• Re: I call this treason (3/3)

    From thang ornerythinchus@1:229/2 to As I on Wednesday, October 21, 2020 08:48:55
    [continued from previous message]

    Give it another few thousand years of evolution and see what happens.

    ### - only if we survive as a species for that long!?

    i.e., it takes about a million years for nature to evolve just one change, >the best we could hope for in only a 1000 years or so being to maybe stop >getting wisdom teeth lol, although having access to knives & forks did >apparently go towards people have a shorter lower jaw haha...


    mind you, with all that increased background radiation things might indeed >have been speeded up a bit no? cell mutation (cancer) becoming rife in the >world today because of it!

    (well they always 'did' say that 2 heads are better than one didn't they?? >lol... silly joke)


    Evolution doesn't only occur due to radiation banging about DNA. It
    can occur due to adaptation as well. So if the environment changes
    quickly, then adaptation takes place and evolution occurs quickly
    (say, over thousands of years). Nothing changes the environment like
    humans and therefore it can be expected that our evolution will be (or
    is being) speeded up.

    The next human species might be among us right now. Realising what
    homo sapiens did to neanderthal man, there would be no reason for the
    next human species to announce its arrival.

    It might then just wipe us out or it might be "woke" and let us
    survive. Who knows.






    and if humanity ain't BIG enough to do that... well...

    we all know what follows...

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)
  • From slider@1:229/2 to thangolossus@gmail.com on Thursday, October 22, 2020 19:31:38
    [continued from previous message]

    China has one big achilles heel. It is decades behind the US in
    design and manufacture of very sophisticated silicon chiips and they >>>>> depend on imports from the US, Taiwan, South Korea and Japan who are >>>>> all more successful in this area.

    Now the US is starting to strangle the ChiCom ability to purchase
    these chips. That is a very big weakness indeed.

    ### - agreed, but they're catching up real fast! and that's a big-big
    problem for the west...

    Not in chips. They don't even have decent foundries. They are
    decades behind and war is close.

    ### - oh they're modern enough to lob quite a few fancy nukes in our
    direction should the need ever arise, china isn't some tin-pot wannabe
    nuclear nation like north korea or iran ya know? i mean, long gone are
    the
    days when we british could just bombard them with impunity into
    submission
    from the sea hah! if we tried that shit today there'd be a very hefty
    price to pay in terms of retaliation, just one well-aimed missile with
    multiple warheads would flatten the uk forever!

    Even the NK can make nukes, they have been around since 1945. That
    doesn't take modern chip technology at all even in ICBM's because
    inertial guided missiles have been around for a long time before
    modern chip foundries and assoc tech. The Chinese are nowhere near
    the Yanks or the Taiwanese or the Japs or South Koreans in chip tech,
    they are decades behind. This is why the US export controls are
    crippling Huawai.

    And I don't think the Chicoms have MIRV technology - perhaps it's only
    one warhead per rocket.

    ### - if you honestly think china only has 300 nukes and are
    technologically poor you're crazy!?

    like, didn't they just send a rover to the moon or something?? (fucking
    thing broke down after only 20 minutes lol, probably due to moon dust, but
    they did actually land one on the moon quite successfully!)




    i mean, how many 'trillions' of american debt does china currently
    hold
    for example? lol

    Not a problem for the Yanks who can just print more money and degrade
    the value of those holdings.

    ### - true... but would also devalue the dollar for themselves in the
    process too, to the point that $1000 prolly wouldn't even buy ya a
    single
    loaf of bread! deflation! (iow: you can only go so far with that shit
    before your own economy collapses no?)

    No that's not how it works. By devaluing the $ exports increase and
    wealth increases. This counteracts any tendency towards inflation. A purposeful increase in money supply can put China down but will not be
    seen by the markets to be overly damaging to the US economy. It is a
    big weapon which has not yet been wielded by the Yanks but has in fact
    been used by China.

    ### - while the west was crashing back in 2008, and ever since, china has
    been growing steadily all along? they can 'afford' to buy up trillions of american debt 'was' the point?? and are set to become the richest nation
    on the planet if nothing stops them! (which is precisely why we're trying
    to stop them!)



    in another 30 or 50 years they'll just call in the debt and own
    america!

    The ChiCOms don't have the luxury of time.

    https://www.msn.com/en-xl/news/other/china-forces-on-high-alert-after-u-s-warship-sails-near-taiwan

    ### - and thus they're preparing for an assault upon them by claiming
    these important + strategic waterways in a counter-attempt to even the
    score that 'we' have un-evened by encroaching upon them!

    Nope, the Chinese are bullies who started the pandemic and they need
    to be taken down a few sizes. In the coming war the US and its allies
    will prevail. Nukes will not be used for the obvious reason (that the Chinese nation will become a radioactive wasteland for the next 100000 years). China will sue for peace but there is a danger that they will
    not accept the peace conditions like Germany after WW1 and futher conflagration will take place down track.

    But there will be war.

    ### - any 'overt' war with china will inevitably lead to all-out nuclear
    war...

    think of it this way: if 'china' won the conventional war with the US do
    ya really think the US would just roll over now??

    forget it, they'd never accept it + long before it ever came to that
    they'd be nuking china with everything its gots!




    thus war with them is inevitable unless the west can change its world
    domination agenda to something else and, perhaps, persuade china to do >>>> something similar? (why can't we all just get along?? hah!)

    else they're quite content to just keep growing and growing while
    western
    economies shrink away, they don't 'need' to start a war except in
    defense
    of their sovereign rights!

    They have already started the war. Soon, the US will finish it.

    ### - i don't agree that they started it, any more than they started a
    war
    with the british that time, rather it's completely the other way around
    as
    we (the west) encroach upon them by sending warships to sail past them?
    they've seen that shit before lol only this time they're better prepared
    to defend themselves! we're actively provoking them! and have, for
    example, already initiated a trade war with them! (trade wars have
    always
    been a prelude to war no? well we've started it then no?)

    The two circumstances are totally different. Now the Chinese are
    trying to close or control shipping lanes which service half the
    world. The US did that to Japan and WW2 in the Pacific ensued. Now
    it's the Chicoms under that flat faced gook bastard Jiping ping pong
    who are doing it and I guarantee they will get pasted for doing it and
    Jipong ping ding dong will get hung as a war criminal. Good. I hope
    the telecast it live on TV.

    ### - you're dreaming hehe, trying to be deliberately offensive no?

    iow: you're being like a trump supporter denying the virus is even real!




    problem is, with china we're treading on the tail of a tiger lol, and
    who
    knows when one of those things will finally lose its temper and take a >>>> swipe at what's been irritating it for so long huh...

    a war with china is just not viable, no one could possibly win a war
    of
    that magnitude, everyone would lose! lose everything! so it's not an
    option, that is unless one is totally insane and/or suicidal hah!

    It probably won't go nuclear so it will be worth fighting.

    ### - oh ho ho! (i have to laugh heh) because going nuclear is
    'inevitable' if/when either side thinks they're going to lose a more
    conventional war? no one will be prepared to give in and thus things
    will
    unavoidably escalate to that level! that even if we strike first we wont
    possibly escape the massive retaliation that will immediately follow!
    and
    because we've all got enough weapons, each, to flatten the entire world
    many times over?

    Nonsense. It is highly unlikely that major powers will make nuclear
    war against each other. They only full well know the consequences for themselves - M.A.D.

    It's more likely that India/Pak or NK/SK or Iran/Israel will launch a
    few nukes if threates become existential. That won't destroy our civilisation but it will put a dent in it.

    Your logic is a little bit faulty. Because they exist doesn't mean
    they will be used. They have been around now for 75 years and haven't
    been used since the end of WW2. They keep the balance.

    ### - MAD was founded on the profound realisation that there's no such
    thing as a winnable nuclear war! once something like that even 'starts' everyone end's up going all-in in a use-it or lose-it type scenario that eventually kills everyone, and the planet to boot!




    "Mutually Assured Destruction" (MAD) was the only thing (the only
    realisation) that stopped the US & russia destroying each other no? so
    do
    ya really think it's any different now with china??

    China has only about 300 nukes. Transit time for a SLBM from an Ohio
    class boomer near Guam is only a few minutes, not enough time to
    launch. In other words, the Yanks could take out practically every
    one of those weapons before they could be launched.

    ### - that's just ridiculous lol, china has it's own satellites and early warning systems too, launch on them and even though they'll be destroyed they'll have fired-off everything they gots before they even start landing there, the land mass of china being just too big to hit it everywhere all
    at once in order to stop them responding... plus it's the same with russia
    even though they're totally surrounded on all sides by nuclear forces...





    Then China would be at the Americans' mercy ready to be occupied by
    Japan and the US.

    ### - there wouldn't BE an america left to occupy anything! they'd be too
    busy just trying to survive themselves, you're dreaming again :)))



    with all the resources running out we actually need to learn to share?

    Give it another few thousand years of evolution and see what happens.

    ### - only if we survive as a species for that long!?

    i.e., it takes about a million years for nature to evolve just one
    change,
    the best we could hope for in only a 1000 years or so being to maybe
    stop
    getting wisdom teeth lol, although having access to knives & forks did
    apparently go towards people have a shorter lower jaw haha...


    mind you, with all that increased background radiation things might
    indeed
    have been speeded up a bit no? cell mutation (cancer) becoming rife in
    the
    world today because of it!

    (well they always 'did' say that 2 heads are better than one didn't
    they??
    lol... silly joke)


    Evolution doesn't only occur due to radiation banging about DNA. It
    can occur due to adaptation as well. So if the environment changes
    quickly, then adaptation takes place and evolution occurs quickly
    (say, over thousands of years). Nothing changes the environment like
    humans and therefore it can be expected that our evolution will be (or
    is being) speeded up.

    ### - adaptation is a very slow process, i.e., don't adapt fast enough and
    you become extinct, game over, something which has already happened to 99%
    of all the creatures that have ever lived! lol we might not even make it through this simple pandemic for example without encountering a total
    economic collapse scenario, that's how tenuous our situation really is,
    and has been all along...




    The next human species might be among us right now. Realising what
    homo sapiens did to neanderthal man, there would be no reason for the
    next human species to announce its arrival.

    It might then just wipe us out or it might be "woke" and let us
    survive. Who knows.

    ### - we talked about this before, and have called that future man 'homo acutus'

    i.e.,

    Acuere (Latin) means to make sharp, pointed, penetrative. Acutus is simply
    the perfect participle. Acumen derived from same root. The meaning is then transferred to someone's intellect. Compare "clever" - to cleave, to cut;
    i.e.; to have the mother-wit to cut through all the crap and appreciate
    the situation as it really is.

    iow: he wont be 'killing' anything, there wont be any need to! he'll
    arrive (if he hasn't already) and gradually replace everyone with a higher expression, he'll be beyond crude wars per se and have totally different
    goals to the completely materialistic ones we only know of today...

    that what we call 'wise masters of wisdom' today will become the norm
    tomorrow!

    if we don't all die in a nuclear war first that is ;)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)
  • From thang ornerythinchus@1:229/2 to As I on Wednesday, October 21, 2020 08:48:55
    [continued from previous message]

    Give it another few thousand years of evolution and see what happens.

    ### - only if we survive as a species for that long!?

    i.e., it takes about a million years for nature to evolve just one change, >the best we could hope for in only a 1000 years or so being to maybe stop >getting wisdom teeth lol, although having access to knives & forks did >apparently go towards people have a shorter lower jaw haha...


    mind you, with all that increased background radiation things might indeed >have been speeded up a bit no? cell mutation (cancer) becoming rife in the >world today because of it!

    (well they always 'did' say that 2 heads are better than one didn't they?? >lol... silly joke)


    Evolution doesn't only occur due to radiation banging about DNA. It
    can occur due to adaptation as well. So if the environment changes
    quickly, then adaptation takes place and evolution occurs quickly
    (say, over thousands of years). Nothing changes the environment like
    humans and therefore it can be expected that our evolution will be (or
    is being) speeded up.

    The next human species might be among us right now. Realising what
    homo sapiens did to neanderthal man, there would be no reason for the
    next human species to announce its arrival.

    It might then just wipe us out or it might be "woke" and let us
    survive. Who knows.






    and if humanity ain't BIG enough to do that... well...

    we all know what follows...

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)
  • From slider@1:229/2 to thangolossus@gmail.com on Thursday, October 22, 2020 19:31:38
    [continued from previous message]

    China has one big achilles heel. It is decades behind the US in
    design and manufacture of very sophisticated silicon chiips and they >>>>> depend on imports from the US, Taiwan, South Korea and Japan who are >>>>> all more successful in this area.

    Now the US is starting to strangle the ChiCom ability to purchase
    these chips. That is a very big weakness indeed.

    ### - agreed, but they're catching up real fast! and that's a big-big
    problem for the west...

    Not in chips. They don't even have decent foundries. They are
    decades behind and war is close.

    ### - oh they're modern enough to lob quite a few fancy nukes in our
    direction should the need ever arise, china isn't some tin-pot wannabe
    nuclear nation like north korea or iran ya know? i mean, long gone are
    the
    days when we british could just bombard them with impunity into
    submission
    from the sea hah! if we tried that shit today there'd be a very hefty
    price to pay in terms of retaliation, just one well-aimed missile with
    multiple warheads would flatten the uk forever!

    Even the NK can make nukes, they have been around since 1945. That
    doesn't take modern chip technology at all even in ICBM's because
    inertial guided missiles have been around for a long time before
    modern chip foundries and assoc tech. The Chinese are nowhere near
    the Yanks or the Taiwanese or the Japs or South Koreans in chip tech,
    they are decades behind. This is why the US export controls are
    crippling Huawai.

    And I don't think the Chicoms have MIRV technology - perhaps it's only
    one warhead per rocket.

    ### - if you honestly think china only has 300 nukes and are
    technologically poor you're crazy!?

    like, didn't they just send a rover to the moon or something?? (fucking
    thing broke down after only 20 minutes lol, probably due to moon dust, but
    they did actually land one on the moon quite successfully!)




    i mean, how many 'trillions' of american debt does china currently
    hold
    for example? lol

    Not a problem for the Yanks who can just print more money and degrade
    the value of those holdings.

    ### - true... but would also devalue the dollar for themselves in the
    process too, to the point that $1000 prolly wouldn't even buy ya a
    single
    loaf of bread! deflation! (iow: you can only go so far with that shit
    before your own economy collapses no?)

    No that's not how it works. By devaluing the $ exports increase and
    wealth increases. This counteracts any tendency towards inflation. A purposeful increase in money supply can put China down but will not be
    seen by the markets to be overly damaging to the US economy. It is a
    big weapon which has not yet been wielded by the Yanks but has in fact
    been used by China.

    ### - while the west was crashing back in 2008, and ever since, china has
    been growing steadily all along? they can 'afford' to buy up trillions of american debt 'was' the point?? and are set to become the richest nation
    on the planet if nothing stops them! (which is precisely why we're trying
    to stop them!)



    in another 30 or 50 years they'll just call in the debt and own
    america!

    The ChiCOms don't have the luxury of time.

    https://www.msn.com/en-xl/news/other/china-forces-on-high-alert-after-u-s-warship-sails-near-taiwan

    ### - and thus they're preparing for an assault upon them by claiming
    these important + strategic waterways in a counter-attempt to even the
    score that 'we' have un-evened by encroaching upon them!

    Nope, the Chinese are bullies who started the pandemic and they need
    to be taken down a few sizes. In the coming war the US and its allies
    will prevail. Nukes will not be used for the obvious reason (that the Chinese nation will become a radioactive wasteland for the next 100000 years). China will sue for peace but there is a danger that they will
    not accept the peace conditions like Germany after WW1 and futher conflagration will take place down track.

    But there will be war.

    ### - any 'overt' war with china will inevitably lead to all-out nuclear
    war...

    think of it this way: if 'china' won the conventional war with the US do
    ya really think the US would just roll over now??

    forget it, they'd never accept it + long before it ever came to that
    they'd be nuking china with everything its gots!




    thus war with them is inevitable unless the west can change its world
    domination agenda to something else and, perhaps, persuade china to do >>>> something similar? (why can't we all just get along?? hah!)

    else they're quite content to just keep growing and growing while
    western
    economies shrink away, they don't 'need' to start a war except in
    defense
    of their sovereign rights!

    They have already started the war. Soon, the US will finish it.

    ### - i don't agree that they started it, any more than they started a
    war
    with the british that time, rather it's completely the other way around
    as
    we (the west) encroach upon them by sending warships to sail past them?
    they've seen that shit before lol only this time they're better prepared
    to defend themselves! we're actively provoking them! and have, for
    example, already initiated a trade war with them! (trade wars have
    always
    been a prelude to war no? well we've started it then no?)

    The two circumstances are totally different. Now the Chinese are
    trying to close or control shipping lanes which service half the
    world. The US did that to Japan and WW2 in the Pacific ensued. Now
    it's the Chicoms under that flat faced gook bastard Jiping ping pong
    who are doing it and I guarantee they will get pasted for doing it and
    Jipong ping ding dong will get hung as a war criminal. Good. I hope
    the telecast it live on TV.

    ### - you're dreaming hehe, trying to be deliberately offensive no?

    iow: you're being like a trump supporter denying the virus is even real!




    problem is, with china we're treading on the tail of a tiger lol, and
    who
    knows when one of those things will finally lose its temper and take a >>>> swipe at what's been irritating it for so long huh...

    a war with china is just not viable, no one could possibly win a war
    of
    that magnitude, everyone would lose! lose everything! so it's not an
    option, that is unless one is totally insane and/or suicidal hah!

    It probably won't go nuclear so it will be worth fighting.

    ### - oh ho ho! (i have to laugh heh) because going nuclear is
    'inevitable' if/when either side thinks they're going to lose a more
    conventional war? no one will be prepared to give in and thus things
    will
    unavoidably escalate to that level! that even if we strike first we wont
    possibly escape the massive retaliation that will immediately follow!
    and
    because we've all got enough weapons, each, to flatten the entire world
    many times over?

    Nonsense. It is highly unlikely that major powers will make nuclear
    war against each other. They only full well know the consequences for themselves - M.A.D.

    It's more likely that India/Pak or NK/SK or Iran/Israel will launch a
    few nukes if threates become existential. That won't destroy our civilisation but it will put a dent in it.

    Your logic is a little bit faulty. Because they exist doesn't mean
    they will be used. They have been around now for 75 years and haven't
    been used since the end of WW2. They keep the balance.

    ### - MAD was founded on the profound realisation that there's no such
    thing as a winnable nuclear war! once something like that even 'starts' everyone end's up going all-in in a use-it or lose-it type scenario that eventually kills everyone, and the planet to boot!




    "Mutually Assured Destruction" (MAD) was the only thing (the only
    realisation) that stopped the US & russia destroying each other no? so
    do
    ya really think it's any different now with china??

    China has only about 300 nukes. Transit time for a SLBM from an Ohio
    class boomer near Guam is only a few minutes, not enough time to
    launch. In other words, the Yanks could take out practically every
    one of those weapons before they could be launched.

    ### - that's just ridiculous lol, china has it's own satellites and early warning systems too, launch on them and even though they'll be destroyed they'll have fired-off everything they gots before they even start landing there, the land mass of china being just too big to hit it everywhere all
    at once in order to stop them responding... plus it's the same with russia
    even though they're totally surrounded on all sides by nuclear forces...





    Then China would be at the Americans' mercy ready to be occupied by
    Japan and the US.

    ### - there wouldn't BE an america left to occupy anything! they'd be too
    busy just trying to survive themselves, you're dreaming again :)))



    with all the resources running out we actually need to learn to share?

    Give it another few thousand years of evolution and see what happens.

    ### - only if we survive as a species for that long!?

    i.e., it takes about a million years for nature to evolve just one
    change,
    the best we could hope for in only a 1000 years or so being to maybe
    stop
    getting wisdom teeth lol, although having access to knives & forks did
    apparently go towards people have a shorter lower jaw haha...


    mind you, with all that increased background radiation things might
    indeed
    have been speeded up a bit no? cell mutation (cancer) becoming rife in
    the
    world today because of it!

    (well they always 'did' say that 2 heads are better than one didn't
    they??
    lol... silly joke)


    Evolution doesn't only occur due to radiation banging about DNA. It
    can occur due to adaptation as well. So if the environment changes
    quickly, then adaptation takes place and evolution occurs quickly
    (say, over thousands of years). Nothing changes the environment like
    humans and therefore it can be expected that our evolution will be (or
    is being) speeded up.

    ### - adaptation is a very slow process, i.e., don't adapt fast enough and
    you become extinct, game over, something which has already happened to 99%
    of all the creatures that have ever lived! lol we might not even make it through this simple pandemic for example without encountering a total
    economic collapse scenario, that's how tenuous our situation really is,
    and has been all along...




    The next human species might be among us right now. Realising what
    homo sapiens did to neanderthal man, there would be no reason for the
    next human species to announce its arrival.

    It might then just wipe us out or it might be "woke" and let us
    survive. Who knows.

    ### - we talked about this before, and have called that future man 'homo acutus'

    i.e.,

    Acuere (Latin) means to make sharp, pointed, penetrative. Acutus is simply
    the perfect participle. Acumen derived from same root. The meaning is then transferred to someone's intellect. Compare "clever" - to cleave, to cut;
    i.e.; to have the mother-wit to cut through all the crap and appreciate
    the situation as it really is.

    iow: he wont be 'killing' anything, there wont be any need to! he'll
    arrive (if he hasn't already) and gradually replace everyone with a higher expression, he'll be beyond crude wars per se and have totally different
    goals to the completely materialistic ones we only know of today...

    that what we call 'wise masters of wisdom' today will become the norm
    tomorrow!

    if we don't all die in a nuclear war first that is ;)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)