put one and one
together
send
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Czs3VgKUQAAKQA8.jpg
(Its too well put together to be Whaleoil; sorry I don't know the
author, but like all satire it appears to contain more than a
smidgeon of truth - in fact without having seen a denial perhaps it
is the truth; Bill will have a few hard decisions to make before
Sunday; he's fishing in a very shallow pool . . . )
Interesting responses though - not all will ge as sympathetic a
off as Shearer:
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/wanganui-chronicle/opinion/news/ >>article.cfm?c_id=1503423&objectid=11766115
and regarding Goff (see above), it seems he has started very well :
http://m.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm? >>c_id=3&objectid=11765928
Irrelevant diversion.
I do not expect any of those National people leaving are likely to
get a positive mention in the press . . .
Irrelevant (and nasty, spiteful) diversion.
Just the facts, JOhnO - see for example re McCully:
http://norightturn.blogspot.co.nz/2016/12/good-riddance.html
(Yes it is an opinion piece, but supported by a lot of news articles)
Oh, I get it. You want Ministers to interfere in operational matters
when it suits your agenda (as in Pike River), but you pillory them when >>they press a point that doesn't suit your agenda.
Which of the articles referenced in that article do you disagree with? http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=2776 https://norightturn.blogspot.co.nz/2010/06/vindictive.html https://norightturn.blogspot.co.nz/2011/06/murray-mccully-never-
https://norightturn.blogspot.co.nz/2014/06/the-jones-appointment.html https://norightturn.blogspot.co.nz/2014/07/murray-mccullys-taxpayer-funded-pissups.html
https://norightturn.blogspot.co.nz/2011/04/paying-for-mccullys-drinking.html
https://norightturn.blogspot.co.nz/2016/11/mccully-lied-to-cabinet.html
(and of course there were numerous references to other articles in most
of those)
But I suppose you could argue that, in speaking with forked tongue, at >>least you are consistent. After a fashion.
Speaking with a forked tongue? What are you trying to say? McCully's
actions that have beenhighlighted have been largely indefensible - and
in any ministry with an ounce of honour he would have been gone for any
one of them. So much for "higher standards"!
On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 11:09:47 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>of the many differences about National; they defend the public service but Labour stab them in the back.
wrote:
On Thursday, 15 December 2016 23:04:01 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 22:40:53 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Thursday, 15 December 2016 18:08:48 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:Another deliberate "typo" from you JohnO - you must be desperate!
On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 15:14:12 +1300, greybeard <nobody@nowhere.invalid> >>>>> wrote:
On 15/12/16 11:02, JohnO wrote:
Nats have 4 of 59 MPs (7%) retiring, and it's a "flood".
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&objectid=11767118
Oh and Audrey, dear, 4 of 59 Nat MPs is 7% not 10%.
Greens have 2 of 14 MPs (14%) retiring and it's a *nothing* apparently. >>>>>>> http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&objectid=11767501
Q: Who is retiring from Labour? Shearer, Cosgrove, Cunliffe. Anyone else? 3 of 31 really is about 10% Audrey. Is that not a flood too? Apparently not even remarkable enough to report on.
Leaving out that Goof (another former leader) has left the building already.
And now we hear that McCully has received the message. Renewal or
removal of dead wood? I suspect most see it as a bit of both, with
some Ministers still faking being alive - Gerry Brownlee was
apparently offended by being told by someone in Kaikoura that he is a >>>>> waste of space; I'm sure it is a common view!
Stop the lies. He was defending the NZTA from unfair criticism. That's one
Really?
Yes. Really.
Read this:
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/nz-earthquake/87590358/pm-bill-english-flies-to-earthquakehit-kaikoura?cid=facebook.post.87590358
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11767842
Yes, already read it, this is what we are discussing you fool.
So an understandably frustrated but altogether ignorant farmer is having a whinge that "nothing has happened" when in fact an enormous amount of work has to be done before they go blundering in and start moving rocks.
Remind you of something? - if so it is probably this:
http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/news/christchurch-earthquake-2011/7656654/Brownlee-fed-up-with-moaning-residents
and I suspect from putting the two together someone has put this
together
Well it would be par for the course for you to put one and one together and make three, Dickbot.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Czs3VgKUQAAKQA8.jpgIrrelevant diversion.
(Its too well put together to be Whaleoil; sorry I don't know the
author, but like all satire it appears to contain more than a smidgeon
of truth - in fact without having seen a denial perhaps it is the
truth; Bill will have a few hard decisions to make before Sunday; he's
fishing in a very shallow pool . . . )
Interesting responses though - not all will ge as sympathetic a send >>>>> off as Shearer:
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/wanganui-chronicle/opinion/news/article.cfm?c_id=1503423&objectid=11766115
and regarding Goff (see above), it seems he has started very well :
http://m.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11765928 >>
I do not expect any of those National people leaving are likely to get
a positive mention in the press . . .
Irrelevant (and nasty, spiteful) diversion.
Just the facts, JOhnO - see for example re McCully: http://norightturn.blogspot.co.nz/2016/12/good-riddance.html
(Yes it is an opinion piece, but supported by a lot of news articles)
On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 03:04:53 -0000 (UTC), HitAnyKey
<nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 15:45:57 +1300, Rich80105 wrote:
On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 11:09:47 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com><nobody@nowhere.invalid>
wrote:
On Thursday, 15 December 2016 23:04:01 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 22:40:53 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote:
On Thursday, 15 December 2016 18:08:48 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 15:14:12 +1300, greybeard
c_id=280&objectid=11767118wrote:
On 15/12/16 11:02, JohnO wrote:
Nats have 4 of 59 MPs (7%) retiring, and it's a "flood".
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?
apparently.
Oh and Audrey, dear, 4 of 59 Nat MPs is 7% not 10%.
Greens have 2 of 14 MPs (14%) retiring and it's a *nothing*
c_id=280&objectid=11767501http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?
Anyone else? 3 of 31 really is about 10% Audrey. Is that not a flood too?
Q: Who is retiring from Labour? Shearer, Cosgrove, Cunliffe.
Apparently not even remarkable enough to report on.
building already.
Leaving out that Goof (another former leader) has left the
is aAnother deliberate "typo" from you JohnO - you must be desperate! >>>>>>>
And now we hear that McCully has received the message. Renewal or >>>>>>> removal of dead wood? I suspect most see it as a bit of both, with >>>>>>> some Ministers still faking being alive - Gerry Brownlee was
apparently offended by being told by someone in Kaikoura that he
That's one of the many differences about National; they defend the publicwaste of space; I'm sure it is a common view!
Stop the lies. He was defending the NZTA from unfair criticism.
service but Labour stab them in the back.
english-flies-to-earthquakehit-kaikoura?cid=facebook.post.87590358
Really?
Yes. Really.
Read this:
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/nz-earthquake/87590358/pm-bill-
having a whinge that "nothing has happened" when in fact an enormoushttp://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11767842 >>>>Yes, already read it, this is what we are discussing you fool.
So an understandably frustrated but altogether ignorant farmer is
amount of work has to be done before they go blundering in and start
moving rocks.
earthquake-2011/7656654/Brownlee-fed-up-with-moaning-residents
Remind you of something? - if so it is probably this:
http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/news/christchurch-
and make three, Dickbot.
and I suspect from putting the two together someone has put this
together
Well it would be par for the course for you to put one and one together
send
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Czs3VgKUQAAKQA8.jpg
(Its too well put together to be Whaleoil; sorry I don't know the
author, but like all satire it appears to contain more than a smidgeon >>>>> of truth - in fact without having seen a denial perhaps it is the
truth; Bill will have a few hard decisions to make before Sunday; he's >>>>> fishing in a very shallow pool . . . )
Interesting responses though - not all will ge as sympathetic a
article.cfm?c_id=1503423&objectid=11766115off as Shearer:
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/wanganui-chronicle/opinion/news/
c_id=3&objectid=11765928
and regarding Goff (see above), it seems he has started very well :
http://m.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?
Irrelevant diversion.
I do not expect any of those National people leaving are likely to get >>>>> a positive mention in the press . . .
Irrelevant (and nasty, spiteful) diversion.
Just the facts, JOhnO - see for example re McCully:
http://norightturn.blogspot.co.nz/2016/12/good-riddance.html
(Yes it is an opinion piece, but supported by a lot of news articles)
Oh, I get it. You want Ministers to interfere in operational matters
when it suits your agenda (as in Pike River), but you pillory them when
they press a point that doesn't suit your agenda.
Which of the articles referenced in that article do you disagree with? http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=2776 https://norightturn.blogspot.co.nz/2010/06/vindictive.html https://norightturn.blogspot.co.nz/2011/06/murray-mccully-never-learns.html https://norightturn.blogspot.co.nz/2014/06/the-jones-appointment.html https://norightturn.blogspot.co.nz/2014/07/murray-mccullys-taxpayer-funded-pissups.html
https://norightturn.blogspot.co.nz/2011/04/paying-for-mccullys-drinking.html https://norightturn.blogspot.co.nz/2016/11/mccully-lied-to-cabinet.html
(and of course there were numerous references to other articles in
most of those)
But I suppose you could argue that, in speaking with forked tongue, at
least you are consistent. After a fashion.
Speaking with a forked tongue? What are you trying to say? McCully's
actions that have beenhighlighted have been largely indefensible - and
in any ministry with an ounce of honour he would have been gone for
any one of them. So much for "higher standards"!
| Sysop: | sneaky |
|---|---|
| Location: | Ashburton,NZ |
| Users: | 31 |
| Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
| Uptime: | 47:45:23 |
| Calls: | 2,096 |
| Files: | 11,143 |
| Messages: | 950,025 |
