• Well Done Deputy P.M Paula.

    From Fred@3:770/3 to All on Saturday, December 10, 2016 12:11:21
    That will really piss the Labour party off. Just wait till they start
    crowing 'how pleased they are' that she got the job implying she's no opposition. Secretly though they'll be shitting themselves, knowing
    nobody in Labour can match her bubbly, likeable personality. Watch
    National in the next polls - hardly missing a beat.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From JohnO@3:770/3 to Fred on Friday, December 09, 2016 17:15:52
    On Saturday, 10 December 2016 12:11:23 UTC+13, Fred wrote:
    That will really piss the Labour party off. Just wait till they start crowing 'how pleased they are' that she got the job implying she's no opposition. Secretly though they'll be shitting themselves, knowing
    nobody in Labour can match her bubbly, likeable personality. Watch
    National in the next polls - hardly missing a beat.

    Yep. And poor old Labour like to present themselves as more "in touch" that the
    Nats but everyone knows that Labour are bunch of minority interests - unions, academics and LGBT whereas the Nats cover everything from former solo mum beneficiaries such as
    Bennett through to farmers like English.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Fred@3:770/3 to JohnO on Saturday, December 10, 2016 18:55:25
    On 10/12/2016 2:15 PM, JohnO wrote:
    On Saturday, 10 December 2016 12:11:23 UTC+13, Fred wrote:
    That will really piss the Labour party off. Just wait till they start
    crowing 'how pleased they are' that she got the job implying she's no
    opposition. Secretly though they'll be shitting themselves, knowing
    nobody in Labour can match her bubbly, likeable personality. Watch
    National in the next polls - hardly missing a beat.

    Yep. And poor old Labour like to present themselves as more "in touch" that
    the Nats but everyone knows that Labour are bunch of minority interests - unions, academics and LGBT whereas the Nats cover everything from former solo mum beneficiaries such
    as Bennett through to farmers like English.

    Labour the oxymoron party with their big - Little problem.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Pooh@3:770/3 to JohnO on Saturday, December 10, 2016 19:01:27
    On 10/12/2016 2:15 p.m., JohnO wrote:
    On Saturday, 10 December 2016 12:11:23 UTC+13, Fred wrote:
    That will really piss the Labour party off. Just wait till they start
    crowing 'how pleased they are' that she got the job implying she's no
    opposition. Secretly though they'll be shitting themselves, knowing
    nobody in Labour can match her bubbly, likeable personality. Watch
    National in the next polls - hardly missing a beat.

    Yep. And poor old Labour like to present themselves as more "in touch" that
    the Nats but everyone knows that Labour are bunch of minority interests - unions, academics and LGBT whereas the Nats cover everything from former solo mum beneficiaries such
    as Bennett through to farmers like English.


    This week certainly highlighted Labours lack of comprehension as to what democracy is. On top of that what a pleasant change from the bitter,
    rancorous, long winded circuses Labour have had when leaders change...

    Pooh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Allistar@3:770/3 to JohnO on Sunday, December 11, 2016 17:11:32
    JohnO wrote:

    On Saturday, 10 December 2016 12:11:23 UTC+13, Fred wrote:
    That will really piss the Labour party off. Just wait till they start
    crowing 'how pleased they are' that she got the job implying she's no
    opposition. Secretly though they'll be shitting themselves, knowing
    nobody in Labour can match her bubbly, likeable personality. Watch
    National in the next polls - hardly missing a beat.

    Yep. And poor old Labour like to present themselves as more "in touch"
    that the Nats but everyone knows that Labour are bunch of minority
    interests - unions, academics and LGBT whereas the Nats cover everything
    from former solo mum beneficiaries such as Bennett through to farmers like English.

    I am unhappy that the new leader believes in bronze-age superstition. Gullibility it not an endearing quality.
    --
    "From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs."
    creates the incentive to minimize your abilities and maximize your needs.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Fred@3:770/3 to Allistar on Monday, December 12, 2016 12:56:20
    On 11/12/2016 5:11 PM, Allistar wrote:
    JohnO wrote:

    On Saturday, 10 December 2016 12:11:23 UTC+13, Fred wrote:
    That will really piss the Labour party off. Just wait till they start
    crowing 'how pleased they are' that she got the job implying she's no
    opposition. Secretly though they'll be shitting themselves, knowing
    nobody in Labour can match her bubbly, likeable personality. Watch
    National in the next polls - hardly missing a beat.

    Yep. And poor old Labour like to present themselves as more "in touch"
    that the Nats but everyone knows that Labour are bunch of minority
    interests - unions, academics and LGBT whereas the Nats cover everything
    from former solo mum beneficiaries such as Bennett through to farmers like >> English.

    I am unhappy that the new leader believes in bronze-age superstition. Gullibility it not an endearing quality.

    I see he will support 'marriage' between shirt-lifters. Seemingly we are allowed to sin, even if he isn't.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Allistar@3:770/3 to Fred on Tuesday, December 13, 2016 08:46:02
    Fred wrote:

    On 11/12/2016 5:11 PM, Allistar wrote:
    JohnO wrote:

    On Saturday, 10 December 2016 12:11:23 UTC+13, Fred wrote:
    That will really piss the Labour party off. Just wait till they start
    crowing 'how pleased they are' that she got the job implying she's no
    opposition. Secretly though they'll be shitting themselves, knowing
    nobody in Labour can match her bubbly, likeable personality. Watch
    National in the next polls - hardly missing a beat.

    Yep. And poor old Labour like to present themselves as more "in touch"
    that the Nats but everyone knows that Labour are bunch of minority
    interests - unions, academics and LGBT whereas the Nats cover everything >>> from former solo mum beneficiaries such as Bennett through to farmers
    like English.

    I am unhappy that the new leader believes in bronze-age superstition.
    Gullibility it not an endearing quality.

    I see he will support 'marriage' between shirt-lifters. Seemingly we are allowed to sin, even if he isn't.

    Sin? What sin?
    What two consenting adults do is no-one else's business, especially the
    state.

    His superstition is a very bad quality for a leader to have. It shows he's willing to believe in abject nonsense.
    --
    "From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs."
    creates the incentive to minimize your abilities and maximize your needs.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)