Little and Pike river
Whilst we are on the issue of Pike River might I take the liberty to remind you
Andrew of a few small details. At the time of the 2010 explosion you
were head of the EPMU which represented approximately half of the 140 miners on
the site. You said there had been no problems at Pike River Coal and
defended its safety record. (21 Nov 2010 Morning Report RNZ) and (NZH 22 Nov). The question that needs to be answered is why you sat on your hands
when members of your union had expressed concerns about the safety of the mine? http://www.whaleoil.co.nz/2016/11/andrew-littles-role-pike-river/

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)

Liberty <liberty48@live.com> wrote:

Little and Pike river
Whilst we are on the issue of Pike River might I take the liberty to remind you Andrew of a few small details. At the time of the 2010 explosion you
were head of the EPMU which represented approximately half of the 140 miners on the site. You said there had been no problems at Pike River Coal and >defended its safety record. (21 Nov 2010 Morning Report RNZ) and (NZH 22 Nov).

The question that needs to be answered is why you sat on your hands

when members of your union had expressed concerns about the safety of the mine?
http://www.whaleoil.co.nz/2016/11/andrew-littles-role-pike-river/

Interesting read. Wonder what Riches spin doctors have to say??

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)

On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 12:20:20 +1300, Mutlley <mutley2000@hotmail.com> wrote:

Liberty <liberty48@live.com> wrote:

Little and Pike river
Whilst we are on the issue of Pike River might I take the liberty to remind you Andrew of a few small details. At the time of the 2010 explosion you
were head of the EPMU which represented approximately half of the 140 miners on the site. You said there had been no problems at Pike River Coal and >>defended its safety record. (21 Nov 2010 Morning Report RNZ) and (NZH 22 Nov). The question that needs to be answered is why you sat on your hands >>when members of your union had expressed concerns about the safety of the mine?
http://www.whaleoil.co.nz/2016/11/andrew-littles-role-pike-river/

Interesting read. Wonder what Riches spin doctors have to say??

So far not a lot.
I suspect Rich has crawled under a rock.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)

On 24/11/2016 10:59 a.m., Liberty wrote:

On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 12:20:20 +1300, Mutlley <mutley2000@hotmail.com> wrote:

Liberty <liberty48@live.com> wrote:

Little and Pike river
Whilst we are on the issue of Pike River might I take the liberty to remind

you Andrew of a few small details. At the time of the 2010 explosion you

were head of the EPMU which represented approximately half of the 140 miners on the site. You said there had been no problems at Pike River Coal and >>> defended its safety record. (21 Nov 2010 Morning Report RNZ) and (NZH 22 Nov). The question that needs to be answered is why you sat on your hands
when members of your union had expressed concerns about the safety of the mine?
http://www.whaleoil.co.nz/2016/11/andrew-littles-role-pike-river/

Interesting read. Wonder what Riches spin doctors have to say??

So far not a lot.
I suspect Rich has crawled under a rock.

He may have realised that he's the troll and isn't talking to himself
any more :) Or he's being reprogrammed .....He'll be back as Rich90210

Pooh

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)