• Rich will spin like a top

    From Liberty@3:770/3 to All on Saturday, May 07, 2016 23:54:21
    Before the pinkos start self pleasuring themselves.
    Labour was in power in 1984-1990
    JK was not in Parliament
    The Cook island taxation was a little dubious.
    1990 National was elected
    National closed up the tax loopholes.
    Winston has been grandstanding ever since.
    Now wait for labour's spin.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From george152@3:770/3 to Liberty on Sunday, May 08, 2016 07:41:46
    On 5/7/2016 11:54 PM, Liberty wrote:
    Before the pinkos start self pleasuring themselves.
    Labour was in power in 1984-1990
    JK was not in Parliament
    The Cook island taxation was a little dubious.
    1990 National was elected
    National closed up the tax loopholes.
    Winston has been grandstanding ever since.
    Now wait for labour's spin.

    Winston I hear got baubles and quit the Winebox noise.
    Several prominent NZ businessmen went on overseas holidays (with their furniture)
    And I suspect the fat Kraut is donkey deep in the latest 'revelations'

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Liberty@3:770/3 to gblack@hnpl.net on Sunday, May 08, 2016 09:42:51
    On Sun, 8 May 2016 07:41:46 +1200, george152 <gblack@hnpl.net> wrote:

    On 5/7/2016 11:54 PM, Liberty wrote:
    Before the pinkos start self pleasuring themselves.
    Labour was in power in 1984-1990
    JK was not in Parliament
    The Cook island taxation was a little dubious.
    1990 National was elected
    National closed up the tax loopholes.
    Winston has been grandstanding ever since.
    Now wait for labour's spin.

    Winston I hear got baubles and quit the Winebox noise.
    Several prominent NZ businessmen went on overseas holidays (with their >furniture)
    And I suspect the fat Kraut is donkey deep in the latest 'revelations'


    You might be right there



    1: Mossack Fonseca was illegally hacked, not a leak, not a whistleblower.

    2: The paymaster is almost certainly a european citizen, but also likely not living there, likely German given the advantage that was given to
    Süddeutsche Zeitung over other media outlets.

    3: Mossack Fonseca is a worldwide company, it even has an office here in little
    old NZ, which means the hack could have happened anywhere in the
    world. It’s a whole lot easier for the hacker, the paymaster and the intermediaries to be close so what is discovered can be discussed and assimilated.

    4: “John Doe” appears to have a better knowledge of NZ politics than a lot of kiwis, a lot of European political tragics wouldn’t even know the name
    of our PM.

    5. The whole modus operandi is boringly familiar.

    Am I joining the dots or do I just need to loosen the tinfoil ?

    Also

    Labour have been briefed ahead of time, and are part of the political hit
    The target is John Key
    The funder is probably someone who hates John Key
    A book will be released by Nicky Hager
    I suspect Key will have second thoughts about cutting me adrift and feeding me to the wolves at the same time as doing absolutely nothing to try and
    identify the criminal hackers, the complicit media working with criminals, and the people in the Labour Party that are funding, facilitating and
    abusing the fruits of crime.

    Sorry to say, I don’t have a lot of sympathy for Key over this. He threw me under the bus. He threw Ede under the bus. He’s thrown Whitney under
    the bus. None of us broke the law.

    But all the criminals and enablers are running free to do it all over again. http://www.whaleoil.co.nz/2016/05/impertinent-questions-comment-day/#more-248802

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From george152@3:770/3 to Liberty on Sunday, May 08, 2016 11:49:22
    On 5/8/2016 9:42 AM, Liberty wrote:
    On Sun, 8 May 2016 07:41:46 +1200, george152 <gblack@hnpl.net> wrote:

    On 5/7/2016 11:54 PM, Liberty wrote:
    Before the pinkos start self pleasuring themselves.
    Labour was in power in 1984-1990
    JK was not in Parliament
    The Cook island taxation was a little dubious.
    1990 National was elected
    National closed up the tax loopholes.
    Winston has been grandstanding ever since.
    Now wait for labour's spin.

    Winston I hear got baubles and quit the Winebox noise.
    Several prominent NZ businessmen went on overseas holidays (with their
    furniture)
    And I suspect the fat Kraut is donkey deep in the latest 'revelations'


    You might be right there



    1: Mossack Fonseca was illegally hacked, not a leak, not a whistleblower.

    2: The paymaster is almost certainly a european citizen, but also likely not
    living there, likely German given the advantage that was given to
    Süddeutsche Zeitung over other media outlets.

    3: Mossack Fonseca is a worldwide company, it even has an office here in
    little old NZ, which means the hack could have happened anywhere in the
    world. It’s a whole lot easier for the hacker, the paymaster and the
    intermediaries to be close so what is discovered can be discussed and
    assimilated.

    4: “John Doe” appears to have a better knowledge of NZ politics than a lot of
    kiwis, a lot of European political tragics wouldn’t even know the name
    of our PM.

    5. The whole modus operandi is boringly familiar.

    Am I joining the dots or do I just need to loosen the tinfoil ?

    Also

    Labour have been briefed ahead of time, and are part of the political hit
    The target is John Key
    The funder is probably someone who hates John Key
    A book will be released by Nicky Hager
    I suspect Key will have second thoughts about cutting me adrift and feeding
    me to the wolves at the same time as doing absolutely nothing to try and
    identify the criminal hackers, the complicit media working with criminals,
    and the people in the Labour Party that are funding, facilitating and
    abusing the fruits of crime.

    Sorry to say, I don’t have a lot of sympathy for Key over this. He threw me
    under the bus. He threw Ede under the bus. He’s thrown Whitney under
    the bus. None of us broke the law.

    But all the criminals and enablers are running free to do it all over again. http://www.whaleoil.co.nz/2016/05/impertinent-questions-comment-day/#more-248802


    About time the fat kraut went to the USA, Hagar got prosecuted and the
    hackers had a holiday.
    Liebor haven't learnt from the last time this tactic was tried

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Pooh@3:770/3 to gblack@hnpl.net on Sunday, May 08, 2016 17:41:07
    "george152" <gblack@hnpl.net> wrote in message news:oaCdnSFARuye4rPKnZ2dnUU7-L3NnZ2d@giganews.com...
    On 5/8/2016 9:42 AM, Liberty wrote:
    On Sun, 8 May 2016 07:41:46 +1200, george152 <gblack@hnpl.net> wrote:

    On 5/7/2016 11:54 PM, Liberty wrote:
    Before the pinkos start self pleasuring themselves.
    Labour was in power in 1984-1990
    JK was not in Parliament
    The Cook island taxation was a little dubious.
    1990 National was elected
    National closed up the tax loopholes.
    Winston has been grandstanding ever since.
    Now wait for labour's spin.

    Winston I hear got baubles and quit the Winebox noise.
    Several prominent NZ businessmen went on overseas holidays (with their
    furniture)
    And I suspect the fat Kraut is donkey deep in the latest 'revelations'


    You might be right there



    1: Mossack Fonseca was illegally hacked, not a leak, not a whistleblower.

    2: The paymaster is almost certainly a european citizen, but also likely
    not living there, likely German given the advantage that was given to
    Süddeutsche Zeitung over other media outlets.

    3: Mossack Fonseca is a worldwide company, it even has an office here in
    little old NZ, which means the hack could have happened anywhere in the
    world. It’s a whole lot easier for the hacker, the paymaster and the
    intermediaries to be close so what is discovered can be discussed and
    assimilated.

    4: “John Doe” appears to have a better knowledge of NZ politics than a
    lot of kiwis, a lot of European political tragics wouldn’t even know the
    name
    of our PM.

    5. The whole modus operandi is boringly familiar.

    Am I joining the dots or do I just need to loosen the tinfoil ?

    Also

    Labour have been briefed ahead of time, and are part of the political hit
    The target is John Key
    The funder is probably someone who hates John Key
    A book will be released by Nicky Hager
    I suspect Key will have second thoughts about cutting me adrift and
    feeding me to the wolves at the same time as doing absolutely nothing to
    try and
    identify the criminal hackers, the complicit media working with
    criminals, and the people in the Labour Party that are funding,
    facilitating and
    abusing the fruits of crime.

    Sorry to say, I don’t have a lot of sympathy for Key over this. He threw
    me under the bus. He threw Ede under the bus. He’s thrown Whitney under
    the bus. None of us broke the law.

    But all the criminals and enablers are running free to do it all over
    again.
    http://www.whaleoil.co.nz/2016/05/impertinent-questions-comment-day/#more-248802


    About time the fat kraut went to the USA, Hagar got prosecuted and the hackers had a holiday.
    Liebor haven't learnt from the last time this tactic was tried

    Has the stench of dead carrion that goes with everything Labour and the
    loopy left have their dirty little fingers in.

    My bet is Rich will go to ground under the nearest bridge till the stench
    goes away as he always does like the owardly little communist punk he is.

    Pooh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)