https://medium.com/@techieshark/google-trends-prove-tppa-protest-impact-74fab57d82#.992g7x74z
https://medium.com/@techieshark/google-trends-prove-tppa-protest-impact-74fab57d82#.992g7x74z
On Wednesday, 10 February 2016 16:44:58 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:number of anti TPPA protesters managed to annoy a very large number of other people. That the anti TPPA mob of idiots think this helps them goes a long way to show that
https://medium.com/@techieshark/google-trends-prove-tppa-protest-impact-74fab57d82#.992g7x74z
What a load of crap. All Google showed was a spike in searches on "TPPA". It says nothing about the opinions or beliefs of those performing the searches.It makes a mindless assumption that people searching TPPA instead of TPP implies something.
The article does laud the disruption the protesters caused. A relatively small
HDPA sums up the protester's stupidity: >http://m.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11585760
On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 20:13:18 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Wednesday, 10 February 2016 16:44:58 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
https://medium.com/@techieshark/google-trends-prove-tppa-protest-impact-74fab57d82#.992g7x74z
What a load of crap. All Google showed was a spike in searches on "TPPA". >>It says nothing about the opinions or beliefs of those performing the >>searches.It makes a mindless assumption that people searching TPPA instead >>of TPP implies something.
The article does laud the disruption the protesters caused. A relatively >>small number of anti TPPA protesters managed to annoy a very large number >>of other people. That the anti TPPA mob of idiots think this helps them >>goes a long way to show that Labour and the left are still a very long way >>from getting into government in NZ.
HDPA sums up the protester's stupidity: >>http://m.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11585760
Disrupting traffic is obviously something that deeply offends you
JohnO.
Do you think street marches should be banned?
On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 20:13:18 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Wednesday, 10 February 2016 16:44:58 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
https://medium.com/@techieshark/google-trends-prove-tppa-protest-impact-74fab57d82#.992g7x74z
What a load of crap. All Google showed was a spike in searches on "TPPA". >>It says nothing about the opinions or beliefs of those performing the >>searches.It makes a mindless assumption that people searching TPPA instead >>of TPP implies something.
The article does laud the disruption the protesters caused. A relatively >>small number of anti TPPA protesters managed to annoy a very large number >>of other people. That the anti TPPA mob of idiots think this helps them >>goes a long way to show that Labour and the left are still a very long way >>from getting into government in NZ.
HDPA sums up the protester's stupidity: >>http://m.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11585760
Disrupting traffic is obviously something that deeply offends you
JohnO.
Do you think street marches should be banned?
On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 20:13:18 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>says nothing about the opinions or beliefs of those performing the searches.It makes a mindless assumption that people searching TPPA instead of TPP implies something.
wrote:
On Wednesday, 10 February 2016 16:44:58 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
https://medium.com/@techieshark/google-trends-prove-tppa-protest-impact-74fab57d82#.992g7x74z
What a load of crap. All Google showed was a spike in searches on "TPPA". It
small number of anti TPPA protesters managed to annoy a very large number of other people. That the anti TPPA mob of idiots think this helps them goes a long way to show thatThe article does laud the disruption the protesters caused. A relatively
HDPA sums up the protester's stupidity: >http://m.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11585760
Disrupting traffic is obviously something that deeply offends you
JohnO.
Do you think street marches should be banned?
On Thu, 11 Feb 2016 22:05:16 +1300, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
wrote:
Rich80105 wrote:
On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 20:13:18 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Wednesday, 10 February 2016 16:44:58 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
https://medium.com/@techieshark/google-trends-prove-tppa-protest-impact-74fab57d82#.992g7x74z
What a load of crap. All Google showed was a spike in searches on >>>>"TPPA". It says nothing about the opinions or beliefs of those >>>>performing the searches.It makes a mindless assumption that people >>>>searching TPPA instead of TPP implies something.
The article does laud the disruption the protesters caused. A relatively >>>>small number of anti TPPA protesters managed to annoy a very large >>>>number of other people. That the anti TPPA mob of idiots think this >>>>helps them goes a long way to show that Labour and the left are still a >>>>very long way from getting into government in NZ.
HDPA sums up the protester's stupidity: >>>>http://m.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11585760
Disrupting traffic is obviously something that deeply offends you
JohnO.
Do you think street marches should be banned?
Preventing people from going about their normal business shouldn't be >>allowed. They could have protested on the foot path.
What sort of penalites should there be then, JohnO?
Rich80105 wrote:
On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 20:13:18 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Wednesday, 10 February 2016 16:44:58 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
https://medium.com/@techieshark/google-trends-prove-tppa-protest-impact-74fab57d82#.992g7x74z
What a load of crap. All Google showed was a spike in searches on "TPPA". >>>It says nothing about the opinions or beliefs of those performing the >>>searches.It makes a mindless assumption that people searching TPPA instead >>>of TPP implies something.
The article does laud the disruption the protesters caused. A relatively >>>small number of anti TPPA protesters managed to annoy a very large number >>>of other people. That the anti TPPA mob of idiots think this helps them >>>goes a long way to show that Labour and the left are still a very long way >>>from getting into government in NZ.
HDPA sums up the protester's stupidity: >>>http://m.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11585760
Disrupting traffic is obviously something that deeply offends you
JohnO.
Do you think street marches should be banned?
Preventing people from going about their normal business shouldn't be >allowed. They could have protested on the foot path.
On Thu, 11 Feb 2016 22:05:16 +1300, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
wrote:
Rich80105 wrote:
On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 20:13:18 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Wednesday, 10 February 2016 16:44:58 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
https://medium.com/@techieshark/google-trends-prove-tppa-protest-impact-74fab57d82#.992g7x74z
What a load of crap. All Google showed was a spike in searches on "TPPA". >>>>It says nothing about the opinions or beliefs of those performing the >>>>searches.It makes a mindless assumption that people searching TPPA instead >>>>of TPP implies something.
The article does laud the disruption the protesters caused. A relatively >>>>small number of anti TPPA protesters managed to annoy a very large number >>>>of other people. That the anti TPPA mob of idiots think this helps them >>>>goes a long way to show that Labour and the left are still a very long way >>>>from getting into government in NZ.
HDPA sums up the protester's stupidity: >>>>http://m.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11585760
Disrupting traffic is obviously something that deeply offends you
JohnO.
Do you think street marches should be banned?
Preventing people from going about their normal business shouldn't be >>allowed. They could have protested on the foot path.
What sort of penalites should there be then, JohnO?
http://www.tfw.govt.nz/news/scots-college-parade-could-cause-significant-delays/
On Thu, 11 Feb 2016 22:05:16 +1300, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
wrote:
Rich80105 wrote:
On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 20:13:18 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Wednesday, 10 February 2016 16:44:58 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
https://medium.com/@techieshark/google-trends-prove-tppa-protest-impact-74fab57d82#.992g7x74z
What a load of crap. All Google showed was a spike in searches on "TPPA". >>>It says nothing about the opinions or beliefs of those performing the >>>searches.It makes a mindless assumption that people searching TPPA instead >>>of TPP implies something.
The article does laud the disruption the protesters caused. A relatively >>>small number of anti TPPA protesters managed to annoy a very large number >>>of other people. That the anti TPPA mob of idiots think this helps them >>>goes a long way to show that Labour and the left are still a very long way >>>from getting into government in NZ.
HDPA sums up the protester's stupidity: >>>http://m.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11585760
Disrupting traffic is obviously something that deeply offends you
JohnO.
Do you think street marches should be banned?
Preventing people from going about their normal business shouldn't be >allowed. They could have protested on the foot path.
What sort of penalites should there be then, JohnO?
http://www.tfw.govt.nz/news/scots-college-parade-could-cause-significant-delays/
I don't always agree with Ms Du Plessis-Allan but she has nailed it this time. I imagine that National are delighted that the haters that took part in the demonstartions are so dumb.https://medium.com/@techieshark/google-trends-prove-tppa-protest-impact-74fab57d82#.992g7x74z
What a load of crap. All Google showed was a spike in searches on "TPPA". It >says nothing about the opinions or beliefs of those performing the searches.It >makes a mindless assumption that people searching TPPA instead of TPP implies >something.
The article does laud the disruption the protesters caused. A relatively small >number of anti TPPA protesters managed to annoy a very large number of other >people. That the anti TPPA mob of idiots think this helps them goes a long way >to show that Labour and the left are still a very long way from getting into >government in NZ.
HDPA sums up the protester's stupidity: >http://m.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11585760
On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 08:25:34 +1300, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Thu, 11 Feb 2016 22:05:16 +1300, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com>
wrote:
Rich80105 wrote:
On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 20:13:18 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Wednesday, 10 February 2016 16:44:58 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
https://medium.com/@techieshark/google-trends-prove-tppa-protest-impact-74fab57d82#.992g7x74z
What a load of crap. All Google showed was a spike in searches on "TPPA". >>>>>It says nothing about the opinions or beliefs of those performing the >>>>>searches.It makes a mindless assumption that people searching TPPA instead >>>>>of TPP implies something.
The article does laud the disruption the protesters caused. A relatively >>>>>small number of anti TPPA protesters managed to annoy a very large number >>>>>of other people. That the anti TPPA mob of idiots think this helps them >>>>>goes a long way to show that Labour and the left are still a very long way >>>>>from getting into government in NZ.
HDPA sums up the protester's stupidity: >>>>>http://m.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11585760
Disrupting traffic is obviously something that deeply offends you
JohnO.
Do you think street marches should be banned?
Preventing people from going about their normal business shouldn't be >>>allowed. They could have protested on the foot path.
What sort of penalites should there be then, JohnO?
http://www.tfw.govt.nz/news/scots-college-parade-could-cause-significant-delays/
Rich - do you not see the difference between a future scheduled parade >celebrating an event and raising funds for charity, and unannounced
political protest action blocking intersections?
If the Scots College parade had deliberately followed a different
route and/or run at a different time with no prior notice then you
might have had a valid point.
On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 09:22:57 +1300, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid>
wrote:
On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 08:25:34 +1300, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Thu, 11 Feb 2016 22:05:16 +1300, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com> >>>wrote:
Rich80105 wrote:
On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 20:13:18 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote:
On Wednesday, 10 February 2016 16:44:58 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:Disrupting traffic is obviously something that deeply offends you
https://medium.com/@techieshark/google-trends-prove-tppa-protest-impact-74fab57d82#.992g7x74z
What a load of crap. All Google showed was a spike in searches on "TPPA". >>>>>>It says nothing about the opinions or beliefs of those performing the >>>>>>searches.It makes a mindless assumption that people searching TPPA instead
of TPP implies something.
The article does laud the disruption the protesters caused. A relatively >>>>>>small number of anti TPPA protesters managed to annoy a very large number >>>>>>of other people. That the anti TPPA mob of idiots think this helps them >>>>>>goes a long way to show that Labour and the left are still a very long way
from getting into government in NZ.
HDPA sums up the protester's stupidity: >>>>>>http://m.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11585760 >>>>>
JohnO.
Do you think street marches should be banned?
Preventing people from going about their normal business shouldn't be >>>>allowed. They could have protested on the foot path.
What sort of penalites should there be then, JohnO?
http://www.tfw.govt.nz/news/scots-college-parade-could-cause-significant-delays/
Rich - do you not see the difference between a future scheduled parade >>celebrating an event and raising funds for charity, and unannounced >>political protest action blocking intersections?
There was plenty of notice for both parades - if anything public
notice for the TPPZ protest was more widely available.
You will be
pleased to know that there were no arrests at either of the two
events. I sdid noticve that you did not answer the question as to what
you believe would be suitable penalties for a protest march . . .
If the Scots College parade had deliberately followed a different
route and/or run at a different time with no prior notice then you
might have had a valid point.
So what penalties should apply to future protests, Crash?
On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 14:37:41 +1300, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 09:22:57 +1300, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> >>wrote:
On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 08:25:34 +1300, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com> >>>wrote:
On Thu, 11 Feb 2016 22:05:16 +1300, Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com> >>>>wrote:
Rich80105 wrote:
On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 20:13:18 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote:
On Wednesday, 10 February 2016 16:44:58 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote: >>>>>>>> https://medium.com/@techieshark/google-trends-prove-tppa-protest-impact-74fab57d82#.992g7x74zDisrupting traffic is obviously something that deeply offends you
What a load of crap. All Google showed was a spike in searches on >>>>>>>"TPPA".
It says nothing about the opinions or beliefs of those performing the >>>>>>>searches.It makes a mindless assumption that people searching TPPA >>>>>>>instead
of TPP implies something.
The article does laud the disruption the protesters caused. A >>>>>>>relatively
small number of anti TPPA protesters managed to annoy a very large >>>>>>>number
of other people. That the anti TPPA mob of idiots think this helps >>>>>>>them
goes a long way to show that Labour and the left are still a very >>>>>>>long way
from getting into government in NZ.
HDPA sums up the protester's stupidity: >>>>>>>http://m.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11585760 >>>>>>
JohnO.
Do you think street marches should be banned?
Preventing people from going about their normal business shouldn't be >>>>>allowed. They could have protested on the foot path.
What sort of penalites should there be then, JohnO?
http://www.tfw.govt.nz/news/scots-college-parade-could-cause-significant-delays/
Rich - do you not see the difference between a future scheduled parade >>>celebrating an event and raising funds for charity, and unannounced >>>political protest action blocking intersections?
There was plenty of notice for both parades - if anything public
notice for the TPPZ protest was more widely available.
How much notice was there for the fact that some intersections may be
blocked for the TPPA protest marches?
You will beSo how is this comparable (as you have) to the TPPA protest? My point
pleased to know that there were no arrests at either of the two
events. I sdid noticve that you did not answer the question as to what
you believe would be suitable penalties for a protest march . . .
If the Scots College parade had deliberately followed a different
route and/or run at a different time with no prior notice then you
might have had a valid point.
is that your comparison (the Scots College being a procession to
honour an event) does not equate to the TPPA march (a political
protest march). As far as I know no advance notice was given by the
TPPA protesters to block intersections as they did.
So what penalties should apply to future protests, Crash?
My point is that comparison of the two is not valid. I thought I made
that clear in my first post.
--
Crash McBash
| Sysop: | sneaky |
|---|---|
| Location: | Ashburton,NZ |
| Users: | 31 |
| Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
| Uptime: | 189:28:47 |
| Calls: | 2,082 |
| Calls today: | 5 |
| Files: | 11,137 |
| Messages: | 947,684 |