On 1/12/2016 8:31 AM, JohnO wrote:their own paid-for UMR polling any time soon to prove this.
In the last week:
Colmar Brunton: Natonal: 50.0%, Labour: 29.0%
Roy Morgan: National: 49.5%, Labour: 23.0%
Naturally bogus! I'm sure Angry little Andy will release a screenshot of
over the last 9 years: nothing but negativity and identity attack politics. An unappealing charisma-free union bully for a leader imposed by the unions against the wishes of...
Andy?
...
<sound of crickets chirping>
None of this surprises me given what we've seen from slow learning Labour
Parker and Adern leaving only the angry little one. National could attempt to gift Labour an electorate seat to pop Little as well... but why would they - he's a gift to them!At 23% in an election Labour would all but one of their list MPs including
Poll was rigged.
In the last week:their own paid-for UMR polling any time soon to prove this.
Colmar Brunton: Natonal: 50.0%, Labour: 29.0%
Roy Morgan: National: 49.5%, Labour: 23.0%
Naturally bogus! I'm sure Angry little Andy will release a screenshot of
...over the last 9 years: nothing but negativity and identity attack politics. An unappealing charisma-free union bully for a leader imposed by the unions against the wishes of the
Andy?
...
<sound of crickets chirping>
None of this surprises me given what we've seen from slow learning Labour
At 23% in an election Labour would all but one of their list MPs includingParker and Adern leaving only the angry little one. National could attempt to gift Labour an electorate seat to pop Little as well... but why would they - he's a gift to them!
In the last week:
Colmar Brunton: Natonal: 50.0%, Labour: 29.0%
Roy Morgan: National: 49.5%, Labour: 23.0%
On 1/12/2016 8:31 AM, JohnO wrote:
In the last week:
Colmar Brunton: Natonal: 50.0%, Labour: 29.0%
Roy Morgan: National: 49.5%, Labour: 23.0%
Naturally bogus! I'm sure Angry little Andy will release a screenshot of their own paid-for UMR polling any time soon to prove this.
...
Andy?
...
<sound of crickets chirping>
None of this surprises me given what we've seen from slow learning
Labour over the last 9 years: nothing but negativity and identity attack politics. An unappealing charisma-free union bully for a leader imposed
by the unions against the wishes of the caucus. Supported by a
chattering twitterati echo chamber of lefty academics, unionists and minority issue pushers.
At 23% in an election Labour would all but one of their list MPs
including Parker and Adern leaving only the angry little one. National could attempt to gift Labour an electorate seat to pop Little as well... but why would they - he's a gift to them!
Poll was rigged.
On 12/1/2016 8:31 AM, JohnO wrote:
In the last week:
Colmar Brunton: Natonal: 50.0%, Labour: 29.0%
Roy Morgan: National: 49.5%, Labour: 23.0%
Liebor have to do something desperate now.
Restoring a previous leader might be a start but there are so many of them. David Shearer -was- more popular than the current angry little man.
They should give him another go
"JohnO" wrote in message news:5f95a5e4-55a5-45e2-a1f1-5143fdaaac09@googlegroups.com...
On Thursday, 1 December 2016 11:38:07 UTC+13, george wrote:
On 12/1/2016 8:31 AM, JohnO wrote:
In the last week:
Colmar Brunton: Natonal: 50.0%, Labour: 29.0%
Roy Morgan: National: 49.5%, Labour: 23.0%
Liebor have to do something desperate now.
Restoring a previous leader might be a start but there are so many of
them.
David Shearer -was- more popular than the current angry little man.
They should give him another go
As we get closer to the election Labour will start offering increasingly ludicrous election bribes. Mark my words.
...........
Ask Helen Clark to come back. But would she come?
On 12/1/2016 8:31 AM, JohnO wrote:
In the last week:
Colmar Brunton: Natonal: 50.0%, Labour: 29.0%
Roy Morgan: National: 49.5%, Labour: 23.0%
Liebor have to do something desperate now.
Restoring a previous leader might be a start but there are so many of
them.
David Shearer -was- more popular than the current angry little man.
They should give him another go
On Thursday, 1 December 2016 09:25:50 UTC+13, Fred wrote:the caucus. Supported by a chattering twitterati echo chamber of lefty academics, unionists and minority issue pushers.
On 1/12/2016 8:31 AM, JohnO wrote:
In the last week:
Colmar Brunton: Natonal: 50.0%, Labour: 29.0%
Roy Morgan: National: 49.5%, Labour: 23.0%
Naturally bogus! I'm sure Angry little Andy will release a screenshot of their own paid-for UMR polling any time soon to prove this.
...
Andy?
...
<sound of crickets chirping>
None of this surprises me given what we've seen from slow learning Labour over the last 9 years: nothing but negativity and identity attack politics. An unappealing charisma-free union bully for a leader imposed by the unions against the wishes of
Poll was rigged.
At 23% in an election Labour would all but one of their list MPs including Parker and Adern leaving only the angry little one. National could attempt to gift Labour an electorate seat to pop Little as well... but why would they - he's a gift to them!
Clearly.
How else could Labour make it as high as 23% ?
On Thursday, 1 December 2016 11:38:07 UTC+13, george wrote:ludicrous election bribes. Mark my words.
On 12/1/2016 8:31 AM, JohnO wrote:
In the last week:
Colmar Brunton: Natonal: 50.0%, Labour: 29.0%
Roy Morgan: National: 49.5%, Labour: 23.0%
Liebor have to do something desperate now.
Restoring a previous leader might be a start but there are so many of them. >> David Shearer -was- more popular than the current angry little man.
They should give him another go
As we get closer to the election Labour will start offering increasingly
On 12/1/2016 8:31 AM, JohnO wrote:
In the last week:
Colmar Brunton: Natonal: 50.0%, Labour: 29.0%
Roy Morgan: National: 49.5%, Labour: 23.0%
Liebor have to do something desperate now.
Restoring a previous leader might be a start but there are so many of them. David Shearer -was- more popular than the current angry little man.
They should give him another go
In the last week:own paid-for UMR polling any time soon to prove this.
Colmar Brunton: Natonal: 50.0%, Labour: 29.0%
Roy Morgan: National: 49.5%, Labour: 23.0%
Naturally bogus! I'm sure Angry little Andy will release a screenshot of their
...the last 9 years: nothing but negativity and identity attack politics. An unappealing charisma-free union bully for a leader imposed by the unions against the wishes of the
Andy?
...
<sound of crickets chirping>
None of this surprises me given what we've seen from slow learning Labour over
At 23% in an election Labour would all but one of their list MPs including Parker and Adern leaving only the angry little one. National could attempt to gift Labour an electorate seat to pop Little as well... but why would they - he's a gift to them!
Yes it is extraordinary that at this level of party support, if they
win one more electorate seat they would be the first major party to
have no list MPs - meaning that at least temporarily their
Parliamentary leader would not be an MP.
On 2016-11-30, JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, 1 December 2016 11:38:07 UTC+13, george wrote:
On 12/1/2016 8:31 AM, JohnO wrote:
In the last week:
Colmar Brunton: Natonal: 50.0%, Labour: 29.0%
Roy Morgan: National: 49.5%, Labour: 23.0%
Liebor have to do something desperate now.
Restoring a previous leader might be a start but there are so many of
them. David Shearer -was- more popular than the current angry little
man. They should give him another go
As we get closer to the election Labour will start offering increasingly
ludicrous election bribes. Mark my words.
As will National. Nothing changed there then.
| Sysop: | sneaky |
|---|---|
| Location: | Ashburton,NZ |
| Users: | 31 |
| Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
| Uptime: | 189:43:10 |
| Calls: | 2,082 |
| Calls today: | 5 |
| Files: | 11,137 |
| Messages: | 947,684 |