s how it's done; on the floor at Taylor's
left, a Lord Valve Napper 12 (24-watt) combo. Tha
Lord Valve, ThD
Expert (fuck you)
On 4/18/20 1:16 PM, Lord Valve wrote:On Saturday, April 18, 2020 at 3:35:07 PM UTC-6, NoName wrote:
On 4/18/20 1:16 PM, Lord Valve wrote:
s how it's done; on the floor at Taylor's
left, a Lord Valve Napper 12 (24-watt) combo. Tha
Lord Valve, ThD
Expert (fuck you)
What a fucking liar !!
A Ted Weber kit with nothing but the name-plate removed !!
100% cloned Fender schematic !!!
https://www.tedweber.com/media/kits/6a20_schem.jpg
That picker and that Napper are both pretty damn wonderful.
I looked at the schematic for Weber and that's not the same amp.
You can't, as you say. claim otherwise. It'd be rather like saying every amp was any amp.
A hole count ought to tell the tale, can you really remove that m
On Sat, 18 Apr 2020 18:57:27 -0700, Lord Valve wrote:
ORIGINAL POST TO AGA:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQVHn9U8r8g
Astonishingly good young guitarist Taylor Scott
shows how it's done; on the floor at Taylor's
left, a Lord Valve Napper 12 (24-watt) combo. That
amp's been on the road constantly since I built
it for him 4-5 years ago (can't remember exactly)
and so far the only thing it's needed is a set
of tubes and a #47 pilot bulb. The speaker is a
Weber DT-12.
And a few more:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0I7PGxbFL5g
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aRnSnaUEB9U
(Napper close-up at 0:32)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JhNqfS1WMNY
Lord Valve, ThD
Expert (fuck you)
--------------------------------------------------------
On Saturday, April 18, 2020 at 3:35:07 PM UTC-6, NoName wrote:
On 4/18/20 1:16 PM, Lord Valve wrote:On Saturday, April 18, 2020 at 3:35:07 PM UTC-6, NoName wrote:
On 4/18/20 1:16 PM, Lord Valve wrote:
s how it's done; on the floor at Taylor's
left, a Lord Valve Napper 12 (24-watt) combo. Tha
Lord Valve, ThD
Expert (fuck you)
What a fucking liar !!
I agree - you certainly are. Hey - have you gotten
that toilet paper/ammo thing sorted out yet? Try
not to shoot yourself up the ass, OK?
A Ted Weber kit with nothing but the name-plate removed !!
Mmmmm, no. Now, pay attention here, junior. If you have
a look at Ted's 6a20, you'll see that it's a 2-channel
amp with reverb and tremolo. As such, the front of the
chassis requires 4 holes for 1/4" jacks plus 10 holes
for controls and one large round hole for the pilot light.
Add a couple of rectangular holes for the bright switches,
and we have a front panel with 17 holes in it. The 6a20
is Ted's version of the Deluxe Reverb. A Napper 12/24 has
2 jacks for inputs, 6 holes for controls, and one larger
hole for the pilot light. This is a one-channel amp; the
control lineup from left to right is Volume, Treble, Middle,
Bass, Reverb and Soul. The "Soul" control is a negative
feedback control. Try to find one of *those* on ANY Fender
schematic...oh, wait, I'm sorry...I forgot. You can't read
one of those, can you. Ref your laugher of a statement on the
MV thread where you claimed: "My 2204 jcm800 had a master
volume set on the input stage, not the PI." Of course, if
you were able to *read* a schematic you'd have pulled one up
to make sure you had that right before you posted it in front
of people who can tell the difference between electronics and
bullshit. And had you done so (assuming that you could read
a schematic, which you can't) you'd have instantly seen that
the 2204's MV control was on the input to the PI stage -
right where you said it wasn't. Well, DUH! Not so slick, are
we? SO - back to the Napper: 9 holes - 8 for 3/8" bushings
and one larger one for the pilot light. No square ones, because
the amp doesn't use slide switches for anything - they're cheap
and cheesy, and I don't use them in my amps. So...if that were
any sort of Weber kit - *ESPECIALLY* the 6a20, there would be
a lot of empty space and extra holes on it. There isn't.
100% cloned Fender schematic !!!
Well, excuse me for mentioning it, but...HOW THE FUCK WOULD
*YOU* KNOW? You've already posted one that's not even related;
are you going to dig through Ted's archives pulling shit up at
random until you find something with the right number of holes?
(No-one's going to wait for you to find something that's even a
distantly-related match; we're talking typewriters and monkeys
here. No time to wait for fucktards, luck or accidents, see?)
https://www.tedweber.com/media/kits/6a20_schem.jpg
Yes, conclusive proof that you A) can't read a schematic, and
B) can neither count to 9 nor subtract 9 from 17 to figure out
how many you missed by. This is getting laughable...how many
times are you going to get your pitiful ass handed to you
before you quit?
You can't bash Taylor Scott, he's one of the finest players
on this fucking planet. Good thing you didn't try, eh? And
as far as the tone goes, that little amp is better than
anything you will ever build (or own, for that matter) in your
entire miserable wannabee life.
Go home and practice, schmuck. And don't forget to feed
the monkeys.
Lord Valve, ThD
Expert (fuck you)
T R U M P 2 0 2 4 - M A G A / K A G - 1 7 7 6 / 1 8 6 1
NoBrains gets thoroughly *Pwn3D!* by Lord Valve! That's gotta sting
like a bitch! :-D
On 4/20/20 9:36 PM, Defiant wrote:
On Sat, 18 Apr 2020 18:57:27 -0700, Lord Valve wrote:
ORIGINAL POST TO AGA:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQVHn9U8r8g
Astonishingly good young guitarist Taylor Scott
shows how it's done; on the floor at Taylor's
left, a Lord Valve Napper 12 (24-watt) combo. That
amp's been on the road constantly since I built
it for him 4-5 years ago (can't remember exactly)
and so far the only thing it's needed is a set
of tubes and a #47 pilot bulb. The speaker is a
Weber DT-12.
And a few more:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0I7PGxbFL5g
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aRnSnaUEB9U
(Napper close-up at 0:32)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JhNqfS1WMNY
Lord Valve, ThD
Expert (fuck you)
--------------------------------------------------------
On Saturday, April 18, 2020 at 3:35:07 PM UTC-6, NoName wrote:
On 4/18/20 1:16 PM, Lord Valve wrote:On Saturday, April 18, 2020 at 3:35:07 PM UTC-6, NoName wrote:
On 4/18/20 1:16 PM, Lord Valve wrote:
s how it's done; on the floor at Taylor's
left, a Lord Valve Napper 12 (24-watt) combo. Tha
Lord Valve, ThD
Expert (fuck you)
What a fucking liar !!
I agree - you certainly are. Hey - have you gotten
that toilet paper/ammo thing sorted out yet? Try
not to shoot yourself up the ass, OK?
A Ted Weber kit with nothing but the name-plate removed !!
Mmmmm, no. Now, pay attention here, junior. If you have
a look at Ted's 6a20, you'll see that it's a 2-channel
amp with reverb and tremolo. As such, the front of the
chassis requires 4 holes for 1/4" jacks plus 10 holes
for controls and one large round hole for the pilot light.
Add a couple of rectangular holes for the bright switches,
and we have a front panel with 17 holes in it. The 6a20
is Ted's version of the Deluxe Reverb. A Napper 12/24 has
2 jacks for inputs, 6 holes for controls, and one larger
hole for the pilot light. This is a one-channel amp; the
control lineup from left to right is Volume, Treble, Middle,
Bass, Reverb and Soul. The "Soul" control is a negative
feedback control. Try to find one of *those* on ANY Fender
schematic...oh, wait, I'm sorry...I forgot. You can't read
one of those, can you. Ref your laugher of a statement on the
MV thread where you claimed: "My 2204 jcm800 had a master
volume set on the input stage, not the PI." Of course, if
you were able to *read* a schematic you'd have pulled one up
to make sure you had that right before you posted it in front
of people who can tell the difference between electronics and
bullshit. And had you done so (assuming that you could read
a schematic, which you can't) you'd have instantly seen that
the 2204's MV control was on the input to the PI stage -
right where you said it wasn't. Well, DUH! Not so slick, are
we? SO - back to the Napper: 9 holes - 8 for 3/8" bushings
and one larger one for the pilot light. No square ones, because
the amp doesn't use slide switches for anything - they're cheap
and cheesy, and I don't use them in my amps. So...if that were
any sort of Weber kit - *ESPECIALLY* the 6a20, there would be
a lot of empty space and extra holes on it. There isn't.
100% cloned Fender schematic !!!
Well, excuse me for mentioning it, but...HOW THE FUCK WOULD
*YOU* KNOW? You've already posted one that's not even related;
are you going to dig through Ted's archives pulling shit up at
random until you find something with the right number of holes?
(No-one's going to wait for you to find something that's even a
distantly-related match; we're talking typewriters and monkeys
here. No time to wait for fucktards, luck or accidents, see?)
https://www.tedweber.com/media/kits/6a20_schem.jpg
Yes, conclusive proof that you A) can't read a schematic, and
B) can neither count to 9 nor subtract 9 from 17 to figure out
how many you missed by. This is getting laughable...how many
times are you going to get your pitiful ass handed to you
before you quit?
You can't bash Taylor Scott, he's one of the finest players
on this fucking planet. Good thing you didn't try, eh? And
as far as the tone goes, that little amp is better than
anything you will ever build (or own, for that matter) in your
entire miserable wannabee life.
Go home and practice, schmuck. And don't forget to feed
the monkeys.
Lord Valve, ThD
Expert (fuck you)
T R U M P 2 0 2 4 - M A G A / K A G - 1 7 7 6 / 1 8 6 1
NoBrains gets thoroughly *Pwn3D!* by Lord Valve! That's gotta sting
like a bitch! :-D
So you share c0ck sucking duties with Ben ?
On 4/19/20 1:37 PM, Twang wrote:amp
That picker and that Napper are both pretty damn wonderful.
I looked at the schematic for Weber and that's not the same amp.
You can't, as you say. claim otherwise. It'd be rather like saying every
was any amp.
A hole count ought to tell the tale, can you really remove that m
You can reduce the circuit to a single input. There are scores of
Fender schematics that show that. All these amps are clones of the
original circuits of 1950s. Nothing is unique about any of them .
the circuitry thatYou can reduce the circuit to a single input. There are scores of
Fender schematics that show that. All these amps are clones of the
original circuits of 1950s. Nothing is unique about any of them .
I don't believe that. I suppose I could be wrong.
But.. it depends on what we mean exactly.
One input fine.. I build them that way. But I don't skip the controls. Nor
is involved with those controls.differences.. and it wont sound the same, will it?
You can take out the reverb, or the tremolo-for two pretty straightforward
In your ears or on your scope?
TWANG
ORIGINAL POST TO AGA:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQVHn9U8r8g
Astonishingly good young guitarist Taylor Scott
shows how it's done; on the floor at Taylor's
left, a Lord Valve Napper 12 (24-watt) combo. That
amp's been on the road constantly since I built
it for him 4-5 years ago (can't remember exactly)
and so far the only thing it's needed is a set
of tubes and a #47 pilot bulb. The speaker is a
Weber DT-12.
And a few more:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0I7PGxbFL5g
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aRnSnaUEB9U
(Napper close-up at 0:32)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JhNqfS1WMNY
Lord Valve, ThD
Expert (fuck you)
--------------------------------------------------------
On Saturday, April 18, 2020 at 3:35:07 PM UTC-6, NoName wrote:
On 4/18/20 1:16 PM, Lord Valve wrote:On Saturday, April 18, 2020 at 3:35:07 PM UTC-6, NoName wrote:
On 4/18/20 1:16 PM, Lord Valve wrote:
s how it's done; on the floor at Taylor's
left, a Lord Valve Napper 12 (24-watt) combo. Tha
Lord Valve, ThD
Expert (fuck you)
What a fucking liar !!
I agree - you certainly are. Hey - have you gotten
that toilet paper/ammo thing sorted out yet? Try
not to shoot yourself up the ass, OK?
A Ted Weber kit with nothing but the name-plate removed !!
Mmmmm, no. Now, pay attention here, junior. If you have
a look at Ted's 6a20, you'll see that it's a 2-channel
amp with reverb and tremolo. As such, the front of the
chassis requires 4 holes for 1/4" jacks plus 10 holes
for controls and one large round hole for the pilot light.
Add a couple of rectangular holes for the bright switches,
and we have a front panel with 17 holes in it. The 6a20
is Ted's version of the Deluxe Reverb. A Napper 12/24 has
2 jacks for inputs, 6 holes for controls, and one larger
hole for the pilot light. This is a one-channel amp; the
control lineup from left to right is Volume, Treble, Middle,
Bass, Reverb and Soul. The "Soul" control is a negative
feedback control. Try to find one of *those* on ANY Fender
schematic...oh, wait, I'm sorry...I forgot. You can't read
one of those, can you. Ref your laugher of a statement on the
MV thread where you claimed: "My 2204 jcm800 had a master
volume set on the input stage, not the PI." Of course, if
you were able to *read* a schematic you'd have pulled one up
to make sure you had that right before you posted it in front
of people who can tell the difference between electronics and
bullshit. And had you done so (assuming that you could read
a schematic, which you can't) you'd have instantly seen that
the 2204's MV control was on the input to the PI stage -
right where you said it wasn't. Well, DUH! Not so slick, are
we? SO - back to the Napper: 9 holes - 8 for 3/8" bushings
and one larger one for the pilot light. No square ones, because
the amp doesn't use slide switches for anything - they're cheap
and cheesy, and I don't use them in my amps. So...if that were
any sort of Weber kit - *ESPECIALLY* the 6a20, there would be
a lot of empty space and extra holes on it. There isn't.
100% cloned Fender schematic !!!
Well, excuse me for mentioning it, but...HOW THE FUCK WOULD
*YOU* KNOW? You've already posted one that's not even related;
are you going to dig through Ted's archives pulling shit up at
random until you find something with the right number of holes?
(No-one's going to wait for you to find something that's even a distantly-related match; we're talking typewriters and monkeys
here. No time to wait for fucktards, luck or accidents, see?)
https://www.tedweber.com/media/kits/6a20_schem.jpg
Yes, conclusive proof that you A) can't read a schematic, and
B) can neither count to 9 nor subtract 9 from 17 to figure out
how many you missed by. This is getting laughable...how many
times are you going to get your pitiful ass handed to you
before you quit?
You can't bash Taylor Scott, he's one of the finest players
on this fucking planet. Good thing you didn't try, eh? And
as far as the tone goes, that little amp is better than
anything you will ever build (or own, for that matter) in your
entire miserable wannabee life.
Go home and practice, schmuck. And don't forget to feed
the monkeys.
Lord Valve, ThD
Expert (fuck you)
T R U M P 2 0 2 4 - M A G A / K A G - 1 7 7 6 / 1 8 6 1
On 4/21/20 10:42 AM, Twang wrote:the circuitry that
You can reduce the circuit to a single input. There are scores of
Fender schematics that show that. All these amps are clones of the
original circuits of 1950s. Nothing is unique about any of them .
I don't believe that. I suppose I could be wrong.
But.. it depends on what we mean exactly.
One input fine.. I build them that way. But I don't skip the controls. Nor
differences.. and it wont sound the same, will it?is involved with those controls.
You can take out the reverb, or the tremolo-for two pretty straightforward
In your ears or on your scope?
TWANG
YES - THOSE CIRCUITS ARE NOT NEEDED
YOU CAN JUST USE THE TED_WEBER SINGLE CHANNEL AMP IN THE SAME CHASSIS
AND CABINET
https://www.tedweber.com/6a14hp-c-kt
On Tuesday, April 21, 2020 at 12:58:34 PM UTC-5, NoName wrote:Nor the circuitry that
On 4/21/20 10:42 AM, Twang wrote:
You can reduce the circuit to a single input. There are scores of
Fender schematics that show that. All these amps are clones of the
original circuits of 1950s. Nothing is unique about any of them .
I don't believe that. I suppose I could be wrong.
But.. it depends on what we mean exactly.
One input fine.. I build them that way. But I don't skip the controls.
straightforward differences.. and it wont sound the same, will it?is involved with those controls.
You can take out the reverb, or the tremolo-for two pretty
In your ears or on your scope?
TWANG
YES - THOSE CIRCUITS ARE NOT NEEDED
YOU CAN JUST USE THE TED_WEBER SINGLE CHANNEL AMP IN THE SAME CHASSIS
AND CABINET
amps likehttps://www.tedweber.com/6a14hp-c-kt
I never thought you could remove tremolo and reverb from a circuit and have the same tone in an amp.
Even with all controls to zero.
But hey.. maybe you can and I just don't know it.
I'm gonna go look deeper, since I have only done some ss reverb on little
the epi vj.reverb.
maybe it's time I built some sort of princeton reverb or maybe a deluxe
TWANG
On Tuesday, April 21, 2020 at 12:58:34 PM UTC-5, NoName wrote:amps like
On 4/21/20 10:42 AM, Twang wrote:
You can reduce the circuit to a single input. There are scores of
Fender schematics that show that. All these amps are clones of the
original circuits of 1950s. Nothing is unique about any of them .
I don't believe that. I suppose I could be wrong.
But.. it depends on what we mean exactly.
One input fine.. I build them that way. But I don't skip the controls. Nor the circuitry that
is involved with those controls.
You can take out the reverb, or the tremolo-for two pretty straightforward differences.. and it wont sound the same, will it?
In your ears or on your scope?
TWANG
YES - THOSE CIRCUITS ARE NOT NEEDED
YOU CAN JUST USE THE TED_WEBER SINGLE CHANNEL AMP IN THE SAME CHASSIS
AND CABINET
https://www.tedweber.com/6a14hp-c-kt
I never thought you could remove tremolo and reverb from a circuit and have the same tone in an amp.
Even with all controls to zero.
But hey.. maybe you can and I just don't know it.
I'm gonna go look deeper, since I have only done some ss reverb on little
the epi vj.reverb.
maybe it's time I built some sort of princeton reverb or maybe a deluxe
TWANG
On 4/22/20 4:03 PM, Twang wrote:Nor the circuitry that
On Tuesday, April 21, 2020 at 12:58:34 PM UTC-5, SmallPenis tinkled:
On 4/21/20 10:42 AM, Twang wrote:
You can reduce the circuit to a single input. There are scores of
Fender schematics that show that. All these amps are clones of the
original circuits of 1950s. Nothing is unique about any of them .
I don't believe that. I suppose I could be wrong.
But.. it depends on what we mean exactly.
One input fine.. I build them that way. But I don't skip the controls.
straightforward differences.. and it wont sound the same, will it?is involved with those controls.
You can take out the reverb, or the tremolo-for two pretty
amps likeIn your ears or on your scope?
TWANG
YES - THOSE CIRCUITS ARE NOT NEEDED
YOU CAN JUST USE THE TED_WEBER SINGLE CHANNEL AMP IN THE SAME CHASSIS
AND CABINET
https://www.tedweber.com/6a14hp-c-kt
I never thought you could remove tremolo and reverb from a circuit and have the same tone in an amp.
Even with all controls to zero.
But hey.. maybe you can and I just don't know it.
I'm gonna go look deeper, since I have only done some ss reverb on little
reverb.the epi vj.
maybe it's time I built some sort of princeton reverb or maybe a deluxe
TWANG
You can actually remove the tubes associated with the reverb and tremolo
( 3 of them if I recall ) and the amp will function fine. You won't even
hear any difference either.
This is advice you will never hear from any "expert " who simply copies
and re-brand Ted Weber kits in some slum shithole neighborhood in Denver.
On Wednesday, April 22, 2020 at 5:16:21 PM UTC-6, SmallPenis tinkled:Nor the circuitry that
On 4/22/20 4:03 PM, Twang wrote:
On Tuesday, April 21, 2020 at 12:58:34 PM UTC-5, SmallPenis tinkled:
On 4/21/20 10:42 AM, Twang wrote:
You can reduce the circuit to a single input. There are scores of >>>> Fender schematics that show that. All these amps are clones of the >>>> original circuits of 1950s. Nothing is unique about any of them .
I don't believe that. I suppose I could be wrong.
But.. it depends on what we mean exactly.
One input fine.. I build them that way. But I don't skip the controls.
straightforward differences.. and it wont sound the same, will it?is involved with those controls.
You can take out the reverb, or the tremolo-for two pretty
haveIn your ears or on your scope?
TWANG
YES - THOSE CIRCUITS ARE NOT NEEDED
YOU CAN JUST USE THE TED_WEBER SINGLE CHANNEL AMP IN THE SAME CHASSIS
AND CABINET
https://www.tedweber.com/6a14hp-c-kt
I never thought you could remove tremolo and reverb from a circuit and
amps likethe same tone in an amp.
Even with all controls to zero.
But hey.. maybe you can and I just don't know it.
I'm gonna go look deeper, since I have only done some ss reverb on little
reverb.the epi vj.
maybe it's time I built some sort of princeton reverb or maybe a deluxe
TWANG
You can actually remove the tubes associated with the reverb and tremolo
( 3 of them if I recall ) and the amp will function fine. You won't even hear any difference either.
This is advice you will never hear from any "expert " who simply copies
and re-brand Ted Weber kits in some slum shithole neighborhood in Denver.
A wager has been proposed. To hear you tell it,
it is a wager you cannot possibly lose. A very
easy ~$9K payday; I'm sure there are many people
reading these threads who find it puzzling that
you wouldn't jump right on it. You prove I'm a
liar, and you pocket $9K. It's a win-win! So, I
guess the only thing to be said at this point is:
P U T U P O R S H U T U P !
And your reply, inevitably, will be... <crickets>
Lord Valve, ThD
Expert (fuck you)
On Wednesday, April 22, 2020 at 7:42:11 PM UTC-6, Lord Valve wrote:
On Wednesday, April 22, 2020 at 5:16:21 PM UTC-6, SmallPenis tinkled:
On 4/22/20 4:03 PM, Twang wrote:A wager has been proposed. To hear you tell it,
On Tuesday, April 21, 2020 at 12:58:34 PM UTC-5, SmallPenis tinkled:
On 4/21/20 10:42 AM, Twang wrote:
You can reduce the circuit to a single input. There are scores of >>>>>>> Fender schematics that show that. All these amps are clones of the >>>>>>> original circuits of 1950s. Nothing is unique about any of them . >>>>>>I don't believe that. I suppose I could be wrong.
But.. it depends on what we mean exactly.
One input fine.. I build them that way. But I don't skip the controls. Nor the circuitry that
is involved with those controls.
You can take out the reverb, or the tremolo-for two pretty straightforward differences.. and it wont sound the same, will it?
In your ears or on your scope?
TWANG
YES - THOSE CIRCUITS ARE NOT NEEDED
YOU CAN JUST USE THE TED_WEBER SINGLE CHANNEL AMP IN THE SAME CHASSIS >>>>> AND CABINET
https://www.tedweber.com/6a14hp-c-kt
I never thought you could remove tremolo and reverb from a circuit and have
the same tone in an amp.
Even with all controls to zero.
But hey.. maybe you can and I just don't know it.
I'm gonna go look deeper, since I have only done some ss reverb on little amps like
the epi vj.
maybe it's time I built some sort of princeton reverb or maybe a deluxe reverb.
TWANG
You can actually remove the tubes associated with the reverb and tremolo >>> ( 3 of them if I recall ) and the amp will function fine. You won't even >>> hear any difference either.
This is advice you will never hear from any "expert " who simply copies
and re-brand Ted Weber kits in some slum shithole neighborhood in Denver. >>
it is a wager you cannot possibly lose. A very
easy ~$9K payday; I'm sure there are many people
reading these threads who find it puzzling that
you wouldn't jump right on it. You prove I'm a
liar, and you pocket $9K. It's a win-win! So, I
guess the only thing to be said at this point is:
P U T U P O R S H U T U P !
And your reply, inevitably, will be... <crickets>
Lord Valve, ThD
Expert (fuck you)
<crickets>
On Wednesday, April 22, 2020 at 7:42:11 PM UTC-6, Lord Valve wrote:controls. Nor the circuitry that
On Wednesday, April 22, 2020 at 5:16:21 PM UTC-6, SmallPenis tinkled:
On 4/22/20 4:03 PM, Twang wrote:
On Tuesday, April 21, 2020 at 12:58:34 PM UTC-5, SmallPenis tinkled:
On 4/21/20 10:42 AM, Twang wrote:
You can reduce the circuit to a single input. There are scores of >>>> Fender schematics that show that. All these amps are clones of the >>>> original circuits of 1950s. Nothing is unique about any of them . >>>I don't believe that. I suppose I could be wrong.
But.. it depends on what we mean exactly.
One input fine.. I build them that way. But I don't skip the
straightforward differences.. and it wont sound the same, will it?is involved with those controls.
You can take out the reverb, or the tremolo-for two pretty
haveIn your ears or on your scope?
TWANG
YES - THOSE CIRCUITS ARE NOT NEEDED
YOU CAN JUST USE THE TED_WEBER SINGLE CHANNEL AMP IN THE SAME CHASSIS >> AND CABINET
https://www.tedweber.com/6a14hp-c-kt
I never thought you could remove tremolo and reverb from a circuit and
little amps likethe same tone in an amp.
Even with all controls to zero.
But hey.. maybe you can and I just don't know it.
I'm gonna go look deeper, since I have only done some ss reverb on
reverb.the epi vj.
maybe it's time I built some sort of princeton reverb or maybe a deluxe
TWANG
You can actually remove the tubes associated with the reverb and tremolo ( 3 of them if I recall ) and the amp will function fine. You won't even hear any difference either.
This is advice you will never hear from any "expert " who simply copies and re-brand Ted Weber kits in some slum shithole neighborhood in Denver.
A wager has been proposed. To hear you tell it,
it is a wager you cannot possibly lose. A very
easy ~$9K payday; I'm sure there are many people
reading these threads who find it puzzling that
you wouldn't jump right on it. You prove I'm a
liar, and you pocket $9K. It's a win-win! So, I
guess the only thing to be said at this point is:
P U T U P O R S H U T U P !
And your reply, inevitably, will be... <crickets>
Lord Valve, ThD
Expert (fuck you)
<crickets>
On Saturday, April 25, 2020 at 9:55:09 AM UTC-6, Lord Valve wrote:amps like
On Wednesday, April 22, 2020 at 7:42:11 PM UTC-6, Lord Valve wrote:
On Wednesday, April 22, 2020 at 5:16:21 PM UTC-6, SmallPenis tinkled:
On 4/22/20 4:03 PM, Twang wrote:
On Tuesday, April 21, 2020 at 12:58:34 PM UTC-5, SmallPenis tinkled: >>>>>> On 4/21/20 10:42 AM, Twang wrote:
You can reduce the circuit to a single input. There are scores of >>>>>>>> Fender schematics that show that. All these amps are clones of the >>>>>>>> original circuits of 1950s. Nothing is unique about any of them . >>>>>>>I don't believe that. I suppose I could be wrong.
But.. it depends on what we mean exactly.
One input fine.. I build them that way. But I don't skip the controls. Nor the circuitry that
is involved with those controls.
You can take out the reverb, or the tremolo-for two pretty straightforward differences.. and it wont sound the same, will it?
In your ears or on your scope?
TWANG
YES - THOSE CIRCUITS ARE NOT NEEDED
YOU CAN JUST USE THE TED_WEBER SINGLE CHANNEL AMP IN THE SAME CHASSIS >>>>>> AND CABINET
https://www.tedweber.com/6a14hp-c-kt
I never thought you could remove tremolo and reverb from a circuit and have
the same tone in an amp.
Even with all controls to zero.
But hey.. maybe you can and I just don't know it.
I'm gonna go look deeper, since I have only done some ss reverb on little
A wager has been proposed. To hear you tell it,the epi vj.
maybe it's time I built some sort of princeton reverb or maybe a deluxe reverb.
TWANG
You can actually remove the tubes associated with the reverb and tremolo >>>> ( 3 of them if I recall ) and the amp will function fine. You won't even >>>> hear any difference either.
This is advice you will never hear from any "expert " who simply copies >>>> and re-brand Ted Weber kits in some slum shithole neighborhood in Denver. >>>
it is a wager you cannot possibly lose. A very
easy ~$9K payday; I'm sure there are many people
reading these threads who find it puzzling that
you wouldn't jump right on it. You prove I'm a
liar, and you pocket $9K. It's a win-win! So, I
guess the only thing to be said at this point is:
P U T U P O R S H U T U P !
And your reply, inevitably, will be... <crickets>
Lord Valve, ThD
Expert (fuck you)
<crickets>
<crickets>
Lord Valve, ThD
Expert (fuck you)
On Saturday, April 25, 2020 at 1:48:54 PM UTC-6, NoName wrote:
Lord Valve, ThD
Expert (fuck you)
I am betting you are an asshole living in a 3rd world slum in the
inner city of Denver with a dead business .. and no one will disagree
either
How much do you want to bet? Your whole wad?
Just a minute, I'll tell the old lady to fetch
the penny jar.
You stupid shit.
Lord Valve, ThD
Expert (fuck you)
I am betting you are an asshole living in a 3rd world slum in the
inner city of Denver with a dead business .. and no one will disagree
either
| Sysop: | sneaky |
|---|---|
| Location: | Ashburton,NZ |
| Users: | 31 |
| Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
| Uptime: | 87:57:36 |
| Calls: | 2,069 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 11,134 |
| Messages: | 946,744 |
