Some time ago National and Key wanted a distraction from their failed economic policies (usual; National increase in unemployed, low wages
rates leading to more poverty, embarrassing hand-outs to friends,
business profits (and tax revenue down because more people not
spending).
So what did they do? Found a distraction. In this case it was security
- so they found an enemy to justify more spying on our own* - and of
course the convenient scape-goats were immigrants and/or Muslems
Since there were demonstrably no problems with their chosen group, Key
had to lie - so they invented women New Zealanders going to marry ISIS soldiers - see http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/political/291631/terror-attacks-'excite'-nz-radicals
Great copy for the news media - "Jihadi Brides!" with Kitteredge being
forced to put the numbers as "up to 12" at the time, but still
leaving the feeling that we were harbouring terrorists - they
mentioned 40 people on a watchlist at the same time.
It turns out that "less than 12", is one or two, and that there were
none who left from New Zealand - any such people having been resident
in Australia before going overseas.
The offended minority called for proof - but of course the racist
National Party ignored that - the damage to trust in the community
meant nothing compared with their politicising spin.
Evidently some people smelt a rat, and tried to find out more through
an Official Information request, so now we have this:
http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/national/299119/nz's-'jihadi-brides'-left-from-australia
and also (using the same photograph - that's cheap journalism!): http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/political/299157/stop-'fear-mongering'-about-muslims
So what's the betting some Nat-bot wil try to excuse this blatant
misleading of New Zealanders for partisan political purposes - by
attempting to divert this thread to something else . . .
On Thursday, 17 March 2016 14:36:35 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:Economic growth is solid.
Some time ago National and Key wanted a distraction from their failed
economic policies (usual; National increase in unemployed, low wages
rates leading to more poverty, embarrassing hand-outs to friends,
business profits (and tax revenue down because more people not
spending).
Unemployment is falling. Wages are rising. Inflation is less than wage rises.
So what is failing again, Dickbot, apart from the opposition?Does that unsuppoerted assertion excuse Key from accusing them of
So what did they do? Found a distraction. In this case it was security
- so they found an enemy to justify more spying on our own* - and of
course the convenient scape-goats were immigrants and/or Muslems
It's Angry little Andy and Labour that routinely take potshots at immigrants, not the Nats.
Since there were demonstrably no problems with their chosen group, Key
had to lie - so they invented women New Zealanders going to marry ISIS
soldiers - see
http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/political/291631/terror-attacks-'excite'-nz-radicals
I think it's great the way useful idiots rant on about stuff like this. It's just a constant reminder that they are heading for an electoral iceberg. Again.
They weren't attacking pakeha New Zealanders - is that race in yourGreat copy for the news media - "Jihadi Brides!" with Kitteredge being
forced to put the numbers as "up to 12" at the time, but still
leaving the feeling that we were harbouring terrorists - they
mentioned 40 people on a watchlist at the same time.
Are you saying Islam is a race now?
The racist National Party, with Key being deliberately misleading to
It turns out that "less than 12", is one or two, and that there were
none who left from New Zealand - any such people having been resident
in Australia before going overseas.
The offended minority called for proof - but of course the racist
National Party ignored that - the damage to trust in the community
meant nothing compared with their politicising spin.
What "race" are we talking about here?
Just so you understand: when Labour whinge about the Chinese, that's racist because Chinese is a race. Islamic is not a race. Got it yet, Dumbo?Nobody has "whinged" about the Chinese - you forget that Labour
I accept your admission that Key misled.
Evidently some people smelt a rat, and tried to find out more through
an Official Information request, so now we have this:
http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/national/299119/nz's-'jihadi-brides'-left-from-australia
and also (using the same photograph - that's cheap journalism!):
http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/political/299157/stop-'fear-mongering'-about-muslims
So what's the betting some Nat-bot wil try to excuse this blatant
misleading of New Zealanders for partisan political purposes - by
attempting to divert this thread to something else . . .
Goodness, a politician misleading people. Surely no left wing politician does that, eh?
Idiot.
On Thursday, 17 March 2016 14:36:35 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:Economic growth is solid.
Some time ago National and Key wanted a distraction from their failed economic policies (usual; National increase in unemployed, low wages
rates leading to more poverty, embarrassing hand-outs to friends,
business profits (and tax revenue down because more people not
spending).
Unemployment is falling. Wages are rising. Inflation is less than wage rises.
So what is failing again, Dickbot, apart from the opposition?
So what did they do? Found a distraction. In this case it was security
- so they found an enemy to justify more spying on our own* - and of
course the convenient scape-goats were immigrants and/or Muslems
It's Angry little Andy and Labour that routinely take potshots at immigrants,not the Nats.
Since there were demonstrably no problems with their chosen group, Key
had to lie - so they invented women New Zealanders going to marry ISIS soldiers - see http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/political/291631/terror-attacks-'excite'-nz-radicals
I think it's great the way useful idiots rant on about stuff like this. It'sjust a constant reminder that they are heading for an electoral iceberg. Again.
Great copy for the news media - "Jihadi Brides!" with Kitteredge being forced to put the numbers as "up to 12" at the time, but still
leaving the feeling that we were harbouring terrorists - they
mentioned 40 people on a watchlist at the same time.
Are you saying Islam is a race now?
because Chinese is a race. Islamic is not a race. Got it yet, Dumbo?It turns out that "less than 12", is one or two, and that there were
none who left from New Zealand - any such people having been resident
in Australia before going overseas.
The offended minority called for proof - but of course the racist
National Party ignored that - the damage to trust in the community
meant nothing compared with their politicising spin.
What "race" are we talking about here?
Just so you understand: when Labour whinge about the Chinese, that's racist
Evidently some people smelt a rat, and tried to find out more through
an Official Information request, so now we have this:
http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/national/299119/nz's-'jihadi-brides'-left-from-australia
and also (using the same photograph - that's cheap journalism!): http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/political/299157/stop-'fear-mongering'-about-muslims
that, eh?So what's the betting some Nat-bot wil try to excuse this blatant misleading of New Zealanders for partisan political purposes - by attempting to divert this thread to something else . . .
Goodness, a politician misleading people. Surely no left wing politician does
Idiot.
On Thursday, 17 March 2016 15:19:51 UTC+13, JohnO wrote:just a constant reminder that they are heading for an electoral iceberg. Again. >>
On Thursday, 17 March 2016 14:36:35 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
Some time ago National and Key wanted a distraction from their failed
economic policies (usual; National increase in unemployed, low wages
rates leading to more poverty, embarrassing hand-outs to friends,
business profits (and tax revenue down because more people not
spending).
Unemployment is falling. Wages are rising. Inflation is less than wage rises. Economic growth is solid.
So what is failing again, Dickbot, apart from the opposition?
So what did they do? Found a distraction. In this case it was security
- so they found an enemy to justify more spying on our own* - and of
course the convenient scape-goats were immigrants and/or Muslems
It's Angry little Andy and Labour that routinely take potshots at immigrants, not the Nats.
Since there were demonstrably no problems with their chosen group, Key
had to lie - so they invented women New Zealanders going to marry ISIS
soldiers - see
http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/political/291631/terror-attacks-'excite'-nz-radicals
I think it's great the way useful idiots rant on about stuff like this. It's
Key repeated. Are you suggesting that the PM should not trust the information provided by the relevant and politically neutral public service?Great copy for the news media - "Jihadi Brides!" with Kitteredge being
forced to put the numbers as "up to 12" at the time, but still
leaving the feeling that we were harbouring terrorists - they
mentioned 40 people on a watchlist at the same time.
Are you saying Islam is a race now?
It turns out that "less than 12", is one or two, and that there were
none who left from New Zealand - any such people having been resident
in Australia before going overseas.
The offended minority called for proof - but of course the racist
National Party ignored that - the damage to trust in the community
meant nothing compared with their politicising spin.
What "race" are we talking about here?
Just so you understand: when Labour whinge about the Chinese, that's racist because Chinese is a race. Islamic is not a race. Got it yet, Dumbo?
Evidently some people smelt a rat, and tried to find out more through
an Official Information request, so now we have this:
http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/national/299119/nz's-'jihadi-brides'-left-from-australia
and also (using the same photograph - that's cheap journalism!):
http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/political/299157/stop-'fear-mongering'-about-muslims
So what's the betting some Nat-bot wil try to excuse this blatant
misleading of New Zealanders for partisan political purposes - by
attempting to divert this thread to something else . . .
Goodness, a politician misleading people. Surely no left wing politician does that, eh?
Idiot.
And it was public servant Rebecca Ketteridge who provided the information that
Idiot.Indeed both Key and Kitteridge were.
On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 19:19:49 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>rises. Economic growth is solid.
wrote:
On Thursday, 17 March 2016 14:36:35 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
Some time ago National and Key wanted a distraction from their failed
economic policies (usual; National increase in unemployed, low wages
rates leading to more poverty, embarrassing hand-outs to friends,
business profits (and tax revenue down because more people not
spending).
Unemployment is falling. Wages are rising. Inflation is less than wage
Those were not hte indications last year - and even now the iprovement
in those statistics leave us worse off than at any time duing the
previous period of a Labour government. Wages are at about the same
real level as 20 years ago, while overall GDP has risen much faster.
Not much success for the majority of the population there - although
to befair National never pretended to have policies to meet the needs
of all New Zealanders.
immigrants, not the Nats.So what is failing again, Dickbot, apart from the opposition?
So what did they do? Found a distraction. In this case it was security
- so they found an enemy to justify more spying on our own* - and of
course the convenient scape-goats were immigrants and/or Muslems
It's Angry little Andy and Labour that routinely take potshots at
Does that unsuppoerted assertion excuse Key from accusing them of
being a significant threat to security?
To lying about "Jihadi
brides"?
just a constant reminder that they are heading for an electoral iceberg. Again.Since there were demonstrably no problems with their chosen group, Key
had to lie - so they invented women New Zealanders going to marry ISIS
soldiers - see
http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/political/291631/terror-attacks-'excite'-nz-radicals
I think it's great the way useful idiots rant on about stuff like this. It's
What is it about your leader sying that you enjoy, JohnO?
Great copy for the news media - "Jihadi Brides!" with Kitteredge being
forced to put the numbers as "up to 12" at the time, but still
leaving the feeling that we were harbouring terrorists - they
mentioned 40 people on a watchlist at the same time.
Are you saying Islam is a race now?They weren't attacking pakeha New Zealanders - is that race in your
view?
It turns out that "less than 12", is one or two, and that there were
none who left from New Zealand - any such people having been resident
in Australia before going overseas.
The offended minority called for proof - but of course the racist
National Party ignored that - the damage to trust in the community
meant nothing compared with their politicising spin.
What "race" are we talking about here?The racist National Party, with Key being deliberately misleading to
pander to the prejudices of those he was targetting.
because Chinese is a race. Islamic is not a race. Got it yet, Dumbo?Just so you understand: when Labour whinge about the Chinese, that's racist
Nobody has "whinged" about the Chinese
- you forget that Labourdoes that, eh?
succesfully negotiated a trade deal with China - they were and remain
our friends, and that agreement has been good for both countries.
Evidently some people smelt a rat, and tried to find out more through
an Official Information request, so now we have this:
http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/national/299119/nz's-'jihadi-brides'-left-from-australia
and also (using the same photograph - that's cheap journalism!):
http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/political/299157/stop-'fear-mongering'-about-muslims
So what's the betting some Nat-bot wil try to excuse this blatant
misleading of New Zealanders for partisan political purposes - by
attempting to divert this thread to something else . . .
Goodness, a politician misleading people. Surely no left wing politician
I accept your admission that Key misled.
Idiot.
On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 19:23:07 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>rises. Economic growth is solid.
wrote:
On Thursday, 17 March 2016 15:19:51 UTC+13, JohnO wrote:
On Thursday, 17 March 2016 14:36:35 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
Some time ago National and Key wanted a distraction from their failed
economic policies (usual; National increase in unemployed, low wages
rates leading to more poverty, embarrassing hand-outs to friends,
business profits (and tax revenue down because more people not
spending).
Unemployment is falling. Wages are rising. Inflation is less than wage
immigrants, not the Nats.
So what is failing again, Dickbot, apart from the opposition?
So what did they do? Found a distraction. In this case it was security >> > - so they found an enemy to justify more spying on our own* - and of
course the convenient scape-goats were immigrants and/or Muslems
It's Angry little Andy and Labour that routinely take potshots at
It's just a constant reminder that they are heading for an electoral iceberg. Again.
Since there were demonstrably no problems with their chosen group, Key >> > had to lie - so they invented women New Zealanders going to marry ISIS >> > soldiers - see
http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/political/291631/terror-attacks-'excite'-nz-radicals
I think it's great the way useful idiots rant on about stuff like this.
racist because Chinese is a race. Islamic is not a race. Got it yet, Dumbo?
Great copy for the news media - "Jihadi Brides!" with Kitteredge being >> > forced to put the numbers as "up to 12" at the time, but still
leaving the feeling that we were harbouring terrorists - they
mentioned 40 people on a watchlist at the same time.
Are you saying Islam is a race now?
It turns out that "less than 12", is one or two, and that there were
none who left from New Zealand - any such people having been resident
in Australia before going overseas.
The offended minority called for proof - but of course the racist
National Party ignored that - the damage to trust in the community
meant nothing compared with their politicising spin.
What "race" are we talking about here?
Just so you understand: when Labour whinge about the Chinese, that's
does that, eh?
Evidently some people smelt a rat, and tried to find out more through
an Official Information request, so now we have this:
http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/national/299119/nz's-'jihadi-brides'-left-from-australia
and also (using the same photograph - that's cheap journalism!):
http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/political/299157/stop-'fear-mongering'-about-muslims
So what's the betting some Nat-bot wil try to excuse this blatant
misleading of New Zealanders for partisan political purposes - by
attempting to divert this thread to something else . . .
Goodness, a politician misleading people. Surely no left wing politician
that Key repeated. Are you suggesting that the PM should not trust the information provided by the relevant and politically neutral public service?
Idiot.
And it was public servant Rebecca Ketteridge who provided the information
Key did no repeatt it - he asked a question to get the answer that he
wanted - "Jihadi Bride" came from Key not Kitteridge,
But you are right that both should apologise for misleading by
ommission
Idiot.Indeed both Key and Kitteridge were.
On Thursday, 17 March 2016 15:54:15 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 19:23:07 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Thursday, 17 March 2016 15:19:51 UTC+13, JohnO wrote:
On Thursday, 17 March 2016 14:36:35 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
Some time ago National and Key wanted a distraction from their failed >> >> > economic policies (usual; National increase in unemployed, low wages
rates leading to more poverty, embarrassing hand-outs to friends,
business profits (and tax revenue down because more people not
spending).
Unemployment is falling. Wages are rising. Inflation is less than wage rises. Economic growth is solid.
So what is failing again, Dickbot, apart from the opposition?
So what did they do? Found a distraction. In this case it was security >> >> > - so they found an enemy to justify more spying on our own* - and of
course the convenient scape-goats were immigrants and/or Muslems
It's Angry little Andy and Labour that routinely take potshots at immigrants, not the Nats.
Since there were demonstrably no problems with their chosen group, Key >> >> > had to lie - so they invented women New Zealanders going to marry ISIS >> >> > soldiers - see
http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/political/291631/terror-attacks-'excite'-nz-radicals
I think it's great the way useful idiots rant on about stuff like this. It's just a constant reminder that they are heading for an electoral iceberg. Again.
Great copy for the news media - "Jihadi Brides!" with Kitteredge being >> >> > forced to put the numbers as "up to 12" at the time, but still
leaving the feeling that we were harbouring terrorists - they
mentioned 40 people on a watchlist at the same time.
Are you saying Islam is a race now?
It turns out that "less than 12", is one or two, and that there were
none who left from New Zealand - any such people having been resident >> >> > in Australia before going overseas.
The offended minority called for proof - but of course the racist
National Party ignored that - the damage to trust in the community
meant nothing compared with their politicising spin.
What "race" are we talking about here?
Just so you understand: when Labour whinge about the Chinese, that's racist because Chinese is a race. Islamic is not a race. Got it yet, Dumbo?
Evidently some people smelt a rat, and tried to find out more through >> >> > an Official Information request, so now we have this:
http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/national/299119/nz's-'jihadi-brides'-left-from-australia
and also (using the same photograph - that's cheap journalism!):
http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/political/299157/stop-'fear-mongering'-about-muslims
So what's the betting some Nat-bot wil try to excuse this blatant
misleading of New Zealanders for partisan political purposes - by
attempting to divert this thread to something else . . .
Goodness, a politician misleading people. Surely no left wing politician does that, eh?
Idiot.
And it was public servant Rebecca Ketteridge who provided the information that Key repeated. Are you suggesting that the PM should not trust the information provided by the relevant and politically neutral public service?
Key did no repeatt it - he asked a question to get the answer that he
wanted - "Jihadi Bride" came from Key not Kitteridge,
Whio care's what name was given - the statement that NZ women were going to the ME to marry was information provided by Ketteridge.
But you are right that both should apologise for misleading by
ommission
Indeed both Key and Kitteridge were.
Idiot.
On Thursday, 17 March 2016 14:36:35 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
Some time ago National and Key wanted a distraction from their failed
economic policies (usual; National increase in unemployed, low wages
rates leading to more poverty, embarrassing hand-outs to friends,
business profits (and tax revenue down because more people not
spending).
Unemployment is falling. Wages are rising. Inflation is less than wage
rises. Economic growth is solid.
So what is failing again, Dickbot, apart from the opposition?
So what did they do? Found a distraction. In this case it was security
- so they found an enemy to justify more spying on our own* - and of
course the convenient scape-goats were immigrants and/or Muslems
It's Angry little Andy and Labour that routinely take potshots at
immigrants, not the Nats.
Since there were demonstrably no problems with their chosen group, Key
had to lie - so they invented women New Zealanders going to marry ISIS
soldiers - see
http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/political/291631/terror-attacks-'excite'-nz-radicals
I think it's great the way useful idiots rant on about stuff like this.
It's just a constant reminder that they are heading for an electoral
iceberg. Again.
Great copy for the news media - "Jihadi Brides!" with Kitteredge being
forced to put the numbers as "up to 12" at the time, but still
leaving the feeling that we were harbouring terrorists - they
mentioned 40 people on a watchlist at the same time.
Are you saying Islam is a race now?
It turns out that "less than 12", is one or two, and that there were
none who left from New Zealand - any such people having been resident
in Australia before going overseas.
The offended minority called for proof - but of course the racist
National Party ignored that - the damage to trust in the community
meant nothing compared with their politicising spin.
What "race" are we talking about here?
Just so you understand: when Labour whinge about the Chinese, that's
racist because Chinese is a race. Islamic is not a race. Got it yet,
Dumbo?
Evidently some people smelt a rat, and tried to find out more through
an Official Information request, so now we have this:
http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/national/299119/nz's-'jihadi-brides'-left-from-australia
and also (using the same photograph - that's cheap journalism!):
http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/political/299157/stop-'fear-mongering'-about-muslims
So what's the betting some Nat-bot wil try to excuse this blatant
misleading of New Zealanders for partisan political purposes - by
attempting to divert this thread to something else . . .
Goodness, a politician misleading people. Surely no left wing politician
does that, eh?
Idiot.
On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 19:23:07 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Thursday, 17 March 2016 15:19:51 UTC+13, JohnO wrote:
On Thursday, 17 March 2016 14:36:35 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
Some time ago National and Key wanted a distraction from their failed
economic policies (usual; National increase in unemployed, low wages
rates leading to more poverty, embarrassing hand-outs to friends,
business profits (and tax revenue down because more people not
spending).
Unemployment is falling. Wages are rising. Inflation is less than wage
rises. Economic growth is solid.
So what is failing again, Dickbot, apart from the opposition?
So what did they do? Found a distraction. In this case it was security >>> > - so they found an enemy to justify more spying on our own* - and of
course the convenient scape-goats were immigrants and/or Muslems
It's Angry little Andy and Labour that routinely take potshots at
immigrants, not the Nats.
Since there were demonstrably no problems with their chosen group, Key >>> > had to lie - so they invented women New Zealanders going to marry ISIS >>> > soldiers - see
http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/political/291631/terror-attacks-'excite'-nz-radicals
I think it's great the way useful idiots rant on about stuff like this.
It's just a constant reminder that they are heading for an electoral
iceberg. Again.
Great copy for the news media - "Jihadi Brides!" with Kitteredge being >>> > forced to put the numbers as "up to 12" at the time, but still
leaving the feeling that we were harbouring terrorists - they
mentioned 40 people on a watchlist at the same time.
Are you saying Islam is a race now?
It turns out that "less than 12", is one or two, and that there were
none who left from New Zealand - any such people having been resident
in Australia before going overseas.
The offended minority called for proof - but of course the racist
National Party ignored that - the damage to trust in the community
meant nothing compared with their politicising spin.
What "race" are we talking about here?
Just so you understand: when Labour whinge about the Chinese, that's
racist because Chinese is a race. Islamic is not a race. Got it yet,
Dumbo?
Evidently some people smelt a rat, and tried to find out more through
an Official Information request, so now we have this:
http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/national/299119/nz's-'jihadi-brides'-left-from-australia
and also (using the same photograph - that's cheap journalism!):
http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/political/299157/stop-'fear-mongering'-about-muslims
So what's the betting some Nat-bot wil try to excuse this blatant
misleading of New Zealanders for partisan political purposes - by
attempting to divert this thread to something else . . .
Goodness, a politician misleading people. Surely no left wing politician >>> does that, eh?
Idiot.
And it was public servant Rebecca Ketteridge who provided the information >>that Key repeated. Are you suggesting that the PM should not trust the >>information provided by the relevant and politically neutral public >>service?
Key did no repeatt it - he asked a question to get the answer that he
wanted - "Jihadi Bride" came from Key not Kitteridge,
But you are right that both should apologise for misleading by
ommission
Indeed both Key and Kitteridge were.
Idiot.
On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 20:36:56 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Thursday, 17 March 2016 15:54:15 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 19:23:07 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Thursday, 17 March 2016 15:19:51 UTC+13, JohnO wrote:
On Thursday, 17 March 2016 14:36:35 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
Some time ago National and Key wanted a distraction from their
failed
economic policies (usual; National increase in unemployed, low
wages
rates leading to more poverty, embarrassing hand-outs to friends,
business profits (and tax revenue down because more people not
spending).
Unemployment is falling. Wages are rising. Inflation is less than
wage rises. Economic growth is solid.
So what is failing again, Dickbot, apart from the opposition?
So what did they do? Found a distraction. In this case it was
security
- so they found an enemy to justify more spying on our own* - and
of
course the convenient scape-goats were immigrants and/or Muslems
It's Angry little Andy and Labour that routinely take potshots at
immigrants, not the Nats.
Since there were demonstrably no problems with their chosen group,
Key
had to lie - so they invented women New Zealanders going to marry
ISIS
soldiers - see
http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/political/291631/terror-attacks-'excite'-nz-radicals
I think it's great the way useful idiots rant on about stuff like
this. It's just a constant reminder that they are heading for an
electoral iceberg. Again.
Great copy for the news media - "Jihadi Brides!" with Kitteredge
being
forced to put the numbers as "up to 12" at the time, but still
leaving the feeling that we were harbouring terrorists - they
mentioned 40 people on a watchlist at the same time.
Are you saying Islam is a race now?
It turns out that "less than 12", is one or two, and that there
were
none who left from New Zealand - any such people having been
resident
in Australia before going overseas.
The offended minority called for proof - but of course the racist
National Party ignored that - the damage to trust in the community
meant nothing compared with their politicising spin.
What "race" are we talking about here?
Just so you understand: when Labour whinge about the Chinese, that's
racist because Chinese is a race. Islamic is not a race. Got it yet,
Dumbo?
Evidently some people smelt a rat, and tried to find out more
through
an Official Information request, so now we have this:
http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/national/299119/nz's-'jihadi-brides'-left-from-australia
and also (using the same photograph - that's cheap journalism!):
http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/political/299157/stop-'fear-mongering'-about-muslims
So what's the betting some Nat-bot wil try to excuse this blatant
misleading of New Zealanders for partisan political purposes - by
attempting to divert this thread to something else . . .
Goodness, a politician misleading people. Surely no left wing
politician does that, eh?
Idiot.
And it was public servant Rebecca Ketteridge who provided the
information that Key repeated. Are you suggesting that the PM should
not trust the information provided by the relevant and politically
neutral public service?
Key did no repeatt it - he asked a question to get the answer that he
wanted - "Jihadi Bride" came from Key not Kitteridge,
Whio care's what name was given - the statement that NZ women were going
to the ME to marry was information provided by Ketteridge.
And Key has admitte that they knew that the women had been in
Australia when they left, and that "up to 12" was in fact "up to 2"
But you are right that both should apologise for misleading by
ommission
Indeed both Key and Kitteridge were.
Idiot.
On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 19:19:49 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Thursday, 17 March 2016 14:36:35 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
Some time ago National and Key wanted a distraction from their failed
economic policies (usual; National increase in unemployed, low wages
rates leading to more poverty, embarrassing hand-outs to friends,
business profits (and tax revenue down because more people not
spending).
Unemployment is falling. Wages are rising. Inflation is less than wage >>rises. Economic growth is solid.
Those were not hte indications last year - and even now the iprovement
in those statistics leave us worse off than at any time duing the
previous period of a Labour government. Wages are at about the same
real level as 20 years ago, while overall GDP has risen much faster.
Not much success for the majority of the population there - although
to befair National never pretended to have policies to meet the needs
of all New Zealanders.
Does that unsuppoerted assertion excuse Key from accusing them of
So what is failing again, Dickbot, apart from the opposition?
So what did they do? Found a distraction. In this case it was security
- so they found an enemy to justify more spying on our own* - and of
course the convenient scape-goats were immigrants and/or Muslems
It's Angry little Andy and Labour that routinely take potshots at >>immigrants, not the Nats.
being a significant threat to security? To lying about "Jihadi
brides"?
Since there were demonstrably no problems with their chosen group, Key
had to lie - so they invented women New Zealanders going to marry ISIS
soldiers - see
http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/political/291631/terror-attacks-'excite'-nz-radicals
I think it's great the way useful idiots rant on about stuff like this. >>It's just a constant reminder that they are heading for an electoral >>iceberg. Again.
What is it about your leader sying that you enjoy, JohnO?
They weren't attacking pakeha New Zealanders - is that race in your
Great copy for the news media - "Jihadi Brides!" with Kitteredge being
forced to put the numbers as "up to 12" at the time, but still
leaving the feeling that we were harbouring terrorists - they
mentioned 40 people on a watchlist at the same time.
Are you saying Islam is a race now?
view?
The racist National Party, with Key being deliberately misleading to
It turns out that "less than 12", is one or two, and that there were
none who left from New Zealand - any such people having been resident
in Australia before going overseas.
The offended minority called for proof - but of course the racist
National Party ignored that - the damage to trust in the community
meant nothing compared with their politicising spin.
What "race" are we talking about here?
pander to the prejudices of those he was targetting.
Just so you understand: when Labour whinge about the Chinese, that'sNobody has "whinged" about the Chinese - you forget that Labour
racist because Chinese is a race. Islamic is not a race. Got it yet,
Dumbo?
succesfully negotiated a trade deal with China - they were and remain
our friends, and that agreement has been good for both countries.
I accept your admission that Key misled.
Evidently some people smelt a rat, and tried to find out more through
an Official Information request, so now we have this:
http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/national/299119/nz's-'jihadi-brides'-left-from-australia
and also (using the same photograph - that's cheap journalism!):
http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/political/299157/stop-'fear-mongering'-about-muslims
So what's the betting some Nat-bot wil try to excuse this blatant
misleading of New Zealanders for partisan political purposes - by
attempting to divert this thread to something else . . .
Goodness, a politician misleading people. Surely no left wing politician >>does that, eh?
Idiot.
| Sysop: | sneaky |
|---|---|
| Location: | Ashburton,NZ |
| Users: | 31 |
| Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
| Uptime: | 188:18:36 |
| Calls: | 2,081 |
| Calls today: | 4 |
| Files: | 11,137 |
| Messages: | 947,668 |