First he tells a lie about John Shewan. He got shown up and eventuallyretracted the statement but didn't apologise. Why not - he's just smeared an upstanding citizen? The answer is that Angry little Andy is a low grade worm.
But to make matters worse, Angry little Andy then told another lie, claimingthat Sherwan didn't want an apology.
That, is a flat out lie. There's no possibility of an innocent mistake ormisunderstanding here. Little was told in writing by Sherwan that he expected an apology. Little is a barefaced liar.
Angry little ain't fit to clean the Parliament toilets, let alone hold highoffice.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11664887apology, only a correction to statements the Labour leader made following the release of the Panama Papers."
"Mr Little said this morning that the former PwC chairman never sought an
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11665006delay in getting the [comments corrected],' he said.
"'I specifically asked for an apology, that being because of the prolonged
Mr Shewan said the Labour leader's office rejected this request. He was alsotold that any further correspondence should be sent to Mr Little's lawyer."
On Wednesday, 29 June 2016 08:30:42 UTC+12, JohnO wrote:of the incorrect statement made by Mr Little.
<snip>
Here's the letter Sherwan sent to Angry little Andy's lawyers:
"The suggested response is not acceptable. It does not recognise the severity
It’s reasonable to expect a person in Mr Little’s position to understandthe impact and damage the statement he has made would have on me personally and
I have been fair and extremely patient. It is close to two months since MrLittle caused me and my family considerable stress and humiliation.
My efforts to address the issue in a fair and timely way were responded to byprocrastination and vain efforts to fob me off, whereas they could and should have brought a prompt resolution to this matter.
The statements made were patently wrong and damaging to my reputation and Inow require an unqualified retraction which will go some way towards mitigating
A correction along the lines you are suggesting would be unacceptable.following additions: ‘I apologise to Mr Shewan for any embarrassment I have caused him through my statements’.”
I now request the statement I sent to you yesterday be issued with the
Please advise Mr Little’s position by 5pm today."
On 29/06/2016 8:30 AM, JohnO wrote:that Sherwan didn't want an apology.
First he tells a lie about John Shewan. He got shown up and eventually retracted the statement but didn't apologise. Why not - he's just smeared an upstanding citizen? The answer is that Angry little Andy is a low grade worm. >>
But to make matters worse, Angry little Andy then told another lie, claiming
told that any further correspondence should be sent to Mr Little's lawyer."
That, is a flat out lie. There's no possibility of an innocent mistake or misunderstanding here. Little was told in writing by Sherwan that he expected an apology. Little is a barefaced liar.
Angry little ain't fit to clean the Parliament toilets, let alone hold high office.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11664887
"Mr Little said this morning that the former PwC chairman never sought an apology, only a correction to statements the Labour leader made following the release of the Panama Papers."
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11665006 >>
"'I specifically asked for an apology, that being because of the prolonged delay in getting the [comments corrected],' he said.
Mr Shewan said the Labour leader's office rejected this request. He was also
Surely leaving Little as leader is another one of the thousand cuts.
He's a liability and I hope they change him. Nobody wins when there's no >opposition.
On Wed, 29 Jun 2016 11:07:44 +1200, Fred <dryrot@hotmail.com> wrote:office.
On 29/06/2016 8:30 AM, JohnO wrote:
First he tells a lie about John Shewan. He got shown up and eventually retracted the statement but didn't apologise. Why not - he's just smeared an upstanding citizen? The answer is that Angry little Andy is a low grade worm. >>>
But to make matters worse, Angry little Andy then told another lie, claiming that Sherwan didn't want an apology.
That, is a flat out lie. There's no possibility of an innocent mistake or misunderstanding here. Little was told in writing by Sherwan that he expected an apology. Little is a barefaced liar.
Angry little ain't fit to clean the Parliament toilets, let alone hold high
Surely leaving Little as leader is another one of the thousand cuts.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11664887
"Mr Little said this morning that the former PwC chairman never sought an apology, only a correction to statements the Labour leader made following the release of the Panama Papers."
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11665006
"'I specifically asked for an apology, that being because of the prolonged delay in getting the [comments corrected],' he said.
Mr Shewan said the Labour leader's office rejected this request. He was also told that any further correspondence should be sent to Mr Little's lawyer."
He's a liability and I hope they change him. Nobody wins when there's no
opposition.
The problem Labour have in NZ is who do they have to replace Little?
Since Helen Clark left they have tried Goff, Shearer, and Cunliffe as peer-elected leaders (ie elected by the Labour Caucus) and then Little (elected by a wider group and the new MP on the block).
So Little remains leader by default?
On Thu, 30 Jun 2016 08:08:53 +1200, george152 <gblack@hnpl.net> wrote:retracted the statement but didn't apologise. Why not - he's just smeared an upstanding citizen? The answer is that Angry little Andy is a low grade worm.
On 6/29/2016 8:42 PM, Crash wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jun 2016 11:07:44 +1200, Fred <dryrot@hotmail.com> wrote:
On 29/06/2016 8:30 AM, JohnO wrote:
First he tells a lie about John Shewan. He got shown up and eventually
claiming that Sherwan didn't want an apology.
But to make matters worse, Angry little Andy then told another lie,
or misunderstanding here. Little was told in writing by Sherwan that he expected an apology. Little is a barefaced liar.
That, is a flat out lie. There's no possibility of an innocent mistake
high office.
Angry little ain't fit to clean the Parliament toilets, let alone hold
an apology, only a correction to statements the Labour leader made following the release of the Panama Papers."
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11664887 >>>>
"Mr Little said this morning that the former PwC chairman never sought
prolonged delay in getting the [comments corrected],' he said.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11665006
"'I specifically asked for an apology, that being because of the
also told that any further correspondence should be sent to Mr Little's lawyer."
Mr Shewan said the Labour leader's office rejected this request. He was
Maybe they could try recycling those leaders' passed over?Surely leaving Little as leader is another one of the thousand cuts.
He's a liability and I hope they change him. Nobody wins when there's no >>> opposition.
The problem Labour have in NZ is who do they have to replace Little?
Since Helen Clark left they have tried Goff, Shearer, and Cunliffe as
peer-elected leaders (ie elected by the Labour Caucus) and then Little
(elected by a wider group and the new MP on the block).
So Little remains leader by default?
It's not as if they're spoiled for choice...
And I'd like to see Mr Shewan ignore any further excuses from the angry >little man and seek retribution for the slander....
I'vew been away for a while, but the same people are being sucked in
by non-news from "reporters"interviewing their imagination - this must
have been a little embarassing for Patrick Gower: http://www.newshub.co.nz/opinion/opinion-case-closed-in-andrew-little-v-john-shewan-stoush-2016062918#axzz4D0565kGU
For more important issues, see: https://www.tvnz.co.nz/one-news/new-zealand/opinion-perhaps-government-might-want-say-sorry
On 6/29/2016 8:42 PM, Crash wrote:delay in getting the [comments corrected],' he said.
On Wed, 29 Jun 2016 11:07:44 +1200, Fred <dryrot@hotmail.com> wrote:
On 29/06/2016 8:30 AM, JohnO wrote:
First he tells a lie about John Shewan. He got shown up and eventually retracted the statement but didn't apologise. Why not - he's just smeared an upstanding citizen? The answer is that Angry little Andy is a low grade worm. >>>>
But to make matters worse, Angry little Andy then told another lie, claiming that Sherwan didn't want an apology.
That, is a flat out lie. There's no possibility of an innocent mistake or misunderstanding here. Little was told in writing by Sherwan that he expected an apology. Little is a barefaced liar.
Angry little ain't fit to clean the Parliament toilets, let alone hold high office.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11664887 >>>>
"Mr Little said this morning that the former PwC chairman never sought an apology, only a correction to statements the Labour leader made following the release of the Panama Papers."
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11665006
"'I specifically asked for an apology, that being because of the prolonged
Maybe they could try recycling those leaders' passed over?Surely leaving Little as leader is another one of the thousand cuts.
Mr Shewan said the Labour leader's office rejected this request. He was also told that any further correspondence should be sent to Mr Little's lawyer."
He's a liability and I hope they change him. Nobody wins when there's no >>> opposition.
The problem Labour have in NZ is who do they have to replace Little?
Since Helen Clark left they have tried Goff, Shearer, and Cunliffe as
peer-elected leaders (ie elected by the Labour Caucus) and then Little
(elected by a wider group and the new MP on the block).
So Little remains leader by default?
It's not as if they're spoiled for choice...
And I'd like to see Mr Shewan ignore any further excuses from the angry >little man and seek retribution for the slander....
On Thursday, 30 June 2016 16:57:28 UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:someone, then refuse to acknowledge he lied until two hours before an All Blacks test kickoff to bury it, then subsequently lie about not being asked for
On Thu, 30 Jun 2016 08:08:53 +1200, george152 <gblack@hnpl.net> wrote:
On 6/29/2016 8:42 PM, Crash wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jun 2016 11:07:44 +1200, Fred <dryrot@hotmail.com> wrote:Maybe they could try recycling those leaders' passed over?
On 29/06/2016 8:30 AM, JohnO wrote:
First he tells a lie about John Shewan. He got shown up and eventually retracted the statement but didn't apologise. Why not - he's just smeared an upstanding citizen? The answer is that Angry little Andy is a low grade worm. >>>>>>Surely leaving Little as leader is another one of the thousand cuts. >>>>> He's a liability and I hope they change him. Nobody wins when there's no >>>>> opposition.
But to make matters worse, Angry little Andy then told another lie, claiming that Sherwan didn't want an apology.
That, is a flat out lie. There's no possibility of an innocent mistake or misunderstanding here. Little was told in writing by Sherwan that he expected an apology. Little is a barefaced liar.
Angry little ain't fit to clean the Parliament toilets, let alone hold high office.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11664887 >>>>>>
"Mr Little said this morning that the former PwC chairman never sought an apology, only a correction to statements the Labour leader made following the release of the Panama Papers."
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11665006
"'I specifically asked for an apology, that being because of the prolonged delay in getting the [comments corrected],' he said.
Mr Shewan said the Labour leader's office rejected this request. He was also told that any further correspondence should be sent to Mr Little's lawyer."
The problem Labour have in NZ is who do they have to replace Little?
Since Helen Clark left they have tried Goff, Shearer, and Cunliffe as
peer-elected leaders (ie elected by the Labour Caucus) and then Little >>>> (elected by a wider group and the new MP on the block).
So Little remains leader by default?
It's not as if they're spoiled for choice...
And I'd like to see Mr Shewan ignore any further excuses from the angry
little man and seek retribution for the slander....
I'vew been away for a while, but the same people are being sucked in
by non-news from "reporters"interviewing their imagination - this must
have been a little embarassing for Patrick Gower:
http://www.newshub.co.nz/opinion/opinion-case-closed-in-andrew-little-v-john-shewan-stoush-2016062918#axzz4D0565kGU
For more important issues, see:
https://www.tvnz.co.nz/one-news/new-zealand/opinion-perhaps-government-might-want-say-sorry
So according to Dickbot , it's OK for Angry little Andy to tell a lie about
It's a strange world of double standards and hypocrisy inside Dickbot's tinylittle head.
On 6/30/2016 5:04 PM, JohnO wrote:also told that any further correspondence should be sent to Mr Little's lawyer."
On Thursday, 30 June 2016 16:57:28 UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jun 2016 08:08:53 +1200, george152 <gblack@hnpl.net> wrote:
On 6/29/2016 8:42 PM, Crash wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jun 2016 11:07:44 +1200, Fred <dryrot@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>
On 29/06/2016 8:30 AM, JohnO wrote:
First he tells a lie about John Shewan. He got shown up and eventually retracted the statement but didn't apologise. Why not - he's just smeared an upstanding citizen? The answer is that Angry little Andy is a low grade worm. >>>>>>>
But to make matters worse, Angry little Andy then told another lie, claiming that Sherwan didn't want an apology.
That, is a flat out lie. There's no possibility of an innocent mistake or misunderstanding here. Little was told in writing by Sherwan that he expected an apology. Little is a barefaced liar.
Angry little ain't fit to clean the Parliament toilets, let alone hold high office.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11664887 >>>>>>>
"Mr Little said this morning that the former PwC chairman never sought an apology, only a correction to statements the Labour leader made following the release of the Panama Papers."
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11665006
"'I specifically asked for an apology, that being because of the prolonged delay in getting the [comments corrected],' he said.
Mr Shewan said the Labour leader's office rejected this request. He was
an apology.Maybe they could try recycling those leaders' passed over?Surely leaving Little as leader is another one of the thousand cuts. >>>>>> He's a liability and I hope they change him. Nobody wins when there's no >>>>>> opposition.
The problem Labour have in NZ is who do they have to replace Little? >>>>> Since Helen Clark left they have tried Goff, Shearer, and Cunliffe as >>>>> peer-elected leaders (ie elected by the Labour Caucus) and then Little >>>>> (elected by a wider group and the new MP on the block).
So Little remains leader by default?
It's not as if they're spoiled for choice...
And I'd like to see Mr Shewan ignore any further excuses from the angry >>>> little man and seek retribution for the slander....
I'vew been away for a while, but the same people are being sucked in
by non-news from "reporters"interviewing their imagination - this must
have been a little embarassing for Patrick Gower:
http://www.newshub.co.nz/opinion/opinion-case-closed-in-andrew-little-v-john-shewan-stoush-2016062918#axzz4D0565kGU
For more important issues, see:
https://www.tvnz.co.nz/one-news/new-zealand/opinion-perhaps-government-might-want-say-sorry
So according to Dickbot , it's OK for Angry little Andy to tell a lie about someone, then refuse to acknowledge he lied until two hours before an All Blacks test kickoff to bury it, then subsequently lie about not being asked for
little head.
It's a strange world of double standards and hypocrisy inside Dickbot's tiny
Especially as the 'reporters' have definite prejudices hidden under the
flag 'opinion'
| Sysop: | sneaky |
|---|---|
| Location: | Ashburton,NZ |
| Users: | 31 |
| Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
| Uptime: | 47:38:02 |
| Calls: | 2,096 |
| Files: | 11,143 |
| Messages: | 950,024 |