http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2016/03/labours_38_billion_bribe.html
Yep, they're actually talking about the MOAB (mother of all bribes).
No wonder less than 30% of voters want them.
On Monday, 21 March 2016 13:44:53 UTC+13, Fred wrote:nonsense. Naturally after a year you'd lose so many people in that bracket that
On 21/03/2016 1:34 p.m., JohnO wrote:
http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2016/03/labours_38_billion_bribe.htmlMorgan was on about this a year or two back. Wrote a book about it
Yep, they're actually talking about the MOAB (mother of all bribes).
No wonder less than 30% of voters want them.
called The big Kahuna. It didn't set too many economists alight, so he
switched his attention to cats.
Garreth Morgan's scheme was for 11k to everyone - tax free. This would
replace all benefits. Then all earnings to be at a flat rate of 30%.
Hate to think what it would do to work incentive. Not a problem because
like Labour winning the next election - it won't happen.
DPF calculated that the tax rate above $48k would have to be 82% to fund this
On 21/03/2016 1:34 p.m., JohnO wrote:
http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2016/03/labours_38_billion_bribe.html
Yep, they're actually talking about the MOAB (mother of all bribes).
No wonder less than 30% of voters want them.
Morgan was on about this a year or two back. Wrote a book about it
called The big Kahuna. It didn't set too many economists alight, so he switched his attention to cats.
Garreth Morgan's scheme was for 11k to everyone - tax free. This would replace all benefits. Then all earnings to be at a flat rate of 30%.
Hate to think what it would do to work incentive. Not a problem because
like Labour winning the next election - it won't happen.
On 21/03/2016 2:00 p.m., JohnO wrote:
On Monday, 21 March 2016 13:44:53 UTC+13, Fred wrote:Yeah, it would have to be a flat tax on all earnings, around 30% but the handout would be tax free for everyone. Even labour will soon work that
On 21/03/2016 1:34 p.m., JohnO wrote:
http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2016/03/labours_38_billion_bribe.htmlMorgan was on about this a year or two back. Wrote a book about it
Yep, they're actually talking about the MOAB (mother of all bribes).
No wonder less than 30% of voters want them.
called The big Kahuna. It didn't set too many economists alight, so he
switched his attention to cats.
Garreth Morgan's scheme was for 11k to everyone - tax free. This would
replace all benefits. Then all earnings to be at a flat rate of 30%.
Hate to think what it would do to work incentive. Not a problem because
like Labour winning the next election - it won't happen.
DPF calculated that the tax rate above $48k would have to be 82% to fund
this nonsense. Naturally after a year you'd lose so many people in that
bracket that the rate would head towards 100%.
out. It will keep them distracted for a while as they slide down in the polls. At least it's not as silly as that scheme Parker came out with
while it was his turn to be the finance spokesman. Can't remember details
but it was about a variable rate for kiwisaver to control inflation or something equally wanky.
"Fred" <dryrot@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:ncnhfv$rrd$1@dont-email.me...
On 21/03/2016 2:00 p.m., JohnO wrote:
On Monday, 21 March 2016 13:44:53 UTC+13, Fred wrote:Yeah, it would have to be a flat tax on all earnings, around 30% but the
On 21/03/2016 1:34 p.m., JohnO wrote:
http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2016/03/labours_38_billion_bribe.htmlMorgan was on about this a year or two back. Wrote a book about it
Yep, they're actually talking about the MOAB (mother of all bribes). >>>>>
No wonder less than 30% of voters want them.
called The big Kahuna. It didn't set too many economists alight, so he >>>> switched his attention to cats.
Garreth Morgan's scheme was for 11k to everyone - tax free. This would >>>> replace all benefits. Then all earnings to be at a flat rate of 30%.
Hate to think what it would do to work incentive. Not a problem because >>>> like Labour winning the next election - it won't happen.
DPF calculated that the tax rate above $48k would have to be 82% to fund >>> this nonsense. Naturally after a year you'd lose so many people in that
bracket that the rate would head towards 100%.
handout would be tax free for everyone. Even labour will soon work that
out. It will keep them distracted for a while as they slide down in the
polls. At least it's not as silly as that scheme Parker came out with
while it was his turn to be the finance spokesman. Can't remember details
but it was about a variable rate for kiwisaver to control inflation or
something equally wanky.
What a couple of sad sack National toadies! Look at the benefits: In one
fell swoop Liebor will eradicate poverty! Rich should be in as soon as he's got his latest update to put you rightwhingers straight :)
Pooh
On 21/03/2016 6:16 p.m., Pooh wrote:
"Fred" <dryrot@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:ncnhfv$rrd$1@dont-email.me...
On 21/03/2016 2:00 p.m., JohnO wrote:
On Monday, 21 March 2016 13:44:53 UTC+13, Fred wrote:Yeah, it would have to be a flat tax on all earnings, around 30% but the >> handout would be tax free for everyone. Even labour will soon work that
On 21/03/2016 1:34 p.m., JohnO wrote:
http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2016/03/labours_38_billion_bribe.htmlMorgan was on about this a year or two back. Wrote a book about it
Yep, they're actually talking about the MOAB (mother of all bribes). >>>>>
No wonder less than 30% of voters want them.
called The big Kahuna. It didn't set too many economists alight, so he >>>> switched his attention to cats.
Garreth Morgan's scheme was for 11k to everyone - tax free. This would >>>> replace all benefits. Then all earnings to be at a flat rate of 30%. >>>> Hate to think what it would do to work incentive. Not a problem because >>>> like Labour winning the next election - it won't happen.
DPF calculated that the tax rate above $48k would have to be 82% to fund >>> this nonsense. Naturally after a year you'd lose so many people in that >>> bracket that the rate would head towards 100%.
out. It will keep them distracted for a while as they slide down in the
polls. At least it's not as silly as that scheme Parker came out with
while it was his turn to be the finance spokesman. Can't remember details >> but it was about a variable rate for kiwisaver to control inflation or
something equally wanky.
What a couple of sad sack National toadies! Look at the benefits: In one fell swoop Liebor will eradicate poverty! Rich should be in as soon as he's got his latest update to put you rightwhingers straight :)
Pooh
Yes. He'll be at the training school at the moment.
On Monday, 21 March 2016 18:43:57 UTC+13, Fred wrote:
On 21/03/2016 6:16 p.m., Pooh wrote:
"Fred" <dryrot@hotmail.com> wrote in messageYes. He'll be at the training school at the moment.
news:ncnhfv$rrd$1@dont-email.me...
On 21/03/2016 2:00 p.m., JohnO wrote:
On Monday, 21 March 2016 13:44:53 UTC+13, Fred wrote:Yeah, it would have to be a flat tax on all earnings, around 30% but
On 21/03/2016 1:34 p.m., JohnO wrote:
http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2016/03/labours_38_billion_bribe.htmlMorgan was on about this a year or two back. Wrote a book about it
Yep, they're actually talking about the MOAB (mother of all
bribes).
No wonder less than 30% of voters want them.
called The big Kahuna. It didn't set too many economists alight, so
he
switched his attention to cats.
Garreth Morgan's scheme was for 11k to everyone - tax free. This
would
replace all benefits. Then all earnings to be at a flat rate of 30%.
Hate to think what it would do to work incentive. Not a problem
because
like Labour winning the next election - it won't happen.
DPF calculated that the tax rate above $48k would have to be 82% to
fund
this nonsense. Naturally after a year you'd lose so many people in
that
bracket that the rate would head towards 100%.
the
handout would be tax free for everyone. Even labour will soon work
that
out. It will keep them distracted for a while as they slide down in
the
polls. At least it's not as silly as that scheme Parker came out with
while it was his turn to be the finance spokesman. Can't remember
details
but it was about a variable rate for kiwisaver to control inflation or
something equally wanky.
What a couple of sad sack National toadies! Look at the benefits: In
one
fell swoop Liebor will eradicate poverty! Rich should be in as soon as
he's
got his latest update to put you rightwhingers straight :)
Pooh
This UBI blurt is just another non-policy on the hoof from a rudderless shambles of a party.
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/opinion/78032969/is-andrew-little-getting-angry-about-all-the-wrong-things
No focus, no direction, no consistency. Just off-the-hoof idea of the
week.
No wonder Dickbot's taking a holiday - poor thing is totally confused
about what to post about.
| Sysop: | sneaky |
|---|---|
| Location: | Ashburton,NZ |
| Users: | 31 |
| Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
| Uptime: | 229:10:35 |
| Calls: | 2,088 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 11,140 |
| Messages: | 948,523 |