• When The 'Voice Of A Nation' Was Sold For A Bottle Of Whiskey

    From Dr. Jai Maharaj@1:229/2 to All on Monday, April 08, 2019 11:30:39
    XPost: soc.culture.indian, alt.fan.jai-maharaj, alt.politics
    XPost: talk.politics.misc, soc.culture.india
    From: alt.fan.jai-maharaj@googlegroups.com

    When The 'Voice Of A Nation' Was Sold For A Bottle Of Whiskey

    By Rajat Mitra
    Psychologist and Author of 'The Infidel Next Door' https://voicesold.blogspot.com
    Saturday, April 6, 2019

    Last week I attended a book launch for a friend in Delhi.
    One of the speakers, a journalist of national stature who
    was also the compere, during his speech began to compare
    the working style of the two prime ministers under whom he
    worked, one Manmohan Singh and the other Narendra Modi
    during travel.

    He began by saying how the journalists and the media
    personnel accompanied the two prime ministers during their
    trips abroad. For the former he described how anyone and
    everyone would be included depending upon his or her
    closeness to the inner circle. He described the choicest
    food and the most expensive alcoholic drinks that flowed
    like water during the time the former prime minister
    travelled. He described how when a journalist would enter
    his room after checking in, an expensive bottle of black
    label would be waiting for him alongside with a note 'with
    best compliments' from the external ministry.

    The two prime ministers have vastly different working
    styles, he shared. Manmohan Singh would work at the most
    half a day and for the rest half they would leave for sight
    seeing and even visiting nightclubs and tourist spots, all
    expenses paid for by the ministry, the matter being kept
    discreet.

    A press room would be set up with the most exotic foods
    from around the world being made available and again
    expensive alcoholic drinks would be available for the
    asking. He said many of the journalists would pick up
    bottles and carry them to their room to be given as gifts
    later.

    When the journey would end, they would be given a bottle of
    black label scotch as a parting gift along with many other
    freebies. The ostentation and gluttony reached its peak
    during the second term of Manmohan Singh, he added saying
    most of them vied to be as close to the lutyens media as
    they could so that they could be included in each trip.

    While describing the working style of Narendra Modi during
    foreign trips, his tone changed. "With him we had to work
    long hours with few gaps in between. There were no pleasure
    trips but two programs scheduled daily and the schedules
    were so tightly packed, people had to hurry to not miss
    their meals. And the alcoholic drinks were replaced with
    tea, coffee and some biscuits."

    "And what did the journalists write during Manmohan Singh's
    time?" Someone next to me in the audience asked.

    "They had to protect Manmohan Singh and project him as a
    good and honest man. And, well, they had a second agenda
    too, that was discreet." A woman who identified herself as
    a journalist in the audience said they all would go on such
    trips too for another reason. "We had to sing paeans and
    praises for the queen." The audience laughed out loud.

    The audience heard him spellbound and laughed at his jokes,
    by now too common. Though what he said was common
    knowledge, it still was a revelation the way he described
    it in minute detail with all the 'mirch masala'. The
    audience laughed at the comparison each time he made of the
    two styles of the prime ministers. After the debauchery of
    the time period spent with Manmohan Singh, it was very
    difficult for the journalists to adapt to the stoic
    discipline of Narendra Modi he added. "Everyone resented it
    and cursed the change."

    As the lecture ended and we were coming out a young woman
    from the audience asked the journalist, "Tell me something.
    Where was your conscience all this while?"

    He was surprised at the question and looked straight at
    her, "Why only ask me?" he said, his eyebrows raised.
    "Where was the conscience of everyone? Where was the
    conscience of the nation?" saying this he walked away.

    Two different leaders. Two different time periods. Two men
    with the responsibility of leading a nation. Yet the two
    periods are marked by sharp differences, sound unreal and
    Kafkaesque as different as night and day, one that we have
    survived. While the former bought off the voice of the
    fourth pillar by silencing them with greed, the other has
    distanced itself from it and is hated.

    What the journalist said was that when the very conscience
    of our nation slept, why only a single individual should be
    asked to bear the responsibility for the collective failure
    of our conscience to speak up? But is that a valid line of
    argument?

    Why did our conscience disappear for ten years? Did we kill
    it like Abhimanyu of Mahabharata encircling and forgetting
    what makes us human is our inner voice? Why did we as a
    nation, didn't raise our voice against injustice after
    injustice, wrongs that we saw committed in front of our
    eyes? Why is so our collective voice weak and doesn't make
    itself heard like a rule of law society should?

    Sometime ago I was watching a film, the trial of a mass
    murderer for crimes against humanity. To every question
    asked by the judge of the international court, he had only
    one answer. "I was only following my orders. I had no
    choice to do otherwise." After listening to him patiently,
    the judge pronounced him guilty and stated, "Each one of us
    is an agent of his or her own free will and has the choice
    to say 'no' when we face evil. If you didn't, that was your
    choice and still was an act of free will."

    The choice to not support, to say 'no' to a wrong, to any
    evil is the last of the freedom as described by Victor
    Frankel in his book 'Man's search for meaning'. We can
    exercise it even when we may have reached the point where
    death is certain and life has stopped to offer any meaning.
    This freedom belongs to us as an individual, not to the
    collective and we must guard it. That is where we as people
    have to take it away from those who stole it from us.

    When we lost our land, our religion, our culture to
    invaders, we also lost this last of the freedom to express.
    We also lost the awareness that we are its only keepers. We
    have come close to losing it again when we give power to
    those who think everything about Indians is up for sale
    including its conscience. Isn't it time we retrieve it?
    Will the future generations then ask us why did we sell our
    nation for something as cheap as a bottle of whiskey?

    -- Rajat Mitra
    Psychologist and Author of 'The Infidel Next Door'

    https://voicesold.blogspot.com/2019/04/when-voice-of-nation-was-sold-for.html

    More articles at:

    https://voicesold.blogspot.com

    Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
    Om Shanti
    http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.jai-maharaj

    o o o

    o Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the
    educational purposes of research and open discussion. The
    contents of this post may not have been authored by, and do
    not necessarily represent the opinion of the poster. The
    contents are protected by copyright law and the exemption
    for fair use of copyrighted works.

    o Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by
    others are not necessarily those of the poster who may or
    may not have read the article. FAIRSE NOTICE: This
    article may contain copyrighted material the use of which
    may or may not have been specifically authorized by the
    copyright owner. This material is being made available in
    efforts to advance the understanding of environmental,
    political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific,
    social, and cultural, etc., issues. It is believed that
    this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted
    material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright
    Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the
    material on this site is distributed without profit to
    those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the
    included information for research, comment, discussion and
    educational purposes by subscribing to USENET newsgroups or
    visiting web sites. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

    If you wish to use copyrighted material from this article
    for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you
    must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

    Since newsgroup posts are being removed by forgery by one
    or more net terrorists, this post may be reposted several
    times.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)