• Re: The Herald calls it a landslide

    From geopelia@3:770/3 to All on Sunday, December 04, 2016 00:13:18
    "Rich80105" wrote in message news:gs754c59f9e5acco8eabomqi87o47qv5mu@4ax.com...

    Having talked up the possibility of NAtional taking the seat early in
    teh campaign, and the on-again off again personal support by the prime minister, this will come as an unwelcome indication that Labour is
    getting its message through: http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11759969

    .........

    You can't judge a party's support by a by election. Here in East Coast Bays
    we once elected Social Credit in a by election, in a "safe" National seat!

    Unless the result could change the government, a by election is a way to express one's opinion of the current government, whichever party is in
    power.

    Geopelia

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Rich80105@3:770/3 to All on Saturday, December 03, 2016 23:35:11
    Having talked up the possibility of NAtional taking the seat early in
    teh campaign, and the on-again off again personal support by the prime minister, this will come as an unwelcome indication that Labour is
    getting its message through: http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11759969

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Pooh@3:770/3 to All on Sunday, December 04, 2016 01:34:50
    On 3/12/2016 11:35 p.m., Rich80105 wrote:
    Having talked up the possibility of NAtional taking the seat early in
    teh campaign, and the on-again off again personal support by the prime minister, this will come as an unwelcome indication that Labour is
    getting its message through: http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11759969

    Oh WOW! So Labour won a Labour seat by a big margin and the Herald
    called it a landslide. Hell only you, angry liddle Andy and the Herald
    would be surprised at the result. Now watch that other dumb marxist
    Little talk it into a win for Labour next year.

    The rest of the country weren't surprised in the slightest Rich.

    Pooh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Rich80105@3:770/3 to All on Sunday, December 04, 2016 08:59:37
    On Sun, 4 Dec 2016 00:13:18 +1300, "geopelia" <geopelia@nowhere.com>
    wrote:



    "Rich80105" wrote in message >news:gs754c59f9e5acco8eabomqi87o47qv5mu@4ax.com...

    Having talked up the possibility of NAtional taking the seat early in
    teh campaign, and the on-again off again personal support by the prime >minister, this will come as an unwelcome indication that Labour is
    getting its message through: >http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11759969

    .........

    You can't judge a party's support by a by election. Here in East Coast Bays >we once elected Social Credit in a by election, in a "safe" National seat!

    Unless the result could change the government, a by election is a way to >express one's opinion of the current government, whichever party is in
    power.

    Geopelia
    You are correct, Geopelia. Social Credit were however fairly well
    supported through the country - the difficulty they had in getting a
    seat was because their support was spread thinly over the whole
    country. They are one ofthe reasons many people wanted MMP. I never
    supported Social Credit, but they did deserve to have a seat in
    parliament - I suspectt hat the exposure is what killed them off.

    A by-election can indicate genuine concerns about a government though
    - the election of Winston Peters in Northland was partly due to the
    candidate National put up, but also concerns about National not
    keeping its promises and ignoring Northland - I don;t think they ever
    did build the bridges they promised.

    Audrey Young is normally a strong supporter of National, but she says
    about th Mt Roskill result:

    "The Mt Roskill byelection victory is Andrew Little's victory.

    The Labour leader has described the win as "a bloody nose for
    National".

    It is more like a bloody nose, a black eye and broken jaw.

    National was comprehensively thrashed in a fight that had the
    potential to run closer, given that National polled 2189 votes higher
    than Labour in the party vote two years ago.

    John Key campaigned just as hard, if not harder in the electorate,
    because an upset result would have destabilised Little's leadership at
    a critical time in the election cycle.

    Key campaigned for seven days in the electorate, between earthquake
    management and international sumiteering in Peru.

    Andrew Little was there for six days.

    Little had a rough week with the defection of Nick Leggett to National
    and some dubious polling results.

    Credible polling still puts Labour in with a chance in a centre-left
    bloc to lead the next Government but there has been nothing in Little repertoire until now that says "winner"."

    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11759981

    I had not realised that Key spent more time in the electorate than
    Andrew Little. They have had a series of weak candidates; I suspect
    National are finding it harder to attract quality candidates as it
    becomes clearer that they are more likely to be in opposition fairly
    soon.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Fred@3:770/3 to All on Sunday, December 04, 2016 09:35:51
    This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
    On 04/12/2016 08:59 AM, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Sun, 4 Dec 2016 00:13:18 +1300, "geopelia" <geopelia@nowhere.com>
    wrote:



    "Rich80105" wrote in message
    news:gs754c59f9e5acco8eabomqi87o47qv5mu@4ax.com...

    Having talked up the possibility of NAtional taking the seat early in
    teh campaign, and the on-again off again personal support by the prime
    minister, this will come as an unwelcome indication that Labour is
    getting its message through:
    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11759969

    .........

    You can't judge a party's support by a by election. Here in East Coast Bays >> we once elected Social Credit in a by election, in a "safe" National seat! >>
    Unless the result could change the government, a by election is a way to
    express one's opinion of the current government, whichever party is in
    power.

    Geopelia
    You are correct, Geopelia. Social Credit were however fairly well
    supported through the country - the difficulty they had in getting a
    seat was because their support was spread thinly over the whole
    country. They are one ofthe reasons many people wanted MMP. I never
    supported Social Credit, but they did deserve to have a seat in
    parliament - I suspectt hat the exposure is what killed them off.

    A by-election can indicate genuine concerns about a government though
    - the election of Winston Peters in Northland was partly due to the
    candidate National put up, but also concerns about National not
    keeping its promises and ignoring Northland - I don;t think they ever
    did build the bridges they promised.

    Audrey Young is normally a strong supporter of National, but she says
    about th Mt Roskill result:

    "The Mt Roskill byelection victory is Andrew Little's victory.

    The Labour leader has described the win as "a bloody nose for
    National".

    It is more like a bloody nose, a black eye and broken jaw.

    National was comprehensively thrashed in a fight that had the
    potential to run closer, given that National polled 2189 votes higher
    than Labour in the party vote two years ago.

    John Key campaigned just as hard, if not harder in the electorate,
    because an upset result would have destabilised Little's leadership at
    a critical time in the election cycle.

    Key campaigned for seven days in the electorate, between earthquake management and international sumiteering in Peru.

    Andrew Little was there for six days.

    Little had a rough week with the defection of Nick Leggett to National
    and some dubious polling results.

    Credible polling still puts Labour in with a chance in a centre-left
    bloc to lead the next Government but there has been nothing in Little repertoire until now that says "winner"."

    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11759981

    I had not realised that Key spent more time in the electorate than
    Andrew Little. They have had a series of weak candidates; I suspect
    National are finding it harder to attract quality candidates as it
    becomes clearer that they are more likely to be in opposition fairly
    soon.


    Of course Rich. Whatever you say. Just a pity they keep getting these
    rogue polls putting them at 20 something %.

    bnVsbA==

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Crash@3:770/3 to All on Monday, December 05, 2016 20:57:18
    On Sat, 03 Dec 2016 23:35:11 +1300, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    Having talked up the possibility of NAtional taking the seat early in
    teh campaign, and the on-again off again personal support by the prime >minister, this will come as an unwelcome indication that Labour is
    getting its message through: >http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11759969

    Except that 61% of voters did not vote. Of those that did vote 66%
    voted for Wood. Tell me how this is an indication that Labour is
    getting the message through? It is more like Labour succeeded in
    getting more of their supporters to the polling booths - a very
    laudable achievement - but not a credible indication on any shift in
    the political landscape in favour of Labour.


    --
    Crash McBash

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From george152@3:770/3 to Crash on Tuesday, December 06, 2016 08:06:30
    On 12/5/2016 8:57 PM, Crash wrote:
    On Sat, 03 Dec 2016 23:35:11 +1300, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    Having talked up the possibility of NAtional taking the seat early in
    teh campaign, and the on-again off again personal support by the prime
    minister, this will come as an unwelcome indication that Labour is
    getting its message through:
    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11759969

    Except that 61% of voters did not vote. Of those that did vote 66%
    voted for Wood. Tell me how this is an indication that Labour is
    getting the message through? It is more like Labour succeeded in
    getting more of their supporters to the polling booths - a very
    laudable achievement - but not a credible indication on any shift in
    the political landscape in favour of Labour.


    Liebor won a seat they've held for years.
    No doubt thats success when they're on 20% +

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Fred@3:770/3 to All on Tuesday, December 06, 2016 08:09:32
    This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
    On 06/12/2016 08:06 AM, george152 wrote:
    On 12/5/2016 8:57 PM, Crash wrote:
    On Sat, 03 Dec 2016 23:35:11 +1300, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    Having talked up the possibility of NAtional taking the seat early in
    teh campaign, and the on-again off again personal support by the prime
    minister, this will come as an unwelcome indication that Labour is
    getting its message through:
    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11759969

    Except that 61% of voters did not vote. Of those that did vote 66%
    voted for Wood. Tell me how this is an indication that Labour is
    getting the message through? It is more like Labour succeeded in
    getting more of their supporters to the polling booths - a very
    laudable achievement - but not a credible indication on any shift in
    the political landscape in favour of Labour.


    Liebor won a seat they've held for years.
    No doubt thats success when they're on 20% +

    Quite so. They hardly won it - they just didn't lose it.

    bnVsbA==

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)