• Re: Anthony Huber's weapon

    From Clem@1:229/2 to Just Wondering on Monday, November 22, 2021 04:35:03
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.homosexual
    From: clem@lycos.com

    In article <FvAmJ.68874$Ql5.65334@fx39.iad>
    Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote:

    On 11/21/2021 6:57 AM, bigdog wrote:
    Many of those decrying the Rittenhouse verdict are lamenting the fact that Anthony Huber was armed only with his skateboard when he was shot dead by Kyle Rittenhouse. ONLY. A simple google search will reveal dozens of
    cases in which a skateboard has been used as a weapon to inflict death or great bodily harm. That fact alone justifies Kyle's use of deadly force against Anthony Huber, a guy with a violent criminal history. The left believes it was Kyle's moral duty
    to allow Huber to continue to bludgeon him and take it like a man. That was the argument made by the assistant DA at Kyle's trial. I'm sure that argument played well with the jury. The last volley fired from a sinking ship.

    Here are just a few examples of cases in which a skateboard was used as a deadly weapon.

    https://www.canyon-news.com/skateboard-used-as-deadly-weapon/10481

    https://www.sfgate.com/crime/article/Skateboard-used-as-weapon-in-alleged-San-13060169.php

    https://www.ocregister.com/2008/02/06/skateboard-used-as-deadly-weapon-leads-to-arrest/

    https://abc7.com/starbucks-fight-santa-ana-man-dies-skateboard/1098183/

    The bottom line is a skateboard is a skateboard when it is under your feet. When it is being used to bash somebody's skull, it becomes a club and a potentially deadly weapon.

    Any object used to commit an assault is an assault weapon.

    That's why it's okay to knock all the teeth out of mouths that
    commit verbal assault instead of just killing the owners.

    No harm no foul and they will no longer do damage when they are
    sucking cocks.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)
  • From Bruce@1:229/2 to All on Monday, December 27, 2021 13:51:44
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.homosexual
    From: Bruce@notreal.invalid

    On Mon, 22 Nov 2021 04:35:03 +0100 (CET), "Clem" <clem@lycos.com>
    wrote:

    In article <FvAmJ.68874$Ql5.65334@fx39.iad>
    Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote:

    On 11/21/2021 6:57 AM, bigdog wrote:
    Many of those decrying the Rittenhouse verdict are lamenting the fact that Anthony Huber was armed only with his skateboard when he was shot dead by Kyle Rittenhouse. ONLY. A simple google search will reveal dozens of
    cases in which a skateboard has been used as a weapon to inflict death or great bodily harm. That fact alone justifies Kyle's use of deadly force against Anthony Huber, a guy with a violent criminal history. The left believes it was Kyle's moral
    duty to allow Huber to continue to bludgeon him and take it like a man. That was the argument made by the assistant DA at Kyle's trial. I'm sure that argument played well with the jury. The last volley fired from a sinking ship.

    Here are just a few examples of cases in which a skateboard was used as a >> > deadly weapon.

    https://www.canyon-news.com/skateboard-used-as-deadly-weapon/10481

    https://www.sfgate.com/crime/article/Skateboard-used-as-weapon-in-alleged-San-13060169.php

    https://www.ocregister.com/2008/02/06/skateboard-used-as-deadly-weapon-leads-to-arrest/

    https://abc7.com/starbucks-fight-santa-ana-man-dies-skateboard/1098183/

    The bottom line is a skateboard is a skateboard when it is under your feet. When it is being used to bash somebody's skull, it becomes a club and a potentially deadly weapon.

    Any object used to commit an assault is an assault weapon.

    That's why it's okay to knock all the teeth out of mouths that
    commit verbal assault instead of just killing the owners.

    No harm no foul and they will no longer do damage when they are
    sucking cocks.

    that is so wrong

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)