http://bryanbruce.co.nz/feature/ethics-values/tppa-fact-check
On Friday, 5 February 2016 08:39:41 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:So you couldn't find anything wrong with it? I guess that's why you
http://bryanbruce.co.nz/feature/ethics-values/tppa-fact-check
Bryan Bruce? Yeah, that's unbiased.
Not.
On Thu, 4 Feb 2016 12:02:19 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Friday, 5 February 2016 08:39:41 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
http://bryanbruce.co.nz/feature/ethics-values/tppa-fact-check
Bryan Bruce? Yeah, that's unbiased.
Not.So you couldn't find anything wrong with it? I guess that's why you
can only attack the author . . .
personal attacks are just a sign of inability to engage in real argument. ROFLMAO
On Friday, 5 February 2016 14:00:54 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:Why do you think it is incorrect? Can you cite just one fact that the
On Thu, 4 Feb 2016 12:02:19 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Friday, 5 February 2016 08:39:41 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:So you couldn't find anything wrong with it? I guess that's why you
http://bryanbruce.co.nz/feature/ethics-values/tppa-fact-check
Bryan Bruce? Yeah, that's unbiased.
Not.
can only attack the author . . .
Almost everything was incorrect - to be expected as the source is politically biased hard-left.
Naturally you wouldn't attack the author if someone posted anything from Cameron Slater to Ayn Rand, eh, oh hypocritical one?
On Thu, 4 Feb 2016 17:27:33 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>politically biased hard-left.
wrote:
On Friday, 5 February 2016 14:00:54 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
On Thu, 4 Feb 2016 12:02:19 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Friday, 5 February 2016 08:39:41 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:So you couldn't find anything wrong with it? I guess that's why you
http://bryanbruce.co.nz/feature/ethics-values/tppa-fact-check
Bryan Bruce? Yeah, that's unbiased.
Not.
can only attack the author . . .
Almost everything was incorrect - to be expected as the source is
Why do you think it is incorrect? Can you cite just one fact that the
article gets wrong?
Of course it is not politically hard-left - it is just a middle of the
road fair and unbiassed analytical assessment.
Cameron Slater to Ayn Rand, eh, oh hypocritical one?Naturally you wouldn't attack the author if someone posted anything from
They are both discredited even for the far-right - but I would prefer
to attack their ideas and arguments- personal attacks are just a sign
of inability to engage in real argument.
On Friday, 5 February 2016 16:07:00 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
On Thu, 4 Feb 2016 17:27:33 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Friday, 5 February 2016 14:00:54 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:Why do you think it is incorrect? Can you cite just one fact that the
On Thu, 4 Feb 2016 12:02:19 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Friday, 5 February 2016 08:39:41 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:So you couldn't find anything wrong with it? I guess that's why you
http://bryanbruce.co.nz/feature/ethics-values/tppa-fact-check
Bryan Bruce? Yeah, that's unbiased.
Not.
can only attack the author . . .
Almost everything was incorrect - to be expected as the source is politically biased hard-left.
article gets wrong?
All of them.
Of course it is not politically hard-left - it is just a middle of the
road fair and unbiassed analytical assessment.
ROTFLMAO! It is long noted that Dickbot considers anything to the right ofMarx to be middle of the road.
of story.
Naturally you wouldn't attack the author if someone posted anything from Cameron Slater to Ayn Rand, eh, oh hypocritical one?
They are both discredited even for the far-right - but I would prefer
to attack their ideas and arguments- personal attacks are just a sign
of inability to engage in real argument.
You appeal to the authority of a well known leftie and get caught out - end
On Thu, 4 Feb 2016 17:27:33 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Friday, 5 February 2016 14:00:54 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:Why do you think it is incorrect? Can you cite just one fact that the
On Thu, 4 Feb 2016 12:02:19 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Friday, 5 February 2016 08:39:41 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:So you couldn't find anything wrong with it? I guess that's why you
http://bryanbruce.co.nz/feature/ethics-values/tppa-fact-check
Bryan Bruce? Yeah, that's unbiased.
Not.
can only attack the author . . .
Almost everything was incorrect - to be expected as the source is >>politically biased hard-left.
article gets wrong?
Of course it is not politically hard-left - it is just a middle of the
road fair and unbiassed analytical assessment.
Naturally you wouldn't attack the author if someone posted anything from >>Cameron Slater to Ayn Rand, eh, oh hypocritical one?
They are both discredited even for the far-right - but I would prefer
to attack their ideas and arguments- personal attacks are just a sign
of inability to engage in real argument.
On 2016-02-05, JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, 5 February 2016 16:07:00 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:Rich 1
On Thu, 4 Feb 2016 17:27:33 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Friday, 5 February 2016 14:00:54 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:Why do you think it is incorrect? Can you cite just one fact that the
On Thu, 4 Feb 2016 12:02:19 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Friday, 5 February 2016 08:39:41 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:So you couldn't find anything wrong with it? I guess that's why you
http://bryanbruce.co.nz/feature/ethics-values/tppa-fact-check
Bryan Bruce? Yeah, that's unbiased.
Not.
can only attack the author . . .
Almost everything was incorrect - to be expected as the source is
politically biased hard-left.
article gets wrong?
All of them.
Of course it is not politically hard-left - it is just a middle of the
road fair and unbiassed analytical assessment.
ROTFLMAO! It is long noted that Dickbot considers anything to the right
of Marx to be middle of the road.
Naturally you wouldn't attack the author if someone posted anything
from Cameron Slater to Ayn Rand, eh, oh hypocritical one?
They are both discredited even for the far-right - but I would prefer
to attack their ideas and arguments- personal attacks are just a sign
of inability to engage in real argument.
You appeal to the authority of a well known leftie and get caught out -
end of story.
JohnO 0
Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
<snip>
personal attacks are just a sign of inability to engage in real argument. >ROFLMAO
On Friday, 5 February 2016 16:07:00 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
On Thu, 4 Feb 2016 17:27:33 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Friday, 5 February 2016 14:00:54 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:Why do you think it is incorrect? Can you cite just one fact that the
On Thu, 4 Feb 2016 12:02:19 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Friday, 5 February 2016 08:39:41 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:So you couldn't find anything wrong with it? I guess that's why you
http://bryanbruce.co.nz/feature/ethics-values/tppa-fact-check
Bryan Bruce? Yeah, that's unbiased.
Not.
can only attack the author . . .
Almost everything was incorrect - to be expected as the source is politically biased hard-left.
article gets wrong?
All of them.
Of course it is not politically hard-left - it is just a middle of the
road fair and unbiassed analytical assessment.
ROTFLMAO! It is long noted that Dickbot considers anything to the right of Marx to be middle of the road.story.
Naturally you wouldn't attack the author if someone posted anything from Cameron Slater to Ayn Rand, eh, oh hypocritical one?
They are both discredited even for the far-right - but I would prefer
to attack their ideas and arguments- personal attacks are just a sign
of inability to engage in real argument.
You appeal to the authority of a well known leftie and get caught out - end of
On Thu, 04 Feb 2016 21:10:31 -0600, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot netAnother bit of sarcasm Rich? You know what my point was and if I wish to change the subject I shall (just like you do ad nauseam).
dot nz> wrote:
Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
<snip>
personal attacks are just a sign of inability to engage in real argument. >>ROFLMAO
Did you have a relevant point you wished to make regarding the subject
of the thread, Tony?
Perhaps you have a view on this article : >http://bryanbruce.co.nz/feature/ethics-values/tppa-fact-checkPerhaps I would if the link wasn't broken but I think I have seen it before and if I am correct it was a left spin on the National release along similar lines. Both were political spin, I would prefer to make my iwn mind up - you?
| Sysop: | sneaky |
|---|---|
| Location: | Ashburton,NZ |
| Users: | 31 |
| Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
| Uptime: | 188:19:28 |
| Calls: | 2,081 |
| Calls today: | 4 |
| Files: | 11,137 |
| Messages: | 947,668 |