http://nominister.blogspot.co.nz/2016/08/and-eurowankers-wonder-why.html
Apple complies with the law, and the EU sees fit to fine it NZ$19billion.
To had over to the Irish government.
Who want none of it.
Typical big government idiocy.
http://nominister.blogspot.co.nz/2016/08/and-eurowankers-wonder-why.html
Apple complies with the law, and the EU sees fit to fine it NZ$19billion.
To had over to the Irish government.
Who want none of it.
Typical big government idiocy.
JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com> wrote:
http://nominister.blogspot.co.nz/2016/08/and-eurowankers-wonder-why.html
Apple complies with the law, and the EU sees fit to fine it NZ$19billion.
To had over to the Irish government.
Who want none of it.
Typical big government idiocy.
This I think is one of the reasons that the poms wanted to exit the
EU. Too many EU bureaucrats wanting to override local country laws..
On 8/31/2016 7:17 PM, JohnO wrote:
http://nominister.blogspot.co.nz/2016/08/and-eurowankers-wonder-why.html
Apple complies with the law, and the EU sees fit to fine it NZ$19billion.
To had over to the Irish government.
Who want none of it.
Typical big government idiocy.
Another reason for any sane country to bail out of the EU.
And after Brexit the Irish want to stay in ???
http://nominister.blogspot.co.nz/2016/08/and-eurowankers-wonder-why.html
Apple complies with the law, and the EU sees fit to fine it NZ$19billion.
To had over to the Irish government.
Who want none of it.
Typical big government idiocy.
On Thu, 01 Sep 2016 08:39:58 +1200, Mutlley <mutley2000@hotmail.com>
wrote:
JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com> wrote:
http://nominister.blogspot.co.nz/2016/08/and-eurowankers-wonder-why.html >>>
Apple complies with the law, and the EU sees fit to fine it NZ$19billion. >>>
To had over to the Irish government.
Who want none of it.
Typical big government idiocy.
This I think is one of the reasons that the poms wanted to exit the
EU. Too many EU bureaucrats wanting to override local country laws..
Apaprently a requirement of EU membership is that their tax rules not
allow special tax benefits for particular companies - can oyou explain
what is so offensive about that, Mutley? Ireland would have known
about membership requirements when they joined the EU, and since then
teh EU has granted a lot of money to Ireland - perhaps they feel that
rather than needing suport reland should be collecting a fair tax from
all the companies that are gegistered in Ireland?
What is it you object to, Mutley?
On Thu, 01 Sep 2016 08:39:58 +1200, Mutlley <mutley2000@hotmail.com>
wrote:
JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com> wrote:
http://nominister.blogspot.co.nz/2016/08/and-eurowankers-wonder-why.html
Apple complies with the law, and the EU sees fit to fine it NZ$19billion. >>>
To had over to the Irish government.
Who want none of it.
Typical big government idiocy.
This I think is one of the reasons that the poms wanted to exit the
EU. Too many EU bureaucrats wanting to override local country laws..
Apaprently a requirement of EU membership is that their tax rules not
allow special tax benefits for particular companies - can oyou explain
what is so offensive about that, Mutley? Ireland would have known
about membership requirements when they joined the EU, and since then
teh EU has granted a lot of money to Ireland - perhaps they feel that
rather than needing suport reland should be collecting a fair tax from
all the companies that are gegistered in Ireland?
What is it you object to, Mutley?
On 31/08/2016 7:17 p.m., JohnO wrote:
http://nominister.blogspot.co.nz/2016/08/and-eurowankers-wonder-why.html
Apple complies with the law, and the EU sees fit to fine it NZ$19billion.
To had over to the Irish government.
Who want none of it.
Typical big government idiocy.
Yup they have really upset the Apple cart !
You're welcome. :D
Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, 01 Sep 2016 08:39:58 +1200, Mutlley <mutley2000@hotmail.com>
wrote:
JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com> wrote:
http://nominister.blogspot.co.nz/2016/08/and-eurowankers-wonder-why.html >>>>
Apple complies with the law, and the EU sees fit to fine it NZ$19billion. >>>>
To had over to the Irish government.
Who want none of it.
Typical big government idiocy.
This I think is one of the reasons that the poms wanted to exit the
EU. Too many EU bureaucrats wanting to override local country laws..
Apaprently a requirement of EU membership is that their tax rules not
allow special tax benefits for particular companies - can oyou explain
what is so offensive about that, Mutley? Ireland would have known
about membership requirements when they joined the EU, and since then
teh EU has granted a lot of money to Ireland - perhaps they feel that
rather than needing suport reland should be collecting a fair tax from
all the companies that are gegistered in Ireland?
What is it you object to, Mutley?
sovereignty Rich. EU countries may as well disband their
governments and be ruled from Berlin or Brussels.
On 9/1/2016 12:12 PM, Mutlley wrote:
Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:That's what is already going on.
On Thu, 01 Sep 2016 08:39:58 +1200, Mutlley <mutley2000@hotmail.com>
wrote:
JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com> wrote:
http://nominister.blogspot.co.nz/2016/08/and-eurowankers-wonder-why.html >>>>>
Apple complies with the law, and the EU sees fit to fine it NZ$19billion. >>>>>
To had over to the Irish government.
Who want none of it.
Typical big government idiocy.
This I think is one of the reasons that the poms wanted to exit the
EU. Too many EU bureaucrats wanting to override local country laws..
Apaprently a requirement of EU membership is that their tax rules not
allow special tax benefits for particular companies - can oyou explain
what is so offensive about that, Mutley? Ireland would have known
about membership requirements when they joined the EU, and since then
teh EU has granted a lot of money to Ireland - perhaps they feel that
rather than needing suport reland should be collecting a fair tax from
all the companies that are gegistered in Ireland?
What is it you object to, Mutley?
sovereignty Rich. EU countries may as well disband their
governments and be ruled from Berlin or Brussels.
And Britain bailed, France is making noises and Germany is less than >impressed.
The only one advocating EU dominance of Europe is Rich... why ?????
On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 14:02:49 +1200, george152 <gblack@hnpl.net> wrote:
On 9/1/2016 12:12 PM, Mutlley wrote:
Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:That's what is already going on.
On Thu, 01 Sep 2016 08:39:58 +1200, Mutlley <mutley2000@hotmail.com>
wrote:
JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com> wrote:Apaprently a requirement of EU membership is that their tax rules not
http://nominister.blogspot.co.nz/2016/08/and-eurowankers-wonder-why.html >>>>>>
Apple complies with the law, and the EU sees fit to fine it
NZ$19billion.
To had over to the Irish government.
Who want none of it.
Typical big government idiocy.
This I think is one of the reasons that the poms wanted to exit the
EU. Too many EU bureaucrats wanting to override local country laws.. >>>>
allow special tax benefits for particular companies - can oyou explain >>>> what is so offensive about that, Mutley? Ireland would have known
about membership requirements when they joined the EU, and since then
teh EU has granted a lot of money to Ireland - perhaps they feel that
rather than needing suport reland should be collecting a fair tax from >>>> all the companies that are gegistered in Ireland?
What is it you object to, Mutley?
sovereignty Rich. EU countries may as well disband their
governments and be ruled from Berlin or Brussels.
And Britain bailed, France is making noises and Germany is less than >>impressed.
The only one advocating EU dominance of Europe is Rich... why ?????
Just seeking clarification, george.
Do you similarly want our government to withdraw from trade agreements
with Australian China, Korea? Are you still in favour of the TPPP?
The EU is an agreement between governments similar to those agreements
- and our current goverment gave additional benefits to Korea that
triggered flow through benefits to China regarding ownership of
property - all binding on future governments and hence a restriction
on sovereignity.
New Zealand also allows trusts and other New Zealand entities with no
New Zealand assets to be exmpt from tax - do you agree with that?
Rich80105 wrote:
On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 14:02:49 +1200, george152 <gblack@hnpl.net> wrote:
On 9/1/2016 12:12 PM, Mutlley wrote:
Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:That's what is already going on.
On Thu, 01 Sep 2016 08:39:58 +1200, Mutlley <mutley2000@hotmail.com> >>>>> wrote:
JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com> wrote:Apaprently a requirement of EU membership is that their tax rules not >>>>> allow special tax benefits for particular companies - can oyou explain >>>>> what is so offensive about that, Mutley? Ireland would have known
http://nominister.blogspot.co.nz/2016/08/and-eurowankers-wonder-why.html
Apple complies with the law, and the EU sees fit to fine it
NZ$19billion.
To had over to the Irish government.
Who want none of it.
Typical big government idiocy.
This I think is one of the reasons that the poms wanted to exit the >>>>>> EU. Too many EU bureaucrats wanting to override local country laws.. >>>>>
about membership requirements when they joined the EU, and since then >>>>> teh EU has granted a lot of money to Ireland - perhaps they feel that >>>>> rather than needing suport reland should be collecting a fair tax from >>>>> all the companies that are gegistered in Ireland?
What is it you object to, Mutley?
sovereignty Rich. EU countries may as well disband their
governments and be ruled from Berlin or Brussels.
And Britain bailed, France is making noises and Germany is less than >>>impressed.
The only one advocating EU dominance of Europe is Rich... why ?????
Just seeking clarification, george.
Do you similarly want our government to withdraw from trade agreements
with Australian China, Korea? Are you still in favour of the TPPP?
The EU is an agreement between governments similar to those agreements
- and our current goverment gave additional benefits to Korea that
triggered flow through benefits to China regarding ownership of
property - all binding on future governments and hence a restriction
on sovereignity.
New Zealand also allows trusts and other New Zealand entities with no
New Zealand assets to be exmpt from tax - do you agree with that?
The more that is exempt from tax the better. This needs to spread elsewhere.
On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 14:02:49 +1200, george152 <gblack@hnpl.net> wrote:Nonsnse the EU is dramaticaally more than the TPP or any trade agreements,
On 9/1/2016 12:12 PM, Mutlley wrote:
Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:That's what is already going on.
On Thu, 01 Sep 2016 08:39:58 +1200, Mutlley <mutley2000@hotmail.com>
wrote:
JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com> wrote:Apaprently a requirement of EU membership is that their tax rules not
http://nominister.blogspot.co.nz/2016/08/and-eurowankers-wonder-why.html >>>>>>
Apple complies with the law, and the EU sees fit to fine it NZ$19billion.
To had over to the Irish government.
Who want none of it.
Typical big government idiocy.
This I think is one of the reasons that the poms wanted to exit the
EU. Too many EU bureaucrats wanting to override local country laws.. >>>>
allow special tax benefits for particular companies - can oyou explain >>>> what is so offensive about that, Mutley? Ireland would have known
about membership requirements when they joined the EU, and since then
teh EU has granted a lot of money to Ireland - perhaps they feel that
rather than needing suport reland should be collecting a fair tax from >>>> all the companies that are gegistered in Ireland?
What is it you object to, Mutley?
sovereignty Rich. EU countries may as well disband their
governments and be ruled from Berlin or Brussels.
And Britain bailed, France is making noises and Germany is less than >>impressed.
The only one advocating EU dominance of Europe is Rich... why ?????
Just seeking clarification, george.
Do you similarly want our government to withdraw from trade agreements
with Australian China, Korea? Are you still in favour of the TPPP?
The EU is an agreement between governments similar to those agreements
- and our current goverment gave additional benefits to Korea thatClearly you still have not read the TPP! It probably won't go ahead but that is not because of sovereignty issues.
triggered flow through benefits to China regarding ownership of
property - all binding on future governments and hence a restriction
on sovereignity.
New Zealand also allows trusts and other New Zealand entities with noYes that is correct just as it is correct for many countries in the OECD who, in common with New Zealand, are not tax havens.
New Zealand assets to be exmpt from tax - do you agree with that?
On Thu, 01 Sep 2016 15:58:01 +1200, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
wrote:
Rich80105 wrote:
On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 14:02:49 +1200, george152 <gblack@hnpl.net> wrote:
On 9/1/2016 12:12 PM, Mutlley wrote:
Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:That's what is already going on.
On Thu, 01 Sep 2016 08:39:58 +1200, Mutlley <mutley2000@hotmail.com> >>>>>> wrote:
JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com> wrote:
http://nominister.blogspot.co.nz/2016/08/and-eurowankers-wonder-why.html
Apple complies with the law, and the EU sees fit to fine it
NZ$19billion.
To had over to the Irish government.
Who want none of it.
Typical big government idiocy.
This I think is one of the reasons that the poms wanted to exit the >>>>>>> EU. Too many EU bureaucrats wanting to override local country
laws..
Apaprently a requirement of EU membership is that their tax rules not >>>>>> allow special tax benefits for particular companies - can oyou
explain what is so offensive about that, Mutley? Ireland would have >>>>>> known about membership requirements when they joined the EU, and
since then teh EU has granted a lot of money to Ireland - perhaps
they feel that rather than needing suport reland should be collecting >>>>>> a fair tax from all the companies that are gegistered in Ireland?
What is it you object to, Mutley?
sovereignty Rich. EU countries may as well disband their
governments and be ruled from Berlin or Brussels.
And Britain bailed, France is making noises and Germany is less than >>>>impressed.
The only one advocating EU dominance of Europe is Rich... why ?????
Just seeking clarification, george.
Do you similarly want our government to withdraw from trade agreements
with Australian China, Korea? Are you still in favour of the TPPP?
The EU is an agreement between governments similar to those agreements
- and our current goverment gave additional benefits to Korea that
triggered flow through benefits to China regarding ownership of
property - all binding on future governments and hence a restriction
on sovereignity.
New Zealand also allows trusts and other New Zealand entities with no
New Zealand assets to be exmpt from tax - do you agree with that?
The more that is exempt from tax the better. This needs to spread >>elsewhere.
If we were able to get profits from New Zealand to a few large global companies taxed at normal company tax rates, I suspect your income
tax, or possibly GST, could indeed be reduced Allistar,
if that was a
government priority - what we don't know is whether there is a linkage between apparently very successful fundraising by some political
parties to retain legislation that distorts tax for some entities at 'äbnormal' levels. The media talks about how many MPs from National
(and other parties) own proiperty in Auckland (and other cities) and
give that as a reason for being nearly alone int he world in not
having a comprehensive capital gains tax regime
- unfairness costs
ordinary taxpayers Allistar
- are you payng more tax than an efficient
and effective government should need to charge?
Of course I am. An effective government would not actively harm it's
citizens and hence would not use extortion to forcibly confiscate property from them.
http://nominister.blogspot.co.nz/2016/08/and-eurowankers-wonder-why.html
Apple complies with the law, and the EU sees fit to fine it NZ$19billion.
To had over to the Irish government.
Who want none of it.
Typical big government idiocy.
| Sysop: | sneaky |
|---|---|
| Location: | Ashburton,NZ |
| Users: | 31 |
| Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
| Uptime: | 56:50:02 |
| Calls: | 2,097 |
| Files: | 11,143 |
| Messages: | 950,216 |