[continued from previous message]
of King's speeches. King described Levison as one of his
"closest friends."
FBI: King Bought Sex With SCLC Money
The Federal Bureau of Investigation had for many years been
aware of Stanley Levison's Communist activities. It was
Levison's close association with King that brought about the
initial FBI interest in King.
Lest you be tempted to believe the controlled media's lie about
"racists" in the FBI being out to "get" King, you should be
aware that the man most responsible for the FBI's probe of King
was Assistant Director William C. Sullivan. Sullivan describes
himself as a liberal, and says that initially "I was one hundred
per cent for King...because I saw him as an effective and badly
needed leader for the Black people in their desire for civil
rights." The probe of King not only confirmed their suspicions
about King's Communist beliefs and associations, but it also
revealed King to be a despicable hypocrite, an immoral
degenerate, and a worthless charlatan.
According to Assistant Director Sullivan, who had direct access
to the surveillance files on King which are denied the American
people, King had embezzled or misapplied substantial amounts of
money contributed to the "civil rights" movement. King used SCLC
funds to pay for liquor, and numerous prostitutes both Black and
White, who were brought to his hotel rooms, often two at a time,
for drunken sex parties which sometimes lasted for several days.
These types of activities were the norm for King's speaking and
organizing tours.
In fact, an outfit called The National Civil Rights Museum in
Memphis, Tennessee, which is putting on display the two bedrooms
from the Lorraine Motel where King stayed the night before he
was shot, has declined to depict in any way the "occupants - -of
those rooms. That "according to exhibit designer Gerard
Eisterhold "would be "close to blasphemy." The reason? Dr.
Martin Luther King, Jr. spent his last night on Earth having sex
with two women at the motel and physically beating and abusing a
third.
Sullivan also stated that King had alienated the affections of
numerous married women. According to Sullivan, who in 30 years
with the Bureau hadáseen everything there was to be seen of the
seamy side of life, King was one of only seven people he had
ever encountered who was such a total degenerate.
Noting the violence that almost invariably attended King's
supposedly "non-violent" marches, Sullivan's probe revealed a
very different King from the carefully crafted public image.
King welcomed members of many different Black groups as members
of his SCLC, many of them advocates and practitioners of
violence. King's only admonition on the subject was that they
should embrace "tactical nonviolence."
Sullivan also relates an incident in which King met in a
financial conference with Communist Party representatives, not
knowing that one of the participants was an infiltrator actually
working for the FBI.
J. Edgar Hoover personally saw to it that documented information
on King's Communist connections was provided to the President
and to Congress. And conclusive information from FBI files was
also provided to major newspapers and news wire services. But
were the American people informed of King's real nature? No, for
even in the 1960s, the fix was in "the controlled media and the
bought politicians were bound and determined to push their
racial mixing program on America. King was their man and nothing
was going to get in their way. With a few minor exceptions,
these facts have been kept from the American people. The pro-
King propaganda machine grinds on, and it is even reported that
a serious proposal has been made to add some of King's writings
as a new book in the Bible.
Ladies and gentlemen, the purpose of this radio program is far
greater than to prove to you the immorality and subversion of
this man called King. I want you to start to think for
yourselves. I want you to consider this: What are the forces and
motivation behind the controlled media's active promotion of
King? What does it tell you about our politicians when you see
them, almost without exception, falling all over themselves to
honor King as a national hero? What does it tell you about our
society when any public criticism of this moral leper and
Communist functionary is considered grounds for dismissal? What
does it tell you about the controlled media when you see how
they have successfully suppressed the truth and held out a
picture of King that can only be described as a colossal lie?
You need to think, my fellow Americans. You desperately need to
wake up.
Sources:
1. The Papers of Martin Luther King, Jr.- - (an official
publication of the Martin Luther King Center for Nonviolent
Social Change).
2. "King's Plagiarism: Imitation, Insecurity and
Transformation," The Journal of American History, June 1991, p.
87) David J. Garrow
3. New York Times" of October 11, 1991, page 15.
4. "The FBI and Martin Luther King, Jr.", David J. Garrow,
(1981).
5. "And the walls came tumbling down," Rev. Ralph Abernathy
(1989)
http://www.martinlutherking.org/thebeast.html
--- SoupGate-DOS v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)