http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11680820

So here we have half a million being spent to promote a political
agenda, with those invovled being cronies and mates of ACT and
National.

If Charter Schools need promotion and support, why do they not pay for
it themselves? Isn'the whole idea of CHarter Schools to use a
commercial model? Why then are additional government subsidies needed?

But its just taxpayer money - ACT and National obviously see a "free"
market as one where the government pays them to push their political
agenda - from the education budget!

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)

On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 23:41:03 +1200, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11680820

So here we have half a million being spent to promote a political
agenda, with those invovled being cronies and mates of ACT and
National.

If Charter Schools need promotion and support, why do they not pay for
it themselves? Isn'the whole idea of CHarter Schools to use a
commercial model? Why then are additional government subsidies needed?

But its just taxpayer money - ACT and National obviously see a "free"
market as one where the government pays them to push their political
agenda - from the education budget!

Rich once again makes a silly generalisation.
Just because the government make a grant . It doesn't mean it is corrupt.
The State pays thousands to 1001 different organisations. From feeding dickheads
Parents children to bike trials.
But if the state pays to some organisation the labour/union /Green party having
A bitch over . They are corrupt. labour/union /Green really are a pack of dickheads.
It would be far for constructive if labours child MP took his head out of his arse
And went and had a look at the schools. Instead of making dick of himself.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)

On 25/07/2016 11:41 p.m., Rich80105 wrote:

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11680820

So here we have half a million being spent to promote a political
agenda, with those invovled being cronies and mates of ACT and
National.

If Charter Schools need promotion and support, why do they not pay for
it themselves? Isn'the whole idea of CHarter Schools to use a
commercial model? Why then are additional government subsidies needed?

But its just taxpayer money - ACT and National obviously see a "free"
market as one where the government pays them to push their political
agenda - from the education budget!

So how is it they're not following a commercial model Rich? Many if not
most businesses don't tender services they're supplying. Do the unions
that supplied your glorious leader the scab Little do it democratically
and in a businesslike manner? NO! They went through a farce of an
election process and gave the unions a twenty percent vote. Funny how
when it's the other lot you forget things like this Rich. is it pure
ignorance on your behalf or are Liebor paying you to conveniently forget
these facts?

Pooh

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)