• Book review: Blood of the Vampire by Florence Marryat

    From Incubus@1:229/2 to All on Tuesday, July 31, 2018 09:40:01
    From: incubus9536612@gmail.com

    First printed in 1897 (yes, the same year that Dracula was printed), The Blood of the Vampire is a most entertaining novel. The style of the prose has a quite modern feel to it (it shouldn't trouble those unfamiliar with Victorian literature) but reflecting authentically the attitudes of Society at the time it was written. Indeed, some of the language might be considered offensive by to-day's standards, particularly if you are an 'intersectional' Feminist intent on 'decolonising' your university campus. For those of us who haven't taken leave of our senses, the various examples of prejudice serve a useful counterpoint to later events in the book.

    The characters are quite interesting - the Baroness striking me as particularly amusing for all her loathsome qualities - none of them lacking in depth or dimension. The pace of the novel at no point seems forced and suspense is sustained without recourse to vulgar plot devices and melodrama.

    I am hirtherto unfamiliar with the authoress but in The Blood of the Vampire she succeeded in writing a most engaging novel that only slightly disappointed me by not being long enough for my taste. Certainly, it can be said that it didn't outstay its welcome and remained intriguing right unto the very end.

    In many respects, it seems quite tragic that this novel has been overshadowed by Bram Stoker's offering because it deserves to be appreciated to an equal extent of the better known book. The edition I have is advertised as being the 'unabridged text of the exceedingly rare 1897 Hutchinson first edition' (ISBN 1934555657).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)
  • From Dr Walpurgis@1:229/2 to The White Lady on Tuesday, July 31, 2018 19:42:09
    From: burke.dennings@cunting.hun

    On 2018-07-31 17:29:49 +0000, The White Lady said:

    Have you heard of Facebook? That's where all the other TEENAGE GIRLS
    are.

    I wish you'd told me this earlier.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)
  • From The White Lady@1:229/2 to Incubus on Tuesday, July 31, 2018 17:29:49
    From: me@privacy.net

    Incubus <incubus9536612@gmail.com> wrote in
    news:pjpaph$gre$1@dont-email.me:

    First printed in 1897 (yes, the same year that Dracula was printed),
    The Blood of the Vampire is a most entertaining novel. The style of
    the prose has a quite modern feel to it (it shouldn't trouble those unfamiliar with Victorian literature) but reflecting authentically the attitudes of Society at the time it was written. Indeed, some of the language might be considered offensive by to-day's standards,
    particularly if you are an 'intersectional' Feminist intent on
    'decolonising' your university campus. For those of us who haven't
    taken leave of our senses, the various examples of prejudice serve a
    useful counterpoint to later events in the book.

    The characters are quite interesting - the Baroness striking me as particularly amusing for all her loathsome qualities - none of them
    lacking in depth or dimension. The pace of the novel at no point
    seems forced and suspense is sustained without recourse to vulgar plot devices and melodrama.

    I am hirtherto unfamiliar with the authoress but in The Blood of the
    Vampire she succeeded in writing a most engaging novel that only
    slightly disappointed me by not being long enough for my taste.
    Certainly, it can be said that it didn't outstay its welcome and
    remained intriguing right unto the very end.

    In many respects, it seems quite tragic that this novel has been
    overshadowed by Bram Stoker's offering because it deserves to be
    appreciated to an equal extent of the better known book. The edition
    I have is advertised as being the 'unabridged text of the exceedingly
    rare 1897 Hutchinson first edition' (ISBN 1934555657).


    Have you heard of Facebook? That's where all the other TEENAGE GIRLS
    are.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)
  • From Jared@1:229/2 to Incubus on Tuesday, July 31, 2018 21:16:39
    From: bijgh@hotmail.com

    On Tuesday, July 31, 2018 at 7:40:41 PM UTC+10, Incubus wrote:

    ... particularly if you are an 'intersectional' Feminist intent
    on 'decolonising' your university campus...

    Not sure what any of this means. How do I work out if I am one?

    In many respects, it seems quite tragic that this novel has been overshadowed by Bram Stoker's offering because it deserves to be appreciated to an equal extent of the better known book. The edition I have is advertised as being
    the
    'unabridged text of the exceedingly rare 1897 Hutchinson first edition' (ISBN 1934555657).

    Never heard of it. Thanks for the heads up.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)
  • From The White Lady@1:229/2 to Dr Walpurgis on Wednesday, August 01, 2018 05:49:23
    From: me@privacy.net

    Dr Walpurgis <burke.dennings@cunting.hun> wrote in news:pjqai1$t7d$1 @drwalpurgis.motzarella.org:

    On 2018-07-31 17:29:49 +0000, The White Lady said:

    Have you heard of Facebook? That's where all the other TEENAGE GIRLS
    are.

    I wish you'd told me this earlier.



    So..teenage boys?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)
  • From Incubus@1:229/2 to The White Lady on Wednesday, August 01, 2018 09:28:13
    From: incubus9536612@gmail.com

    On 2018-07-31, The White Lady <me@privacy.net> wrote:
    Incubus <incubus9536612@gmail.com> wrote in
    news:pjpaph$gre$1@dont-email.me:

    First printed in 1897 (yes, the same year that Dracula was printed),
    The Blood of the Vampire is a most entertaining novel. The style of
    the prose has a quite modern feel to it (it shouldn't trouble those
    unfamiliar with Victorian literature) but reflecting authentically the
    attitudes of Society at the time it was written. Indeed, some of the
    language might be considered offensive by to-day's standards,
    particularly if you are an 'intersectional' Feminist intent on
    'decolonising' your university campus. For those of us who haven't
    taken leave of our senses, the various examples of prejudice serve a
    useful counterpoint to later events in the book.

    The characters are quite interesting - the Baroness striking me as
    particularly amusing for all her loathsome qualities - none of them
    lacking in depth or dimension. The pace of the novel at no point
    seems forced and suspense is sustained without recourse to vulgar plot
    devices and melodrama.

    I am hirtherto unfamiliar with the authoress but in The Blood of the
    Vampire she succeeded in writing a most engaging novel that only
    slightly disappointed me by not being long enough for my taste.
    Certainly, it can be said that it didn't outstay its welcome and
    remained intriguing right unto the very end.

    In many respects, it seems quite tragic that this novel has been
    overshadowed by Bram Stoker's offering because it deserves to be
    appreciated to an equal extent of the better known book. The edition
    I have is advertised as being the 'unabridged text of the exceedingly
    rare 1897 Hutchinson first edition' (ISBN 1934555657).


    Have you heard of Facebook? That's where all the other TEENAGE GIRLS
    are.

    Might not their blood be contaminated? Perhaps I may instead depend on one who styles herself as The White Lady being sufficiently virginal and pure to
    give succour for my hideous repast.

    What say you?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)
  • From Incubus@1:229/2 to Jared on Wednesday, August 01, 2018 09:30:09
    From: incubus9536612@gmail.com

    On 2018-08-01, Jared <bijgh@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 31, 2018 at 7:40:41 PM UTC+10, Incubus wrote:

    ... particularly if you are an 'intersectional' Feminist intent
    on 'decolonising' your university campus...

    Not sure what any of this means. How do I work out if I am one?

    If you were then you had surely known for some time.

    In many respects, it seems quite tragic that this novel has been overshadowed
    by Bram Stoker's offering because it deserves to be appreciated to an equal >> extent of the better known book. The edition I have is advertised as being the
    'unabridged text of the exceedingly rare 1897 Hutchinson first edition' (ISBN
    1934555657).

    Never heard of it. Thanks for the heads up.

    I am pleased to be at your service.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)
  • From The White Lady@1:229/2 to Incubus on Wednesday, August 01, 2018 09:39:43
    From: me@privacy.net

    Incubus <incubus9536612@gmail.com> wrote in
    news:pjrufd$fad$1@dont-email.me:

    On 2018-07-31, The White Lady <me@privacy.net> wrote:
    Incubus <incubus9536612@gmail.com> wrote in
    news:pjpaph$gre$1@dont-email.me:

    First printed in 1897 (yes, the same year that Dracula was printed),
    The Blood of the Vampire is a most entertaining novel. The style of
    the prose has a quite modern feel to it (it shouldn't trouble those
    unfamiliar with Victorian literature) but reflecting authentically
    the attitudes of Society at the time it was written. Indeed, some
    of the language might be considered offensive by to-day's standards,
    particularly if you are an 'intersectional' Feminist intent on
    'decolonising' your university campus. For those of us who haven't
    taken leave of our senses, the various examples of prejudice serve a
    useful counterpoint to later events in the book.

    The characters are quite interesting - the Baroness striking me as
    particularly amusing for all her loathsome qualities - none of them
    lacking in depth or dimension. The pace of the novel at no point
    seems forced and suspense is sustained without recourse to vulgar
    plot devices and melodrama.

    I am hirtherto unfamiliar with the authoress but in The Blood of the
    Vampire she succeeded in writing a most engaging novel that only
    slightly disappointed me by not being long enough for my taste.
    Certainly, it can be said that it didn't outstay its welcome and
    remained intriguing right unto the very end.

    In many respects, it seems quite tragic that this novel has been
    overshadowed by Bram Stoker's offering because it deserves to be
    appreciated to an equal extent of the better known book. The
    edition I have is advertised as being the 'unabridged text of the
    exceedingly rare 1897 Hutchinson first edition' (ISBN 1934555657).


    Have you heard of Facebook? That's where all the other TEENAGE GIRLS
    are.

    Might not their blood be contaminated? Perhaps I may instead depend
    on one who styles herself as The White Lady being sufficiently
    virginal and pure to give succour for my hideous repast.

    What say you?


    As pure as the driven snow.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)