From the irrelevant: >http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/the-flag-debate/78253159/duncan-garner-the-flagging-fortunes-of-a-leader-chasing-a-legacy.htmlIrrelevant indeed, not the first time that Duncan Garner has published irrelevancies.
(although there is some humour there: >http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&objectid=11611813 >)
To important issues worthy of discussion for the good of our future: >http://www.stuff.co.nz/taranaki-daily-news/news/78271488/Ross-Henderson-Labour-not-shying-away-from-big-ideasI am absolutely sure that Labour supporters have some good ideas, even better that they can pick up on an idea that a right wing businessman has been pushing for some years. The problem is not that there are no ideas, simply that the party does not have the competence to develop them into policieas and somehow get the New Zealand public to take an interest!
Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Both the Labour Party itself and Labour supporters have good ideas,
From the irrelevant: >>http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/the-flag-debate/78253159/duncan-garner-the-flagging-fortunes-of-a-leader-chasing-a-legacy.htmlIrrelevant indeed, not the first time that Duncan Garner has published >irrelevancies.
I am absolutely sure that Labour supporters have some good ideas, even better >that they can pick up on an idea that a right wing businessman has been pushing
(although there is some humour there: >>http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&objectid=11611813
)
To important issues worthy of discussion for the good of our future: >>http://www.stuff.co.nz/taranaki-daily-news/news/78271488/Ross-Henderson-Labour-not-shying-away-from-big-ideas
for some years. The problem is not that there are no ideas, simply that the >party does not have the competence to develop them into policieas and somehow >get the New Zealand public to take an interest!
Tony
On Sat, 26 Mar 2016 16:54:27 -0500, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot netThank you for proving my point - ideas are there, competence is not,
dot nz> wrote:
Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Both the Labour Party itself and Labour supporters have good ideas,
From the irrelevant: >>>>http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/the-flag-debate/78253159/duncan-garner-the-flagging-fortunes-of-a-leader-chasing-a-legacy.htmlIrrelevant indeed, not the first time that Duncan Garner has published >>>irrelevancies.
I am absolutely sure that Labour supporters have some good ideas, even >>>better
(although there is some humour there: >>>>http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&objectid=11611813
)
To important issues worthy of discussion for the good of our future: >>>>http://www.stuff.co.nz/taranaki-daily-news/news/78271488/Ross-Henderson-Labour-not-shying-away-from-big-ideas
that they can pick up on an idea that a right wing businessman has been >>>pushing
for some years. The problem is not that there are no ideas, simply that the >>>party does not have the competence to develop them into policieas and >>>somehow
get the New Zealand public to take an interest!
Tony
Tony, and discussing them is important to an effecitive process.
Look here: >>https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/nzlabour/pages/4238/attachments/original/1458693579/Future_of_Work_Ten_Big_Ideas_sm.pdf
For similar ideas from National we have:Don't forget reducing unemployment in real terms despite the poor legacy left >by the Labour government and the serious international crisis which this >government managed us through very well see >http://www.tradingeconomics.com/new-zealand/unemployment-rate
Flag
TPPA
Changing school funding (nothing yet to discuss)
Pandas
???
and improving the balance of trade see >http://www.tradingeconomics.com/new-zealand/balance-of-trade
Oh! Of course using the tentative start that Labour made on the TPPA and >turning it into a positive opportunity for this country.
Tomorrow's schools was one of the best ideas that Labour have ever had, pity >they didn't implement it as well as they should have - there are still some >things to sort.
Pandas? It is good that we have a government with heart and a commitment to an >under threat species - the fact that you think it is unimportant tells me much >about your priorities.
Who cares about the, a bagatelle and about as important as Helen Clark's >forgery.
On Sat, 26 Mar 2016 16:54:27 -0500, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
dot nz> wrote:
Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Both the Labour Party itself and Labour supporters have good ideas,
From the irrelevant: >>>http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/the-flag-debate/78253159/duncan-garner-the-flagging-fortunes-of-a-leader-chasing-a-legacy.htmlIrrelevant indeed, not the first time that Duncan Garner has published >>irrelevancies.
I am absolutely sure that Labour supporters have some good ideas, even better >>that they can pick up on an idea that a right wing businessman has been >>pushing
(although there is some humour there: >>>http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&objectid=11611813
)
To important issues worthy of discussion for the good of our future: >>>http://www.stuff.co.nz/taranaki-daily-news/news/78271488/Ross-Henderson-Labour-not-shying-away-from-big-ideas
for some years. The problem is not that there are no ideas, simply that the >>party does not have the competence to develop them into policieas and somehow >>get the New Zealand public to take an interest!
Tony
Tony, and discussing them is important to an effecitive process.
Look here: >https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/nzlabour/pages/4238/attachments/original/1458693579/Future_of_Work_Ten_Big_Ideas_sm.pdf
For similar ideas from National we have:Don't forget reducing unemployment in real terms despite the poor legacy left by the Labour government and the serious international crisis which this government managed us through very well see http://www.tradingeconomics.com/new-zealand/unemployment-rate
Flag
TPPA
Changing school funding (nothing yet to discuss)
Pandas
???
On Sat, 26 Mar 2016 16:54:27 -0500, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
dot nz> wrote:
Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Both the Labour Party itself and Labour supporters have good ideas,
From the irrelevant: >>>http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/the-flag-debate/78253159/duncan-garner-the-flagging-fortunes-of-a-leader-chasing-a-legacy.htmlIrrelevant indeed, not the first time that Duncan Garner has published >>irrelevancies.
I am absolutely sure that Labour supporters have some good ideas, even >>better
(although there is some humour there: >>>http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&objectid=11611813
)
To important issues worthy of discussion for the good of our future: >>>http://www.stuff.co.nz/taranaki-daily-news/news/78271488/Ross-Henderson-Labour-not-shying-away-from-big-ideas
that they can pick up on an idea that a right wing businessman has been >>pushing
for some years. The problem is not that there are no ideas, simply that
the
party does not have the competence to develop them into policieas and >>somehow
get the New Zealand public to take an interest!
Tony
Tony, and discussing them is important to an effecitive process.
Look here: https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/nzlabour/pages/4238/attachments/original/1458693579/Future_of_Work_Ten_Big_Ideas_sm.pdf
For similar ideas from National we have:
Flag
TPPA
Changing school funding (nothing yet to discuss)
Pandas
???
On Sat, 26 Mar 2016 16:54:27 -0500, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
dot nz> wrote:
Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Both the Labour Party itself and Labour supporters have good ideas,
From the irrelevant: >>>http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/the-flag-debate/78253159/duncan-garner-the-flagging-fortunes-of-a-leader-chasing-a-legacy.htmlIrrelevant indeed, not the first time that Duncan Garner has published >>irrelevancies.
I am absolutely sure that Labour supporters have some good ideas, even better >>that they can pick up on an idea that a right wing businessman has been pushing
(although there is some humour there: >>>http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&objectid=11611813
)
To important issues worthy of discussion for the good of our future: >>>http://www.stuff.co.nz/taranaki-daily-news/news/78271488/Ross-Henderson-Labour-not-shying-away-from-big-ideas
for some years. The problem is not that there are no ideas, simply that the >>party does not have the competence to develop them into policieas and somehow >>get the New Zealand public to take an interest!
Tony
Tony, and discussing them is important to an effecitive process.
Look here: >https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/nzlabour/pages/4238/attachments/original/1458693579/Future_of_Work_Ten_Big_Ideas_sm.pdf
For similar ideas from National we have:
Flag
TPPA
Changing school funding (nothing yet to discuss)
Pandas
???
On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 12:34:01 +1300, Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Sat, 26 Mar 2016 16:54:27 -0500, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
dot nz> wrote:
Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Both the Labour Party itself and Labour supporters have good ideas,
From the irrelevant: >>>>http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/the-flag-debate/78253159/duncan-garner-the-flagging-fortunes-of-a-leader-chasing-a-legacy.htmlIrrelevant indeed, not the first time that Duncan Garner has published >>>irrelevancies.
I am absolutely sure that Labour supporters have some good ideas, even >>>better
(although there is some humour there: >>>>http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&objectid=11611813
)
To important issues worthy of discussion for the good of our future: >>>>http://www.stuff.co.nz/taranaki-daily-news/news/78271488/Ross-Henderson-Labour-not-shying-away-from-big-ideas
that they can pick up on an idea that a right wing businessman has been >>>pushing
for some years. The problem is not that there are no ideas, simply that >>>the
party does not have the competence to develop them into policieas and >>>somehow
get the New Zealand public to take an interest!
Tony
Tony, and discussing them is important to an effecitive process.
Look here: >>https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/nzlabour/pages/4238/attachments/original/1458693579/Future_of_Work_Ten_Big_Ideas_sm.pdf
Rich this is without doubt worthy of consideration - the trick though
is for Labour to produce ideas that resonate with the electorate and therefore garner public support in the face of whatever National and
other political parties throw up against these ideas.
For similar ideas from National we have:
Flag
TPPA
Changing school funding (nothing yet to discuss)
Pandas
???
Every post from you includes denigration of National. You simply
cannot promote a political point of view in its own right - you must
also descend into National-bashing. Presumably in promoting the ideas
coming out of the "commission" you could not find any
employment-related National-bashing ideas so were forced to digress to unrelated issues to do so.
--
Crash McBash
| Sysop: | sneaky |
|---|---|
| Location: | Ashburton,NZ |
| Users: | 31 |
| Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
| Uptime: | 228:31:54 |
| Calls: | 2,088 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 11,140 |
| Messages: | 948,514 |