XPost: alt.men.politics, alt.mens-rights, alt.politics.correct
XPost: alt.politics.equality

____


Canada v. George W. Bush - Trial of the Millennium

There is a Facebook propaganda effort underway, to claim
my sister caught me having sex with my mother, as that
is why I was in Court. The Crown has removed access
to my motions throughout the proceedings - claimed to
be Top Secret.

I have no sister. Was never charged for such a crime.
The warrant is available that was used to try and stop
me telling of how 9/11 happened. I won the Case against
the complainants, G. W. Bush, and Rumsfeld.

Here is how I did it.

---

LET IT BE KNOWN
Propagandized stupider than the fates will allow

Realize, CNN and CBC have received this post, yet, continue to lie to dying soldiers for the unholy benefit of the enemy neo-con.

When we cancel other people’s human rights, we cancel our own.
= Highwater =

-

A Soldier’s Life Held in Contempt

The way I see it, is that I am completely documented correct on who was responsible for the terrorist crimes of 9/11. I have my own theories on why our media and police services have failed our Soldiers by refusing to support my cause directly thus far,
but I am far without hope.

These are the motions than were filed on behalf of Johnny Wizard’s defense in Winnipeg. A man arrested for threatening the continuing existence of the lawless demon anti-Christ, Our Mr. bush Jnr. The demon nazi who murdered thousands in New York City as
God’s enemy. I, beg and plead my case to ALL that will listen. The tyrannies of suffering on our God happen when good people go silent in the face of

[continued from previous message]

To Police effectually, I would suggest a public domain transparently coded checksum program checker to automatically recognize, known illegal materials made available free, with a downloadable database updated by the work of one or
two officers
monitoring currently available internet image traffic
classifiable almost near the speed of electricity across the country. This action is good to take despite my personal innocence or fraudulent guilt, for media labelings are completely impossible to designate content/control, but as such, shouldn’t
forbid Police services from locating where possibly actual hugely offensive content is being distributed through.

With volunteer co- operation of programming, a user, server, or internet service provider could be warned of material almost in their possession as expression is classified criminal so then simply delete it, and carry on. I’m confident such Police
planning with open for public appeals to fine tune further, would end putting the hugely profitable exploitation units across the continent almost completely
out of business. Now, who truly wants that?

3. Constitutional Challenges

This possession charge absent intent, where everybody is auto guilty to lose all their stolen computer gear through fraudulent demonization of the innocent included, is a for sure, crime in progress. I’d imagine if we had a public inquiry, we’d find what
the exploitation crews are doing, is needing to locate only a small few arguably illegal depictions, then trumping up a lot of fraudulent totals. Figuring, I’d imagine, if they openly started convicting individuals for a couple of images they perhaps
deleted when witnessed, people might begin to ask, just how much money is the unit taking in sold stolen merchandise? Perhaps 50,000 dollars in a single case
where the business owner of said
stolen property wasn’t even charged for a criminal offense! No troublesome Court appearance required to protect your public business image even!

Generally, in cases that do reach trial, all images are seldomly reviewed by the Courts, and at the "professional" porno viewers discretion, or the Crown, a
small sample is only offered. [The professional naked people person they have in my case I
suspect is lost somewhere in bushville as the clinically insane, or just extremely helpful to my Judicial cause, thanks big guy, either way.] This has worked largely unhindered because lawyers for the defense wouldn’t generally see a connection. For only
one freely available image that you couldn’t see until you already had it, is all that is needed to put a, loss for words Canadian, in prison for half a decade. Not only that, but such convictions
insist irrationally that the guilty must also be sexually deviant and require professional counseling. The law enforced absent rights infringed needs to be Constitutionally challenged as clearly unjust, and the sentencing structure as being seriously
cruel.

[What does one guilty of an actual assault for comparison get, or better yet, threat of assault that was never truly made?] So, as a result, I need the assistance of Constitutional lawyers who would provide me consultations on prepatory requirements and
on the relevant Constitutional questions regarding this specific challenge. And
maybe co-operation with the Crown or Police chief to tally records and total sales figures on cases under similar circumstances to consider the exploitation
unit for re-
evaluation. [Example: The foolish, faith in ignorance argument given by all similar units, is that nothing can be securely deleted from a hard drive is assuredly patently ridiculous.

Truly indicative however, that we do indeed have a real hidden problem here regarding their/our intelligence gathering capabilities.] While maybe supporting public discussions on how to even improve further, the valuable work
that the exploitation unit
surely does do already somewhere I’m sure to operate for our interests. We may together have to overthrow CJOB with our human skills at demanding some space to talk about bettering our lives by communicating without two minute commercials every five
minutes, and opening up the phone lines to talk about whatever. They take too much from us as the clearly disenfranchised already. Like, so who’s talk radio station is it anyway?

4. The Crown’s Crown

I have concerns regarding the job requirements that our community asks a Crown to bravely achieve. One, would be to pursue Justice for the principled betterment of our society. It is clear to anyone familiar with my case, that our corporate media
managers have decided for one fear or another, that such noble reaches must be left from the grasp of Canadian soldiers and their loving giving families. This
place the Court holds of a principle that all people should be treated fairly, includes those
we know Bush has already had murdered in America under these left silenced demands for a true accounting by good police work completed already. The fear that every criminal Court Crown shrugs off when
proudly defending the innocent in our legal challenges, seems thus far, absent in support of Justice for Johnny.

When I read statements from the Crown stating, John’s legal arguments against traitor Bush is irrelevant to the case our Crown hold’s against myself, in our name as Canadians, smacks of an unjust and blind totalitarian state. Corporately broadcasted
uncertainty is forsaking the innocent lives of Bush’s continuing real murder victims. Certainly, the Crown has a responsibility to pursue just causes, and granted, can falsely suspect I don’t hold the best of intentions towards life with everything I am.
However, the Crown’s summations of my character will never change the official FBI’s conclusions arrived at by following the crime scene leads, at the real murder scene, to discover who
personally is still escaping arrest for mass murder of our good friends in New York City on 9/11. A crime who’s principle perpetrators obviously faithfully count on this form of injustice to dictate continuous failures by our Crown to serve our public
interest. For whatever reason, my case documents a corporate news agenda of non-committal in our pursuit of Justice for ourselves as the little people.

Ourselves, including the Crown’s of all Canada, are, without doubt, denied fair
representation by CBC standards. Canada is being left not defending honorable American police officers, doing their jobs to the best of their ability, should
not leave too,
our Public’s Crown unrepresented. (If the Crowns of Canada so willed it in our names.) So, I would ask that the Crown’s refusal to speak out for Canada, while
fighting to silence my cries with an unjust as cruel prison sentence, be investigated for
obstructing Justice, and therefore, aiding and abetting the terrorist crimes of
first degree mass murder. Now, how to do this... I’m not sure.

Perhaps the Court’s assistance of aid in the form of one or two Crown offices from a different province in Canada could be considered, or a Constitutional Law firm more up on what all I got to work with here. Look, somebody has tricked my nation, and
subsequently our naiver youths, into excepting Canadians can not hear the silenced screams of global tyranny. If soldiers the world over need to die for Bush, let it be for something worth fighting. Freedom must be Canada, a Canada that would go if asked,
in favor of Universal Justice always. Just ask US.

Your Friend,

John W.

-----------------

I know I’m innocent under the law as it currently stands, and in addition, I wished to teach our Courts why the law stands unjust against our public in other respects. With no criminal intent to obtain or distribute something illegal alleged against
myself, and the simple truth that one can not perceive an image until it is at the very least, already in one’s possession, says enough by itself.

But most importantly, the Crown’s interpretations of my possessions are not my expressions. Example: I could have in my possession a written work from one who
espouses the glories of war criming, but I, personally, am diametrically opposed to it’s unwise
declarations. I still use it however to gain understanding of my world in which
I politically work to improve God’s World through indivisibly principled reason.

Feel free to do with this as you will.

---------------

THE QUEEN’S BENCH

WINNIPEG CENTRE

NOTICE OF MOTION

For an Order of Production

BETWEEN:

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN,

and

JOHNNY WIZARD

Accused.

This Notice of Motion regarding an Order of Production is to have disclosed to the defense, the complete evidence without undue hindrance, evidence the Crown holds against the accused as a member of our public. These following arguments are the reasons
why Justice must prevail in these proceedings:

Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms section 7. "No person shall be deprived
of life, liberty or security of the person except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice."

R. v. Stinchcombe "[...] counsel for the Crown is under a general duty to disclose all relevant information."

In R. v. Stinchcombe, the Supreme Court of Canada held once again, as any legitimate Court of any land would, that the accused in criminal cases has a Constitutional right to full and complete disclosure of the Crown’s case. Yet, in the criminal case
involving myself, the Crown’s refusal to return my legal property [such as including my actual expressions] is motivated by contempt for fundamental justice - for true accountability - by intentionally working to deceive our Courts through denying the
evidence of one: the charge against me is truly fraudulent under our law as it stands currently, and two: that I don’t already have the silent moral support of every honorable top secret
intelligence officer this world over.

Canada’s "Commission of Inquiry into the Actions of Canadian Officials in Relation to Maher Arar"

"The RCMP notes that because national security investigations are criminal investigations, the possibility of judicial scrutiny always exists and the presence of this possibility acts as an indirect accountability mechanism." [Maher Arar was an innocent
Canadian tortured and left for murdered by the irrational as criminal pro-bush forces negatively influencing Canadian jurisprudence.]

Firstly, I, like any, need ready easy access to all the evidence the Crown holds against myself, to indicate a possibly hidden motive behind her criminal allegations. For it is in our authority as a free society that the Crown holds any legitimacy.

It would be unfair for our Courts to side with the unjust Crown on not giving me ready easy access to the evidence, but for only by hugely limiting degrees that include costly bus rides, or as the seriously impractical, hundreds of thousands of printed
texts that would likely fill roomfuls.

I need to provide the evidence of my actual expressions to counter balance the false interpretations the Crown alleges, when it comes to asking where specifically the rights of a child are being compromised when she makes her defined as sexually
dysfunctional inferences. All the images on my computer, deleted and otherwise,
are not my expressions. Similarly, are all the written texts on my computer those of words I hold to be my own personal philosophy. As indicated by the Supreme Court of
Canada’s Sharpe case, a defense against fraudulent accusations regarding the Rights of our children being compromised, can be readily addressed early on by understanding the possession charge in relative
context to the personal life of the accused.

R. v. Sharpe

"Section 163.1(6) creates a further defence for material that serves an "educational, scientific or medical purpose". This refers to the purpose the material, viewed objectively, may serve, not the purpose for which the possessor actually holds it."

So, purpose of digital media as determined illegal must therefore, be backed firstly by criminal intent, for without any intent you have no purpose. A defense is made available by the Sharpe decision on personal\professional conduct to indicate actual
established purpose of accused to prevent blind "overreaching". The Supreme Court of Canada’s deep concerns of "overreaching" are very much apparent in my particular criminal matter. Conduct of individuals who have lost their purpose in Police keeping,
who aren’t being managed to express through our Police actions, a public interest in where the "offensable" images are coming from, or came, but instead, where it’s all going as potential new
innocent porno victims with millions of dollars worth of stuff they can get away stealing. [I’ve read porno cops in America recently acquired 300,000 more American names of households to raid, off of one single server found managed in
violation, but have
taken a pause before then moving on to arrest anybody who has ever used the internet for whatever, to consider, just what have we gotten ourselves into here.] See, perfectly legal imagery can be made into illegal thoughts relatively quickly by the weaker
irrationals that exist within our police services. Where, to prove for the record, a twenty two year old is only twelve, even when she has in her possession all her proper paperwork,
completed puberty, a living mother, a popular working web site and historical documentations, is just foolishly impossible.

While at Your end Mr. Surfer Citizen, your demonized guilty, until proven innocent of thinking their faulting criminal perceptions, they do practically nothing to verify. Without needing to establish intent, they make off like bandits. See, under a
simple possession charge, there is no allegations of intent to obtain or distribute something illegal, and likewise, not found a responsible public’s interest in seeking the means of which the criminal content was as could be LEGALLY provided. The last
thing we want in our dying world is a setup where private legal businesses are selling, promoting, and releasing content that only becomes illegal when the exploitation unit comes into your home to
steal your stuff by grossly misunderstanding what the threat actually is.

By exercising our right to perceive representations of that which is made freely available, is of in itself, important to the sociologist, psychologist, concerned parent, and of course, the conceptualizing artist reflecting on our shared reality.

My private and public expressions are more tuned to those who are personally responsible in escaping arrest for running death squads against innocent children in Afghanistan financed by the undefended as uniformed American tax paying Public, [10th
Mountain Division] a criminal enterprise still cashing in on the rewards of bush’s mass murder campaigns. Or, the dropping of cluster dud land mines throughout residential school districts to murder our children indiscriminately. Mercury tainted vaccines
that for sure cause irreparable damage to North American children, or as currently, about John DeCamp’s just released updated 2005 edition, about the secret White House-linked national child
sex-ring entitled "The Franklin Cover-up." However, the real motivating factor [intent] in the Crown’s purpose by attempting to pirate our public’s right to defend Ourselves judiciously, is more specifically because I articulate the HONORABLE FBI’s
official publicly available findings on who orchestrated, and funded the crimes
of 911. Namely, Mr. Bush Jnr. along with his business partner, the still escaping Lieutenant General Mahmoud Ahmad.

[University of Ottawa Professor Michel Chossudovsky, has researched the Ahmad/Bush relationship as documented by CNN ABC et al, and can be quested for at www.globalresearch.ca]

http://www.globalresearch.ca/articl...
http://www.prisonplanet.com/new_rev...

The Crown to not fight on our behalf regarding this easily verifiable mass murder issue, is indicative of an intention, to cast aside the concern of all children who benefit from my communicating higher truths for the betterment of the entire public body.
I ask our Court, who, in Canada, informs our public truthfully as I do, that the "scumbags" Canada’s own General Hillier is referring to get Canadian youths
for sure killed over in his nationally broadcasted barbaric adolescent bigotry,
against all the
INNOCENT students of Afghanistan, is of a People who factually opened up schools for girls under the Taliban’s getting better through communicating leadership?, and who outlawed Bush’s heroin
production, and the slavery and rape of women?

Women who were when working at the Taliban’s newspaper, were not required to wear burkas despite CBC’s propaganda to the contrary? The Crown would suggest her ignorance on such subjects is irrelevant to her case against me, for those children’s lives,
and others like them, are not who she is working to protect. So, where I demand
is a crime against our real God occurring I ask the hiding in darkness Crown to
explain herself publicly in the light of these proceedings to our Honorable Lord.

The Crown’s case argues that a determined selection of legal images, can be sited under a labeled classification of "collateral images", as somehow, unto it’s separated self, being an indicator, or summation of my unbridled character. Therefor, to
question such interpretations I need the luxury and comforts of a stress free environment to ponder the significant meaning of each of these collateral damages against ourselves as the innocent the Crown argues for as a weapon of Justice.

For, those personally responsible for making repeatedly easily verifiable faulting expressions with the evidence the Crown refuses to return to me as my legal property, are in all likelihood, still blabbering corporately un-accosted, the completely blind
support of indiscriminate mass murder in thoughtless praise for war criminal traitor to Humanity George Bush Jr., their supreme no nothing about squat leader. While myself, am a well documented public defender of children’s rights
and a studious
observant researcher on media matters, who is schooled in the field(s) of Psychology and Genetics, Sexuality and Religion, along with the chaotic order to the indivisible nature of life ourselves.
[And who when not terribly busy building this needed defense against the Crown’s alleged criminality, still champion the written word for Justice being - US all as treated fairly.]]

I also need to show, how I come to be in possession of another’s expressions, of some managed images, or some strewn texts.

It would be unfair for our Courts to side with the unjust Crown on not giving me ready easy access to the evidence, but for only by hugely limiting degrees that include costly bus rides, or as the seriously impractical, hundreds of thousands of printed
texts that would likely fill roomfuls. While sitting just outside my police door, could be the public accuser who professes proudly the deeply ignorant ungodly beliefs of cop killing and heroin dealing to push US all over the top with Bush as it’s global
mastermind. Knowing such an enemy of freedom who taunts all our judicial matters with true personal self contempt, is there still escaping public ridicule, wearing our community’s Police
Officer uniform, could create unto itself, an unneeded frustration on my part, for, I am a honorable defender to all that is Just.

A honorable defender that is needing by threat of false imprisonment to concentrate on Justice for just myself personally currently. As the Court well knows, a bushite’s favored public intent is well established by the evidence, as documented truly
criminal being the ungodly. [Hypnotized lawless through the mechanics of suggestion I would diagnose for the don’t know knowing any better.] There exists no evidence against bin Laden for 911, nor, was any factually alleged to
exist, and despite what
Bush broadcasts unchallenged nationally on our airwaves privately, Saddam did actually let the inspectors in to go where ever they wanted without delay.

Furthermore, indiscriminately murdering people with tens of thousands of cluster dud land mines, 9000 missiles targeting public infrastructure, many multiple 2000 pound bombs containing radio-active toxic waste, along with the new and improved napalm and
phosphorous poison gas clouds all because we are in the approximate age range of 15 to 55 is a for sure real war crime going unaddressed publicly by the Crown, but not by myself. So, the Crown’s interest is in jeopardizing the lives
of our children for
sure by working to silence my extremely rare public cries for true accountability here in Winnipeg.

I am sworn to protect all as indicated by my recorded actions and praised world
wide word. The National Supreme Court of Canada’s Sharpe decision allows this defense to be made on our behalf.

By Our Honorable Court’s "Lord" siding to support claims made by my false accusers - as the running definitive summation of what can be claimed as "collateral images" - [legal relative media content present on my computer,] while judging to refuse to
have returned my therefore stolen legal property so I can adequately prepare a counter defense against the Crown’s confusions, is nothing short of a crime in progress. At least it should be. By denying me the evidence the Crown holds in contempt of our
Court, would create an undue hardship on my, seeking to illuminate the facts from our vantage points. Having to travel back and forth across the city to view hundreds of thousands of media
messages pertinent to my case at hand, left denied search tools, and a comfortable atmosphere, is unduly unfair for all concerned.

Now, I know, I have to deal personally with those who support such a criminal ungodly nature when I have no choice to, but to have them located in the same listening vicinity throughout all my inquiries on stolen legal media content, to spew their
boastful chauvinistic fascist state partiality of how great George W. Bush is as their master thinking celebrated American Cop Killer, would leave me unfairly tensioned. I need the meditative comforts of home study with good coffee and private friends to
ponder my adroit, to the point defense with the evidence I demand the fair right to contend.

I hold children’s rights paramount in the public defense stands I’ve made for near a decade, and privately, I’m free to think my way on anything. The Crown has no right to dictate what my private thoughts are, especially, if I’m not granted to speak on
her conclusions with the ready made evidence she don’t want me to have returned
possession of. My legal property that the Crown’s crew has plans to sell! God, are you listening?

I need the luxury of computer processing that the Crown used to surmise her relative faulting judgment of my worth to our society.

I need returned all my legal possessions, like my real expressions such as public communications, to fairly challenge the Crown’s refusal to consider such
objectiveness on who the one holding criminal intent actually is on this serious matter. So
therefore, the Crown’s crew should not be allowed by our law to sell my stolen property as they are planning, while surely as sadomasochists, destroying a life time of my written works they know mean a great deal to me personally.

Wishing to deprive our rights as the community, to be granted fair treatment in
our Court systems of accountability, is surely what will happen if our Honorable Judge does not Judge honorably against the Crown and grant me the legal return of my stolen
property. I need to establish the mechanics of my specifically unique computer system, so I can establish my fair defense made available by the Supreme Court of Canada’s Standing Sharpe decision.

The Court recognizes finding that all declared illegal possessions serve a criminal purpose without any intent, unless found serving otherwise by made available evidence from the defense. [ergo my Constitutional challenge] Evidence of real purpose the
Crown doesn’t want to grant our Court, because usually, guilty or innocent, they do sell everybody’s stolen stuff actually. And truly, the Crown has expressed no interest in assisting our Police agencies in apprehending those known responsible by the
evidence for first degree mass murders. [Instead, pick on the helpless innocent
little Jewish man bearing a cross, as cowardly brown shirt jack boot nazi fascists under Hitler would have too.
[surprising for many, it is formally illegal to be Jewish currently in God’s Israel. As for the Crowns in my case, and the Judge, well they seem to be not all that bad over all.

[So far... But this innocent people go to prison for speaking un-contended truths thing for me is just some extreme to the core serious business of ours, and good or bad, the Judges, and the Crowns, and the Police Officers have a paid job to do by
following the rules designed ultimately in purpose to protect both me and you. So, can’t we all just find a way to get our public news agencies to live up to our responsibilities by recognizing standing laws not yet enforced against the un-elected
dictator, the monstrous war mongering American traitor criminal, 911’s George Bush Jnr., instead of present company???]]]

I need returned my 37,333 [minus the contended for argument] images to sensibly
consider their feasibility to collectively represent the Crown’s faulting illogical argument in a brighter picture.

I need to show what I did with obtained media information on general terms by mechanical processing through my very specific as unique operating systems, and
through my definitive writing on the very subject we are here considering. I need operating
script batch programs that do specific tasks regarding general media managements.

I need to show how Usenet [early raw based sub-internet knowledge sharing web communications system] is used, and how it was legally accessed by my specific personal system, granting me, to be a part of one of the greatest collected artistic expressions
of the known world. And how, when using such services, informations aren’t found perceived until, at the very least, they are already in one’s possession,
thereby making the Crown’s standing accusation absent criminal intent clearly unjust.

[those responsible for distribution/expression of actual for real illegal depictions are where the infraction against the public’s interest can be compromised, but the exploitation units I’m aware of seem to have little of no financial interest in
recognizing such a wanting to lose their lucrative industry brokered through what should be worked to be made into redundancy.]

I need returned possession of my computer content, to seek for indicative examples of huge disparities with what is described with the Crown’s own relative definitions, and what my media machine actually contains regarding my for real expressions. I need
to reference my personal writings surmising the faulting state of the child porn policing industry. To surmise grand totals, as such the Crown’s crew alleges of legal content she’ll bemoan despairingly of collateral damages against us as innocence. Knock
knock knock.

If the Crown argues falsely that the evidence I request is irrelevant to her criminal case, then what could the harm be honestly in showing the error of her
ways? If she argues it jeopardizes to expose the true criminality used to try convicting me, an
innocent honorable man in Our name, I would move that the charge against me be stayed, my property returned, and the Courts help me make a Constitutional challenge to the validity of the law, while communicating also Your dissatisfaction in not having us
heard speaking out nationally for the truly Honorable FBI - against 911’s true money man - Lieutenant General Mahmoud Ahmad - getting away as bush’s not so secret any longer private business
partner, escaping he is from the mass murder of thousands of our good friends, the still left undefended corporate Americans.

I need to know what settings were set in place for the installed programs to access the internet. And a whole bunch else besides.

In conclusion, I need to show where my outstanding character was at, by indicating exactly what I spent my free time on, to illustrate for our Court, my TRUE intent as motive on this matter.

Yours truly,

JOHNNY WIZARD

------------------------------------

THE QUEEN’S BENCH

WINNIPEG CENTRE

NOTICE OF MOTION

for the Crown to Stay Proceedings

BETWEEN:

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN,

and

JOHNNY WIZARD

Accused.

The Validity of the Law

While true, to distribute material in an abusive form of sexually explicit child pornography, can have a detrimental impact on the impressionable, being in simple possession, does not connotate the same negative risk to the public body. It is not a
Freedom of Expression issue. All the pictures on my computer, deleted and otherwise, are not my expressions. Nor, importantly, can digital images be perceived, until, at least, they are already in your possession. Under current law, as is in my case, you’
re already guilty on nothing. So, if you should see something arguably imprisoning, you’re too late to point fingers elsewhere.

It’s analogous to you sitting in your parked car with someone throwing through the opened window, a closed paper bag of crack cocaine, followed behind by an arresting police officer, who while cuffing you hears your plead that some completely unknown
person threw the innocuous unmarked bag through the window, leaving the unjust officer of our law, to reply for the record "Yeah, I saw the, left to go on his
own "stranger" do it. And it’s a crime in this country don’t you know to be found in simple
possession? Now, where are the keys to the trunk of this fancy car I’m planning
to sell for a tidy profit crack head loser?"

The Crown appears under this law in my case to have no need to prove a criminal
intent to do her things.

See, under a simple possession charge, there is no allegations of intent to obtain or distribute something illegal, and

likewise, not found a responsible public’s interest in seeking the means of which the criminal content was as could be LEGALLY distributed. The last thing we want in our dying world is a setup where private legal businesses are selling, promoting, and
releasing content that only becomes illegal when the exploitation unit comes into your home under false pretences to steal all your electronic stuff by grossly misunderstanding what the threat actually is.

A digital image isn’t possibly perceived until it is at least, already in your possession. Making the standing law as it is interpreted by the faulting Crown,
unjust. No criminal intent is alleged by my sole possession charge, but for by myself against
the Crown’s secret bushite crew for aiding and abetting the crimes of first degree mass murder in New York City.

An infraction against the public’s interest occurs when such materials are expressed through distribution. Digital images of people posing as testaments to the beauty of being human, are not the same as expressions of sexually exploited children. Yet,
from as near as I can tell, the threat of seriously cruel and inhuman treatment
against me with a five year prison sentence is being made because the Crown has
made included, condemnable interpretations of the public’s free expressions of youth and
beauty. Again, not my own. Leaving still no made interest in understanding where these prison term perceptions, that are often admitted by the Crown’s crew to be legal, originated.


[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)

[continued from previous message]

If the Crown’s case remains standing, why shouldn’t we expect the child exploitation units to then widely distribute as near as can be Barely Legal materials in hopes to nab more of us as the fearful to be shamed as criminal through threatened public
Court proceedings regarding your alledged deviant private sexual thoughts? Of legal images perceived as a god honest, testimony of youth and beauty, being ourselves beautifully youthful, could leave you too as depicted hiding some unknown something about
your unseen character. Or, an even worse madness, exploitation units distributing truly illegal depictions, named maybe after car models, to see who
could be made found only in simple possession
of the accusers relative perception?

For, if the internationally popular woman depicted was well over eighteen and had her own legal website, don’t matter for indictment, cause the expert of expert experts they have in my case, a double full time professional computer porno viewer, states
with a complete straight face, the full figured pubic wisped woman, he knows nothing of, is really only ten or twelve. You’re for sure either normal being human, or guilty of thinking their bad thoughts punishable with real prison sentences.

As a result of course, I’m now demanded to divorce my life of other critically important responsibilities, to prove my complete innocence on these deliberately planned top secret schemes, they didn’t want You, the public to know of. A near criminal
attempt, (as documented by the now disclosed once top secret warrant), to silence my cries for the arrest of the publicly established factual 911 masterminds - Our Mr. bush Jr., General Ahmad, rumsfeld, myers and cheney, along with almost the entire
senior staff of disclosed as flagrantly criminal propaganda proliferators, The Office of Special Plans.

The Warrant details by exclusion, a deliberate top secret plan on the Crown’s part, a deviant anti-government plan to silence my calls for accountability through my world wide public addresses on the FBI answers still surrounding the
murder of thousands
of American Citizens. The Crown, as an attempt to undermine Liberty by thwarting me off my one chosen career path of Universal Speaker, and fictionalized demon slayer - leaves you instead, this quickly passing opportunity to stand up for the rights of
another being cheated for real, and in so doing, we’ll find together, that true
freedom is justice for US all. Law stands strong for good reason, so too, does tyranny rule by censorship for
false imprisonment. Do not allow my voice for freedom’s reign to be silenced unjustly, by those who would have us falsely believe, Bush personally didn’t do
the crimes we all easily now know the evidence of.

An unjust Law enslaves all Religions, for reason is beautifully Just through your will to conceive, that God’s interests are as naturally too, your own included. My commitments to equal rights for all have never changed, and Humanity’s true commitment to
defend Iraqi children to the last cowardly murderous thieving bushite enemy, will carry on, despite the corrupted Crown’s attempt to stop real Justice from continuing. When one views public photographs of rumsfeld’s un-arrested mercenary soldiers raping
an Iraqi woman, are our rights being further violated with every passing witness? How about witnessing that Guantanamo’s torture victim Moazzam Begg, was running a girl’s school program with
his wife under the female loving Taliban? [You know, Moazzam Begg, the one and same British Citizen depicted solely by heroin pushing donald "sexy cluster dud
land mine dropper" rumsfeld, as one of our Lord’s most dangerous criminals?]

The Crown alleges in truly contemptuous silence, she’s not interested in defending the rights of those children, or victims of mass murder, while voicing publicly in Our Court, that I, am infringing on the rights of children somewhere else because, even
though no body is perceiving the data located anywhere on my hard drive, it still magically constitutes a personal violation, on its own by itself, of an unjust law that others have been demonized, robbed, then falsely imprisoned on.
This irrational
demand on behalf of the Crown to Your Court, where she states her private viewings do not infringe on children’s rights, while EVERYONE else’s does somehow, even if you didn’t see at all the
picture judged as the reflecting mind of a true sexual deviant, is US ALL being
the auto-guilty anyway, and not firstly innocent as it should be.

See, the Judge could say to a Jury, "Your job is not to judge the injustice committed with these blind and broken laws, but that solely, did Top Cop Johnny
have this one single picture on his computer?, and if he did, then the bushite liars who fight our
systems of accountability through Justice to further escape real rapists, torturers, and documented treasonous war criminals like those who for sure committed 911, get to put him in Our prison for half a decade."

However this issue requires much for further study. It turns out my two primary
accusing officers who deal with real sicko child porn every day full time, also
support death squads against innocent families in Afghanistan to protect the demon lies of
George W. Bush, and they’d almost tell the jury that too as blind devote disciples of the self hating bushmob cabal of neo-con peenackers, if the Crown wasn’t there to forbid the truth from being spoken.

The two abusers, the two anti-cop officers of question, lied to me, then censored my agreement they had their word on, then, attempted to twist my comments into something clearly I didn’t mean.. and that’s not even the half of
it. So, don’t tell me I’m
being over critical of their naked wicked evil. If an image was an offensive act witnessed, why then is it that a genuine concern is not with a possible victim all the time? The shocker to the uninitiated in the battles of good against evil in these
child exploitation units, is that rarely do they have a real monetary care to follow though with the details. - "Oh, the girl is really a woman, and the web address on the digital image is of a
server acting completely within the confines of our law, nudist campers are nudist campers, and as for the beautifully naked young girl taking a bubble bath smiling, er.. I mean the one looking seductive... drat."

Examples: I have many texts willfully ignored by the Crown that articulate irrational praise for one heinous crime against God or another of the un-elected neocon war wankers, that I, as a human, certainly don’t find myself in automatic, no free thought
agreement with., right? And my objective as Human defender isn’t to censor the known criminality of the, murder innocent people for the war profiting bushmob liars, but to expose the true injustice committed against our better selves - US all dying
slavishly censored through Our corporate international communication network of
good old ideas left long gone dead and buried. Hammurabi’s Code of Law: it’s first sentence, of his first paragraph,
the number one most important Law as example. - Here’s the translation - The public figure blaming someone else for a capital offense, such as terrorist, who uses NO EVIDENCE for PROOF, to murder in Your name as Citizen, is the FOR SURE ENEMY, always,
EVERY TIME. And in the next four thousand years that single law has timelessly stood unbroken, not one person has been capable to declare a true, wanting disagreement.

The corporate news mandate is to take You for granted - without any given say so. Our sold as sworn public defenders, CBC, CNN, et al, hold no opinions of our Humanity on the needless indiscriminate bombing of populated cities, the torturing of men women
and children by un-arrested as openly confessed complete psychotics, the thieving of hundreds of billions from America and Iraq, and as such, tyrannically support [don’t call us, will call you] commi censorship, all done in to assist the "escape" of
those truly responsible for the crimes of 911.

When the Crown argues that disturbing images simply in your possession constitute an absolute evaluation of your punishable character, while denying\forbidding a Court to know what you do in your life with our time is faulted. I hold children’s rights
paramount in the public defense stands I’ve made for near a decade, and privately, I’m free to think my way on anything. The Crown has no right to dictate what my private thoughts are. This insistence on behalf of the Crown on
what we all perceive
individually by judgment is determined solely by media content - is a foolish falsehood forwarded by Our Great Lord’s, Supreme Court of Canada.

Example: Does not the public videos of rumsfeld’s, defended from YOUR LAW bushite soldiers, gunning down women and children running for their lives from a mosque, or where hundreds of unarmed defenseless families are huddled together, then bombed by a
bushite enemy grunt, a grunt who on VIDEO TAPE, moans itself to orgasm when they all die as the innocent murdered with "ah.. dude" just speak for itself? Sure, the celebrating bushies repeatedly depicted have no honor, or courage, only a fascistic hatred
for their fellow man - openly thieves who die without a fighting cause for Freedom, nor a true commitment to Law - but I would ask if We had a voice to cry in Your Court, what do You see in
this corporate World that leaves my stand professionally unworthy for deliberations? The Crown’s concern remains silent on the DOCUMENTED and easily verifiable murder issues, when she has her regular huddles with a local corporate reporter, discussing on
who, from the community, was in Our court challenging, a sexually dysfunctional
sadomasochistic label.

For the Crown to witness and know first hand of such barbaric criminality, such
as the true perpetrators of 9/11 found revealed by THE FBI stinger, along with the rest of the evidence trail that all leads directly to the Whitehouse, is a Crown who does
not hold Canadian’s freedom in check, or a care for our soldier aged sons and daughters conflicting near death. But to side instead, as they are hiding behind the honorable Crown’s position, a small group of four or five dim blips,
attempting they are to
silence these calls for real freedom for the masses. I am a proud and honorable
man who objects to furthering bush’s war crime aims with this lifeless corporate tyranny of enslavement through
whoring for the dark foreboding wills of Our Mr. bush Jr.. Censorship is the tool of tyrants, while I beckon a new light for peace by communicating. Please,
I beg you, do not allow them to silence my objections to have us unjustly imprisoning myself,
while bringing great hardship to my immediate family by denying the truth be spoken publicly in my defense on why I’m in the Court room, and what is documented irrespective of their spin doctoring and label pasting.

Where is the violation of a child’s rights, specifically, when the Crown’s crew
gleefully ponder images she’ll use to silence the words of Johnny Wizard by prison sentence? Where? No, where?

Commanding our public indignation for those who disrespect human rights she will use as her weapon, all the while, hidden from the jury, and the judge, a secret contempt for thousands of innocent murder victims denied my unchallenged
demands for real
Justice. No officer of our laws anywhere have found fault with my PUBLIC summation, documented fully, on who, and how, 9/11 was truly orchestrated. A Crown stuck committed to global bushite tyranny Vs. a Truth seeker of the highest order.

Come to the trial! Tell your friends! Tell your neighbors! The People vs. an overburdened unjust Crown, and a near treasonous national security officer, who
wrote in the original top secret warrant nobody was suppose to see, it’d be so much easier to
help bush escape arrest by avoiding the public accountability process entirely.
The once top secret Johnny Wizard Warrant is freely available with most names being detracted, to protect the innocent until proven guilty. A traitor to God and Country the
Crown and one National Security officer potentially is in this top secret bush administration conspiracy endeavor, to serve by bushite criminal decree up here
in defenseless Canada. For as
potential accessories to first degree mass murder, they are stuck attempting to
undermine Canada’s National Security Services, the FBI, the People, US, all to further unjustly sacrifice, more of our uninformed sons and daughters for further bounty, as
substantiated real world criminal, bushite evils. I say no. Help me get public recognition through talk radio, take a stand for your fellow man, and help a Jury in Winnipeg learn of who I am, and why they are forbidden to know what’s truly going on, and
you’ll be helping yourself to a better future.

My principle allegations against George W. Bush require a qualified and adapt security officer no more that forty three minutes to verify. Namely, bush’s business partner, General Ahmad funded 911’s "mastermind" "ringleader" Atta, and was also sent, the
General was, from the Whitehouse on behalf of bush to the Taliban stating, no evidence will be brought against Laden as the accused, therefore an innocent man in Christ. And, that as MSNBC reported of the top secret documents provided
to themselves
anonymously from Condoleezza Rice’s office, George had a confidential plan at his desk on how to invade Afghanistan dated September 9th, 2001 that he didn’t want anybody in America to know he was
working on during his "vacation". His confessed publicly to MSNBC, as "fully implemented" Afghanistan strategy, demanded that he not pursue the true 911 evil doers, for it would upset his made before hand, guaranteed plan. That had soldier grunts moving
out to get ready just before the event.

All premised on blaming Laden as a terrorist without a shred of evidence, for a
crime that hadn’t yet taken place, but that bush was personally prepared as closing investigations on. To secure criminal invasion he would refuse to follow the evidence trail
and as a result - NOT apprehend the have to let go - falsely accused bin Laden. [cowardly soldiers who didn’t speak up as real Patriots would have much earlier, who were ordered to let Laden go on his way in Torra Borra, have now all mostly fallen
quietly dead., by fluke mishap or something like the sort it is said.] All set in play, this plan of Our Mr. bush Jr’s, top secretly with General Ahmad riding
gun shot, just days before thousands of American People were still left unaccountably murdered.
See? Mr. Bush would need such an event to happen unhindered as a requirement to
galvanize world sentiment. Providing no evidence substantiated would guarantee his needed invasion for American
pension thievers Enron, and that is exactly what HE planned, what HE did, and who HE is. Evil is the deceived disguised. What more do you need to know buddy?

I, armed with only the facts, demand the arrest of those who participated in the murder of children to protect the demon lies of George W. Bush, while the Crown’s case, on top of alleging that the simple possession Law [no criminal intent to express or
obtain is alleged] states a child’s rights are being infringed on due to the content by itself, ALONE, appears ready to fight for disallowing a jury, to freely witness, this fishing expedition was intentionally started to stop me speaking my outrage that
bush hasn’t been yet arrested for committing 9/11 with General Ahmad, so according to the unmentionables in the no longer top secret Warrant. That this Crown would officially state holding our
virtues while attempting to condemn me to a long prison sentence, shows her possible personal true contempt for the value of Your human life my friend.

I have written extensively on defending the rights of children, and the psychology of sexually dysfunctional sadomasochists, I have studied this world to create some thing greater than average, some thing better than normal, a world where all children
are respected, including those of Iraq who have been purposefully denied safe drinking water, because negroponte needed to STEAL the emergency funds for his new embassy. See?, she would argue that those real world crimes aren’t relevant
to my case in her
hands, those REAL children like perhaps your own don’t concern her, nor do the lives of Canadians lied to by corporate command for criminal sacrifice.

The Crown convinces us irrationally, with her only excuse being, because the specific broken Law she’s decided to singly exercise, (with the exclusion of all others, like thou shall not murder,) stupidly says she can, and you dummies
can’t do anything at
all about it yourself. Why? Because you wont speak out for anyone else’s rights
to be heard publicly - the bushite enemy trust to figure. Justice is Freedom, and to have a real concern for another’s lost rights to freely be, is to be truly concerned with
your very own in serious jeopardy. I wouldn’t lie to you. Believing, as the bushite do, willfully deceitful corporate news propaganda excuses the Bush Administration’s rampant criminality
against the innocent as God is, truly, excuses nothing, especially if I have something to say on the subject of accountability.

This final Court challenge against my Freedom to be myself, that the bush administration attempted firstly to do top secretly, has now been laid publicly
at our door step as a blatant threat to everyone of us as a member of the Canadian Public. Will you
help me politely address my false accusers on our public airwaves? Will you help speak for freedom from tyranny is this question riddled, or will you deny yourself my generous helping?

The reasons why such abhorrent behaviors continue unaddressed in our Police Force actions will be documented fully with remedies offered during the second part of the third phase of the upcoming Question Period press conferences - press conferences
running during the available down times of The Trial of

JOHNNY WIZARD

------------------------------------------------

/ /And that of course gives the bushites and CBC and CNN their implausible deniability, where they can say their remaining neutral, by not providing us the facts to allow us to decide for ourselves. Because otherwise, we wouldn’t kill ourselves to profit
the bushmob cabal of God haters. Who victimize innocent Christians for no other
reason but for to profit off our suffering.

[...]

Think of all those people in that situation as God. And these, the bushite nazi
grunts, have positions that are completely irrational, they’re making no sense,
your fuking up. It’s like a cancer that God of that whole situation, is inflicted with. They’
re lying to themselves. If your there to fight on behalf of Iraqis, you take a position to demand all the money that has been taken through this Iraq Development Fund, be returned. \ \

—

/ / What is particularly disturbing is how the administration misused intelligence information to make its case for war and failed to plan competently for the postwar period. \ \

What seems even more disturbing, to me, and PBS’ FRONTLINE, is that there was a
"State" plan, the ORHA plan to prevent looting and carnage, but it was sabotaged by rumsfeld and franks, so the bushmob could try to make some sense of needlessly bombing the
country for our labored dollars, while robbing the central bank and museum by mopping up the mess with the bodies of American Patriots still dying as dumfuks.

you know what is right, though you may still be blind, never too late to change
your mind, we are all in agreement, in truth we rise, evil is just the deceived
disguised...

STAND TOGETHER, OR DON’T

Our Gambling Problem

Instead of our government deciding what services we need and are willing to pay
for, they’ll have us think that by actively promoting gambling to those we can take advantage of, somehow serves them right, and us well. This abnormal behavior is not only
destructive to many cheated players, their families and friends, but also to our institutions, government, and economy. You may have heard some say, that gambling is a tax on stupidity, and here are only some of the reasons why. This
information is for
you to judge, think freely, ask the questions, then pray your wrong. The whole VLT system our government uses is so deeply flawed it’s beyond belief. They count credits as dollars, reporting to
trusting economists and reporters, a payout of 96%. They will tell you they’re needed because otherwise the victims of manipulation would travel to the states
before the local state casinos to spend their last two bucks, and they should, their odds are a
real deal better.

There are no checks and balances in place as there is normally to regulate tax revenues. Nobody in the corrupt gaming commission, MLC, AFM in fact Canada has looked at the computer code, and in Montana where they have, they’ve made them illegal to
operate. They’re not stupid. Some of the possible new car owners at the MLC, state that the machines run on a random basis. They have deduced this by testing that they are computers and can simulate a random number concluding presumably that every
computer program is just an act of chance. I guess the free cars to some in management make this easier. If this is true, how come no one ever wins more than a $1000? If, as they claim, it is random,
occasionally one might win $33 billion by starting at 125 credits doubling 30 times. Get a deck of cards and a calculator and try! Your odds are slim, but at
least you have a chance. If this type of psychological manipulation is to be allowed, why not
physiological as well.

Why not put an odorless chemical right on the pay slips that would leach through the players skin, causing them to act against their better judgment? Body and mind? Here’s a tip: Bar owners are privy to much statistical information, that we, the general
public are not. If they play, your being really stupid. Also the machines are filthy, wash your hands. You see, they’re trying to turn us against each other,
into one of them, blinding us, making us lash out and cheat our weaker brothers
and their
families, if it means we can drink their blood (190+ suicides last year). But in truth, we are all being bled. BAH HA! It is a pure regressive tax, no attached goods or services! Billionaires own
freezers and stacks of paper! These players are REAL consumers, shopping and moving the economy, if they hadn’t lost all our money. Filmon was right wing when he called in gambling for the stupid. Was not the reason for forcing the VLT’s into our homes
to protect us from casinos? Were we not warned that if you remove what would normally be consumer dollars from an economy, there would be less there? If you
call the gaming commission they take 4%, Manitoba lottery books say 30%, but in
truth they take
all they take.

They pull in 191,000,000- (not mentioning 92% casinos and the shut down of Crystal, not enough money in an honest game of cards, and all those losing free
$2 ticket tickets) in revenues each year. If you divide revenues by 4813 odd machines, 313 odd days
a year, holy Christmas, if they return 96%, that’s close to a payout of $3000 every day, every machine! Why don’t we take 40%? We could advertise the best odds in North America! It works well in Vegas, where they actually give players
a chance with games
of chance, and because more than 50% of the players are from out of state. In Oct 97, Nova Scotia gaming Corp. head Ralf Fisk quit claiming his concerns were
ignored, and his power was
stripped. In Dec 97, 5 of 6 B.C. gaming commissioners quit stating they felt they were made redundant and could provide no significant contribution. I guess
the major media doesn’t think this is worth knowing! If your lucky enough to get a hold of any of
the receipts that come out when the machines are opened, or tilted, you’ll see that if you count actual game-ply, some bars, are taking 70%+ of the games and giving you all the credit. Churning of credits with many NON- random events, and prize amounts
are critical in determining how much is actually removed and returned to our communities. Why don’t we promise a payout of 99.9%, we can still take the same
amount of the dollar. Couple extra
play 5 win 5 backs, walla! Some gaming (don’t say lottery! VGT’s?) information is classified information, so there are only a small tiny few, who might know all the details, but refuse to tell anyone, some by law or maybe threat.

They destroy "gaming operations" records (VLT’s and casinos) yearly, but keep employee’s names for fifty! (under MLF0028) Their argument, that makes it illegal, for anyone to publicly disclose the actual dollars, on a site by site basis was "site-holders
could gain an unfair advantage if they knew what their competitors were taking in" How? Don’t they already have one? If you average it out, bars are making close to ten grand a machine per year, Just provide an addict a seat, and you can still pay your
waitresses minimum wage. People can be addicted to many things like VLT’s or peanuts, and they can be equally motivating, but they have different consequences. It’s nearly impossible to
consume 500 dollars worth of peanuts in 2 seconds, and how many entertaining peanuts are there, that leave you smiling and filled with glee? Mr. dealer will
you help these addicts see? If you deposit a hundred thousand and then cash out
without playing,
it’s now short four thousand, and the bars, more flesh for the pound. If these bars were ever caught committing such an act, they’d get a wink and 2 days of profits taken, instead of time in Stony Mountain.

If Stephenson did it, who would know! They paid out 2.6 billion in credits, and
took 191 in cash! Should we, the fascists (look it up), support a predominantly
VLT infested NDP riding with provincial funding, nothing wrong with that, right? When
Stephenson (the same who told us no, we would never sell MTS, then sold it way below value, hundreds of employee’s fired, rates etc.) was asked way back on June 24/95 in the Sun, why some areas such as Carman, Morden, Thompson, and The
Pas, were losing
as much as 1.4 million yearly after counting provincial grants Stephenson quipped "We have to make an assessment to make sure the project makes economic sense for the area" the same story also informs
us, we guarantee a 10% return of gambling profit to our communities. So I guess
that means we’re really stealing as much as 90%?#! Also in conjunction, we threaten communities that don’t want the machines, saying they wouldn’t get "revenues". Then
shouldn’t those that do, get theirs? Even if they did, how would they? Would it
be like the "well advertised" $25,000 VLT hearings held between 1 and 4 on a weekday, where apparently only something like six from Manitoba showed up, with
nothing important
to say. Is that imp lying a thread to 1,043.863- of us, which of at least 96%, want to know where in hell they are going. Can they be that stupid? Can we? We’d bet er.. not.

If we were misled, we should be outraged! There is nothing wrong with earning money, but this is a great deal of money stolen off the backs of the sore, the desperately poor, grocery stores and many many more. Is it because we think we’re only illegally (
section 209, 380(1) 380(2), 181, 52(1-4) etc.) ripping off evil welfare mothers
with too much money in their pockets, or those sinister seniors on some mental incomes? Many in the media mistakenly think that if we cheat the poor and stupid into paying
more in taxes, theirs will equally go down. That is misguided, this regressive tax doesn’t simply work in this manner. In addition, the lotteries claim that 300 mill is spent in salaries to
less than 10000 employees. We know it’s not into the workers at the casinos or bars. Just what is the going rate for paper shredders? Are there any other sides that should be at issues? Would you like all information to make a sound right decision? Why
would one would not? A crucial trust is clearly being violated.

I would suggest showing prudence with where you place your full page ads until some of these serious questions are addressed. Nobody is watching, nobody is really regulating, where are we? Your dream of utopia? You’ll have us pay huge taxes, take away
tax benefits from all renters($?) and single mothers, infants, create monopolies for your sympathizing fascist supporters knowingly against the interests and wishes of the vast majority, cut back on provincial welfare if necessary, liquidate assets,
screw the schools (you certainly don’t need to be educated), hospitals, breed a
judicial system to keep us reminded while you drain the entire economy, and if there’s anything left over you’ll give
it to a private Bank. Then blame the transfer reductions of 250 mill, call it billions, not telling that your including all of Canada when your good for nothing, black sheep brother comes beggin for a nickel. Better yet, you’ll lock
him up. With faith
that most !private! media won’t bring up the fact that you pulled in an extra 900, that social programs have been continually cut for the last twenty years when compared to the GDP, that we don’t even have to be borrowing from American
private banks,
that we are in fact being robbed, or that your brother was just hungry and hurt.

How does anyone buy this? On credit? Things are changing from bad to worse, and
everybody appears, from one or two media accounts, to think, so what or, whatever. Don’t drink the water! A part of the problem is the journalists who are in fact just
trained reporters, who take all the perks and none of the responsibilities. Selling off themselves to something they have written, for them to read. Told what is cover, where is resources, drawing our pictures with their color crayolas. Telling
themselves there must be a good reason why no one is doing the story! Or they’ll take any of a 1000, why think if you don’t have work to? They know the scores, much more money in advertising. The odds would
also dictate a small tiny informed few who have their minds made closed, polluted by greed, and lack of power, looking at another side, pleading ignorance, they didn’t see anything at all, and say you won’t either.

Exercising power the only way they can, draining from all, including themselves. Can you believe it? This is our government re-appropriating billions of our dollars, causing economic destruction and death! Leading the way to the misled and cheated is the
well paid AFM, advising us to only blame ourselves, and the best thing we could
do for ourselves is to drink at the bar/casino. It’s akin to the schoolyard heroin dealer paying some chump to quickly get help to misguided children by selling them crack.
Why bite the hand that stuffs you? Do you wonder what happened to all our money? The truth is out, the lies are old, but the blind idiots directing your show, don’t want to see, you know. Do
300,000+ petition signing Albertans, incidentally more than register to vote, know something you don’t? Studies galore! Watch what you support with money, and with your thoughts. Do your own polls! Did you know we’re planning to take away your
fundamental democratic right to put up garage, and election signs freely? How do they win elections, if nobody put up any signs? How will we ever get a honest deal? Is lying and cheating just endemic with this communist government?
Is anyone making money
on all these bad business investments? Pool the legislature transcripts!


[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)

[continued from previous message]

Take a day on, call your grand mother, vote! But just how many "obscured ballots" are there, phone and see. Do you think in a democracy this information
should be open to the public? Do you own thinking! Why not? Also what’s a public voters list good for?
Did you know since ’95 votes have been tallied by computer, coded in Texas? Now carefully in a measured way, ask yourself, just who is foolish enough to be
manipulated by the machine? Having themselves, their family and just about everyone else punished
for it? Send for the facts, over the lines, face the truth, you’re living, alive! Horrors committed before your eyes, n your name, are you justified? If this is allowed to continue to grow,
it can only turn into something much worse. Slowly, your freedom will further become chained, and the only thing you’ll wish for is that you had taken the time to take action while you had the chance. Just what are the chances? Unless
you think you don’t
count? Better by golly, you sure as do so Bobby! Petitions delicious! Or do nothing, continuing on going backwards, selling yourself short. You know who you are, it’s made up for you, you don’t have to go far. Just don’t sit on the sidewalk or leave a
ticket unpaid, or beg for justice of the wounded dying or dead. Blame the weak and disabled, you’ll be so strong, living in your fable. Then when they come for you, you’ll say something must be
wrong, but who cares? Your not listening.

You’d know if you were being deceived. 1000 of beer in one small sip, remove all your regulations, they’re just there to keep us in, and privatize always, right.. ya.. that’s thinking. We want to sell Winnipeg Hydro, it’s working making a profit. All we
need now are private prisons and the economy will really take off screaming! The one only reason people commit crimes is cause, they know we don’t have guns. Bombs don’t kill people that are killing people! The sky isn’t falling, the sky isn’t falling.
Something to consider, what’s the cause-like symptom and how do you treat it? Like an infection? As a matter of truth, it is completely without question, there it is no such thing, as
deception. Now you know the rules, your losses, odds and stakes. What’s your limit? Can you stop? Are you feeling okay buddy? Let us get out of here, and go
to talk.

------

Sleep Walkers

http://houston.indymedia.org/upload...
http://arizona.indymedia.org/upload...

HERO

http://houston.indymedia.org/upload...
http://arizona.indymedia.org/upload...

/ / That is a high act of treason. And it’s not,

"oh well, but maybe it’s not true.." No, we have the two documents of question.
\ \

What is the Coast to Coast radio network Head talking about tonight?, the re-re-re-hashing of the "Allaways Interslinging" Bigfoot phenomenon? Where was I...

Look, you’re not going to go to hell for not giving me a couple of dollars to further my cause, but it sure couldn’t help to leave me without any support here whatsoever.

—

White House keeps dossiers on more than 10,000 ’political enemies’

http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artm...

---

The United States of America v. Adam Vaughn
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/...

He was a stand-up Marine, a beloved cop, and a local hero

/ / Vaughn was accused of possessing child pornography on the basis of images in his browser cache and downloaded photos he had deleted from his hard drive long before the accusations. Although Vaughn says he never sought out or wanted to keep
pornographic images of children, he’s serving four and a half years in jail. \ \

—

http://ww.alternet.org/columnists/s...

/ / It’s as if our government is telling us that if we’re going to look at porn, we’d better pay for it. Otherwise, we might get branded pedophiles. How many innocent lives will be destroyed before the child porn wars are over? \ \

---

WHICH SIDE ARE YOU ON?

/ / Specialist Damien “Monster” Corsetti—known affectionately as the “King of Torture” among his Bagram colleagues—was later fined and demoted for forcing an Iraqi woman to strip during an interrogation at Abu Ghraib. Yet