And it's not down to recession and it's not down to bullshit carbon taxes or credits.which said:
It's mainly down to fracking and the subsequently the use of natural gas instead of coal.
Yet the dopey Greens continue to oppose fracking. Go figure.
H/t DPF
http://capx.co/external/co2-emissions-in-the-united-states-keep-falling/
On Mon, 30 May 2016 12:46:53 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
wrote:
And it's not down to recession and it's not down to bullshit carbon taxes or credits.Most of the reduction comes from burning less coal.
It's mainly down to fracking and the subsequently the use of natural gas instead of coal.
Yet the dopey Greens continue to oppose fracking. Go figure.
H/t DPF
http://capx.co/external/co2-emissions-in-the-united-states-keep-falling/ >which said:
On Mon, 30 May 2016 12:46:53 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>credits.
wrote:
And it's not down to recession and it's not down to bullshit carbon taxes or
instead of coal.It's mainly down to fracking and the subsequently the use of natural gas
Yet the dopey Greens continue to oppose fracking. Go figure.
H/t DPF
http://capx.co/external/co2-emissions-in-the-united-states-keep-falling/ which said:Most of the reduction comes from burning less coal.
According to the
U.S. Energy Information Administration, changes in the national mix of electricity production—especially the shift toward cleaner-burning
natural gas—accounted for 68 percent of the emissions reductions
between 2005 and 2015.
teh article below it is interesting as well https://www.technologyreview.com/s/601455/global-air-pollution-is-getting-worse-but-removing-it-could-worsen-climate-change/#
See this for information about fracking: http://serc.carleton.edu/NAGTWorkshops/health/case_studies/hydrofracking_w.html
A danger for fracking in New Zealand is that it would be likely to
trigger earthquakes
On Mon, 30 May 2016 12:46:53 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>credits.
wrote:
And it's not down to recession and it's not down to bullshit carbon taxes or
instead of coal.It's mainly down to fracking and the subsequently the use of natural gas
Yet the dopey Greens continue to oppose fracking. Go figure.
H/t DPF
http://capx.co/external/co2-emissions-in-the-united-states-keep-falling/ which said:Most of the reduction comes from burning less coal. According to the
U.S. Energy Information Administration, changes in the national mix of electricity production—especially the shift toward cleaner-burning
natural gas—accounted for 68 percent of the emissions reductions
between 2005 and 2015.
teh article below it is interesting as well https://www.technologyreview.com/s/601455/global-air-pollution-is-getting-worse-but-removing-it-could-worsen-climate-change/#
See this for information about fracking: http://serc.carleton.edu/NAGTWorkshops/health/case_studies/hydrofracking_w.html
A danger for fracking in New Zealand is that it would be likely to
trigger earthquakes
On Tuesday, 31 May 2016 08:31:51 UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:the practice of re-infecting the spoil that *might* produce a damaging earthquake.
On Mon, 30 May 2016 12:46:53 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
wrote:
And it's not down to recession and it's not down to bullshit carbon taxes or credits.which said:
It's mainly down to fracking and the subsequently the use of natural gas instead of coal.
Yet the dopey Greens continue to oppose fracking. Go figure.
H/t DPF
http://capx.co/external/co2-emissions-in-the-united-states-keep-falling/
Most of the reduction comes from burning less coal. According to the
U.S. Energy Information Administration, changes in the national mix of
electricity production—especially the shift toward cleaner-burning
natural gas—accounted for 68 percent of the emissions reductions
between 2005 and 2015.
teh article below it is interesting as well
https://www.technologyreview.com/s/601455/global-air-pollution-is-getting-worse-but-removing-it-could-worsen-climate-change/#
See this for information about fracking:
http://serc.carleton.edu/NAGTWorkshops/health/case_studies/hydrofracking_w.html
A danger for fracking in New Zealand is that it would be likely to
trigger earthquakes
Bullshit. Fracking only produces micro tremors that don't cause damage. It is
https://www2.usgs.gov/faq/categories/9833/3428been attributed to it.
Fracking has been used in New Zealand for over 23 years and no earthquake has
But anything has risk whether it's building a hydro dam, a nuclear plant, awind turbine of whatever.
However the Greens will oppose fracking as a kneejerk reaction regardless.
Sysop: | sneaky |
---|---|
Location: | Ashburton,NZ |
Users: | 31 |
Nodes: | 8 (1 / 7) |
Uptime: | 55:12:52 |
Calls: | 2,097 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 11,143 |
Messages: | 950,138 |