• =?ISO-8859-1?Q?What=92s?= the Deal With Seinfeld?

    From Ubiquitous@1:229/2 to All on Thursday, November 11, 2021 12:54:15
    XPost: rec.arts.tv
    From: weberm@polaris.net

    I too am watching Seinfeld. Sometimes I come across an episode I
    haven’t seen before, but mostly, I’m rewatching it, revisiting the
    familiar characters, their reliable frailty, the comedic timing so
    finely calibrated it becomes formulaic. It’s absurd, in a moment where
    there is so much other content vying for my attention, that I would
    turn to a 30-year-old sitcom to entertain me. But because Netflix
    acquired the exclusive streaming rights to Seinfeld (for reportedly
    more than half a billion dollars) and began hosting the show in
    October, it’s supremely easy to throw it on in the background and let
    its rhythms wash over you.

    So easy it’s almost dangerous. Seinfeld is like the anti-binge show, a
    series very much designed to be watched amid all the other crap on TV
    on a Thursday night. In single half-hour chunks, its characters are
    like a balm, implicitly forgiving you for every unkind word you’ve
    considered saying, for every time you ranked getting laid over showing
    up for your loved ones. But for more than a few episodes at a time,
    these people and their concerns—so self-absorbed, so entitled, so
    stupid—are a little deadening to watch.

    Seinfeld’s leads are a tiresome quartet; in the show, everyone who
    meets them ends up deeply regretting it. Still, from their vantage
    point as bottom-feeders, they find ways to skewer conventions. I don’t
    think I’ve bought a present for a host in my life without thinking
    about the chocolate babka debacle in season five’s “The Dinner Party,”
    a comedy of errors about what goes into the effort of showing up at
    someone’s door with something nice.

    Co-creator Larry David has continued to explore these modes in his HBO
    series Curb Your Enthusiasm, which premiered in 1999 and just this week produced another episode so funny it’s practically painful. But
    Seinfeld had network television machinery behind it. Each episode of a
    classic multi-camera sitcom—like Friends, The Office, and The Big Bang
    Theory, which have all starred in staggering streaming-rights
    acquisition deals over the last few years—is a carefully calibrated
    unit of content designed to go down as easy as possible. These shows
    produce consistency as a perk—life is unreliable, but TV doesn’t have
    to be.

    So Seinfeld is not just a show: It’s a whole state of mind. Every
    episode sounds the same: The opening lip pops and tongue clicks, the
    way George Costanza (Jason Alexander) exclaims “Jerry!” with that
    perfect aggrieved tone, the singsongy punch lines from Jerry Seinfeld’s stand-up. It gets so that you can easily create a Seinfeld mood in your
    own life—tack on a “Jerry!” at the end of a complaint; repeat a
    question with different inflection; do one of those big Elaine (Julia Louis-Dreyfus) groans at a restaurant table; throw open the door to the apartment you don’t live in, like Kramer (Michael Richards). Indeed,
    the show invites you to participate in the lexicon of the characters,
    which is why so much of what I know about Seinfeld comes from other
    people quoting it.

    But sometimes the show’s machinery is so seamless it’s slick. In my
    current rewatch, I’ve just finished season four; I’ve grown so tired of Seinfeld’s increasingly inane opening monologue that I wish I could
    just skip it. As the show became more popular, some of the balance
    between the characters’ foibles and the consequences of their actions
    was lost in favor of comedy that gets gimmicky. With an audience that
    cheers and claps wildly when the characters are at their most venal, it
    feels less that Seinfeld is subverting expectations and increasingly
    like the show is pandering to them.

    Even so, I’m still watching it. And to be honest, these days when I’m
    watching Seinfeld, most of what I’m encountering is my own age. I grew
    up knowing the show as a ubiquitous fixture of NBC’s Must See TV, and a must-see in our house. (I don’t think I understood a lot of what was
    happening, but I remember thinking it was very funny when Jerry told a tightrope walker to break a leg, and then he really did break a leg.)
    Then came the series finale, in 1998, and the way it made everyone mad
    —on the way to school the next day, even the shock jocks on the radio
    were complaining about it. When I got to college, Seinfeld setups and
    punch lines seemed to arise out of every other drinking night. I’m not
    sure you can escape a four-year liberal arts education without having
    to listen to some guy shout “shrinkage” as everyone else collapses in
    laughter.

    Now I’m hearing from people who are watching the show for the first
    time—both young viewers who don’t remember the original run and older
    viewers who never got around to it. It’s prompted me to try to
    disentangle Seinfeld from my own personal history, to unmoor it, even,
    from the decade in which the show is so firmly based. It was the ’90s;
    oh, was it ever the ’90s. The show’s anxieties are inextricably tied to
    the that decade—answering machines, VCRs, the discomfort its straight characters feel upon encountering queer people. (“Not that there’s
    anything wrong with that!”) I’ve also been watching Impeachment:
    American Crime Story—another window to the ’90s—and marveling at how
    the endemic misogyny of Seinfeld’s moment was distilled and refracted
    through Elaine Benes—and how brilliantly Louis-Dreyfus manages meet and
    also refute the expectations placed on her character, even as she
    remains underwritten for most of the show’s run.

    At the same time, the show is sometimes weirdly prescient, especially
    about the future of TV. The entire fourth season, which showcases
    George and Jerry selling their pilot of a show about nothing to NBC,
    feels to me like the beginning of the end of network television. It has
    a snake-eating-its-own-tail meta quality that is both brilliant and
    supremely weird—and seems to serve as a vehicle for the show’s veiled
    critiques of its own sausage-making process. When NBC head Russell
    Dalrymple (Bob Balaban) leaves the TV business to join Greenpeace to
    impress Elaine (who, among her other disjointed character traits, is
    sort of an activist?), it feels like a harbinger of things to come.

    But if network TV were dead, maybe its last gasps wouldn’t be so damn watchable. I have Seinfeld on DVD somewhere, but it’s not really the
    same; one of the reasons I’m watching Seinfeld now, on Netflix, is
    because I know others are watching it too. Seinfeld is like an
    extraordinary device that communicates the things about humanity we are
    most ashamed to acknowledge. Shame is a social emotion; it requires
    other people to function. Seinfeld is a show that is dramatically
    enhanced when shared with a viewing audience, even if it’s just an
    implied one. It’s imperfect, watching a broadcast show 30 years later
    on a streaming platform—but it’s either this or TBS reruns of Seinfeld,
    and those don’t seem to have quite the same reach. Maybe society has
    changed a little since the heyday of Seinfeld. But in the last few
    decades, the sitcom—and how we watch it—has changed entirely.

    --
    Let's go Brandon!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)