• A comparison for Rich

    From Pooh@3:770/3 to All on Thursday, December 08, 2016 10:38:58
    Compare the swift smooth change of leadership happening with National
    with the circus junket at the taxpayers expense of the Labour party and
    tell me honestly (if you can be honest for once Rich) which party
    displays the best understanding of democracy Rich.

    Pooh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Fred@3:770/3 to Fred on Thursday, December 08, 2016 14:15:47
    This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
    On 08/12/2016 02:15 PM, Fred wrote:
    On 08/12/2016 10:38 AM, Pooh wrote:
    Compare the swift smooth change of leadership happening with National
    with the circus junket at the taxpayers expense of the Labour party and
    tell me honestly (if you can be honest for once Rich) which party
    displays the best understanding of democracy Rich.

    Pooh

    Yep. All sorted already apart from deputy. English P.M. Joyce finance.
    Deputy vote on monday.




    bnVsbA==

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Fred@3:770/3 to Pooh on Thursday, December 08, 2016 14:15:01
    This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
    On 08/12/2016 10:38 AM, Pooh wrote:
    Compare the swift smooth change of leadership happening with National
    with the circus junket at the taxpayers expense of the Labour party and
    tell me honestly (if you can be honest for once Rich) which party
    displays the best understanding of democracy Rich.

    Pooh

    Yep. All sorted already apart from deputy. English P.M. Joyce finance.
    Deputy vote on monday.

    bnVsbA==

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From JohnO@3:770/3 to Fred on Wednesday, December 07, 2016 19:08:03
    On Thursday, 8 December 2016 14:14:59 UTC+13, Fred wrote:
    On 08/12/2016 10:38 AM, Pooh wrote:
    Compare the swift smooth change of leadership happening with National
    with the circus junket at the taxpayers expense of the Labour party and tell me honestly (if you can be honest for once Rich) which party
    displays the best understanding of democracy Rich.

    Pooh

    Yep. All sorted already apart from deputy. English P.M. Joyce finance.
    Deputy vote on monday.

    What? No months-long "talent" show? No bitter in-fighting and white-anting? No 3rd party bloc vote landing in the middle to override caucus's wishes?

    Not like the Labour party at all.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Gordon@3:770/3 to JohnO on Thursday, December 08, 2016 04:33:07
    On 2016-12-08, JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Thursday, 8 December 2016 14:14:59 UTC+13, Fred wrote:
    On 08/12/2016 10:38 AM, Pooh wrote:
    Compare the swift smooth change of leadership happening with National
    with the circus junket at the taxpayers expense of the Labour party and
    tell me honestly (if you can be honest for once Rich) which party
    displays the best understanding of democracy Rich.

    Pooh

    Yep. All sorted already apart from deputy. English P.M. Joyce finance.
    Deputy vote on monday.

    What? No months-long "talent" show? No bitter in-fighting and white-anting?
    No 3rd party bloc vote landing in the middle to override caucus's wishes?

    That comes after the election loss. Really some people do have short
    memories.

    Not like the Labour party at all.

    At the moment maybe.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Rich80105@3:770/3 to Gordon on Thursday, December 08, 2016 20:35:52
    On 8 Dec 2016 04:33:07 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@clear.net.nz> wrote:

    On 2016-12-08, JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Thursday, 8 December 2016 14:14:59 UTC+13, Fred wrote:
    On 08/12/2016 10:38 AM, Pooh wrote:
    Compare the swift smooth change of leadership happening with National
    with the circus junket at the taxpayers expense of the Labour party and >>> > tell me honestly (if you can be honest for once Rich) which party
    displays the best understanding of democracy Rich.

    Pooh

    Yep. All sorted already apart from deputy. English P.M. Joyce finance.
    Deputy vote on monday.

    What? No months-long "talent" show? No bitter in-fighting and white-anting? No 3rd party bloc vote landing in the middle to override caucus's wishes?

    That comes after the election loss. Really some people do have short >memories.

    Not like the Labour party at all.

    At the moment maybe.

    I was amused to hear Collins saying that the election gave most
    National MPs the first time in nearly 10 years to make a decision
    collectively that may affect their future. They are used to being told
    what to think and say, and it appears the experience was just too much
    for most of them - a National Government is led by "The Leader", who
    through total control of who gets to the Cabinet, or the inner
    'kitchen cabinet', keeps near total control. With the goofiness factor
    being reduced (as Paddy Gower put it), there may even be answers to
    some questions in the house - but all that may really happen it will
    be more obvious that the National ministers don't have any answers.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Pooh@3:770/3 to JohnO on Thursday, December 08, 2016 22:09:41
    On 8/12/2016 4:08 p.m., JohnO wrote:
    On Thursday, 8 December 2016 14:14:59 UTC+13, Fred wrote:
    On 08/12/2016 10:38 AM, Pooh wrote:
    Compare the swift smooth change of leadership happening with National
    with the circus junket at the taxpayers expense of the Labour party and
    tell me honestly (if you can be honest for once Rich) which party
    displays the best understanding of democracy Rich.

    Pooh

    Yep. All sorted already apart from deputy. English P.M. Joyce finance.
    Deputy vote on monday.

    What? No months-long "talent" show? No bitter in-fighting and white-anting?
    No 3rd party bloc vote landing in the middle to override caucus's wishes?

    Not like the Labour party at all.

    After the news today leaving English in charge I couldn't help thinking
    That's what you call a government!

    Pooh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Pooh@3:770/3 to All on Thursday, December 08, 2016 22:12:17
    On 8/12/2016 8:35 p.m., Rich80105 wrote:
    On 8 Dec 2016 04:33:07 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@clear.net.nz> wrote:

    On 2016-12-08, JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Thursday, 8 December 2016 14:14:59 UTC+13, Fred wrote:
    On 08/12/2016 10:38 AM, Pooh wrote:
    Compare the swift smooth change of leadership happening with National >>>>> with the circus junket at the taxpayers expense of the Labour party and >>>>> tell me honestly (if you can be honest for once Rich) which party
    displays the best understanding of democracy Rich.

    Pooh

    Yep. All sorted already apart from deputy. English P.M. Joyce finance. >>>> Deputy vote on monday.

    What? No months-long "talent" show? No bitter in-fighting and white-anting?
    No 3rd party bloc vote landing in the middle to override caucus's wishes?

    That comes after the election loss. Really some people do have short
    memories.

    Not like the Labour party at all.

    At the moment maybe.

    I was amused to hear Collins saying that the election gave most
    National MPs the first time in nearly 10 years to make a decision collectively that may affect their future. They are used to being told
    what to think and say, and it appears the experience was just too much
    for most of them - a National Government is led by "The Leader", who
    through total control of who gets to the Cabinet, or the inner
    'kitchen cabinet', keeps near total control. With the goofiness factor
    being reduced (as Paddy Gower put it), there may even be answers to
    some questions in the house - but all that may really happen it will
    be more obvious that the National ministers don't have any answers.

    Well you got it half right in your typical lefty lying way Rich. Pity
    you're incapable of remembering anything before your last post.

    Pooh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From JohnO@3:770/3 to All on Thursday, December 08, 2016 11:08:05
    On Thursday, 8 December 2016 20:35:52 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
    On 8 Dec 2016 04:33:07 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@clear.net.nz> wrote:

    On 2016-12-08, JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Thursday, 8 December 2016 14:14:59 UTC+13, Fred wrote:
    On 08/12/2016 10:38 AM, Pooh wrote:
    Compare the swift smooth change of leadership happening with National >>> > with the circus junket at the taxpayers expense of the Labour party and >>> > tell me honestly (if you can be honest for once Rich) which party
    displays the best understanding of democracy Rich.

    Pooh

    Yep. All sorted already apart from deputy. English P.M. Joyce finance. >>> Deputy vote on monday.

    What? No months-long "talent" show? No bitter in-fighting and
    white-anting? No 3rd party bloc vote landing in the middle to override caucus's
    wishes?

    That comes after the election loss. Really some people do have short >memories.

    Not like the Labour party at all.

    At the moment maybe.

    I was amused to hear Collins saying that the election gave most
    National MPs the first time in nearly 10 years to make a decision collectively that may affect their future. They are used to being told
    what to think and say, and it appears the experience was just too much
    for most of them - a National Government is led by "The Leader", who
    through total control of who gets to the Cabinet, or the inner
    'kitchen cabinet', keeps near total control. With the goofiness factor
    being reduced (as Paddy Gower put it), there may even be answers to
    some questions in the house - but all that may really happen it will
    be more obvious that the National ministers don't have any answers.

    LOL. The Labour cabinet voted Grant Robinson but got Little forced on them by the unions. But Dickbot thinks Nat MPs, who get a free anonymous vote are told what to do?

    The idiocy and hypocrisy from Dickbot reaches new levels.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From george152@3:770/3 to JohnO on Friday, December 09, 2016 08:17:39
    On 12/9/2016 8:08 AM, JohnO wrote:

    LOL. The Labour cabinet voted Grant Robinson but got Little forced on them by
    the unions. But Dickbot thinks Nat MPs, who get a free anonymous vote are told what to do?

    The idiocy and hypocrisy from Dickbot reaches new levels.

    No. The year still has some time to run

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Allistar@3:770/3 to Pooh on Friday, December 09, 2016 16:14:58
    Pooh wrote:

    Compare the swift smooth change of leadership happening with National
    with the circus junket at the taxpayers expense of the Labour party and
    tell me honestly (if you can be honest for once Rich) which party
    displays the best understanding of democracy Rich.

    <sarcasm>
    How can it be fair if they don't take into account gender? And surely some unrelated 3rd party organisation should get a certain percentage of the vote solely for them? Oh, that's right, that would be the undemocratic semi-
    corrupt way to do it.
    </sarcasm>
    --
    "From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs."
    creates the incentive to minimize your abilities and maximize your needs.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)