https://www.facebook.com/Channel4NewsDemocracy/videos/1118263898251552/
Since cell phone towers were among the first to go in the recent
earthquakes, this will not be as useful as keeping National Radiowell
funded - but what else was Key trying to distract from?
On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 23:06:35 +1300, Rich80105 wrote:
https://www.facebook.com/Channel4NewsDemocracy/videos/1118263898251552/
Since cell phone towers were among the first to go in the recent
earthquakes, this will not be as useful as keeping National Radiowell
funded - but what else was Key trying to distract from?
What's the connection between that URL and cellphone towers, I wonder?
On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 23:06:35 +1300, Rich80105 wrote:
https://www.facebook.com/Channel4NewsDemocracy/videos/1118263898251552/
Since cell phone towers were among the first to go in the recent earthquakes, this will not be as useful as keeping National Radiowell funded - but what else was Key trying to distract from?
What's the connection between that URL and cellphone towers, I wonder?
On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 23:06:35 +1300, Rich80105 wrote:
https://www.facebook.com/Channel4NewsDemocracy/videos/1118263898251552/
Since cell phone towers were among the first to go in the recent
earthquakes, this will not be as useful as keeping National Radiowell
funded - but what else was Key trying to distract from?
What's the connection between that URL and cellphone towers, I wonder?
On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 23:06:35 +1300, Rich80105 wrote:Sorry, that was for the previous post
https://www.facebook.com/Channel4NewsDemocracy/videos/1118263898251552/
Since cell phone towers were among the first to go in the recent
earthquakes, this will not be as useful as keeping National Radiowell
funded - but what else was Key trying to distract from?
What's the connection between that URL and cellphone towers, I wonder?
On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 10:24:27 -0000 (UTC), HitAnyKey <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:videos/1118263898251552/
On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 23:06:35 +1300, Rich80105 wrote:
https://www.facebook.com/Channel4NewsDemocracy/
system-being-announced-shortly-john-keySorry, that was for the previous post See http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/86647304/national-tsunami-warning-
Since cell phone towers were among the first to go in the recent
earthquakes, this will not be as useful as keeping National Radiowell
funded - but what else was Key trying to distract from?
What's the connection between that URL and cellphone towers, I wonder?
Meanwhile, the monitoring agency remains short funded . . .
On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 10:24:27 -0000 (UTC), HitAnyKeyThere is no reason to believe that there will not be a move/requirement to strengthen cell towers against earthquakes as there is in California. Not that there was a problem this time in Wellington.
<nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 23:06:35 +1300, Rich80105 wrote:See >http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/86647304/national-tsunami-warning-system-being-announced-shortly-john-key
https://www.facebook.com/Channel4NewsDemocracy/videos/1118263898251552/
Since cell phone towers were among the first to go in the recent
earthquakes, this will not be as useful as keeping National Radiowell
funded - but what else was Key trying to distract from?
What's the connection between that URL and cellphone towers, I wonder? >Sorry, that was for the previous post
Meanwhile, the monitoring agency remains short funded . . .
On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 08:33:38 +1300, Rich80105 wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 10:24:27 -0000 (UTC), HitAnyKeyvideos/1118263898251552/
<nobody@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 23:06:35 +1300, Rich80105 wrote:
https://www.facebook.com/Channel4NewsDemocracy/
system-being-announced-shortly-john-keySorry, that was for the previous post See
Since cell phone towers were among the first to go in the recent
earthquakes, this will not be as useful as keeping National Radiowell
funded - but what else was Key trying to distract from?
What's the connection between that URL and cellphone towers, I wonder?
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/86647304/national-tsunami-warning-
Meanwhile, the monitoring agency remains short funded . . .
I don't recall that cellphone towers in Wellington were disabled by the earthquake near Kaikoura. But I do recall that the tsunami warming
applied to many places beyond Kaikoura, including Wellington, even to
some that didn't feel the earthquake itself.
Your posit that cellphone warnings and radio are mutually exclusive alternatives is therefore nonsense - classic false dilemma. Cellphones
and radio are not an "either-or", but an "and".
The seventh deadly sin is said to be to see evil where none exists.
Your habitual anti-government hysteria causes you to fall into that pit. Frequently.
On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 20:39:37 +0000, HitAnyKey wrote:
On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 08:33:38 +1300, Rich80105 wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 10:24:27 -0000 (UTC), HitAnyKeyvideos/1118263898251552/
<nobody@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 23:06:35 +1300, Rich80105 wrote:
https://www.facebook.com/Channel4NewsDemocracy/
system-being-announced-shortly-john-keySorry, that was for the previous post See
Since cell phone towers were among the first to go in the recent
earthquakes, this will not be as useful as keeping National Radiowell >>>>> funded - but what else was Key trying to distract from?
What's the connection between that URL and cellphone towers, I wonder?
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/86647304/national-tsunami-warning-
Meanwhile, the monitoring agency remains short funded . . .
I don't recall that cellphone towers in Wellington were disabled by the
earthquake near Kaikoura. But I do recall that the tsunami warming
applied to many places beyond Kaikoura, including Wellington, even to
some that didn't feel the earthquake itself.
Your posit that cellphone warnings and radio are mutually exclusive
alternatives is therefore nonsense - classic false dilemma. Cellphones
and radio are not an "either-or", but an "and".
The seventh deadly sin is said to be to see evil where none exists.
Your habitual anti-government hysteria causes you to fall into that pit.
Frequently.
For "seventh", read "eighth". For "warming", read "warning".
I should be more careful. As should you.
On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 08:33:38 +1300, Rich80105 wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 10:24:27 -0000 (UTC), HitAnyKey <nobody@nowhere.com>videos/1118263898251552/
wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 23:06:35 +1300, Rich80105 wrote:
https://www.facebook.com/Channel4NewsDemocracy/
Sorry, that was for the previous post See
Since cell phone towers were among the first to go in the recent
earthquakes, this will not be as useful as keeping National Radiowell
funded - but what else was Key trying to distract from?
What's the connection between that URL and cellphone towers, I wonder?
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/86647304/national-tsunami-warning- >system-being-announced-shortly-john-key
Meanwhile, the monitoring agency remains short funded . . .
I don't recall that cellphone towers in Wellington were disabled by the >earthquake near Kaikoura. But I do recall that the tsunami warming
applied to many places beyond Kaikoura, including Wellington, even to
some that didn't feel the earthquake itself.
Your posit that cellphone warnings and radio are mutually exclusive >alternatives is therefore nonsense - classic false dilemma. CellphonesI don't see them as mutually exclusive - it is a matter of priorities.
and radio are not an "either-or", but an "and".
The seventh deadly sin is said to be to see evil where none exists. Your >habitual anti-government hysteria causes you to fall into that pit. >Frequently.
On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 20:39:37 -0000 (UTC), HitAnyKey <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 08:33:38 +1300, Rich80105 wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 10:24:27 -0000 (UTC), HitAnyKey
<nobody@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 23:06:35 +1300, Rich80105 wrote:Sorry, that was for the previous post See
https://www.facebook.com/Channel4NewsDemocracy/ >>videos/1118263898251552/
Since cell phone towers were among the first to go in the recent
earthquakes, this will not be as useful as keeping National
Radiowell funded - but what else was Key trying to distract from?
What's the connection between that URL and cellphone towers, I wonder?
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/86647304/national-tsunami-warning- >>system-being-announced-shortly-john-key
Meanwhile, the monitoring agency remains short funded . . .
I don't recall that cellphone towers in Wellington were disabled by the >>earthquake near Kaikoura. But I do recall that the tsunami warming
applied to many places beyond Kaikoura, including Wellington, even to
some that didn't feel the earthquake itself.
Perhaps you are a little Wellington fixated - I understand the towers
near the centre of the quake did go down - they are the people most
affected. There were reports of people whose only copntact witht he
outside world was thrugh radio - and Radio NZ did better than commercial radio that morning.
Your posit that cellphone warnings and radio are mutually exclusive >>alternatives is therefore nonsense - classic false dilemma. CellphonesI don't see them as mutually exclusive - it is a matter of priorities.
and radio are not an "either-or", but an "and".
I don;t think we disagree - it was John Key that was looking to only put money into a system to send text messages . . .
The seventh deadly sin is said to be to see evil where none exists.
Your habitual anti-government hysteria causes you to fall into that pit. >>Frequently.
I did not see evil - merely incompetence. You are over-reacting.
On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 20:39:37 -0000 (UTC), HitAnyKey
<nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 08:33:38 +1300, Rich80105 wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 10:24:27 -0000 (UTC), HitAnyKey <nobody@nowhere.com> >> wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 23:06:35 +1300, Rich80105 wrote:Sorry, that was for the previous post See
https://www.facebook.com/Channel4NewsDemocracy/ >videos/1118263898251552/
Since cell phone towers were among the first to go in the recent
earthquakes, this will not be as useful as keeping National Radiowell >>>> funded - but what else was Key trying to distract from?
What's the connection between that URL and cellphone towers, I wonder?
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/86647304/national-tsunami-warning- >system-being-announced-shortly-john-key
Meanwhile, the monitoring agency remains short funded . . .
I don't recall that cellphone towers in Wellington were disabled by the >earthquake near Kaikoura. But I do recall that the tsunami warming
applied to many places beyond Kaikoura, including Wellington, even to
some that didn't feel the earthquake itself.
Perhaps you are a little Wellington fixated - I understand the towers
near the centre of the quake did go down - they are the people most
affected. There were reports of people whose only copntact witht he
outside world was thrugh radio - and Radio NZ did better than
commercial radio that morning.
Your posit that cellphone warnings and radio are mutually exclusive >alternatives is therefore nonsense - classic false dilemma. CellphonesI don't see them as mutually exclusive - it is a matter of priorities.
and radio are not an "either-or", but an "and".
I don;t think we disagree - it was John Key that was looking to only
put money into a system to send text messages . . .
The seventh deadly sin is said to be to see evil where none exists. Your >habitual anti-government hysteria causes you to fall into that pit. >Frequently.
I did not see evil - merely incompetence. You are over-reacting.
On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 17:15:18 +1300, Rich80105 wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 20:39:37 -0000 (UTC), HitAnyKey <nobody@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 08:33:38 +1300, Rich80105 wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 10:24:27 -0000 (UTC), HitAnyKey
<nobody@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 23:06:35 +1300, Rich80105 wrote:http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/86647304/national-tsunami-warning- >>>system-being-announced-shortly-john-key
https://www.facebook.com/Channel4NewsDemocracy/ >>>videos/1118263898251552/
Since cell phone towers were among the first to go in the recent
earthquakes, this will not be as useful as keeping National
Radiowell funded - but what else was Key trying to distract from?
What's the connection between that URL and cellphone towers, I wonder? >>>> Sorry, that was for the previous post See
Meanwhile, the monitoring agency remains short funded . . .
I don't recall that cellphone towers in Wellington were disabled by the >>>earthquake near Kaikoura. But I do recall that the tsunami warming >>>applied to many places beyond Kaikoura, including Wellington, even to >>>some that didn't feel the earthquake itself.
Perhaps you are a little Wellington fixated - I understand the towers
near the centre of the quake did go down - they are the people most
affected. There were reports of people whose only copntact witht he
outside world was thrugh radio - and Radio NZ did better than commercial
radio that morning.
Your posit that cellphone warnings and radio are mutually exclusive >>>alternatives is therefore nonsense - classic false dilemma. Cellphones >>>and radio are not an "either-or", but an "and".I don't see them as mutually exclusive - it is a matter of priorities.
I don;t think we disagree - it was John Key that was looking to only put
money into a system to send text messages . . .
The seventh deadly sin is said to be to see evil where none exists.
Your habitual anti-government hysteria causes you to fall into that pit. >>>Frequently.
I did not see evil - merely incompetence. You are over-reacting.
... and, not unexpectedly, you've completely missed my point.
On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 22:28:45 +1300, Rich80105 wrote:
On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 05:31:54 -0000 (UTC), HitAnyKey <nobody@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 17:15:18 +1300, Rich80105 wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 20:39:37 -0000 (UTC), HitAnyKey... and, not unexpectedly, you've completely missed my point.
<nobody@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 08:33:38 +1300, Rich80105 wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 10:24:27 -0000 (UTC), HitAnyKeyvideos/1118263898251552/
<nobody@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 23:06:35 +1300, Rich80105 wrote:
https://www.facebook.com/Channel4NewsDemocracy/
system-being-announced-shortly-john-keySorry, that was for the previous post SeeWhat's the connection between that URL and cellphone towers, I
Since cell phone towers were among the first to go in the recent >>>>>>>> earthquakes, this will not be as useful as keeping National
Radiowell funded - but what else was Key trying to distract from? >>>>>>>
wonder?
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/86647304/national-tsunami-warning-
Meanwhile, the monitoring agency remains short funded . . .
I don't recall that cellphone towers in Wellington were disabled by
the earthquake near Kaikoura. But I do recall that the tsunami
warming applied to many places beyond Kaikoura, including Wellington, >>>>> even to some that didn't feel the earthquake itself.
Perhaps you are a little Wellington fixated - I understand the towers
near the centre of the quake did go down - they are the people most
affected. There were reports of people whose only copntact witht he
outside world was thrugh radio - and Radio NZ did better than
commercial radio that morning.
Your posit that cellphone warnings and radio are mutually exclusiveI don't see them as mutually exclusive - it is a matter of priorities. >>>> I don;t think we disagree - it was John Key that was looking to only
alternatives is therefore nonsense - classic false dilemma.
Cellphones and radio are not an "either-or", but an "and".
put money into a system to send text messages . . .
The seventh deadly sin is said to be to see evil where none exists.
Your habitual anti-government hysteria causes you to fall into that
pit.
Frequently.
I did not see evil - merely incompetence. You are over-reacting.
Was there a point you were trying to make?
What an extraordinarily stupid thing to say.
On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 20:39:37 -0000 (UTC), HitAnyKey
<nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 08:33:38 +1300, Rich80105 wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 10:24:27 -0000 (UTC), HitAnyKey <nobody@nowhere.com> >>> wrote:videos/1118263898251552/
On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 23:06:35 +1300, Rich80105 wrote:
https://www.facebook.com/Channel4NewsDemocracy/
system-being-announced-shortly-john-keySorry, that was for the previous post See
Since cell phone towers were among the first to go in the recent
earthquakes, this will not be as useful as keeping National Radiowell >>>>> funded - but what else was Key trying to distract from?
What's the connection between that URL and cellphone towers, I wonder?
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/86647304/national-tsunami-warning-
Meanwhile, the monitoring agency remains short funded . . .
I don't recall that cellphone towers in Wellington were disabled by the
earthquake near Kaikoura. But I do recall that the tsunami warming
applied to many places beyond Kaikoura, including Wellington, even to
some that didn't feel the earthquake itself.
Perhaps you are a little Wellington fixated - I understand the towers
near the centre of the quake did go down - they are the people most
affected. There were reports of people whose only copntact witht he
outside world was thrugh radio - and Radio NZ did better than
commercial radio that morning.
I don't see them as mutually exclusive - it is a matter of priorities.
Your posit that cellphone warnings and radio are mutually exclusive
alternatives is therefore nonsense - classic false dilemma. Cellphones
and radio are not an "either-or", but an "and".
I don;t think we disagree - it was John Key that was looking to only
put money into a system to send text messages . . .
That's only because of your lack of comprehension skills Rich. Sad toThe seventh deadly sin is said to be to see evil where none exists. Your
habitual anti-government hysteria causes you to fall into that pit.
Frequently.
I did not see evil - merely incompetence. You are over-reacting.
On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 05:31:54 -0000 (UTC), HitAnyKey <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 17:15:18 +1300, Rich80105 wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 20:39:37 -0000 (UTC), HitAnyKey... and, not unexpectedly, you've completely missed my point.
<nobody@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 08:33:38 +1300, Rich80105 wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 10:24:27 -0000 (UTC), HitAnyKey
<nobody@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 23:06:35 +1300, Rich80105 wrote:Sorry, that was for the previous post See
https://www.facebook.com/Channel4NewsDemocracy/ >>>>videos/1118263898251552/What's the connection between that URL and cellphone towers, I >>>>>>wonder?
Since cell phone towers were among the first to go in the recent >>>>>>> earthquakes, this will not be as useful as keeping National
Radiowell funded - but what else was Key trying to distract from? >>>>>>
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/86647304/national-tsunami-warning- >>>>system-being-announced-shortly-john-key
Meanwhile, the monitoring agency remains short funded . . .
I don't recall that cellphone towers in Wellington were disabled by
the earthquake near Kaikoura. But I do recall that the tsunami
warming applied to many places beyond Kaikoura, including Wellington, >>>>even to some that didn't feel the earthquake itself.
Perhaps you are a little Wellington fixated - I understand the towers
near the centre of the quake did go down - they are the people most
affected. There were reports of people whose only copntact witht he
outside world was thrugh radio - and Radio NZ did better than
commercial radio that morning.
Your posit that cellphone warnings and radio are mutually exclusive >>>>alternatives is therefore nonsense - classic false dilemma.I don't see them as mutually exclusive - it is a matter of priorities.
Cellphones and radio are not an "either-or", but an "and".
I don;t think we disagree - it was John Key that was looking to only
put money into a system to send text messages . . .
The seventh deadly sin is said to be to see evil where none exists. >>>>Your habitual anti-government hysteria causes you to fall into that >>>>pit.
Frequently.
I did not see evil - merely incompetence. You are over-reacting.
Was there a point you were trying to make?
On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 22:28:45 +1300, Rich80105 wrote:
On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 05:31:54 -0000 (UTC), HitAnyKey <nobody@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 17:15:18 +1300, Rich80105 wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 20:39:37 -0000 (UTC), HitAnyKey... and, not unexpectedly, you've completely missed my point.
<nobody@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 08:33:38 +1300, Rich80105 wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 10:24:27 -0000 (UTC), HitAnyKeyvideos/1118263898251552/
<nobody@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 23:06:35 +1300, Rich80105 wrote:
https://www.facebook.com/Channel4NewsDemocracy/
system-being-announced-shortly-john-keySorry, that was for the previous post SeeWhat's the connection between that URL and cellphone towers, I
Since cell phone towers were among the first to go in the recent >>>>>>>> earthquakes, this will not be as useful as keeping National
Radiowell funded - but what else was Key trying to distract from? >>>>>>>
wonder?
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/86647304/national-tsunami-warning-
Meanwhile, the monitoring agency remains short funded . . .
I don't recall that cellphone towers in Wellington were disabled by
the earthquake near Kaikoura. But I do recall that the tsunami
warming applied to many places beyond Kaikoura, including Wellington, >>>>> even to some that didn't feel the earthquake itself.
Perhaps you are a little Wellington fixated - I understand the towers
near the centre of the quake did go down - they are the people most
affected. There were reports of people whose only copntact witht he
outside world was thrugh radio - and Radio NZ did better than
commercial radio that morning.
Your posit that cellphone warnings and radio are mutually exclusiveI don't see them as mutually exclusive - it is a matter of priorities. >>>> I don;t think we disagree - it was John Key that was looking to only
alternatives is therefore nonsense - classic false dilemma.
Cellphones and radio are not an "either-or", but an "and".
put money into a system to send text messages . . .
The seventh deadly sin is said to be to see evil where none exists.
Your habitual anti-government hysteria causes you to fall into that
pit.
Frequently.
I did not see evil - merely incompetence. You are over-reacting.
Was there a point you were trying to make?
What an extraordinarily stupid thing to say.
On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 20:39:37 -0000 (UTC), HitAnyKey
<nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 08:33:38 +1300, Rich80105 wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 10:24:27 -0000 (UTC), HitAnyKey <nobody@nowhere.com> >>> wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 23:06:35 +1300, Rich80105 wrote:Sorry, that was for the previous post See
https://www.facebook.com/Channel4NewsDemocracy/ >>videos/1118263898251552/
Since cell phone towers were among the first to go in the recent
earthquakes, this will not be as useful as keeping National Radiowell >>>>> funded - but what else was Key trying to distract from?
What's the connection between that URL and cellphone towers, I wonder?
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/86647304/national-tsunami-warning->>system-being-announced-shortly-john-key
Meanwhile, the monitoring agency remains short funded . . .
I don't recall that cellphone towers in Wellington were disabled by the >>earthquake near Kaikoura. But I do recall that the tsunami warming
applied to many places beyond Kaikoura, including Wellington, even to
some that didn't feel the earthquake itself.
Perhaps you are a little Wellington fixated - I understand the towers
near the centre of the quake did go down - they are the people most
affected. There were reports of people whose only copntact witht he
outside world was thrugh radio - and Radio NZ did better than
commercial radio that morning.
On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 22:28:45 +1300, Rich80105 wrote:
On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 05:31:54 -0000 (UTC), HitAnyKey <nobody@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 17:15:18 +1300, Rich80105 wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 20:39:37 -0000 (UTC), HitAnyKey... and, not unexpectedly, you've completely missed my point.
<nobody@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 08:33:38 +1300, Rich80105 wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 10:24:27 -0000 (UTC), HitAnyKey
<nobody@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 23:06:35 +1300, Rich80105 wrote:Sorry, that was for the previous post See
https://www.facebook.com/Channel4NewsDemocracy/ >>>>>videos/1118263898251552/What's the connection between that URL and cellphone towers, I >>>>>>>wonder?
Since cell phone towers were among the first to go in the recent >>>>>>>> earthquakes, this will not be as useful as keeping National
Radiowell funded - but what else was Key trying to distract from? >>>>>>>
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/86647304/national-tsunami-warning- >>>>>system-being-announced-shortly-john-key
Meanwhile, the monitoring agency remains short funded . . .
I don't recall that cellphone towers in Wellington were disabled by >>>>>the earthquake near Kaikoura. But I do recall that the tsunami >>>>>warming applied to many places beyond Kaikoura, including Wellington, >>>>>even to some that didn't feel the earthquake itself.
Perhaps you are a little Wellington fixated - I understand the towers
near the centre of the quake did go down - they are the people most
affected. There were reports of people whose only copntact witht he
outside world was thrugh radio - and Radio NZ did better than
commercial radio that morning.
Your posit that cellphone warnings and radio are mutually exclusive >>>>>alternatives is therefore nonsense - classic false dilemma. >>>>>Cellphones and radio are not an "either-or", but an "and".I don't see them as mutually exclusive - it is a matter of priorities. >>>> I don;t think we disagree - it was John Key that was looking to only
put money into a system to send text messages . . .
The seventh deadly sin is said to be to see evil where none exists. >>>>>Your habitual anti-government hysteria causes you to fall into that >>>>>pit.
Frequently.
I did not see evil - merely incompetence. You are over-reacting.
Was there a point you were trying to make?
What an extraordinarily stupid thing to say.
Rich80105 wrote:
Perhaps you are a little Wellington fixated - I understand the towers
near the centre of the quake did go down - they are the people most
affected. There were reports of people whose only copntact witht he
outside world was thrugh radio - and Radio NZ did better than
commercial radio that morning.
Can you provide proof of that claim?
On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 11:30:08 -0000 (UTC), HitAnyKey <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:government-knows-play-disaster
On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 22:28:45 +1300, Rich80105 wrote:
On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 05:31:54 -0000 (UTC), HitAnyKey
<nobody@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 17:15:18 +1300, Rich80105 wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 20:39:37 -0000 (UTC), HitAnyKey... and, not unexpectedly, you've completely missed my point.
<nobody@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 08:33:38 +1300, Rich80105 wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 10:24:27 -0000 (UTC), HitAnyKey
<nobody@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 23:06:35 +1300, Rich80105 wrote:Sorry, that was for the previous post See
https://www.facebook.com/Channel4NewsDemocracy/ >>>>>>videos/1118263898251552/
Since cell phone towers were among the first to go in the recent >>>>>>>>> earthquakes, this will not be as useful as keeping National
Radiowell funded - but what else was Key trying to distract
from?
What's the connection between that URL and cellphone towers, I >>>>>>>>wonder?
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/86647304/national-tsunami-warning- >>>>>>system-being-announced-shortly-john-key
Meanwhile, the monitoring agency remains short funded . . .
I don't recall that cellphone towers in Wellington were disabled by >>>>>>the earthquake near Kaikoura. But I do recall that the tsunami >>>>>>warming applied to many places beyond Kaikoura, including >>>>>>Wellington,
even to some that didn't feel the earthquake itself.
Perhaps you are a little Wellington fixated - I understand the
towers near the centre of the quake did go down - they are the
people most affected. There were reports of people whose only
copntact witht he outside world was thrugh radio - and Radio NZ did
better than commercial radio that morning.
Your posit that cellphone warnings and radio are mutually exclusive >>>>>>alternatives is therefore nonsense - classic false dilemma. >>>>>>Cellphones and radio are not an "either-or", but an "and".I don't see them as mutually exclusive - it is a matter of
priorities.
I don;t think we disagree - it was John Key that was looking to only >>>>> put money into a system to send text messages . . .
The seventh deadly sin is said to be to see evil where none exists. >>>>>>Your habitual anti-government hysteria causes you to fall into that >>>>>>pit.
Frequently.
I did not see evil - merely incompetence. You are over-reacting.
Was there a point you were trying to make?
What an extraordinarily stupid thing to say.
Yes your post was stupid. If you wish to disagree, it is useful to give
some reason for that disagreement. I have disagreed with a proposal that sending text messages to mobile phones (which may be themselves disabled
in an earthquake area of most importance) is the most useful use of
money for emergency money , and suggested that funding for Geonet and
Radio NZ are a higher priority. In the absence of any suggestion of any professional avice, the brain-fart of Key looks ike a typical attempt to
be seen to be doing something.
anything, to distract from something - possibly the lack of real action
after the Christchurch quakes to review emergency services:
For example we have this: http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11752316
which includes:
Speaking to reporters this afternoon, he said it was now apparent that
GNS had raised a 24-hour, seven-day-a-week monitoring system in various reports over the years.
"But they have never, ever provided anything directly to Government or
even close to it."
Brownlee agrees that the public warning system will need to upgraded,
given the inconsistency or total absence of warnings in some regions
after the quake.
But it was irritating to face criticism "at a time when people were suffering", he said. A new warning system could not be "magic-ed up overnight".
___
Translation - Brownlee bullied a scientist before checking is facts -
typical Nat arrogance and lack of preperedness to take advice.
then we have this: https://www.tvnz.co.nz/one-news/new-zealand/john-armstrong-opinion-
and this: https://twitter.com/NZNationalParty/status/799084907368546304/photo/1 https://twitter.com/NZNationalParty/status/799084907368546304
Notice the little logos telling you the government is spending money to
help victims of the earthquakes? - oh wait . . . .
National's priorities are themselves first. business second, and others
can wait.
Have you seen any acknowledgement that Radio NZ did a good job of
getting out public interest information on the night of the first quake?
They would prefer that profit goes to private broadcasters -
but some of them broadcasting canned programmes didn't even know about
the quakes until hours later . . .
On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 11:30:08 -0000 (UTC), HitAnyKeyYou are pontificating on a subject that you do not even begin to comprehend. You are guessing, making stuff up and extracting spurious bits of data to try to support your unsupportable position.
<nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 22:28:45 +1300, Rich80105 wrote:
On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 05:31:54 -0000 (UTC), HitAnyKey <nobody@nowhere.com> >>> wrote:
On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 17:15:18 +1300, Rich80105 wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 20:39:37 -0000 (UTC), HitAnyKey... and, not unexpectedly, you've completely missed my point.
<nobody@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 08:33:38 +1300, Rich80105 wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 10:24:27 -0000 (UTC), HitAnyKey
<nobody@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 23:06:35 +1300, Rich80105 wrote:Sorry, that was for the previous post See
https://www.facebook.com/Channel4NewsDemocracy/ >>>>>>videos/1118263898251552/What's the connection between that URL and cellphone towers, I >>>>>>>>wonder?
Since cell phone towers were among the first to go in the recent >>>>>>>>> earthquakes, this will not be as useful as keeping National
Radiowell funded - but what else was Key trying to distract from? >>>>>>>>
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/86647304/national-tsunami-warning- >>>>>>system-being-announced-shortly-john-key
Meanwhile, the monitoring agency remains short funded . . .
I don't recall that cellphone towers in Wellington were disabled by >>>>>>the earthquake near Kaikoura. But I do recall that the tsunami >>>>>>warming applied to many places beyond Kaikoura, including Wellington, >>>>>>even to some that didn't feel the earthquake itself.
Perhaps you are a little Wellington fixated - I understand the towers >>>>> near the centre of the quake did go down - they are the people most
affected. There were reports of people whose only copntact witht he
outside world was thrugh radio - and Radio NZ did better than
commercial radio that morning.
Your posit that cellphone warnings and radio are mutually exclusive >>>>>>alternatives is therefore nonsense - classic false dilemma. >>>>>>Cellphones and radio are not an "either-or", but an "and".I don't see them as mutually exclusive - it is a matter of priorities. >>>>> I don;t think we disagree - it was John Key that was looking to only >>>>> put money into a system to send text messages . . .
The seventh deadly sin is said to be to see evil where none exists. >>>>>>Your habitual anti-government hysteria causes you to fall into that >>>>>>pit.
Frequently.
I did not see evil - merely incompetence. You are over-reacting.
Was there a point you were trying to make?
What an extraordinarily stupid thing to say.
Yes your post was stupid. If you wish to disagree, it is useful to
give some reason for that disagreement. I have disagreed with a
proposal that sending text messages to mobile phones (which may be
themselves disabled in an earthquake area of most importance) is the
most useful use of money for emergency money , and suggested that
funding for Geonet and Radio NZ are a higher priority. In the absence
of any suggestion of any professional avice, the brain-fart of Key
looks ike a typical attempt to be seen to be doing something.
anything, to distract from something - possibly the lack of real
action after the Christchurch quakes to review emergency services:
For example we have this: >http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11752316
which includes:
Speaking to reporters this afternoon, he said it was now apparent that
GNS had raised a 24-hour, seven-day-a-week monitoring system in
various reports over the years.
"But they have never, ever provided anything directly to Government or
even close to it."
Brownlee agrees that the public warning system will need to upgraded,
given the inconsistency or total absence of warnings in some regions
after the quake.
But it was irritating to face criticism "at a time when people were >suffering", he said. A new warning system could not be "magic-ed up >overnight".
___
Translation - Brownlee bullied a scientist before checking is facts -
typical Nat arrogance and lack of preperedness to take advice.
then we have this: >https://www.tvnz.co.nz/one-news/new-zealand/john-armstrong-opinion-government-knows-play-disaster
and this: >https://twitter.com/NZNationalParty/status/799084907368546304/photo/1 >https://twitter.com/NZNationalParty/status/799084907368546304
Notice the little logos telling you the government is spending money
to help victims of the earthquakes? - oh wait . . . .
National's priorities are themselves first. business second, and
others can wait.
Have you seen any acknowledgement that Radio NZ did a good job of
getting out public interest information on the night of the first
quake? They would prefer that profit goes to private broadcasters -
but some of them broadcasting canned programmes didn't even know about
the quakes until hours later . . .
On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 20:39:37 -0000 (UTC), HitAnyKeyYou are lying again. He did not suggest that it was exclusive. How do you manage to sleep at night knowing that you manufacture nonsense like this?
<nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 08:33:38 +1300, Rich80105 wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 10:24:27 -0000 (UTC), HitAnyKey <nobody@nowhere.com> >>> wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 23:06:35 +1300, Rich80105 wrote:Sorry, that was for the previous post See
https://www.facebook.com/Channel4NewsDemocracy/ >>videos/1118263898251552/
Since cell phone towers were among the first to go in the recent
earthquakes, this will not be as useful as keeping National Radiowell >>>>> funded - but what else was Key trying to distract from?
What's the connection between that URL and cellphone towers, I wonder?
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/86647304/national-tsunami-warning- >>system-being-announced-shortly-john-key
Meanwhile, the monitoring agency remains short funded . . .
I don't recall that cellphone towers in Wellington were disabled by the >>earthquake near Kaikoura. But I do recall that the tsunami warming
applied to many places beyond Kaikoura, including Wellington, even to
some that didn't feel the earthquake itself.
Perhaps you are a little Wellington fixated - I understand the towers
near the centre of the quake did go down - they are the people most
affected. There were reports of people whose only copntact witht he
outside world was thrugh radio - and Radio NZ did better than
commercial radio that morning.
I don't see them as mutually exclusive - it is a matter of priorities.
Your posit that cellphone warnings and radio are mutually exclusive >>alternatives is therefore nonsense - classic false dilemma. Cellphones
and radio are not an "either-or", but an "and".
I don;t think we disagree - it was John Key that was looking to only
put money into a system to send text messages . . .
You would not recognise incompetence if it hit you in the face; otherwise you would not support the Labour party!The seventh deadly sin is said to be to see evil where none exists. Your >>habitual anti-government hysteria causes you to fall into that pit. >>Frequently.
I did not see evil - merely incompetence. You are over-reacting.
On 11/22/2016 8:44 AM, Allistar wrote:They do not all have aletrnative supplies and almost none have battery backup for well understood technical reasons. Unlike cellphone towers.
Rich80105 wrote:
Perhaps you are a little Wellington fixated - I understand the towers
near the centre of the quake did go down - they are the people most
affected. There were reports of people whose only copntact witht he
outside world was thrugh radio - and Radio NZ did better than
commercial radio that morning.
Can you provide proof of that claim?
Radio is dependent upon -their- aerials remaining up and unbroken.
And no disruption to the main and alternate power supplies
On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 11:30:08 -0000 (UTC), HitAnyKey
<nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 22:28:45 +1300, Rich80105 wrote:
On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 05:31:54 -0000 (UTC), HitAnyKey <nobody@nowhere.com> >>> wrote:
On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 17:15:18 +1300, Rich80105 wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 20:39:37 -0000 (UTC), HitAnyKey... and, not unexpectedly, you've completely missed my point.
<nobody@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 08:33:38 +1300, Rich80105 wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 10:24:27 -0000 (UTC), HitAnyKeyvideos/1118263898251552/
<nobody@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 23:06:35 +1300, Rich80105 wrote:
https://www.facebook.com/Channel4NewsDemocracy/
Sorry, that was for the previous post SeeWhat's the connection between that URL and cellphone towers, I >>>>>>>> wonder?
Since cell phone towers were among the first to go in the recent >>>>>>>>> earthquakes, this will not be as useful as keeping National
Radiowell funded - but what else was Key trying to distract from? >>>>>>>>
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/86647304/national-tsunami-warning- >>>>>> system-being-announced-shortly-john-key
Meanwhile, the monitoring agency remains short funded . . .
I don't recall that cellphone towers in Wellington were disabled by >>>>>> the earthquake near Kaikoura. But I do recall that the tsunami
warming applied to many places beyond Kaikoura, including Wellington, >>>>>> even to some that didn't feel the earthquake itself.
Perhaps you are a little Wellington fixated - I understand the towers >>>>> near the centre of the quake did go down - they are the people most
affected. There were reports of people whose only copntact witht he
outside world was thrugh radio - and Radio NZ did better than
commercial radio that morning.
Your posit that cellphone warnings and radio are mutually exclusive >>>>>> alternatives is therefore nonsense - classic false dilemma.I don't see them as mutually exclusive - it is a matter of priorities. >>>>> I don;t think we disagree - it was John Key that was looking to only >>>>> put money into a system to send text messages . . .
Cellphones and radio are not an "either-or", but an "and".
The seventh deadly sin is said to be to see evil where none exists. >>>>>> Your habitual anti-government hysteria causes you to fall into that >>>>>> pit.
Frequently.
I did not see evil - merely incompetence. You are over-reacting.
Was there a point you were trying to make?
What an extraordinarily stupid thing to say.
Yes your post was stupid. If you wish to disagree, it is useful to
give some reason for that disagreement. I have disagreed with a
proposal that sending text messages to mobile phones (which may be
themselves disabled in an earthquake area of most importance) is the
most useful use of money for emergency money , and suggested that
funding for Geonet and Radio NZ are a higher priority. In the absence
of any suggestion of any professional avice, the brain-fart of Key
looks ike a typical attempt to be seen to be doing something.
anything, to distract from something - possibly the lack of real
action after the Christchurch quakes to review emergency services:
george152 <gblack@hnpl.net> wrote:
On 11/22/2016 8:44 AM, Allistar wrote:They do not all have aletrnative supplies and almost none have battery backup for well understood technical reasons. Unlike cellphone towers.
Rich80105 wrote:
Perhaps you are a little Wellington fixated - I understand the towers
near the centre of the quake did go down - they are the people most
affected. There were reports of people whose only copntact witht he
outside world was thrugh radio - and Radio NZ did better than
commercial radio that morning.
Can you provide proof of that claim?
Radio is dependent upon -their- aerials remaining up and unbroken.
And no disruption to the main and alternate power supplies
Tony
On 11/22/2016 8:03 PM, Tony wrote:Funny.
george152 <gblack@hnpl.net> wrote:True.
On 11/22/2016 8:44 AM, Allistar wrote:They do not all have aletrnative supplies and almost none have battery backup
Rich80105 wrote:
Perhaps you are a little Wellington fixated - I understand the towers >>>>> near the centre of the quake did go down - they are the people most
affected. There were reports of people whose only copntact witht he
outside world was thrugh radio - and Radio NZ did better than
commercial radio that morning.
Can you provide proof of that claim?
Radio is dependent upon -their- aerials remaining up and unbroken.
And no disruption to the main and alternate power supplies
for well understood technical reasons. Unlike cellphone towers.
Tony
Which is why during disasters they use radio hams to do the comms
| Sysop: | sneaky |
|---|---|
| Location: | Ashburton,NZ |
| Users: | 31 |
| Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
| Uptime: | 188:52:05 |
| Calls: | 2,082 |
| Calls today: | 5 |
| Files: | 11,137 |
| Messages: | 947,676 |