• An opportunity to make a better New Zealand

    From Rich80105@3:770/3 to All on Wednesday, April 13, 2016 23:28:44
    http://www.labour.org.nz/taxdodging

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From JohnO@3:770/3 to All on Wednesday, April 13, 2016 12:58:49
    On Wednesday, 13 April 2016 23:28:18 UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
    http://www.labour.org.nz/taxdodging

    This is not the place to make party political broadcasts, Dickbot.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Allistar@3:770/3 to All on Thursday, April 14, 2016 09:13:15
    Rich80105 wrote:

    http://www.labour.org.nz/taxdodging

    What kind of person thinks that increasing the state sponsored extortion and property confiscation scheme is better for anyone? Personal property rights should be protected. Labour want to erode what property rights we have even further.
    --
    "From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs."
    creates the incentive to minimize your abilities and maximize your needs.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Fred@3:770/3 to All on Thursday, April 14, 2016 10:14:16
    On 13/04/2016 11:28 p.m., Rich80105 wrote:
    http://www.labour.org.nz/taxdodging



    How ridiculous to promote a petition to anyone wandering down thestreet.
    This is a matter for the IRD and various tax experts to tackle;
    particularly in the matter of transfer pricing - something many
    governments are grappling with. Waste of time and if it gets much
    further - a total waste of taxpayers money because it cannot achieve
    anything. Labour know this of course unless they're thicker than I
    thought. They are just shit-stirring.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Pooh@3:770/3 to All on Thursday, April 14, 2016 12:00:15
    "JohnO" <johno1234@gmail.com> wrote in message news:2916d2e2-e5ba-469d-a666-2d6237a58d5c@googlegroups.com...
    On Wednesday, 13 April 2016 23:28:18 UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
    http://www.labour.org.nz/taxdodging

    This is not the place to make party political broadcasts, Dickbot.

    You want Rich to leave do you JohnO? What would we do for a good laugh if he follows your advice?

    Pooh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Pooh@3:770/3 to Fred on Thursday, April 14, 2016 12:03:17
    "Fred" <dryrot@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:nemg6a$qrn$1@dont-email.me...
    On 13/04/2016 11:28 p.m., Rich80105 wrote:
    http://www.labour.org.nz/taxdodging



    How ridiculous to promote a petition to anyone wandering down thestreet.
    This is a matter for the IRD and various tax experts to tackle;
    particularly in the matter of transfer pricing - something many
    governments are grappling with. Waste of time and if it gets much
    further - a total waste of taxpayers money because it cannot achieve anything. Labour know this of course unless they're thicker than I
    thought. They are just shit-stirring.

    Besides as so often these days Labour takes 'action' long after the
    government starts dealing with the percieved problem. Typical of the useless filthy political marxist muppets.

    Labour: The party for all except the 'rich pricks'*

    Pooh

    *Anyone earning more than a Labour MP.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Pooh@3:770/3 to rich80105@hotmail.com on Thursday, April 14, 2016 11:59:15
    "Rich80105" <rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:8absgb5ooog23l0knmfq32rhotp1luf3q6@4ax.com...
    http://www.labour.org.nz/taxdodging

    So what exactly would their 'fair share' of tax be Rich. 50%, 75%, 99%?
    Again it's not a policy from Labour. Just another dumb bumper sticker.

    Labour: the bumper sticker and tired marxist rhetoric party.

    Pooh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Rich80105@3:770/3 to Fred on Thursday, April 14, 2016 13:18:57
    On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 10:14:16 +1200, Fred <dryrot@hotmail.com> wrote:

    On 13/04/2016 11:28 p.m., Rich80105 wrote:
    http://www.labour.org.nz/taxdodging



    How ridiculous to promote a petition to anyone wandering down thestreet.


    This is a matter for the IRD and various tax experts to tackle;
    particularly in the matter of transfer pricing - something many
    governments are grappling with. Waste of time and if it gets much
    further - a total waste of taxpayers money because it cannot achieve >anything. Labour know this of course unless they're thicker than I
    thought. They are just shit-stirring.
    Look at just what the petition asks for:

    Close the loopholes that allow foreign trusts in New Zealand to hide tax avoidance, money laundering and fraud
    This activity does not directly affect most New Zealanders, but
    indirectly affects us all. Trust is a lot about perception, and
    harbouring tax cheats from other countries is not a good look.
    Increasingly we rely on overseas investors - our government debt is
    said to be increasing at $27 million dollars a day under National. a
    lower level of trust in New Zealand could increase the risk margin for
    New Zealand - we already pay a margin above some other developed
    nations because of our size. If you are interested in competitiveness,
    you should want the lowest possible rate of borrowing.

    Shewan has admitted that he has little or no experience in this area,
    but even if he had some (and he is intelligent enough to understand
    quite a bit), involving others as well would be a good idea - and
    broadening the scope of the investigation, and giving it adequate time
    to research alternatives would also be a good thing to do.


    Crack down on tax avoidance from multinational companies operating in New Zealand
    As you have said, other countries are looking to develop responses to
    the propblems of companies avoiding tax - with a strong perception
    of evading tax. Transfer pricing is certainly a major part of those
    problems, but not the only one.

    Again Shewan is not necessarily an expert in multi-national financing
    and tax avoidance, although again he has some knowledge. Involving
    others with experience in multi-national accounting, taxation and
    expereince from other countries would result in better alternatives
    for New Zealand.

    Launch an urgent inquiry into tax avoidance, particularly by multinational companies and the use of New Zealand as a tax haven.
    To an extent most of this is covered in the previous two items, but it
    would also enable more public exploration of issues and possible
    reactions. Any changes will result from both international agreements
    and domestic actions - both need to have sufficient support to be
    accepted, and given the provisions of the TPPA, it may be desirable to
    have some of those changes made as soon as possible.

    There is nothing in what Labour or I have said that should be a
    problem forthe government - these are issues that have been
    acknowledged by all political parties, and the government that finds a
    solution to them may well be able to reduce rates of some taxes if
    more global companies and wealthy individuals pay their fair share
    of tax in respet of real profits made in New Zealand - what is it that
    you do not like about reducing taxes?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Fred@3:770/3 to All on Thursday, April 14, 2016 20:07:49
    On 14/04/2016 1:18 p.m., Rich80105 wrote:
    On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 10:14:16 +1200, Fred <dryrot@hotmail.com> wrote:

    On 13/04/2016 11:28 p.m., Rich80105 wrote:
    http://www.labour.org.nz/taxdodging



    How ridiculous to promote a petition to anyone wandering down thestreet.


    This is a matter for the IRD and various tax experts to tackle;
    particularly in the matter of transfer pricing - something many
    governments are grappling with. Waste of time and if it gets much
    further - a total waste of taxpayers money because it cannot achieve
    anything. Labour know this of course unless they're thicker than I
    thought. They are just shit-stirring.
    Look at just what the petition asks for:

    Close the loopholes that allow foreign trusts in New Zealand to hide tax avoidance, money laundering and fraud
    This activity does not directly affect most New Zealanders, but
    indirectly affects us all. Trust is a lot about perception, and
    harbouring tax cheats from other countries is not a good look.
    Increasingly we rely on overseas investors - our government debt is
    said to be increasing at $27 million dollars a day under National. a
    lower level of trust in New Zealand could increase the risk margin for
    New Zealand - we already pay a margin above some other developed
    nations because of our size. If you are interested in competitiveness,
    you should want the lowest possible rate of borrowing.

    Shewan has admitted that he has little or no experience in this area,
    but even if he had some (and he is intelligent enough to understand
    quite a bit), involving others as well would be a good idea - and
    broadening the scope of the investigation, and giving it adequate time
    to research alternatives would also be a good thing to do.


    Crack down on tax avoidance from multinational companies operating in New Zealand
    As you have said, other countries are looking to develop responses to
    the propblems of companies avoiding tax - with a strong perception
    of evading tax. Transfer pricing is certainly a major part of those
    problems, but not the only one.

    Again Shewan is not necessarily an expert in multi-national financing
    and tax avoidance, although again he has some knowledge. Involving
    others with experience in multi-national accounting, taxation and
    expereince from other countries would result in better alternatives
    for New Zealand.

    Launch an urgent inquiry into tax avoidance, particularly by multinational companies and the use of New Zealand as a tax haven.
    To an extent most of this is covered in the previous two items, but it
    would also enable more public exploration of issues and possible
    reactions. Any changes will result from both international agreements
    and domestic actions - both need to have sufficient support to be
    accepted, and given the provisions of the TPPA, it may be desirable to
    have some of those changes made as soon as possible.

    There is nothing in what Labour or I have said that should be a
    problem forthe government - these are issues that have been
    acknowledged by all political parties, and the government that finds a solution to them may well be able to reduce rates of some taxes if
    more global companies and wealthy individuals pay their fair share
    of tax in respet of real profits made in New Zealand - what is it that
    you do not like about reducing taxes?

    Can you not post a response to anything without some smart-arse question
    or statement at the end? Are you trying to be funny or trying to prove
    you're just a fuckwit?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Tony @3:770/3 to Fred on Thursday, April 14, 2016 04:03:20
    Fred <dryrot@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On 14/04/2016 1:18 p.m., Rich80105 wrote:
    On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 10:14:16 +1200, Fred <dryrot@hotmail.com> wrote:

    On 13/04/2016 11:28 p.m., Rich80105 wrote:
    http://www.labour.org.nz/taxdodging



    How ridiculous to promote a petition to anyone wandering down thestreet.


    This is a matter for the IRD and various tax experts to tackle;
    particularly in the matter of transfer pricing - something many
    governments are grappling with. Waste of time and if it gets much
    further - a total waste of taxpayers money because it cannot achieve
    anything. Labour know this of course unless they're thicker than I
    thought. They are just shit-stirring.
    Look at just what the petition asks for:

    Close the loopholes that allow foreign trusts in New Zealand to hide tax >>>>avoidance, money laundering and fraud
    This activity does not directly affect most New Zealanders, but
    indirectly affects us all. Trust is a lot about perception, and
    harbouring tax cheats from other countries is not a good look.
    Increasingly we rely on overseas investors - our government debt is
    said to be increasing at $27 million dollars a day under National. a
    lower level of trust in New Zealand could increase the risk margin for
    New Zealand - we already pay a margin above some other developed
    nations because of our size. If you are interested in competitiveness,
    you should want the lowest possible rate of borrowing.

    Shewan has admitted that he has little or no experience in this area,
    but even if he had some (and he is intelligent enough to understand
    quite a bit), involving others as well would be a good idea - and
    broadening the scope of the investigation, and giving it adequate time
    to research alternatives would also be a good thing to do.


    Crack down on tax avoidance from multinational companies operating in New >>>Zealand
    As you have said, other countries are looking to develop responses to
    the propblems of companies avoiding tax - with a strong perception
    of evading tax. Transfer pricing is certainly a major part of those
    problems, but not the only one.

    Again Shewan is not necessarily an expert in multi-national financing
    and tax avoidance, although again he has some knowledge. Involving
    others with experience in multi-national accounting, taxation and
    expereince from other countries would result in better alternatives
    for New Zealand.

    Launch an urgent inquiry into tax avoidance, particularly by multinational >>>companies and the use of New Zealand as a tax haven.
    To an extent most of this is covered in the previous two items, but it
    would also enable more public exploration of issues and possible
    reactions. Any changes will result from both international agreements
    and domestic actions - both need to have sufficient support to be
    accepted, and given the provisions of the TPPA, it may be desirable to
    have some of those changes made as soon as possible.

    There is nothing in what Labour or I have said that should be a
    problem forthe government - these are issues that have been
    acknowledged by all political parties, and the government that finds a
    solution to them may well be able to reduce rates of some taxes if
    more global companies and wealthy individuals pay their fair share
    of tax in respet of real profits made in New Zealand - what is it that
    you do not like about reducing taxes?

    Can you not post a response to anything without some smart-arse question
    or statement at the end? Are you trying to be funny or trying to prove
    you're just a fuckwit?
    No he can't - sad is it not?
    Tony

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Gordon@3:770/3 to Pooh on Thursday, April 14, 2016 21:09:18
    On 2016-04-14, Pooh <rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:

    "JohnO" <johno1234@gmail.com> wrote in message news:2916d2e2-e5ba-469d-a666-2d6237a58d5c@googlegroups.com...
    On Wednesday, 13 April 2016 23:28:18 UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
    http://www.labour.org.nz/taxdodging

    This is not the place to make party political broadcasts, Dickbot.

    You want Rich to leave do you JohnO? What would we do for a good laugh if he follows your advice?

    Indeed the National side posters would have nothing to respond to.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From george152@3:770/3 to Gordon on Friday, April 15, 2016 10:00:16
    On 4/15/2016 9:09 AM, Gordon wrote:
    On 2016-04-14, Pooh <rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:

    "JohnO" <johno1234@gmail.com> wrote in message
    news:2916d2e2-e5ba-469d-a666-2d6237a58d5c@googlegroups.com...
    On Wednesday, 13 April 2016 23:28:18 UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
    http://www.labour.org.nz/taxdodging

    This is not the place to make party political broadcasts, Dickbot.

    You want Rich to leave do you JohnO? What would we do for a good laugh if he >> follows your advice?

    Indeed the National side posters would have nothing to respond to.

    Leaving the group to the real nutters posting about strange things

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Pooh@3:770/3 to Gordon on Friday, April 15, 2016 15:15:25
    "Gordon" <Gordon@clear.net.nz> wrote in message news:dnaf7uFl674U1@mid.individual.net...
    On 2016-04-14, Pooh <rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:

    "JohnO" <johno1234@gmail.com> wrote in message
    news:2916d2e2-e5ba-469d-a666-2d6237a58d5c@googlegroups.com...
    On Wednesday, 13 April 2016 23:28:18 UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
    http://www.labour.org.nz/taxdodging

    This is not the place to make party political broadcasts, Dickbot.

    You want Rich to leave do you JohnO? What would we do for a good laugh if
    he
    follows your advice?

    Indeed the National side posters would have nothing to respond to.

    We don't have anything to respond to now Gordon. Rich and you left posters
    on deal in hypocrisy and bumper sticker slogans!

    Pooh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Pooh@3:770/3 to rich80105@hotmail.com on Friday, April 15, 2016 15:14:20
    "Rich80105" <rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:8absgb5ooog23l0knmfq32rhotp1luf3q6@4ax.com...
    http://www.labour.org.nz/taxdodging

    Pretty good from a bunch of parasitic pricks who not only pay NO tax but are hypocritical enough to believe they 've earned the right to pay no tax. Rich when it comes to hypocrisy you and Labour have the corner and half way down
    the street covered!

    Pooh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Pooh@3:770/3 to Fred on Friday, April 15, 2016 15:19:56
    "Fred" <dryrot@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:nenisj$nr6$3@dont-email.me...
    On 14/04/2016 1:18 p.m., Rich80105 wrote:
    On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 10:14:16 +1200, Fred <dryrot@hotmail.com> wrote:

    On 13/04/2016 11:28 p.m., Rich80105 wrote:
    http://www.labour.org.nz/taxdodging



    How ridiculous to promote a petition to anyone wandering down thestreet.


    This is a matter for the IRD and various tax experts to tackle;
    particularly in the matter of transfer pricing - something many
    governments are grappling with. Waste of time and if it gets much
    further - a total waste of taxpayers money because it cannot achieve
    anything. Labour know this of course unless they're thicker than I
    thought. They are just shit-stirring.
    Look at just what the petition asks for:

    Close the loopholes that allow foreign trusts in New Zealand to hide
    tax avoidance, money laundering and fraud
    This activity does not directly affect most New Zealanders, but
    indirectly affects us all. Trust is a lot about perception, and
    harbouring tax cheats from other countries is not a good look.
    Increasingly we rely on overseas investors - our government debt is
    said to be increasing at $27 million dollars a day under National. a
    lower level of trust in New Zealand could increase the risk margin for
    New Zealand - we already pay a margin above some other developed
    nations because of our size. If you are interested in competitiveness,
    you should want the lowest possible rate of borrowing.

    Shewan has admitted that he has little or no experience in this area,
    but even if he had some (and he is intelligent enough to understand
    quite a bit), involving others as well would be a good idea - and
    broadening the scope of the investigation, and giving it adequate time
    to research alternatives would also be a good thing to do.


    Crack down on tax avoidance from multinational companies operating in
    New Zealand
    As you have said, other countries are looking to develop responses to
    the propblems of companies avoiding tax - with a strong perception
    of evading tax. Transfer pricing is certainly a major part of those
    problems, but not the only one.

    Again Shewan is not necessarily an expert in multi-national financing
    and tax avoidance, although again he has some knowledge. Involving
    others with experience in multi-national accounting, taxation and
    expereince from other countries would result in better alternatives
    for New Zealand.

    Launch an urgent inquiry into tax avoidance, particularly by
    multinational companies and the use of New Zealand as a tax haven.
    To an extent most of this is covered in the previous two items, but it
    would also enable more public exploration of issues and possible
    reactions. Any changes will result from both international agreements
    and domestic actions - both need to have sufficient support to be
    accepted, and given the provisions of the TPPA, it may be desirable to
    have some of those changes made as soon as possible.

    There is nothing in what Labour or I have said that should be a
    problem forthe government - these are issues that have been
    acknowledged by all political parties, and the government that finds a
    solution to them may well be able to reduce rates of some taxes if
    more global companies and wealthy individuals pay their fair share
    of tax in respet of real profits made in New Zealand - what is it that
    you do not like about reducing taxes?

    Can you not post a response to anything without some smart-arse question
    or statement at the end? Are you trying to be funny or trying to prove
    you're just a fuckwit?

    Come on Fred. Rich doesn't need to prove he's a fuckwit and hypocrite. He
    and Labour did that years ago!:)

    Pooh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Pooh@3:770/3 to rich80105@hotmail.com on Friday, April 15, 2016 15:18:40
    "Rich80105" <rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:kcqtgbhcccvdhl06i4beu5edi6s2vgtdqs@4ax.com...
    On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 10:14:16 +1200, Fred <dryrot@hotmail.com> wrote:

    On 13/04/2016 11:28 p.m., Rich80105 wrote:
    http://www.labour.org.nz/taxdodging



    How ridiculous to promote a petition to anyone wandering down thestreet.


    This is a matter for the IRD and various tax experts to tackle; >>particularly in the matter of transfer pricing - something many
    governments are grappling with. Waste of time and if it gets much
    further - a total waste of taxpayers money because it cannot achieve >>anything. Labour know this of course unless they're thicker than I
    thought. They are just shit-stirring.
    Look at just what the petition asks for:

    Close the loopholes that allow foreign trusts in New Zealand to hide tax >>>avoidance, money laundering and fraud
    This activity does not directly affect most New Zealanders, but
    indirectly affects us all. Trust is a lot about perception, and
    harbouring tax cheats from other countries is not a good look.
    Increasingly we rely on overseas investors - our government debt is
    said to be increasing at $27 million dollars a day under National. a
    lower level of trust in New Zealand could increase the risk margin for
    New Zealand - we already pay a margin above some other developed
    nations because of our size. If you are interested in competitiveness,
    you should want the lowest possible rate of borrowing.

    Shewan has admitted that he has little or no experience in this area,
    but even if he had some (and he is intelligent enough to understand
    quite a bit), involving others as well would be a good idea - and
    broadening the scope of the investigation, and giving it adequate time
    to research alternatives would also be a good thing to do.


    Crack down on tax avoidance from multinational companies operating in New >>Zealand
    As you have said, other countries are looking to develop responses to
    the propblems of companies avoiding tax - with a strong perception
    of evading tax. Transfer pricing is certainly a major part of those
    problems, but not the only one.

    Again Shewan is not necessarily an expert in multi-national financing
    and tax avoidance, although again he has some knowledge. Involving
    others with experience in multi-national accounting, taxation and
    expereince from other countries would result in better alternatives
    for New Zealand.

    Launch an urgent inquiry into tax avoidance, particularly by multinational >>companies and the use of New Zealand as a tax haven.
    To an extent most of this is covered in the previous two items, but it
    would also enable more public exploration of issues and possible
    reactions. Any changes will result from both international agreements
    and domestic actions - both need to have sufficient support to be
    accepted, and given the provisions of the TPPA, it may be desirable to
    have some of those changes made as soon as possible.

    There is nothing in what Labour or I have said that should be a
    problem forthe government - these are issues that have been
    acknowledged by all political parties, and the government that finds a solution to them may well be able to reduce rates of some taxes if
    more global companies and wealthy individuals pay their fair share
    of tax in respet of real profits made in New Zealand - what is it that
    you do not like about reducing taxes?

    On the subject of tax cheats wasn't it one of your angelic Labour MPs who conveniently forgot several hundred thousand dollars lodged in a New York
    bank several years ago Rich? Shearer wasn't it. One of the better idiots who blazed across Labours leadership skys for a few months before the unions put their foot down and forced angry little Andy on marxist muppets we affectionatly and with some merriment refer to as the Labour party?

    Pooh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)