• Liberals Begin to Revolt against [Their own democrat...] 'Rock Stupid'

    From Leroy N. Soetoro@1:229/2 to All on Friday, May 17, 2019 17:51:30
    XPost: alt.society.mental-health, rec.arts.tv, alt.california
    XPost: sac.politics, alt.politics.republicans, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
    From: leroysoetoro@barackobama.com

    https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/05/denver-voters-reject-homeless- referendum/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=idealmedia&utm_campaign=nationa lreview.com&utm_term=68856&utm_content=1

    In a referendum last week, the idea that vagrancy should be legalized was
    shot down by a resounding 83 percent of Denver voters.
    The more that progressive policies have failed to address the homelessness problem in urban areas, the more that progressives are doubling down on
    bad solutions.

    Take Denver. The Mile High City presented voters last week with Issue 300.
    It was placed on the ballot by advocates for the homeless who wanted to legalize “camping” in parks and in vehicles on city streets, including in
    front of homes and local businesses. This was too much for voters, even in
    a city that gave Donald Trump only 19 percent of the vote in 2016. The
    idea of legalizing vagrancy was shot down by a resounding 83 percent of
    local voters.

    Liberal mayor Michael Hancock said the city had dodged making a bad
    situation worse. Noting that tent cities had already begun already
    sprouting up in parks and alleyways, he maintained that “300 would have
    created an unsanitary problem for the homeless and for Denver residents.”

    But that doesn’t mean the courts elsewhere aren’t stepping in to impose
    what voters rejected. Last September, the notoriously liberal Ninth
    Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that officials in Boise, Idaho, had
    violated the Eighth Amendment rights of the homeless when they issued
    citations for sleeping or camping in public. In 2015, the Obama Justice Department backed a lawsuit against the Boise anti-vagrancy laws, arguing
    that “if a person literally has nowhere else to go, then enforcement of
    the anti-camping ordinance against that person criminalizes her for being homeless.”

    But it’s not as if cities aren’t already spending vast amounts on the
    homeless. In 2017, the Puget Sound Business Journal in Seattle reported
    that Seattle-area governments were spending $1.06 billion a year on
    programs for homeless people. “Having failed to build enough shelters for
    the growing numbers of homeless, the activists will soon be back with a rock-stupid big-government solution — and all they’ll need to implement it
    is a massive amount of taxpayer funding,” says John Carlson, a Seattle
    radio talk-show host.

    Peter Droege is a former executive director of Step 13, an innovative
    homeless shelter in Denver. “What these activists do not understand is
    that people struggling with homelessness, mental health issues, or
    addiction do not want to be enabled in their behavior,” he wrote last
    month in the Washington Examiner. “Nor do they need greater access to
    drugs or alcohol. What they need is community support and supportive
    services that require them to be accountable and self-sufficient.”

    When I first toured Step 13 some 20 years ago, it was an eye-opening experience. The late Bob Cote, a homeless man who picked himself up off
    the streets and founded Step 13, had a high success rate in rehabilitating people with his “no drugs, no booze, find a job” program. “My biggest adversaries are government homeless shelters that don’t ask people to do anything for themselves, and Social Security Disability programs that
    allow people to continue the same mistakes they’ve been making,” he told
    me. Cote was constantly battling local bureaucrats who oversaw
    homelessness issues. It’s one reason he would not accept government money,
    or the strings that came with it.

    Every homeless person has a different story, and some are truly down on
    their luck through no fault of their own. But most are mired in a cycle of behavior that they refuse to change. I once reported on an effort in San Francisco to encourage pedestrians and tourists to hand out coupons
    instead of money to the homeless. The coupons were redeemable for many
    things: a free meal, clothing, haircuts, and laundromat services. Over the course of several days, I tried to distribute such coupons myself and met rejection about 80 percent of the time. Cash was what homeless people
    wanted — and for you know what.

    Allowing people to remain mired in problems involving mental illness,
    drugs, or alcohol affects the wider community. In Seattle, Scott Lindsay,
    a former public-safety adviser to the mayor’s office, has written a new
    report called “System Failure.” He found that a mere 100 “prolific
    offenders” among the homeless are responsible for more than 3,500 criminal cases. Often they are released from jail the same day they are taken in.

    “We need help, I have businesses broken into every single night,” says
    Erin Goodman, head of a local Seattle Business Improvement Area.
    “Something has to change.” Goodman says crime is up 31 percent this year
    in her area because of the “prolific offenders.”

    There are options out there. Rhode Island has had great success with its Medically Assisted Treatment (MAT) program, which blends punishment with treatment, managing to keep most addicts from straying into old alliances
    and bad habits. Several people in the MAT program say that jail,
    accompanied by treatment, saved their lives. Rhode Island authorities are hosting a two-day workshop at the end of the month for cities around the country that have asked about it. But progressive Seattle can’t be
    bothered and isn’t sending anyone. The city attorney, Pete Holmes, told a
    local podcast that the Seattle’s problems are caused in part by its
    failure to impose a new city income tax.

    Last month, Michael Gordon, a former vice president for grants at the San Francisco–based Thiel Foundation, wrote in NRO that a walk through his
    city is a sobering experience:

    You notice homeless men and women — junkies, winos, the dispossessed —
    passed out in the vestibules of empty storefronts on otherwise busy
    streets. Encampments of tents sprout in every shadowy corner: under
    highway overpasses, down alleys. Streets are peppered with used syringes. Strolling the sidewalks, you smell the faint malodorous traces of human excrement and soiled clothing. Crowded thoroughfares such as Market
    Street, even in the light of midday, stage a carnival of indecipherable outbursts and drug-induced thrashings about which the police seem to do nothing.

    The confused mumble, the incoherent finger-pointing tirade, the twitch,
    the cold daemonic stare, the drunken stumble and drool — these are the
    rhythms of a city on the edge of a schizophrenic explosion.

    Whatever cities like San Francisco, Seattle, and Denver have been doing
    isn’t working.

    70
    Finding the right balance between compassion and personal responsibility
    in homelessness policy is incredibly difficult. Simply spending money on
    more apartments for the homeless only attracts more homeless and breeds corruption. Demanding that people get off drugs and alcohol and on to any prescribed medication they have invites howls of outrage and civil-rights lawsuits.

    That’s why it’s noteworthy that the citizens of liberal Denver finally
    said “Enough” to liberal plans to broaden the right of homeless people to
    live on city streets. It’s now time for reformers to realize that the
    public is yearning for answers and to propose tough-love solutions that
    address the root cause of the homeless problem, rather than sentimentalize
    it.



    --
    No collusion - Special Counsel Robert Swan Mueller III, March 2019.

    Donald J. Trump, 304 electoral votes to 227, defeated compulsive liar in
    denial Hillary Rodham Clinton on December 19th, 2016. The clown car
    parade of the democrat party ran out of gas and got run over by a Trump
    truck.

    Congratulations President Trump. Thank you for cleaning up the disaster
    of the Obama presidency.

    The Obama-led Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) approved Uranium One in fall 2010. With a little luck, we'll see
    compulsive liar Hillary Clinton in jail before she dies.

    Under Barack Obama's leadership, the United States of America became the
    The World According To Garp.

    Obama increased total debt from $10 trillion to $20 trillion in the eight
    years he was in office, and sold out heterosexuals for Hollywood queer
    liberal democrat donors.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)