[continued from previous message]

King also lied about his name all his life; he lied to his
ordination committee; he lied to his wife; he lied on his
college and seminary papers; he lied in his books; he lied when
he said he fired Communists on his payroll; he lied when he said
that twice as many blacks died in Vietnam than whites. Hoover
was right.

King was a plagiarist: King stole from others all his lifetime
as was supported by King’s people in Atlanta! “King’s plagiarism
was a general pattern evident in nearly all of his academic
writings….We found that instances of textual appropriation can
be seen in his earliest extant writings as well as his
dissertation. The pattern is also noticeable in his speeches and
sermons throughout his career.” Note King’s family excused his
plagiarism calling it “textual appropriation.”

King’s biographer David J. Garrow states: “King’s academic
compositions, especially at Boston University, were almost
without exception little more than summary descriptions…and
comparisons of other’s writings. Nonetheless, the papers almost
always received desirable letter grades, strongly suggesting
that King’s professors did not expect more….” Why did they not
expect more? It is a fact that King stole 66% of his Ph.D.
dissertation! It seems Boston University wanted to give a
doctorate to an unqualified and dishonest man, therefore played
the game.

In his seminary papers, King reproduced the research and
writings of others but he also incorporated their many errors,
grammatical as well as theological!

King was a phony: In another paper King wrote that “the orthodox
view of the divinity of Christ is in my mind quite readily
denied.” He other papers King denied Christ’s virgin birth and
vicarious death and visible return of Christ. Martin Luther King
was an unbeliever! He was a phony preacher and phony Christian!

What would be the reaction if a national holiday were suggested
to honor a man, even a good man, who had past ties with the Klan
or Nazis? Would it not be expected that everyone would demand
that he answer some questions and his life be looked at very
closely? Why is King an exception? And why are conservatives
playing this game of whitewashing King’s reputation? Obviously,
truth is unimportant.

To sum up: There is no argument. As usual, I’ll be accused of
racism but it’s only the facts. King was a pinko, a philander, a
pervert, a prevaricator, a plagiarist and a phony. That doesn’t
bother most people but it does bother honest people.

http://gbctroyny.com/mlk.html


--- SoupGate-DOS v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)