• Re: First black hole image validates Einstein's Theory of General Relat

    From Dr. Jai Maharaj@1:229/2 to All on Wednesday, April 10, 2019 21:22:52
    XPost: soc.culture.indian, alt.fan.jai-maharaj, alt.religion.hindu
    XPost: uk.religion.hindu, sci.math, sci.physics
    XPost: sci.energy, sci.astronomy, alt.philosophy
    XPost: soc.culture.usa, alt.politics, talk.politics.misc
    XPost: alt.jyotish, free.bharat, soc.culture.india
    From: alt.fan.jai-maharaj@googlegroups.com

    Dr. Jai Maharaj posted:

    First black hole image validates Einstein's Theory of
    General Relativity

    The team's observations strongly validated the theory of
    general relativity proposed in 1915 by Einstein, the famed
    theoretical physicist, to explain the laws of gravity and
    their relation to other natural forces.

    dnaindia.com
    Wednesday, April 10, 2019

    Continues at:

    https://www.dnaindia.com/science/photo-gallery-first-black-hole-image-validates-einstein-s-theory-of-general-relativity-2738282

    When Eddington snubbed Chandrasekhar

    A new book by a famed science historian traces one of
    modern science's most written about and tragic standoffs
    between Nobel prize winning Indian physicist Subrahmanyan
    Chandrasekhar and legendary English astrophysicist Sir
    Arthur Eddington.

    "Empire Of The Stars"

    http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/061834151X/qid=1122767273/sr=2-1/ref=pd_bbs_b_2_1/002-5140784-4401660

    by Arthur I Miller is being hailed as a brilliant book
    about how a young Chandra, as the Indian scientist came to
    be known, was laid low by an abrasively arrogant Eddington
    over the former's postulation about the existence of black
    holes.

    Eddington, considered one of a handful of physicists in the
    1930s who really comprehended Albert Einstein's Theory of
    Relativity, ridiculed Chandra's postulation as "stellar
    buffoonery". An excerpt from the book on its US publisher
    Houghton Mifflin says Chandra's "flash of inspiration came
    when he was an unknown 19-year-old in the hot summer of
    1930. In 10 minutes, sitting in a deck chair overlooking
    the Arabian Sea, Chandra (as he was universally known)
    carried out some calculations that augured a disturbing
    fate for the small, dense stars known as white dwarfs.  

    An excerpt from the book on its US publisher Houghton
    Mifflin says Chandra's "flash of inspiration came when he
    was an unknown 19-year-old in the hot summer of 1930. In 10
    minutes, sitting in a deck chair overlooking the Arabian
    Sea, Chandra (as he was universally known) carried out some
    calculations that augured a disturbing fate for the small,
    dense stars known as white dwarfs.

    "At the time scientists assumed that white dwarfs were dead
    stars in their final resting state. Those that had been
    found had more or less the mass of the Sun but were no
    bigger than Earth. Chandra's calculations showed that there
    was an upper limit to the mass of these white dwarfs.

    "Any star more massive than that when it burned out would
    not end its life as an inert rock but would begin an
    endless process of collapse, crunched by its own gravity
    into a singularity -- a minuscule point of infinite density
    and zero volume, many trillions of times smaller than the
    period at the end of this sentence and many trillions of
    times denser than Earth."

    The author says only one person understood the full
    implications of Chandra's discovery: Eddington, "the
    greatest astrophysicist in the world at that time."

    "Eddington himself had flirted with the idea that a dead
    star might collapse indefinitely in this manner, so he
    should have been delighted with Chandra's mathematical
    verification. Instead, without any warning, he used a
    meeting of the Royal Astronomical Society to savage
    Chandra's result cynically and unmercifully. The encounter
    cast a shadow over the lives of both men and hindered
    progress in astrophysics for nearly half a century," the
    book says.

    "The more I discovered about Chandra's story, the more
    intriguing it became. For all his brilliance, his life was
    tinged with tragedy. After Eddington refused to take his
    idea seriously and subjected him to public ridicule,
    Chandra never really regained his confidence. Despite a
    long and incredibly productive scientific career, no amount
    of recognition could ever satisfy him. I wondered what
    other great discoveries he might have made, had his early
    life not been blighted by disappointment," the book says.

    Chandra never missed an opportunity to recount the events
    of that fateful day at the Royal Astronomical Society,
    emphasizing that he had been right and Eddington wrong,
    even though Eddington refused ever to admit it, the books
    says. After being dormant for over three decades, Chandra's
    discovery was eventually vindicated when he won the Nobel
    Prize for it in 1983. "But he did not feel vindicated, for
    his achievement had been virtually ignored for almost 40
    years," the author says. Chandra immigrated from India in
    1937 and taught at the University of Chicago till his death
    in 1995 when he was 85 years old.

    Source: When Eddington snubbed Chandrasekhar --
    hindustantimes.com

    http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/181_1347788,00040010.htm

    http://www.hinduwisdom.info/Glimpses_XIV.htm

    Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
    Om Shanti
    https://tinyurl.com/jaimaharaj

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)
  • From Dr. Jai Maharaj@1:229/2 to All on Wednesday, April 10, 2019 21:36:02
    XPost: soc.culture.indian, alt.fan.jai-maharaj, alt.religion.hindu
    XPost: uk.religion.hindu, sci.math, sci.physics
    XPost: sci.energy, sci.astronomy, alt.philosophy
    XPost: soc.culture.usa, alt.politics, talk.politics.misc
    XPost: alt.jyotish, free.bharat, soc.culture.india
    From: alt.fan.jai-maharaj@googlegroups.com

    Dr. Jai Maharaj posted:

    First black hole image validates Einstein's Theory of
    General Relativity

    The team's observations strongly validated the theory of
    general relativity proposed in 1915 by Einstein, the famed
    theoretical physicist, to explain the laws of gravity and
    their relation to other natural forces.

    dnaindia.com
    Wednesday, April 10, 2019

    Continues at:

    https://www.dnaindia.com/science/photo-gallery-first-black-hole-image-validates-einstein-s-theory-of-general-relativity-2738282

    When Eddington snubbed Chandrasekhar

    A new book by a famed science historian traces one of
    modern science's most written about and tragic standoffs
    between Nobel prize winning Indian physicist Subrahmanyan
    Chandrasekhar and legendary English astrophysicist Sir
    Arthur Eddington.

    "Empire Of The Stars"

    http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/061834151X/qid=1122767273/sr=2-1/ref=pd
    _bbs_b_2_1/002-5140784-4401660

    by Arthur I Miller is being hailed as a brilliant book
    about how a young Chandra, as the Indian scientist came to
    be known, was laid low by an abrasively arrogant Eddington
    over the former's postulation about the existence of black
    holes.

    Eddington, considered one of a handful of physicists in the
    1930s who really comprehended Albert Einstein's Theory of
    Relativity, ridiculed Chandra's postulation as "stellar
    buffoonery". An excerpt from the book on its US publisher
    Houghton Mifflin says Chandra's "flash of inspiration came
    when he was an unknown 19-year-old in the hot summer of
    1930. In 10 minutes, sitting in a deck chair overlooking
    the Arabian Sea, Chandra (as he was universally known)
    carried out some calculations that augured a disturbing
    fate for the small, dense stars known as white dwarfs.  

    An excerpt from the book on its US publisher Houghton
    Mifflin says Chandra's "flash of inspiration came when he
    was an unknown 19-year-old in the hot summer of 1930. In 10
    minutes, sitting in a deck chair overlooking the Arabian
    Sea, Chandra (as he was universally known) carried out some
    calculations that augured a disturbing fate for the small,
    dense stars known as white dwarfs.

    "At the time scientists assumed that white dwarfs were dead
    stars in their final resting state. Those that had been
    found had more or less the mass of the Sun but were no
    bigger than Earth. Chandra's calculations showed that there
    was an upper limit to the mass of these white dwarfs.

    "Any star more massive than that when it burned out would
    not end its life as an inert rock but would begin an
    endless process of collapse, crunched by its own gravity
    into a singularity -- a minuscule point of infinite density
    and zero volume, many trillions of times smaller than the
    period at the end of this sentence and many trillions of
    times denser than Earth."

    The author says only one person understood the full
    implications of Chandra's discovery: Eddington, "the
    greatest astrophysicist in the world at that time."

    "Eddington himself had flirted with the idea that a dead
    star might collapse indefinitely in this manner, so he
    should have been delighted with Chandra's mathematical
    verification. Instead, without any warning, he used a
    meeting of the Royal Astronomical Society to savage
    Chandra's result cynically and unmercifully. The encounter
    cast a shadow over the lives of both men and hindered
    progress in astrophysics for nearly half a century," the
    book says.

    "The more I discovered about Chandra's story, the more
    intriguing it became. For all his brilliance, his life was
    tinged with tragedy. After Eddington refused to take his
    idea seriously and subjected him to public ridicule,
    Chandra never really regained his confidence. Despite a
    long and incredibly productive scientific career, no amount
    of recognition could ever satisfy him. I wondered what
    other great discoveries he might have made, had his early
    life not been blighted by disappointment," the book says.

    Chandra never missed an opportunity to recount the events
    of that fateful day at the Royal Astronomical Society,
    emphasizing that he had been right and Eddington wrong,
    even though Eddington refused ever to admit it, the books
    says. After being dormant for over three decades, Chandra's
    discovery was eventually vindicated when he won the Nobel
    Prize for it in 1983. "But he did not feel vindicated, for
    his achievement had been virtually ignored for almost 40
    years," the author says. Chandra immigrated from India in
    1937 and taught at the University of Chicago till his death
    in 1995 when he was 85 years old.

    Source: When Eddington snubbed Chandrasekhar --
    hindustantimes.com

    http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/181_1347788,00040010.htm

    http://www.hinduwisdom.info/Glimpses_XIV.htm

    These Swirls of Light Could Be Signs of a Previous Universe
    Existing Before Ours

    Hindu Press International, Hinduism Today Magazine
    hinduismtoday.com
    August 30, 2018

    Source: https://www.sciencealert.com/penrose-b-mode-hawking-points-sign-previous-universe-in-conformal-cyclic-cosmology

    United States, August 16, 2018 (Science Alert by Mike
    McRae) -- If our Universe happened to be locked in an
    eternal heartbeat of expansion and collapse, black holes
    would leave an impression. And it could look just like a
    number of swirls recently detected in the faint echo of
    light at the edge of space. It's hardly the smoking gun for
    what's called the conformal cyclic cosmology (CCC) model,
    especially given other things that could also explain these
    scars. But it's definitely worthy of serious consideration.
    As it stands, most cosmologists agree we live in an
    expanding universe that started as a homogeneous point
    called a singularity, and we don't know what happened
    before it, or what could lie in our future.

    Mathematical physicist Roger Penrose has a reputation on
    par with the likes of Stephen Hawking and Leonard Susskind.
    His model of a pulsating universe with no beginning or end
    isn't everybody's cup of tea, but it is a contender for
    explaining the fate of everything. Penrose's idea suggests
    the future isn't destined for a collapse - we'll keep
    expanding until everything evaporates into light and the
    very concept of space and time is made moot by the insane
    distances that exist. At that point, our Universe is
    indistinguishable from a singularity, out of which another
    one might emerge.

    More at "source" above.

    HPI Adds: In Hindu thought, the Universe goes through
    endless cycles of creation, preservation, and dissolution
    when all is absorbed back into the source only to be issued
    forth anew in the next cycle of creation.

    Hindu Press International, Hinduism Today Magazine

    https://www.hinduismtoday.com/blogs-news/hindu-press-international/these-swirls-of-light-could-be-signs-of-a-previous-universe-existing-before-ours/16382.html

    Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
    Om Shanti
    http://7.ly/jai

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)