An article telling another side or view of Castro. It certainly cannot
have been easy to achieve what was achieved being located close to a
hostile United States - New Zealand knbows the benefit of access to
trade; the restrictions will have severely affected Cuba.
http://localbodies-bsprout.blogspot.co.nz/2016/11/cuba-vs-usa-what-castro-really-achieved.html
Undoubteldy there were aspects of his regime that we found repugnant
at the time, and still do, but hysterical paranoia and one-sided
attacks echoing battles of the past do us no credit.
Rich80105 wrote:
An article telling another side or view of Castro. It certainly cannot
have been easy to achieve what was achieved being located close to a hostile United States - New Zealand knbows the benefit of access to
trade; the restrictions will have severely affected Cuba.
http://localbodies-bsprout.blogspot.co.nz/2016/11/cuba-vs-usa-what-castro-really-achieved.html
Undoubteldy there were aspects of his regime that we found repugnant
at the time, and still do, but hysterical paranoia and one-sided
attacks echoing battles of the past do us no credit.
Tell that to the people he imprisoned well into the 1970s for not being heterosexual.
To support such a man is as misguided as saying that Mother
Theresa was a friend of the poor.
--
"From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs." creates the incentive to minimize your abilities and maximize your needs.
An article telling another side or view of Castro. It certainly cannot
have been easy to achieve what was achieved being located close to a
hostile United States - New Zealand knbows the benefit of access to
trade; the restrictions will have severely affected Cuba.
http://localbodies-bsprout.blogspot.co.nz/2016/11/cuba-vs-usa-what-castro-really-achieved.html
Undoubteldy there were aspects of his regime that we found repugnant
at the time, and still do, but hysterical paranoia and one-sided
attacks echoing battles of the past do us no credit.
An article telling another side or view of Castro. It certainly cannotThere is no other side that we should even think about considering. To do so would make us as morally bankrupt as you are!
have been easy to achieve what was achieved being located close to a
hostile United States - New Zealand knbows the benefit of access to
trade; the restrictions will have severely affected Cuba.
http://localbodies-bsprout.blogspot.co.nz/2016/11/cuba-vs-usa-what-castro-really-achieved.html
Undoubteldy there were aspects of his regime that we found repugnant
at the time, and still do, but hysterical paranoia and one-sided
attacks echoing battles of the past do us no credit.
On Tuesday, 29 November 2016 11:57:43 UTC+13, Allistar wrote:am not surprised as he'd stooped this low many tomes.
Rich80105 wrote:
An article telling another side or view of Castro. It certainly cannot
have been easy to achieve what was achieved being located close to a
hostile United States - New Zealand knbows the benefit of access to
trade; the restrictions will have severely affected Cuba.
http://localbodies-bsprout.blogspot.co.nz/2016/11/cuba-vs-usa-what-castro-really-achieved.html
Undoubteldy there were aspects of his regime that we found repugnant
at the time, and still do, but hysterical paranoia and one-sided
attacks echoing battles of the past do us no credit.
Tell that to the people he imprisoned well into the 1970s for not being
heterosexual.
That's nothing.
http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB113590852154334404
The guy is responsible for mass murder. Yet Dickbot seeks to minimise this. I
On Tuesday, 29 November 2016 11:01:56 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:Cuba into an
An article telling another side or view of Castro. It certainly cannot
have been easy to achieve what was achieved being located close to a
hostile United States - New Zealand knbows the benefit of access to
trade; the restrictions will have severely affected Cuba.
http://localbodies-bsprout.blogspot.co.nz/2016/11/cuba-vs-usa-what-castro-really-achieved.html
Undoubteldy there were aspects of his regime that we found repugnant
at the time, and still do, but hysterical paranoia and one-sided
attacks echoing battles of the past do us no credit.
What is utterly repugnant is your mealy-mouthed smarmy dismissal of the terrible crimes Castro committed. Thousands put before the firing squads. Free speech and free association suppressed. Contributed to near nuclear war. Turned
Are those not enough "aspects" to simply brand him as a brutal, murderous despot with little more to be said?Why should they be?
And don't start blubbering about the free healthcare and education. That only worked with free money from the Soviet Union and then Venezuela. We all know that all collapsed as is inevitable with communist states.
On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 16:36:32 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>This has absolutely nothing to do with National or Labour or any other New Zealand political party. It is all to do with morality, he was evil and you somehow manage to see some good in him.
wrote:
On Tuesday, 29 November 2016 11:01:56 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:What part of Undoubteldy there were aspects of his regime that we
An article telling another side or view of Castro. It certainly cannot
have been easy to achieve what was achieved being located close to a
hostile United States - New Zealand knbows the benefit of access to
trade; the restrictions will have severely affected Cuba.
http://localbodies-bsprout.blogspot.co.nz/2016/11/cuba-vs-usa-what-castro-really-achieved.html
Undoubteldy there were aspects of his regime that we found repugnant
at the time, and still do, but hysterical paranoia and one-sided
attacks echoing battles of the past do us no credit.
What is utterly repugnant is your mealy-mouthed smarmy dismissal of the >>terrible crimes Castro committed. Thousands put before the firing squads. Free
speech and free association suppressed. Contributed to near nuclear war. Turned
Cuba into an impoverished satellite of the Soviet Union.
found repugnant at the time, and still do" do you not understand?
Are those not enough "aspects" to simply brand him as a brutal, murderous >>despot with little more to be said?Why should they be?
And don't start blubbering about the free healthcare and education. That only >>worked with free money from the Soviet Union and then Venezuela. We all know >>that all collapsed as is inevitable with communist states.
So you believe those in Merril Lynch and other merchant banks were
part of a communist conspirtacy when their actionsled to the global
financial crisis? Its all black and white to you, isn't it . JohnO -
National can do no wrong - anyone not "right-thinking"in that way is a >communist and automatically entirely wrong to you . . .
On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 16:36:32 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>This has absolutely nothing to do with National or Labour or any other New Zealand political party. It is all to do with morality. he was evil and you somehow manage to see some good in him.
wrote:
On Tuesday, 29 November 2016 11:01:56 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:What part of Undoubteldy there were aspects of his regime that we
An article telling another side or view of Castro. It certainly cannot
have been easy to achieve what was achieved being located close to a
hostile United States - New Zealand knbows the benefit of access to
trade; the restrictions will have severely affected Cuba.
http://localbodies-bsprout.blogspot.co.nz/2016/11/cuba-vs-usa-what-castro-really-achieved.html
Undoubteldy there were aspects of his regime that we found repugnant
at the time, and still do, but hysterical paranoia and one-sided
attacks echoing battles of the past do us no credit.
What is utterly repugnant is your mealy-mouthed smarmy dismissal of the >>terrible crimes Castro committed. Thousands put before the firing squads. Free
speech and free association suppressed. Contributed to near nuclear war. Turned
Cuba into an impoverished satellite of the Soviet Union.
found repugnant at the time, and still do" do you not understand?
Are those not enough "aspects" to simply brand him as a brutal, murderous >>despot with little more to be said?Why should they be?
And don't start blubbering about the free healthcare and education. That only >>worked with free money from the Soviet Union and then Venezuela. We all know >>that all collapsed as is inevitable with communist states.
So you believe those in Merril Lynch and other merchant banks were
part of a communist conspirtacy when their actionsled to the global
financial crisis? Its all black and white to you, isn't it . JohnO -
National can do no wrong - anyone not "right-thinking"in that way is a >communist and automatically entirely wrong to you . . .
On 11/29/2016 1:41 PM, JohnO wrote:There is no single example of communism being successful for more than a handful of years.
On Tuesday, 29 November 2016 11:57:43 UTC+13, Allistar wrote:
Rich80105 wrote:
An article telling another side or view of Castro. It certainly cannot >>>> have been easy to achieve what was achieved being located close to a
hostile United States - New Zealand knbows the benefit of access to
trade; the restrictions will have severely affected Cuba.
http://localbodies-bsprout.blogspot.co.nz/2016/11/cuba-vs-usa-what-castro-really-achieved.html
Undoubteldy there were aspects of his regime that we found repugnant
at the time, and still do, but hysterical paranoia and one-sided
attacks echoing battles of the past do us no credit.
Tell that to the people he imprisoned well into the 1970s for not being
heterosexual.
That's nothing.
http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB113590852154334404
The guy is responsible for mass murder. Yet Dickbot seeks to minimise this. >>I am not surprised as he'd stooped this low many tomes.
And like all the Left he evidently was into the good life meanwhile
claiming to be as poor as those he oppressed.
No-one like the left for hypocrisy
On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 16:36:32 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>terrible crimes Castro committed. Thousands put before the firing squads. Free speech and free association suppressed. Contributed to near nuclear war. Turned
wrote:
On Tuesday, 29 November 2016 11:01:56 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
An article telling another side or view of Castro. It certainly cannot
have been easy to achieve what was achieved being located close to a
hostile United States - New Zealand knbows the benefit of access to
trade; the restrictions will have severely affected Cuba.
http://localbodies-bsprout.blogspot.co.nz/2016/11/cuba-vs-usa-what-castro-really-achieved.html
Undoubteldy there were aspects of his regime that we found repugnant
at the time, and still do, but hysterical paranoia and one-sided
attacks echoing battles of the past do us no credit.
What is utterly repugnant is your mealy-mouthed smarmy dismissal of the
What part of Undoubteldy there were aspects of his regime that we
found repugnant at the time, and still do" do you not understand?
despot with little more to be said?Are those not enough "aspects" to simply brand him as a brutal, murderous
Why should they be?only worked with free money from the Soviet Union and then Venezuela. We all know that all collapsed as is inevitable with communist states.
And don't start blubbering about the free healthcare and education. That
So you believe those in Merril Lynch and other merchant banks were
part of a communist conspirtacy when their actionsled to the global
financial crisis? Its all black and white to you, isn't it . JohnO -
National can do no wrong
- anyone not "right-thinking"in that way is a
communist and automatically entirely wrong to you . . .
On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 16:36:32 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>Cuba into an
wrote:
On Tuesday, 29 November 2016 11:01:56 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
An article telling another side or view of Castro. It certainly cannot
have been easy to achieve what was achieved being located close to a
hostile United States - New Zealand knbows the benefit of access to
trade; the restrictions will have severely affected Cuba.
http://localbodies-bsprout.blogspot.co.nz/2016/11/cuba-vs-usa-what-castro-really-achieved.html
Undoubteldy there were aspects of his regime that we found repugnant
at the time, and still do, but hysterical paranoia and one-sided
attacks echoing battles of the past do us no credit.
What is utterly repugnant is your mealy-mouthed smarmy dismissal of the terrible crimes Castro committed. Thousands put before the firing squads. Free speech and free association suppressed. Contributed to near nuclear war. Turned
What part of Undoubteldy there were aspects of his regime that we
found repugnant at the time, and still do" do you not understand?
Are those not enough "aspects" to simply brand him as a brutal, murderous despot with little more to be said?Why should they be?
And don't start blubbering about the free healthcare and education. That only worked with free money from the Soviet Union and then Venezuela. We all know that all collapsed as is inevitable with communist states.
So you believe those in Merril Lynch and other merchant banks were
part of a communist conspirtacy when their actionsled to the global
financial crisis? Its all black and white to you, isn't it . JohnO -
National can do no wrong - anyone not "right-thinking"in that way is a communist and automatically entirely wrong to you . . .
On Tuesday, 29 November 2016 11:01:56 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:terrible crimes Castro committed. Thousands put before the firing squads. Free speech and free association suppressed. Contributed to near nuclear war. Turned
An article telling another side or view of Castro. It certainly cannot
have been easy to achieve what was achieved being located close to a
hostile United States - New Zealand knbows the benefit of access to
trade; the restrictions will have severely affected Cuba.
http://localbodies-bsprout.blogspot.co.nz/2016/11/cuba-vs-usa-what-castro-really-achieved.html
Undoubteldy there were aspects of his regime that we found repugnant
at the time, and still do, but hysterical paranoia and one-sided
attacks echoing battles of the past do us no credit.
What is utterly repugnant is your mealy-mouthed smarmy dismissal of the
Are those not enough "aspects" to simply brand him as a brutal, murderousdespot with little more to be said?
And don't start blubbering about the free healthcare and education. That onlyworked with free money from the Soviet Union and then Venezuela. We all know that all collapsed as is inevitable with communist states.
An article telling another side or view of Castro. It certainly cannot
have been easy to achieve what was achieved being located close to a
hostile United States - New Zealand knbows the benefit of access to
trade; the restrictions will have severely affected Cuba.
http://localbodies-bsprout.blogspot.co.nz/2016/11/cuba-vs-usa-what-castro-really-achieved.html
Undoubteldy there were aspects of his regime that we found repugnant
at the time, and still do, but hysterical paranoia and one-sided
attacks echoing battles of the past do us no credit.
| Sysop: | sneaky |
|---|---|
| Location: | Ashburton,NZ |
| Users: | 31 |
| Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
| Uptime: | 65:08:33 |
| Calls: | 2,097 |
| Files: | 11,144 |
| Messages: | 948,987 |