http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b07lq12w/panorama-trumps-angry-america
On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 21:13:20 +1200, Liberty <liberty48@live.com>
wrote:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b07lq12w/panorama-trumps-angry-america
The BBC is a left driven state run propaganda outlet.
It is not necessary to be a Trump apologist to understand that Hillary Clinton is far worse.
Clinton and Trump are the only two names on the ticket. Wouldn't it be
better to choose the lesser evil?
On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 21:13:20 +1200, Liberty <liberty48@live.com>I don't disagree but it was still a interesting program.
wrote:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b07lq12w/panorama-trumps-angry-america
The BBC is a left driven state run propaganda outlet.
BR wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 21:13:20 +1200, Liberty <liberty48@live.com>
wrote:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b07lq12w/panorama-trumps-angry-america >>The BBC is a left driven state run propaganda outlet.
It is not necessary to be a Trump apologist to understand that Hillary
Clinton is far worse.
Clinton and Trump are the only two names on the ticket. Wouldn't it be
better to choose the lesser evil?
A system with only two choices is broken. Now is the chance for an outsider to run with their own party. Is a two party system baked into their system, or is that just the way it's evolved? Surely people are not forced to vote for one of the two major parties?
Given how terrible Trump and Clinton are there is an opportunity for an outsider to pick up a lot of votes.
Sysop: | sneaky |
---|---|
Location: | Ashburton,NZ |
Users: | 31 |
Nodes: | 8 (1 / 7) |
Uptime: | 55:09:39 |
Calls: | 2,097 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 11,143 |
Messages: | 950,134 |