[continued from previous message]

energy solutions. Instead it was denied, and now because it has been
denied the world is facing great loss of life, great loss of property,
and irreversible damage, none of which had to be if this problem had
not been denied and been acted upon when it was discovered.

Claim: God will fix this.
Answer: People created this problem, people must solve this problem.
It is not fair to ask God to clean up our mess.

Claim: There is no global warming. These are the end times.
Answer: People have choice as to what world to have, and for how long
to have it. It is only the end times if you make these the end times
by destroying life on earth. The stance of destroying the planet will
not earn you any favor with God or with any power with any concept of righteousness. And if you continue this stance, you have everything to
fear for your soul if the end times ever are to arrive.

Claim: It would be expensive to do anything about it / people would
have to lose what they have.
Answer: There are technically and economically sound technologies that
can provide all of people's present and much more energy needs through processes that are not destructive to the environment or are much less destructive than current technologies. Some of these technologies
carry vast economic benefit, both short-term and long-term, along with
their environmental benefit, while delivering greater convenience and
utility than technologies of today. And these technologies can be put
into place by the private sector as easily as they can be put into
place by the government, resulting both in job and prosperity growth
in the present and significant economic gains over the long term. This
can be done without even involving the government for anything except
this:

Refusing to give into lobbying by Texas Oil.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)