From:
slider@anashram.com
On Fri, 29 Jan 2021 23:44:34 -0000, o'Mahoney <
libertidad@south.south.com> wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jan 2021 15:18:43 -0000, slider <slider@anashram.com>
wrote:
### - this is from a documentary shown here today on rt, many of the
things he's saying/suggesting being really quite reasonable, so see
whatcha think ;)
https://www.rt.com/shows/sophieco-visionaries/513939-theory-everything-fabrication-physicist/
Fuck me, Slider. WHat the FUCK are you doing reading Russian/Putin propaganda broadsheets for?
Yet on the other hand, you dislike Trump. But Trump was a useful
puppet or tool for Putin. So, you disllike Trump, therefore by proxy
dislike Putin and his crowd of oligarchic assassins, yet you read RT
which is nothing less than a broadsheet for Russian bullshit propping
up Putin and his band of fucking THIEVES.
"RT (formerly Russia Today) is a state-controlled international
television network funded by the federal tax budget of the Russian government.[5][6] It operates pay television channels directed to
audiences outside of Russia, as well as providing Internet content in English, Spanish, French, German, Arabic, and Russian.
RT has been described as a propaganda outlet for the Russian
government[12] and its foreign policy.[13][14][15][16][17][18] RT has
also been accused of spreading disinformation[18][19][20] by news reporters,[21][22] including some former RT reporters.[23][24][25] The
UK media regulator, Ofcom, has repeatedly found RT to have breached
its rules on impartiality and on one occasion found it had broadcast "materially misleading" content.[26][27][28][29] RT's editor-in-chief compared it with the Defence Ministry and talked about it "waging the information war against the entire Western world."[6] In September
2017, RT America was ordered to register as a "foreign agent" with the
United States Department of Justice under the Foreign Agents
Registration Act. Under the act, RT is required to disclose financial information to the U.S.[30]"
### - i look at a wide variety & range of available news sources knowing/realising full well what their own personal agendas likely are
and/or, traditionally or otherwise, pertain to... all of the above also applying equally to the bbc afaic haha; they're all the same and all do
exactly the same job!
each still has their own particular spin on things though, and if ya
understand that + take that into consideration, plus then contrast &
compare etc etc, it's possible to eventually even end up with a little bit wider overall view than any single one of them on their own sets out to provide, particularly if one also reads between the lines of them; the
whole effectively thus being greater than the sum of its parts kinda
thing... try it sometime and you'll perhaps see what i mean ;)
perforce it's then down to moi to cherry-pick from amongst them what i personally consider to be the real + perhaps emerging news, rt often
reporting on things well before the bbc does for example, especially if
it's some bad or inconvenient news on the uk front that the bbc is then
slow to report on haha (always makes me laff when i see that) just today
being a case in point, where rt reported on a fire and small riot
involving a sealed kent barracks where some 400 asylum seekers are being
kept on ice... it then taking the bbc another 2 hours to start reporting
on it with the newscaster reporting breaking news about a fire in kent
with few details that he was quite obviously playing down, whereas on
other channels it was already all over & done with lol :D
fact is, Truth can come from 'any' source (even something fairly obscure/relatively unknown) providing one has the discerning eye to
recognise it, and because in that sense Truth really is (or certainly can
be) in the eye of the beholder heh, so i look at everything! anything! all
with equal impunity ;)
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)